Why won't we tell students that Kant is better than the Koran? Brendan O'Neill on relativism and Islamism. http://t.co/IODEEHBOcl
— spiked (@spikedonline) March 2, 2015
@ntfem The article was pure tripe. He went on about how superior "western Enlightenment" is to the Quran but never demonstrates how.
— Colisha Harris (@sweet_coloosh) March 3, 2015
@ntfem He gives no concrete reason why those students shouldn't scoff at the mess that is today's western democracy.
— Colisha Harris (@sweet_coloosh) March 3, 2015
@ntfem He didn't even cite the Quran but based his opinion of Islam on attitudes & dress of ppl he views as "backwards" and "non western"
— Colisha Harris (@sweet_coloosh) March 3, 2015
@ntfem I see a talk about extremist Muslims in the article but no explanation as to why Kant is better than the Quran. Why is it better?
— Bilal Mahmood (@bilalmahmooduk) March 3, 2015
@bilalmahmooduk Brendan O'Neill exemplifies the chauvinism and arrogance of libtards.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@mikesey1 @UKIP_Candidate Why doesn't @spikedonline hold a debate on just this motion and invite @anjemchoudary to oppose the motion?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@mikesey1 @UKIP_Candidate @spikedonline @anjemchoudary Would Brendan O'Neill like to tell us why he thinks Kant is better than the Koran?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@mikesey1 @UKIP_Candidate @spikedonline @anjemchoudary Would Brendan O'Neill like to tell us what Kant actually said?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@mikesey1 @UKIP_Candidate @spikedonline @anjemchoudary Kant did no more than repeat the golden rule already present in the Bible/Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Does Brendan O'Neill agree that the cleverest thing Kant said was: To establish the truth use both rationalism and empiricism?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Empiricism is learning from your own mistakes and rationalism is learning from the mistakes of others. Kant just said do both.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline What laws can we derive from Kantian principles which say no more than "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you"?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline What laws can we derive from the Kantian principle of "Do not use others as a means to an end"? There is not much to go on.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline If you wanted principles to form the basis of your law it cannot be denied that the Koran is infinitely superior to Kant.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline The problems of Western government are problems of Christianity and its failure to maintain morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Religion comes from the Latin "religare" - to bind. Religion is for social cohesion to bind society with common values.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Marriage = social stability. It was always the intention of feminism to destroy marriage and by extension the patriarchy
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Marriage can only be maintained by a belief that extramarital sex was a sin or that it would be punished as a sexual offence.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline All the Abrahamic faiths promote patriarchal moral values and PC Liberalism is the antithesis of this.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline ISIS is the international patriarchy reasserting itself against the effeminate degenerate demented matriarchy of the West.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline In a military and ideological war between the patriarchy and the matriarchy the result is a foregone conclusion.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline The Neanderthals were matriarchal, Homo Sapiens who superseded them practised marriage, which established the patriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Who will not support marriage? Sluts, Slut Single Mothers, bastards, MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) - ie most voters
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Who will unambiguously and uncompromisingly forbid extramarital sex and respect marriage? Muslims, but not Christians.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Why has Christianity failed? Because it entrusts a corruptible clergy to maintain morality while Islam uses the law.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline What the Westerner hates most about Islam is the threat it poses to their access to extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline What is the religion of the West? It is not Christianity but PC Liberalism. The West is as Xtian as a skeleton used 2b human.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline The religion of the West is slut -worship, its sacrament extramarital sex. This "religion" is the antithesis of marriage.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Brendan O'Neill's should know that marriage is eugenic, while bastardy is dysgenic. Most Britons are singly-parented bastards.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline In a war between bastards of sluts and the sons of mothers married to their fathers, who will win?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
@spikedonline Which is better at discouraging civilisation-destroying sluts from producing degenerate bastards? Kant or the Koran?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 3, 2015
