Translate

Thursday, 2 April 2009

Shock horror! Cameron endorses Islamic values at the expense of "British" values!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities

If being British is public drunkenness, obesity, pornography, feral youth, underaged sex, single parenthood, educational under-achievement etc and being Muslim is sobriety, moderation, chastity, charity and family values, it seems that the BNP still thinks being British remains vastly superior. Is this on racial or cultural grounds then?

I wonder if the BNP is even intellectually capable of making that distinction as it cannot even make the distinction between race and nation. One is of course visible and the other is conceptual, ie requiring thought and definition.

White people can be as illegitimate, intoxicated, indigent and indolent as they like and still be inherently superior to non-whites, can they?

This seems to be the BNP view.

Cameron clearly thinks that the future is not Orange, it is Muslim.

Perhaps Cameron thinks Islamic values include the Christian values this country has long since abandoned and forgotten about, who knows?

You will not be surprised that the BNP is determined not to accept this line of reasoning and would rather embrace fundamentalist Christianity and have Creationism taught in British schools. At least the Muslims have no such perverse desire to cut off their noses (of racism) to spite their faces (of knowledge and scientific enquiry).

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/tory-shadow-minister-named-as-“britains-most-powerful-muslim-woman”/

No comments:

The Founding Fathers: what did they really say by Mat Clark

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Founding-Fathers-Evidence-Christian-Principles/dp/1979939470 Christian principles are not "freedom for everyon...