Translate

Thursday, 5 June 2014

Why oh why oh why won't the Marriage Foundation blog publish my comments?


Your comment is awaiting moderation.

June 5, 2014 at 1:54 pm
Why don’t you ask Sir Paul Coleridge if he thinks marriage contracts would be a good idea? Making the agreement of a marriage contract compulsory would make it easier to apportion fault when things go wrong, so we will know which party is the one in breach of a term of the marriage contract and in this way apportion blame. Blame always starts at 50/50 in any divorce.

No fault divorce should also be abolished. Is this too radical because it sounds like it might just work? Is that the reason why you would reject this solution out of hand? But of course. Men in Britain are pathologically afraid of criticising sluts, SSMs and bad mothers, are they not? The reason why is to be wondered at. Perhaps it is just a given that the more promiscuous the women, the more frightened of them the men are, and the women of Britain are very promiscuous indeed, which totally explains the utter gutlessness and emasculation of British men.

https://marriagefoundationblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/15/when-things-go-wrong-marriage-family-and-social-support/

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

June 5, 2014 at 1:47 pm
“My sister is a brilliant single mum who depends on them for occasional childcare so that she can work away from home for a few days.”

In what way is she “brilliant”?

So your sister is a single mum, and that is why you will not stigmatise these disgusting women who have illegitimate offspring, and who are a cancer of society. What a disgusting moral coward you are.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

https://marriagefoundationblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/08/three-questions-all-politicians-need-to-answer-about-family-breakdown/

Your comment is awaiting moderation.
June 5, 2014 at 2:03 pm
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html Most British mothers are SSMs. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts

This means ALL the political parties are afraid of alienating the female vote in a society where most mothers are SSMs and most women are sluts who become SSMs.

You could narrow the franchise to taxpayers only, and this would instantly disenfranchise SSMs and their variously-fathered feral bastards who only grow up to be jobless criminal losers, but you don’t dare say such things, do you?
https://marriagefoundationblog.wordpress.com/2014/05/05/should-i-be-surprised-that-the-oxford-union-thinks-promiscuity-is-a-virtue/comment-page-1/#comment-29

Your comment is awaiting moderation.
June 5, 2014 at 2:32 pm
“in the end, the evidence will win through.” Really? How are you going to win through without even a proposal to change the law and are too liberal and soft to even contemplate the shaming of sluts? 

https://marriagefoundationblog.wordpress.com/2014/04/29/sorting-out-divorce-and-cohabitation-law-will-take-the-wisdom-of-solomon/comment-page-1/#comment-30

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

June 5, 2014 at 2:39 pm
The Islamic rule is that the mother gets to look after her offspring until she is 7 and thereafter the offspring go to live with their father leaving the divorced mother without any “baggage” so she can marry again if anyone else will have her. What’s wrong with that?

No comments:

The Founding Fathers: what did they really say by Mat Clark

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Founding-Fathers-Evidence-Christian-Principles/dp/1979939470 Christian principles are not "freedom for everyon...