Translate

Thursday, 2 April 2009

The rules of succession and a British and Muslim monarch

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7966987.stm

I predict that the politicians will be too busy dealing with the effects of quantitative easing to get round to changing the rules of succession, which it is claimed discriminates against women and Catholics.

Interestingly, the current rules do not exclude a Muslim monarch. But I would bet that even if the politicians got round to changing the rules of succession, they would even then not, for Politically Correct reasons, not explicitly state they would exclude a Muslim monarch.

This means that were Charles minded to cause a constitutional crisis, he could easily do so. It is just a matter of time before more sensible, educated white Britons, such as Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad, acknowledge that the Europeans have adopted the inferior version of monotheism when a better one was available all along.

Napoleon Hill, author of Think and Grow Rich, said so as long ago as 1937.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-03-27T08%3A35%3A00Z&max-results=7


Once that idea takes hold, the genie will be out of the bottle, and the BNP themselves will be wanting to establish their own version of Islam, perhaps, with their own Nationalist Islamist Adviser ...

They would not be the first political movement to use Islam as an ideological weapon, for the black separatist movement - The Nation of Islam - the one Muhammad Ali joined, has already beaten them to it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam

Cameron's comments about the benefits of Islamic values (which by definition include Christian values, ie the ones that the British have long abandoned and forgotten about) is just the thin end of the wedge.

It would appear that Cameron is yet another voice saying that the future is not Orange, but Islam ...

No comments:

The Founding Fathers: what did they really say by Mat Clark

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Founding-Fathers-Evidence-Christian-Principles/dp/1979939470 Christian principles are not "freedom for everyon...