@BBCr4today Any personal identity and national identity can be defined and redefined by doing things differently.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Englishness is an identity that can be defined and redefined. Like personal identity, national identity is fluid.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today To redefine English identity, simply change the laws, change the government, have a revolution or even a war, and 'tis done.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The reason the English are having an identity crisis is because imperial glory didn't drain away over overnight, it leaked away.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today It is tedious to listen to a bunch of English academics witter on about how buttoned-up and "Eeyorish" Englishman are.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Only English academics who only mix with each other have this ridiculously dated notion of Englishness that Tombs described.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Englishmen no longer have a stiff upper lip but a trembling lower one, which is now frequently displayed on television.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The sight of Englishmen crying for reasons of getting female sympathy and votes, is disgusting and contemptible.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The best description of Englishness/Britishness can be found at http://t.co/d5hzfrbQ2B dipso, fatso, bingo, asbo, Tesco, paedo
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The question to ask is not so much what English identity is (contemptible, effeminate, embarrassing etc) but what it ought to be
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Why did no one mention race in this discussion? So fucking typical of the BBC to raise the question and not answer it properly.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@AndyHarrison_uk @BBCr4today There is a purpose to having a national identity and that purpose is social cohesion.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today National identity is forged in war and revolution, blood and iron, and cannot be done by totalitarian PC libtard legislation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The Englishman of old was defined by the British empire and the moral values necessary for the administration of a world empire.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The moral values necessary to run a world empire were patriarchal/masculine/hierarchical for maximum efficiency/effectiveness.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The moral values necessary to run an empire were masculine and aristocratic and these were actively cultivated and maintained.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today What are masculine and aristocratic virtues? A strict regard for truth, fair play, courage, resourcefulness, reason and strength
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today What are feminine vices? Cowardice, hypocrisy, promiscuity, denial, irrationality, self-pity and refusing to take responsibility
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Why is the government destroying anything that might cultivate masculine virtue while cultivating feminine viciousness?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The privilege of being a woman is that no one expects her to take responsibility for anything, not even feminists.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The privilege of being a woman is she already has a long list of excuses for her vices which even the patriarchy avails to her.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Uncertain of his identity, the 21st century Englishman is neurotic uncertain, insecure, angry, vengeful, vicious n opportunistic
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today It is the government's responsibility n duty to redefine Britishness, if not Englishness, for the sake of the English n British.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Failure to define English/British identity in a way that is appealing, inspirational and rational will disgust non-white Britons
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The non-white Britons white Britons feel most threatened by are of course the Muslims whose religion gives them their identity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Religion is nothing really more than state/group ideology whose purpose is to bring about group cohesion through shared values.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Our culture is no more and no less what our laws allow to do, and our laws are passed and repealed by the political classes.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today While white Britons lack a sense of identity, non-white Britons who do will have the advantage over them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The English should know that the Welsh, Irish and Scots have more of a sense of identity than they do.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The Scots, Irish and Welsh will have the advantage over the English because they have a greater sense of identity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today These days anyone can be English, even a Chinaman with a British passport. Not surprisingly this causes offence to BNP-types.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today This lack of English identity is in fact *dangerous* to the Union, 4 it is the English who are the cement of the United Kingdom.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today We have already seen that a disturbing number of white non-Muslim adolescents find ISIS attractive and romantic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Adolescents in particular r prone to fanaticism n reckless behaviour if they do not have a healthy and strong sense of identity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today It would be easy to redefine Englishness. The idea is not to say what it is now, cos it is shit, but just say what it SHOULD be.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today "Englishness has not been a political concept" but it is now!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today "There isn't an English ideology or party" says Robert Tombs. Which planet is he on? Planet Academic Ivory Tower. @EnglishVoice
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Kate Fox social anthropologist invited cos she is well-born totty talking about her little surveys of her group of friends.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Next time you do Englishness again you should ask ME instead of going through the motions of discussing this very urgent issue.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today An English leader of vision and courage would have no trouble thinking of three adjectives he would like to describe the English
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Being a female, a foreigner and not white, I cannot presume to be the leader of the English who r without leadership and vision.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today I am known for my reason, resourcefulness and robustness and it would do the English no harm at all to adopt my virtues.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Thru the symptoms I have diagnosed the disease that has caused British malaise and I alone have the medicine (bitter) n the cure
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today My two other virtues of swiftness and resolution in action it would also do the English no harm to adopt.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Yet more of my virtues come to mind: clarity of purpose/thought/speech/expression/communication I also commend to the English.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today No successful national identity can be based on effeminacy n all the other female vices of cowardice, hypocrisy and promiscuity.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today The secret of a successful national identity is of course to have the kind of national identity that others would want to ape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today Having a national identity that others want to ape is of course the secret of empire-building, and currently, the success of IS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
@BBCr4today I suggest 2u that the next time u think of doing n item on Englishness ur minds will turn ineluctably to me, foreign-born woman.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2014
2 comments:
You talk and tweet more sense than that far-left hippy Russell Brand. But I want to ask you something, Claire. Do you think it's reasonable for a husband to expect his wife to be solely responsible for the nappy changing and potty training of their children? It seems to me that the popular trend of mums expecting their men to "do their fair share" is actually an instance of feminazi policy, which creates tension within marriages as well as putting men off procreating in the first place. I myself, who am a 29 year old single white man, am partly refraining from breeding due to my aversion to the prospect of being roped into that disgusting work, work which I suspect most mums are secretly happy to do.
If I were a bloke I wouldn't get married either and would go on an OFFICIAL marriage strike to make my point.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/121566994537384/?fref=ts
Post a Comment