Translate

Showing posts with label extramarital sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label extramarital sex. Show all posts

Monday, 24 September 2018

Muslim countries under sharia have no need for the age of consent

The approach to marriage in Muslim countries like Afghanistan, Iran, Kuwait, Maldives, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine Gaza Strip, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, UAE and Yemen is that you must be married to each other in order to have legal sex.

This means they entirely reject and have no use for the concept of an age of consent. You only need an age of consent when you in practice condone premarital sex.

https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

Friday, 24 August 2018

Why feminists are nihilists

The problem with people who don't believe in anything is people who won't risk anything to defend any principle - because they have none.

At the very least, we as reasoning humans should believe in the primacy of truth, logic and morality, even if we do not believe in God.

If through the exercise of our reasoning faculties we arrive at the conclusion that civilised life and the continuation of our tribe, national identity and civilisation is impossible without patriarchy and a religion that promotes marriage and family values, we are morally obliged to support patriarchy.

The world is divided between

1) people who see the point in supporting patriarchy and

2) those who refuse to do so because they are selfish nihilists with no intention or prospect of becoming married parents and who do not wish to make the sacrifice of adhering to the rules in a moral system necessary to keep their group in existence.

What about the people who refuse to even discuss this?

They would be those who are indifferent to the destruction of their own civilisation.

Who are these people?

They make up the Western liberal establishment ie those in academia, politics, the media and the judiciary.

Why won't they discuss any of these subjects or answer any questions?

Because they cannot answer our simple questions honestly without giving up their position and losing the argument.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-culture-war-and-status-quo.html

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

Marriage and democracy

Only those who are parents of legitimate offspring or want to become parents of legitimate offspring would support marriage. If there are more parents of bastard offspring and more bastards than there are those who are legitimate, then you would expect slut single mothers, morally compromised slut fuckers who have sired bastard offspring, sodomites and bastards not to support marriage. Since this is already the case, it highlights the moral bankruptcy of democracy and tells us it is time to take it out with the trash.

What does it mean to support marriage?

The most important rule of marriage is the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex since the purpose of doing so is to make couples marry in order to have the right to have sex and children with each other.

If you allow people to have sex outside marriage ie fornication, sodomy, adultery etc, then people would predictably use these marriage substitutes to have exclusively recreational sex all their lives and not be troubled by the expense and inconvenience of rearing of the next generation either properly or at all.

A declining birth rate is a sign of a dying civilisation that cannot even replace itself in sufficient numbers to fight a successful defensive war. This means that such a society would have the characteristic of a risk-averse elderly woman and nations with this characteristic will be easily conquered by nations with the characteristic of enterprising young fighting men.

Slut single mothers, men who have sired bastard offspring with slut single mothers, bastards and sodomites who acknowledge that the next generation would be better off brought up by two married parents living together would at least support marriage in principle if not in practice, if they cared about the national interest.

If slut single mothers, fathers of bastards and LGBTs can neither acknowledge this truth nor accept the imperative of promoting the national interest, then they are clearly doubly subversive, making it even more justifiable to ignore their anti-marriage views. The views of those who are both selfish and intellectually dishonest should certainly be ignored.

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

Why nationalism is impossible without patriarchal moral values

Morality comes from religion. Morality is about obtaining group solidarity. British men cannot cooperate because their lack of male solidarity makes it impossible for them to cooperate with each other to solve problems.

They lack male solidarity because Christianity has failed. 

Once they realise they cannot cooperate with each other to solve problems they will pretend the problem cannot be solved and ignore obvious solutions because they have lost the will to fight. Once they reach this conclusion, they will deny truth and the operation of logic and morality. That is why no senior male politician will be criticise feminism and leave it to little Philip Davies MP - the only MP in Britain who once dared speak up against feminism - who is now too scared to say or do anything, for fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence. 

Feminism operates by bribing men with extramarital sex until they are hooked on it and then accusing them of sexual misconduct.

Being atomised and lacking trust in God or self-belief, they do not think they can individually or collectively do anything to fight the oppression of the matriarchy and feel they can only lie low. 

Lacking in male solidarity, they do not trust anyone. 

Lacking in inter-generational concern for one another, the elder, wiser and more experienced do not see it as their job's worth to advise and warn the younger.  Lacking in respect for the elderly, the young are not disposed to listen to the older generation. 

And this is why nationalism will never get off the ground in the West once Trump has come and gone, because he is not going to live forever, is he?  How many billionaires are likely to want to give him up their peace of mind and leisure to deal with the burdens of office for the ungrateful, disloyal, unreliable and hateful? 

Monday, 11 September 2017

Men who condone extramarital sex and gay marriage while refusing to support traditional marriage

Fornication is a mortal sin and treated as a sexual offence in the Koran attracting corporal punishment of 100 lashes.



British men are now so degenerate that even the men of the Traditional Britain Group cannot bring themselves to support traditional values. Indeed, it is rumoured that John Kersey, its Vice President, is about to sire illegitimate offspring.

Fornication is a mortal sin and the gateway to bastardy, and bastardy is the gateway to degeneracy, delinquency, criminality and the decline and fall of your civilisation. For these reasons, it must be punished in this life by the government as quran.com/24/2 prescribes, or our degeneracy will be terminal as well as irreversible and the the angels to weep for us.

Matthew 13:49-50, "So it will be at the end of the age; the angels shall come forth, and take out the wicked from among the righteous. 50 and will cast them into the furnace of fire; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."



http://traditionalbritain.org/tag/john-kersey/

Such men will fall under one or more of the following categories.

a) His mother is an unmarried mother.

b) He is an unmarried father.

c) He is is currently having sex with a fornicating slut.

d) He is hoping to have sex with a fornicating slut.

e) If he is a none of the above, he will be afraid to offend fornicating sluts and men who fall under these categories, who are the overwhelming majority of men and women in his society.

f) He is not masculine enough to defend the patriarchal moral values necessary for a patriarchy.

g) He is an atheist and believes that by the time the shit hits the fan he will be long gone or, he believes God will forgive him for ignoring his religious duty to exterminate the Amalekite if he is a Jew, or to forbid evil if he is Muslim.

h) He belongs to the Western liberal political establishment whose voters fall into categories above.

i) He is anti-establishment and criticising the Western liberal political establishment ie alt-right but also morally compromised, falling into one or more of the categories above.

j) He is a degenerate living in a degenerate culture whose morals have been corrupted by half a century of degenerate feminism.

k) He cannot bear the vices of his civilisation nor their cure - Secular Koranism.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Should MCSF and SPOSSM bachelors be treated as second class citizens?

Saturday, 13 May 2017

Religion and the Nationalist Dilemma

People who say they need proof of God's existence are hedging their bets and being commitment-averse. You simply choose to believe, or not.

You work out the advantages of believing or disbelieving. If the thought of going to heaven if you are good and going to hell if you are bad sustains you, then you would choose to believe. You may find regular prayer also sustaining.

If you choose not to believe, it is because you don't want to do what is necessary to call yourself a believer eg give up pork, refrain from sex outside marriage etc.

You may wish to believe in God and identify as Christian and be part of what you think is the dominant culture because you were born in the West, male and white, but find having to say that you believe in the absurdity of the Trinity is a lie too far.

Or you may find yourself in the position of a certain senior nationalist who claims to be Christian while rejecting the Trinity and denying he is either a Unitarian or a mere Cultural Christian. The children's game of Twister comes to mind.



You may be white and a nationalist, which usually means you resent Jews and Muslims having a higher status than you in your own land, and certainly don't want to show acceptance of their superior status by embracing their religion and in the process alienating your intimates, family, friends and associates.

And that is why you continue to pretend that you haven't made up your mind or that you are atheist.

I call myself agnostic, which is midway between belief and disbelief, which I like to think is a clever compromise.

You should certainly have made up your mind one way or another by the time you are middle aged, and to say in your 50s and 60s that you are still waiting for proof of God's existence only signifies

1) your inability to think rationally
2) your phobia of commitment
3) a lifetime of procrastination

or one, or some, or all of these attributes.

Let me be clear: feminised and liberalised Christianity has nothing at all to offer the British nationalist or any white British man because it has been infested by feminists and LGBTs smearing their progressive agenda all over the church like a lunatic smearing his faeces over the walls of his padded cell. If Christianity were not kaput, you would not be suffering the indignities of uncontrolled immigration and be disabled from complaining about it in your own land.

Let us assume you need to choose a religion and are a British nationalist who accepts that your nation needs a religion but that Christianity has failed.

There are five world religions:

1) Judaism
2) Christianity
3) Islam
4) Hinduism
5) Buddhism

You already know Christianity is kaput.

You also know that Hinduism and Buddhism are alien to your culture and history.

This leaves Judaism and Islam.

You already know Judaism has a higher entry threshold than Islam and is far far more high maintenance. Kosher is also dearer than halal.

Jews are a tribe and Judaism is for Jews only. Islam however is for everyone.

If Judaism is an exclusive club, then Islam is a political party in a one party state.

Islam has been said to be "Judaism Lite".

If this is so, Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". Indeed, it does not even require you to believe in God, only acknowledge the following:

1) A religion promoting social conservatism, marriage and patriarchy is necessary for national survival.

2) Law should conform to morality.

3) Morality should conform to religious principles.

4) We should choose the religion whose moral principles we find the least objectionable.

You know the problem is the fact that the matriarchy established itself in your country and that you didn't notice in the way a householder might not notice that he has rising damp or dry rot, until I pointed it out to you. If you don't deal with it, it will spread to all the walls of your home and eventually cause serious damage, perhaps resulting in it being condemned and eventually demolished.

When you have eliminated the impossible, then whatever's left, however improbable, must be the answer.

Islam - in the form of Secular Koranism - must be the answer. Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system. It is a legal system in the way that EU law is a legal system that does not require you to agree with it to work within it as an EU lawyer, as long as you understand its rules and are legally qualified to practice in this field.

Let me remind you all again. It was Voltaire, not I, who said:

If God did not already exist, it would be necessary to invent Him. 

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

The Idiocracy and Matriarchy of the West

Stupid Slut:

Last year, someone on Facebook forced me to strip in front of him. It might be social media, but this is still a virtual society and social norms must be adhered to.

Me:

How did this person force you to strip in front of him on Facebook?

Stupid Slut:

By use of emotional manipulation. It's sexually abusive tactic known as grooming.

This woman is a graduate in an apparently responsible job who compounded her stupidity by admitting to it and then failing to take responsibility for her stupidity or realising it for what it was.

What must be borne in mind is that these women have the vote and Western politicians pander to them, knowing that capturing the female vote is crucial to electoral success.

What does this say about our much-vaunted democracy? It is surely nothing but the systematic cultivation of failure leading to the decline and fall of your civilisation.

Men are so much under the spell of the stupid slut now that they will not denounce it, because sexually active bachelors all hope that somewhere out there, there is a stupid slut prepared to strip in front of him and have sex with him no questions or money asked, if he asks her nicely.

Even married men refuse to denounce sluts because they are only too aware that their wives will be offended if they do this and divorce them, thereby depriving them of their matrimonial home and access to their children.

As for the men who are already divorced and no longer sexually active, they will fear to offend their children who are sluts and slut fuckers, who may abandon and reject their father just for holding a view they find offensive. (Feminism with its Cult of Youth has seen to it that the young no longer respect their elders.)

What about sexually inactive bachelors who do not have any wives or sexually active children indulging in extramarital sex to offend?

They will fear to offend practically everyone they know.

Clearly, there is no man in the West masculine enough to defend patriarchal moral values. Not even Trump is man enough to declare the Culture War against Feminism, which operates through turning women into sluts and men into Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of uncompromisingly defending marriage and the family, without which Patriarchy and Nationhood are impossible.

And that is why the Great Matriarchy of the West is going to hell in its handcart, and we with it.

Monday, 13 March 2017

Feminism causes anti-Semitism (as well as degeneracy, dementia, immigration and paedophilia)


Feminism makes you stupid.



Stupid people of all races and religions are exploited and invaded by people of all races and religions because we live in a cruel Darwinian world.

Jews are less stupid than gentiles because of their religion.

But even Jews can become stupid if they allow feminism to infect their faith and are warned against this in https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+28

The extent to which Jews are infected by feminism - living in the West as they do - is the extent to which they are prepared to condone extramarital sex.

Most Jews are Liberal Jews, Liberal Jews are Assimilated Jews, Assimilated Jews are Jews corrupted by feminism and liberalism, and liberalism now is an ideology solely devoted towards promoting sexual liberation, which God forbids.

Allowing sexual liberation means making your society vulnerable to its internal and external enemies.

The eternal enemies of all societies and civilisaitons are sluts and socialists.

Forget Liberal Jews and Reform Jews, it is Orthodox Jews that have a duty to warn the gentile against further tolerating feminism and to denounce all matriarchies as latter day Amalekites.

http://www.breslov.org/who-and-where-is-amalek-today/

If they do not, anti-Semitism will continue to widen and deepen.









Feminists hate Trump.

Feminists hate Trump because an alpha male who commands the loyalty of beta males is a threat to the matriarchy.


The matriarchy prefers to appoint men like the uxorious Obama whose mother was a single mother who has no male offspring and who allows his wife to boss him around.


http://courses.jercol.macam.ac.il/62/english/lessons/lesson11.html

Her sin is Pride, she puts herself over God, because of too much sensual appetite and too much intellectual ambition.  She places herself, thus, over both God and Adam, the man who has God-in-himself.

His sin uxoriousness, the sin of loving woman too much, of loving woman more than God, which can also be understood as putting the body over the spirit.  At the same time, preferring her, he certainly shares her pride.

https://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/03/30/16-feminists-who-have-taken-over-conservative-media/

Why do women get more university places?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1299400/Fathers-sleazy-mothers-lazy-What-au-pair-REALLY-thinks-you.html

Questions on paedophilia Louis Theroux did not ask when filming A Place for Paedophiles

Feminazis are white middle class women who hate white men and the civilisation their male ancestors created

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html 

Why aren't feminists interested in nationalism?

Swedish woman is now Western woman, therefore Swedish man is now Western man

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balaam

Balaam told King Balak how to get the Israelites to commit sin by enticing them with sexual immorality and food sacrificed to idols. The Israelites fell into transgression due to these traps and God sent a deadly plague to them as a result (Numbers 31:16).

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/03/12/putin-speaking-collapse-western-civilization-valdai-international-discussion-club/

Today almost all developed nations are no longer able to reproduce themselves, even with the help of migration. Without the values embedded in Christianity and other world religions, without the standards of morality that have taken shape over millennia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity.  

Friday, 20 January 2017

Two very important essays by F Schmidt that say what I say about sex and God

Feminism is the natural expression of women's changing mating preference in a decaying society.  But let's imagine that we could magically eliminate feminism.  Would this be better for humanity?  I believe that what this would look like is America almost permanently stuck in the 1950s.  As I explained in "The Rise and Fall of Christian Culture", American culture began to break down in the 1800s when religion went from encouraging people to follow Jesus's moral teaching to simply having a personal relationship with Jesus.  With such a change, it was inevitable that society would lose focus on the core issues of sexual morality, and lose the ability of effective enforcement.  In the 1950s, America retained the facade of a moral culture, but underneath society was breaking down.  Women clearly expressed sexual excitement for "bad boys" in movies.  And I am certain that this must have corresponded to a rising adultery rate.  Without feminism, the facade could have remained intact for centuries, with moral men continuing to find wives but these wives cheating on them and having illegitimate children with immoral men.  The genetic breakdown of society would have been much slower, but the ultimate result would have been the same.  So instead of taking decades for society to call apart, it would have taken centuries.  Which is preferable?  I think it is preferable for a morally broken society to fall apart as quickly as possible so that it can be replaced by something else.  Feminism doesn't change the end result, it only speeds it up.  And so I support feminism.

What about the poor suffering moral men in modern culture who can't get women?  One can read the complaints of these men all over the internet.  If you suggest options to these men like using a prostitute or looking abroad, they will tell you that they want validation.  Any moral man who wants validation from a woman in modern culture is simply a moron who deserves to suffer and die without reproducing.  Unlike feminists, he hasn't slightest understanding of evolution.  The only sound evolutionary strategy for moral men is to join together to form moral patriarchal societies.  Such societies are evolutionarily superior to modern culture.  When modern culture has decayed sufficiently, a good moral patriarchal culture should attack modern culture and slaughter all of its men for the genetic good of humanity.

If a woman from the modern culture calls a moral man a loser, the correct response is "I would be a loser if I were a member of your culture, but I am not.  My culture is superior to your culture and my culture will eventually destroy your culture."  Intelligent moral men must reject modern culture and find an alternative.  And from the perspective of an alternative culture, we can recognize feminism as a good thing that is helping to destroy our enemy, namely modern culture. 

http://www.mikraite.org/In-Defense-of-Feminism-td570.html
So evolutionary salvation requires one god and the right god. And the god of the Old Testament is certainly the right god. Are there any others? Are there any other books in this world that address the issues of human evolution even close to the degree that the Old Testament does? None that I know of. And this is why the only means of evolutionary salvation is through God.  
http://www.mikraite.org/Human-Evolution-td17.html

Monday, 14 November 2016

Social Services - jobs for the girls

What better way of showing how evil men are and how useful you are when you protect children and women from these monsters at taxpayers' expense in your role as Social Worker?

All these violent and abusive men who are also fathers and husbands and all those women to rescue!

What better way of making yourself feel good, useful and needed about "saving" children that you will never have as a spinster by removing them from their parents?

Of course, it would be in your interests to pretend all men are guilty and evil. In this way do you make yourself more important to the more gullible members of the public.

Of course you will never support laws that prevent women from having sex with men not their husbands because if all women made sensible choices about their sex partner who must also be their husband, you'd be out of a job!

That is why no social worker will support slut-shaming.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slut-shaming

Thursday, 15 September 2016

Why the West is a matriarchy

Feminism is just the practice of slut-fucking. Anyone who wants to be a slut or who wants to fuck sluts is already a conscripted foot soldier of feminism. A feminist society is a society in which most of the sex that takes place is extramarital sex. This would include Western society, wouldn't it?

POINTS TO NOTE

1. A slut is a fornicatress.

2. A fornicatress is any woman has had sex with a man not her husband.

3. A conclusive sign of moral degeneracy is ignorance, disbelief and outrage upon being reminded about these principles of marriage.

4. Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage.

5. Everything about feminism undermines marriage.

6. When people talk about the Western Way of Life that Islam threatens, they really mean their widespread practice of Fornication.

7. The sacred religion of feminists is feminism. To feminists, I am a heretic.

Wednesday, 14 September 2016

Why some female teachers have sex with schoolboys

http://theothermccain.com/2016/09/13/teacher-had-sex-with-12-year-old-boy/

http://news3lv.com/news/local/former-teachernicole-willfinger-charged-with-sex-with-student-to-face-stricter-penalties

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/female-teacher-admits-having-sex-8383454

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3549878/Female-teacher-27-sex-16-year-old-boy-faces-jail-admitting-six-month-relationship-child.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10578951/Female-history-teacher-who-shared-bed-with-two-schoolboys-banned-from-classroom-for-sexual-misconduct.html

Not only are men lower than sluts, sluts are now corrupting the morals of boys.

The best way of corrupting boys is to give them sex before they even ask for it, so they will always yearn to be taken by a woman the way a woman is taken by a man.

Men now yearn to be dominated by women, to be disciplined and punished. It turns them on.

The more power men give to women, the more they will take, and to be weak is to invite exploitation.

It is clearly the intention of these immoral female teachers to corrupt the morals of adolescent schoolboys in their charge in order to destroy their masculinity as adult men. You won't have much masculinity to display if all the while you are seeking a woman who is older than you who will dominate you and boss you around. Give such a man who has been got at by an older woman a submissive woman, and he won't know what to do with her.

Men who are submissive to women and addicted to sex with sluts are easy to control. Such men would never be able to recognise a principle, much less stand up and fight for it. Such men would be spiritually incapable of standing up for the patriarchy and incapable of even desiring a patriarchy because patriarchy supports marriage and this by definition means it would forbid and punish extramarital sex, which is the very thing they are constantly craving for.

Sex addicted men are not interested in marrying and having progeny, but in merely continuing to enjoy sex with women they are not married to. Most men in the West are MCSFs - Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers incapable of supporting marriage.

Such men would be spiritually incapable of protecting their women from invaders. Men with no wives and offspring are not going to risk anything to protect sluts or random women from invaders. They can't even get it together to challenge the status quo - feminism- after all.

Talking to Western men about this is like talking to drug-addicted and intoxicated men who are incapable of focusing on the matter at hand, much less being persuaded by the case I have put to them for supporting marriage.

All they will be capable of doing is denying that things are as bad as they say they are and then changing the subject to something they would much rather talk and think about, probably the next fix of extramarital sex they hope to get.

I guess we women in the West will be taken as slaves and sex slaves by invaders because our men are too weak, gay and old to defend us.

The invaders will be predictably Muslim, and Western women will have no choice.

Perhaps surrender will be sweet, precisely because it is inevitable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_a_Scandal_(film)

Tuesday, 19 April 2016

Got a question about the Catholic faith but never had a chance to ask?


My questions are:

  1. Is the West as Christian as a skeleton used to be human?
  2. Is Christianity kaput?
  3. Has the Catholic Church been absorbed into the matriarchy?
  4. Is the Catholic Church capable of regaining its moral authority within our lifetimes?
  5. Will the Catholic Church be capable of regaining its morality authority after our lifetimes?
  6. If the Catholic Church is capable of regaining its moral authority, ever, how do you envisage this coming about? 
  7. If the Catholic Church is not capable of regaining its morality, should Catholics convert to Islam if they wish to respect the institutions of marriage and the family and protect themselves from the degeneracy of feminism?
  8. Is the next Pope likely to be even more liberal than the current one?
  9. Is the Catholic Church increasingly resembling the Anglican Church?
  10. Is there a purpose to the Catholic Church if it no longer teaches Catholic teaching?
  11. Can the Catholic Church protect its members against an increasingly dominant matriarchy, or should it pass this burden to Islam?
  12. Is sedevacantism the way forward for traditional Catholics? 


I posted these at https://www.facebook.com/schooloftheannunciation/timeline but they were almost immediately deleted and then I was disabled from making further comments.

Friday, 18 December 2015

Michael Voris: "The Catholic Church has a homosexual priest problem."



This mindset — this lackluster, lukewarm, status quo, never-rock-the-boat approach — is destroying the Church from within. Men like Cdl. Dolan are allowed to pass over scandals and ignore them because they know they will never be called out or challenged by those milquetoast lackeys more concerned about their careers and money than the truth and souls.

This is exactly how the whole homosexual priest sex abuse scandal went on for so long, this same attitude. Homosexual men have infiltrated the Church for decades, and whether they intended to or not — some did probably, others not — they have been part of a destruction of the Faith that staggers the mind. And their accomplices among the hierarchy are even more staggering. The very men consecrated to protect and love the sheep have abandoned them for every corruption conceivable. The silence around this evil, the participation in these evils, the refusal and denial of so many regarding this evil, shows how deeply the diabolical has dug its way into the Church. 


https://www.facebook.com/Michael-Voris-for-Pope-or-President-or-both-1492050997746004/

https://www.facebook.com/Should-the-Pope-convert-to-Islam-141277252691901/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/Does-promoting-gay-marriage-cause-degeneracy-210948989029916/?fref=ts

Sunday, 11 October 2015

God, marriage and Western civilisation

The Roman birth rate fell when the Roman Empire was declining and falling. A falling birth rate is a signifier of a decline in the ability and numbers of married men available to exercise good husbandry over their women.

Make no mistake, a lower birth rate is the consequence of degeneracy, and degeneracy is the consequence of prioritising the right to have recreational sex over the duty to have legitimate offspring as well as producing a heir and a spare. Degenerate societies are invariably senescent and effeminate.

Even if we all replaced ourselves and all married and had a son and a daughter, women would eventually predominate because women live longer than men, unless this is dealt with using sati - the Hindu tradition of widow burning.

Those who are concerned about immigration should note that in Calais there are hardly any young people and certainly more old women than old men. This explains the inability of Calais to repel invaders.

The purpose of marriage is to have legitimate offspring, so that the quality of the next generation is maintained and not worse than the current one, and therefore the best they possibly can be. This duty to have legitimate offspring is linked to the attempt by a nation's government to maintain its ability to fight a successful defensive war.

While there are some who blame the increasing feminisation of society to material causes such as oestrogen in the water, feminisation is caused by policies tolerating extramarital sex. Extramarital sex is of course forbidden in both the Bible and the Koran which treats it as a sexual offence attracting corporal and even capital punishment.

We can most easily understand God by knowing what His laws are, and we can most easily please Him by obeying them and divining their purpose. Even if we do not really believe in the literal existence of God, we should have no difficulty identifying the evils His laws were intended to discourage and prevent ie degeneracy. The problem of degeneracy will always remain as long as the next generation require sexual reproduction to come into being.

We are degenerate if we are morally, materially, intellectually and physically inferior to our parents. If we are legitimate but our offspring are illegitimate, we are degenerate. If we are gay and cannot bring ourselves to marry a spouse of the opposite sex with whom to have legitimate offspring, then we are also degenerate.

God if He exists intended for us to obey His laws and rewards those who most faithfully and rationally obey His laws with success in warfare. It is the Koran that states His laws most briefly and clearly compared to the Old and New Testament.

Only Christian and Western chauvinism prevents degenerate politicians who have been marinating in porn and morally corrupting feminism for decades. This degeneracy they already suffer from also prevents them from acknowledging that their society is degenerate. This means they cannot bring themselves to discuss, let alone implement policies that would bring about the moral regeneration of the West because democratic politicians already know that the overwhelming majority of their voters do not wish to give up what they regard as their inalienable human right to have extramarital sex and are too cowardly to persuade them otherwise.

The Abrahamic God is also the Roman God of War as well as the synthesis of the deities of the Greek and Roman pantheon. While Mars was the Roman God of War, Pallas Athene was the Greek Goddess of Wisdom and War. In the end both the Greeks and Romans broke their own rules. The Greeks who prided themselves on their reason lost their reason when they succumbed to ruinous wars and warmongering, and the Romans who prided themselves on their hatred of kings and autocrats in time began to worship their emperors.

Great civilisations breaking the rules that made them great are of course well advanced in their journey on the road to perdition. Liberalism is no longer about free speech and rational discourse but about gay marriage and labelling anyone opposed to the legalisation of gay marriage as extremists and potential terrorists. Gay marriage is really no more than sanctifying a sexual offence, and analogous to repealing criminal laws to "solve" the problem of rising crime.

The West has now strayed so far from the baseline of morality that it has redefined both the institutions of family and marriage for the purposes of making their perversions legitimate in the eyes of their law. It is laughable that a family is now defined as capable of existing in any form other than children and their biological parents. The right to marry has now been extended to couples patently incapable of sexual reproduction with each other.

Gay marriage is conclusive evidence of degeneracy because its existence proclaims the government's intention of conferring equality on couples obviously not capable of sexual reproduction with each other and only interested in recreational sex with those who have taken the trouble of getting married before having legitimate children staying together to bring them up. As Aristotle said, the greatest injustice is treating unequal things equally.

Those who don't respect the rules of traditional marriage are invariably degenerate and will eventually defeated by people who do see the benefits of marriage and family and the necessity of enforcing a system of laws that protects these institutions.

Friday, 11 September 2015

Women and Civilisation

Male politicians in Europe are now so emasculated they cannot now deal with national affairs without being in fear of being thought a nasty brute by stupid sentimental infantile female voters who don’t give a damn about the future of their civilisation.

Because very few women contribute to civilisation, they are not interested in anything that is not about them. This is why they applaud when invaders arrive in their cities as they did in Munich and collectively conspire to undermine the rules of traditional marriage with feminism, which they know is the oxygen of the patriarchy.

Treacherous women with bastard offspring, sluts and socialists say such things as “All children are legitimate, even if they are bastards.” By denying bastardy they of course deny marriage. They will only be happy when all children are bastards, all women sluts so that their bastard offspring will be adjudged the same in status as everyone else’s.

Islam at least acknowledges that extramarital sex deserves and requires corporal punishment in order to prevent a situation in which most of your women are sluts, most of your children bastards and most of your men MCSFs (Morally-Compromised Slut-Fuckers) incapable of standing up for any principle, certainly not the one of speaking the truth as they see and understand it, much less defending European cities against invasion by migrant swarms.


BBC sends only pro-migrant female journalists to report on migrant swarms

Monday, 27 July 2015

The degeneracy of the West is evidenced by its rejection of any idea that points to its degeneracy

The badges of being a degenerate:


  1. an inability to understand the concept of degeneracy
  2. denying that one is degenerate
  3. denying that the West is degenerate
  4. believing that degeneracy is not his or her problem
  5. having no shame that one is in denial about one's degeneracy
  6. being incapable either individually or collectively of uncompromisingly supporting marriage
  7. being incapable of understanding or pretending not to understand that supporting marriage means logically and necessarily forbidding and punishing extramarital sex
  8. being incapable of understanding or pretending not to understand that marriage is eugenic and bastardy dysgenic
  9. believing that degeneracy is not the problem of the degenerate because it will be the problem of the next generation
  10. really not knowing or pretending not to know why Muslims do not wish to integrate into a culture that has turned most Western men into pussywhipped degenerate cowards lower than sluts afraid to uncompromisingly support marriage and denounce/renounce feminism
  11. feeling no shame that one is a selfish atheist childless sex-addicted libtard who only cares about the next sexual encounter and doesn't give a damn about what happens after he or she is dead



The person who wrote https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/33xk5h/dr_penman_or_how_i_stopped_worrying_and_learned/ accusing Penman of supporting eugenics but was too cowardly to give his or her name is not a social conservative either.

If you are a social conservative then you believe in the law supporting marriage through forbidding and punishing extramarital sex and privileging the married and their children over the unmarried.

If you call social conservatives fascists or Nazis, you must be a libtard. A libtard is a feminist believes that sex between consenting adults is no business of the government and that extramarital sex is a human right.

Most Western voters are libtards and all Western politicians pander to libtard sexual preferences because they are so cowardly and corrupt they prefer to remain in office rather than correct grave and continuing errors.




Instead of denying that she wanted to legalise inceset, she blocked me.

The Decline and Fall of the West | Dr. Jim Penman and Stefan Molyneux

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

How to solve the problem of rape complaints

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/11738202/Sex-consent-contracts-for-university-students-Would-you-sign.html

Court: "Have you, the complainant, previously had sex with your alleged rapist?"

Complainant: "Yes, but ... "

Court: "Right. 100 lashes each. Then come before me again if you have anything more you want done by the court."


024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

Can a wife to claim to be raped by her husband?

I would suggest the frequency of sex be stipulated in the marriage contract.

How many times a month? I think once a month should be the standard minimum. More often than the agreed number of times could be classified as unreasonable behaviour or possibly rape.

There is the question of whether they expire if unused or can be rolled over. If the husband goes away for a year, can he use all his 12 times up in one week, or will they be treated as expired? Is roll-over permitted? These are questions to be discussed and agreed by the parties to the marriage and their legal advisers.

Thursday, 28 May 2015

Claire Khaw issues the death certificate of Christianity



Monday, 18 May 2015

Marriage acted as a constraint on the degenerative consequences of casual sex


Now, a slut going clubbing on the pull would choose a male sex partner for the size of his sex organ, knowing nothing about him. She might have sex in a toilet with him and possibly find herself knocked up a few months later, having forgotten even his name, if indeed he gave her his real name at the time.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1182373/Welcome-binge-Britain-Polish-photographer-documents-years-drunken-revelry-Cardiff.html


An adolescent aristocratic female is likely to find her coachman more attractive than males of her own class. Familiarity breeds contempt, after all. Coachmen would be hired on the basis of their looks. Should an aristocratic father allow his daughter to marry or fuck as she pleases? What do you think, dear reader?

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...