When you don’t get the basic principles of economics, you get hurt. It happens when you elect a president who thinks money can be printed off without a shred of harm. And it also happens when you don’t understand the basic premise of supply-and-demand. What women never got was that the most valuable bargaining card they were holding – their sexuality – does indeed conform to the laws of supply-and-demand (as well as to monetary principles); and that by making supply (of their sexuality) in essence never-ending, they were destroying the value of their sexuality on the market.
We can also put this proposition in monetary terms with female sexuality being like the dollar. When both the supply and the velocity of sexuality increase, the value of each woman’s sexuality takes a nose-dive. Now, if you think of each woman’s sexuality as a currency with which she acquires a unit of Stability (under this we can include things like the value of the male, his faithfulness, his ability to take care of the woman and her children, etc) then we can better show what is happening using Fisher’s equation for the quantity of money:
MV = PT, where:
M = Money Supply
V = Velocity of Circulation (the number of times money changes hands)
P = Average Price Level
T = Volume of Transactions of Goods and Services
Which we can alter a bit
SV = PT (where S = Supply of female sexuality)
What do we find? If we reorder to solve for P:
P= SV/T
Not only has M (number of women ready to have premarital sex) incrased radically, but so has V (the number of times or the number of males with whom those women are ready to have premarital sex). The equation shows that the P for Stability has increased which means what? It means that the inherent value of a woman’s sexuality has been inflated into worthlessness. She can no longer afford to buy Stability, or, to put it differently, her bargaining position is now much weaker and can only obtain a much lower quality of Stability.
I am all for freedom and liberation, but freedom that goes against your long-term self-interest needs to be seen as foolhardy. Women have given away their most valued commodity and that will never be regained. The ship has sailed and the genie is himself fornicating and has no desire to get back in the bottle.
The sexual revolution that started off in the 1960s was an unmitigated disaster to every woman, except maybe lesbians.
We can also put this proposition in monetary terms with female sexuality being like the dollar. When both the supply and the velocity of sexuality increase, the value of each woman’s sexuality takes a nose-dive. Now, if you think of each woman’s sexuality as a currency with which she acquires a unit of Stability (under this we can include things like the value of the male, his faithfulness, his ability to take care of the woman and her children, etc) then we can better show what is happening using Fisher’s equation for the quantity of money:
MV = PT, where:
M = Money Supply
V = Velocity of Circulation (the number of times money changes hands)
P = Average Price Level
T = Volume of Transactions of Goods and Services
Which we can alter a bit
SV = PT (where S = Supply of female sexuality)
What do we find? If we reorder to solve for P:
P= SV/T
Not only has M (number of women ready to have premarital sex) incrased radically, but so has V (the number of times or the number of males with whom those women are ready to have premarital sex). The equation shows that the P for Stability has increased which means what? It means that the inherent value of a woman’s sexuality has been inflated into worthlessness. She can no longer afford to buy Stability, or, to put it differently, her bargaining position is now much weaker and can only obtain a much lower quality of Stability.
I am all for freedom and liberation, but freedom that goes against your long-term self-interest needs to be seen as foolhardy. Women have given away their most valued commodity and that will never be regained. The ship has sailed and the genie is himself fornicating and has no desire to get back in the bottle.
The sexual revolution that started off in the 1960s was an unmitigated disaster to every woman, except maybe lesbians.
http://therightstuff.biz/2013/12/16/free-milk-is-always-greener-on-the-other-side/
 |
| A piece of ass, a dime a dozen. |
With thanks and acknowledgement to my Facebook friend Rafal Pruszyn-ski
If you enjoyed this, you will probably enjoy http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/what-is-feminism-libertarian-facebook.html also by Rafal.
No comments:
Post a Comment