After a week of discussing this subject, I have come to the conclusion that there are more mad and silly people in the liberal establishment who are keener to cause women to be raped and prosecute men than they are to prevent it. (It was after all a Canadian policeman's well-meaning suggestion to rape victims and potential rape victims not to dress like sluts if they don't want to be raped that provoked an outbreak of Slutwalks all over the Western world.)
It just goes to show how intellectually and morally bankrupt the liberal establishment is.
These people are the Agent Provocateurs of Rape.
1. They want women to provoke men into raping them.
2. They then want women to first become victims and then prosecute men for the rape they provoke. This is presumably because liberalism - which is essentially feminine and irrational - loves victimhood. The greater one's victimhood the higher up the pecking order we are.
Question 1: Why do these people want to destroy Western civilisation? What's in it for them?
Question 2: Can they even explain themselves?
Question 3: Does feminism cause dementia?
1 comment:
I disagree with you on one point, I don't think the problem is feminism, the problem is Western men.
Western men want their women to dress and act provactively, they want promiscous women, they want the whore not the madonna as it were. No one is surprised when a whore gets fucked so why should anyone be surprised when a woman who dresses and acts like a whore - which is what men want - gets fucked? - which is what men want!
Sluts aren't agent provocatuers of rape, they just personify the hypocrisy of the West.
Post a Comment