http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/04/tess-culnane-speaking-at-a-bromley-lewisham-meeting/
This is a rather moving speech by Tessa Culnane whom I met at Howden & Haltemprice last year, when she was campaigning for the National Front. She has since rejoined the BNP.
Her answer, when I asked the reason for her change of party, was that she wanted a more "traditional" nationalist party. A significant portion of the BNP membership think it has liberalised quite enough. To go any further would mean having a Black Section, apparently.
I certainly do not think she was telling lies about her experience of living in Brockley, sandwiched as she was between two bad black neighbours.
The only thing I would question is whether the abuse she suffered from unpleasant black neighbours would have been more bearable if they had been meted out by unpleasant white neighbours.
The Lib-Lab-Con was blamed for the nation's ills, and I was delighted to hear her questioning the necessity of Nick Griffin condolences to David Cameron on the death of his son Ivan. She speculated that it would not have been welcomed and should not have been sent, because Cameron's lot as well as Labour were after all the traitors who have for decades allowed liberal policies to spread like a cancer.
Tessa Culnane appears to share my view that the lives of those who could have grown into productive adults have been ruined and sacrificed by liberal policies, which have instead encouraged crime and feckless behaviour from all races, faiths and classes.
I share her view, stated with such ringing, simple conviction, that liberal policies (which she calls multiculturalism) have failed the white working classes. Indeed, they have failed everyone they were intended to benefit - the lower classes and the criminal elements as well as the victims of the criminal elements (who are inevitably the law-abiding lower classes).
The irony of course is that the Muslims whom they fear and hate, feel exactly the same way about liberal policies too! Their deliberate policy of insisting on having an identifiable and alienating Muslim look of beard, hijab and burqa, is rooted in the same distaste and rejection for liberalism. It is not so much a badge of Islam, but a badge that declares that you reject liberal values.
Tessa Culnane is an impressive and dignified lady with a hardcore of sweetness, and it is easy to speak well when you speak from the heart.
This is a rather moving speech by Tessa Culnane whom I met at Howden & Haltemprice last year, when she was campaigning for the National Front. She has since rejoined the BNP.
Her answer, when I asked the reason for her change of party, was that she wanted a more "traditional" nationalist party. A significant portion of the BNP membership think it has liberalised quite enough. To go any further would mean having a Black Section, apparently.
I certainly do not think she was telling lies about her experience of living in Brockley, sandwiched as she was between two bad black neighbours.
The only thing I would question is whether the abuse she suffered from unpleasant black neighbours would have been more bearable if they had been meted out by unpleasant white neighbours.
The Lib-Lab-Con was blamed for the nation's ills, and I was delighted to hear her questioning the necessity of Nick Griffin condolences to David Cameron on the death of his son Ivan. She speculated that it would not have been welcomed and should not have been sent, because Cameron's lot as well as Labour were after all the traitors who have for decades allowed liberal policies to spread like a cancer.
Tessa Culnane appears to share my view that the lives of those who could have grown into productive adults have been ruined and sacrificed by liberal policies, which have instead encouraged crime and feckless behaviour from all races, faiths and classes.
I share her view, stated with such ringing, simple conviction, that liberal policies (which she calls multiculturalism) have failed the white working classes. Indeed, they have failed everyone they were intended to benefit - the lower classes and the criminal elements as well as the victims of the criminal elements (who are inevitably the law-abiding lower classes).
The irony of course is that the Muslims whom they fear and hate, feel exactly the same way about liberal policies too! Their deliberate policy of insisting on having an identifiable and alienating Muslim look of beard, hijab and burqa, is rooted in the same distaste and rejection for liberalism. It is not so much a badge of Islam, but a badge that declares that you reject liberal values.
Tessa Culnane is an impressive and dignified lady with a hardcore of sweetness, and it is easy to speak well when you speak from the heart.
4 comments:
Your view is just reductionism; you have a view that living alongside bad black, brown or white neighbours is equally likely. This is not so.
The majority of blacks and Asians in inner city areas tend to make unpleasant neighbours for white people. For around 30 years, I had no problems at all with neighbours in the East End until I began to have problems with various Asian neighbours.
But my problems with Asian neighbours would have been most unlikely to have occurred at all, if the numbers of Asians in that area had not reached critical mass - to the point where they started to outnumber white people.
Not long ago, I heard a white person in that area who was complaining about 'Pakis' being told that he is now the 'Paki' - 'Paki' being merely shorthand for a member of persecuted, victimised & despised minority.
Years ago, of course, this minority did in fact consist of people from South Asia. Today the minority that gets regularly attacked is white.
It is mostly a question of numbers. Perhaps in the past, Tess Culnane might have been less likely to have had problem black neighbours.
But the immigrant gains confidence as his numbers increase, and attacks on whites then increase, since this is the immigrants' chosen method of ethnically cleansing the natives - just as whites in the past sometimes used to attack immigrants in the hope they would leave.
Unfortunately they did not leave.
While it is equally distressing to be attacked by anyone, the resentment one feels towards that attacker perhaps depends on his identity and position in society.
Is it more distressing to be attacked by someone you feel is an inferior or ought to be in an inferior position, than it is to be attacked by someone who uses his superior position to exploit you?
Looks like it's all in the mind!
:-)
It is a fine speech, anyway, especially her comments about the behaviour of her neighbours, and the way black immigrants so often destroy the quality of people´s lives.
´They have ruined the lives of my family since 1969´, she said - by bringing unbearable levels of noise and the constant fear of crime into their lives.
The police, the courts, and the housing department are unhelpful at best to white people who find themselves in this situation.
Her points about the death of David Cameron´s son were well made too. It is true, of course, that one would naturally feel sympathy for the loss of a six-year old child.
However this does need to be tempered by the fact that far more productive & useful people have been lost to anti-white racism, including the lives of children - such as 15-year-old Kriss Donald, who was murdered by Asian thugs.
Such killings take place because of multiculturalism, which has brought social breakdown.
When Cameron tells us we should ´hug a hoodie´ it is as though he is telling us - literally - to embrace the society full of chaos & crime that liberal politicians like him have created.
Furthermore, the loss of a seriously mentally-disabled child should not be seen as a national tragedy. Society today positively fetishises the disabled. It is no accident that special needs schools are among the very few types of state schools which currently perform better than they used to.
By contrast the education of the top 30% of children in the state sector has greatly suffered. State education no longer encourages excellence or properly develops the abilities of more intelligent children, as it once did through the grammar school system.
Of course, perhaps Cameron is right not to support the reintroduction of grammars - one might argue they have had their day.
However there appear to be no signs as yet that he plans to beef up the performance of the state comprehensives, which grow steadily worse & worse as traditional subjects are dropped and competitiveness among the children all but disappears.
The tragedy here is the loss of a decent education for so many able children, who should be the nation´s main priority. The ´rights´ of the mentally disabled should come second.
What a great web log. I spend hours on the net reading blogs, about tons of various subjects. I have to first of all give praise to whoever created your theme and second of all to you for writing what i can only describe as an fabulous article. I honestly believe there is a skill to writing articles that only very few posses and honestly you got it. The combining of demonstrative and upper-class content is by all odds super rare with the astronomic amount of blogs on the cyberspace.
Post a Comment