A typically excellent serious piece by @Baddiel which ends with a brilliant joke http://t.co/Dmi6RNN8aZ
— Daniel Finkelstein (@Dannythefink) December 3, 2014
@Dannythefink Jew @Baddiel *delights* in totalitarian laws against free speech. Will he call the cops on me now for saying this? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@Dannythefink @Baddiel @cpsuk Are you being racist if you through words said you incite hatred against your OWN race? http://t.co/tYmd9fwOD0
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink u thot I was being "incoherent"? Wot don't u get about free speech? I thot u guys r supposed to be clever
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@El_Andrew_Uno @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I am sorry u find truth n reason u can't argue against "detestable". The truth will save u
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Get help.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014
@El_Andrew_Uno @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I was really hoping for a more reasoned response and am disappointed u were not up to it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink You do realise every response is proving you are more & more crazed? Keep it coming!
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014
@ntfem Nope. You just crack on pal.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014
@El_Andrew_Uno Your refusal is a sign of your intellectual bankruptcy for which I thank you for displaying.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Why don't you answer this question: do racial characteristics exist, or not?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If racial characteristics exist, why are we not allowed to refer to them if we have free speech?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Do Jews have something against free speech?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If Jews are against free speech, why is that?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Why is saying someone is good and careful with money a bad racist thing?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Because that stereotype was used as an excuse to murder millions of them?? You thick cunt.
— Jonjon Spencer (@JonjonSpencer) December 3, 2014
@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Talking about people's racial characteristics ended in the Holocaust? Really?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Germans angry about hyperinflation during which middle class lost their savings.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Germans voted 4 Hitler cos they were sick to back teeth of bad govt of Weimar Republic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@JonjonSpencer @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Jews were of course a convenient scapegoat but were never popular in Christian Europe.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What is racism anyway? Is it just referring to the racial characteristic of anyone whatever their race?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What if you thought the racial characteristic you are referring to is a POSITIVE and ENVIABLE one?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink its still bloody racist you gigantic doofus!
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If u say Jews r good with money in a nice way u cd still be done 4 racism if Jew doesn't like u? @cpsuk
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
Hello 999? Yes, twat police please. RT @ntfem: @Dannythefink Jew @Baddiel delights in laws v free speech. Will he call the cops on me now?
— David Baddiel (@Baddiel) December 3, 2014
@Baddiel @ntfem @Dannythefink we'll be right over sir
— dean verlander (@1walkingfish1) December 3, 2014
@Baddiel @ntfem @Dannythefink "I believe you want the Incoherent Troll Department. Just putting you through now, sir."
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink You mad!
— Ali Lane (@alister_lane) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink you do know "jew" isn't one person, rite? How the fuck can they all think the same.? Ridiculous.
— EVS (@lee_evans999) December 3, 2014
@lee_evans999 It is clear Jews other than @Baddiel @Dannythefink gloating about trouble Mario Balotelli, Malky Mackay n Dave Whelan got in2.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink YOU. ARE. *ADORABLE*.
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink PS. I'm consigning you to the Phantom Zone of "mute" now, 'Claire', so tatty-bye.
— David Llewellyn (@TheDaiLlew) December 3, 2014
@TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink What a shame no Jew is clever enough to answer my philosophical questions. Thot u was supposed 2b clever.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink no jew is clever enough. And you asked what racism is? Are you a parody?
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014
@martindlacey @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink If you can define racism, then please do so.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink judging an entire race of people on certain characteristics for one thing
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink you asked question what if characteristic was an enviable one to define a race like that is RACIST
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014
@erswell_tim @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Is referring to someone's racial characteristic racist?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink yes to assume there are characteristics is lazy stereotyping
— tim erswell (@erswell_tim) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink I have no need to. You're doing that all by yourself.
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014
@martindlacey @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Not rising to the challenge, I see.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink there's no challenge there. Just your banality
— Martin Lacey (@martindlacey) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink all Jews? U know All Jews? Wow that's impressive. How come?
— EVS (@lee_evans999) December 3, 2014
@lee_evans999 @Baddiel @Dannythefink How do you infer from my previous tweet that I said I knew *all* Jews? I *never* said that.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @TheDaiLlew @Baddiel @Dannythefink Not sure you've ever had a "thot" that wasn't instantly detestable. Shut up.
— Andrew D (@El_Andrew_Uno) December 3, 2014
@danbarker @Baddiel @Dannythefink You are going down the ad hominem route to avoid answering my questions, it seems. Sad. :-(
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@ntfem @Baddiel @Dannythefink 'genetic fallacy' falls fairly firmly under 'ad hominem'.
— dan barker (@danbarker) December 3, 2014
@lee_evans999 Jews like @Dannythefink @Baddiel etc may gloat but I am sure there are Jews who are pained at yet more loss of free speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
@lee_evans999 @Dannythefink @Baddiel I like to think @rabbisacks whom I admire would not be gloating at yet more loss of free speech.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) December 3, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment