Why do criminal lawyers *pretend* not to notice that the requirement for the criminal standard of proof to be convicted of rape has been dispensed with?

Peter Jones understands the rule of law & the way it's being trashed in favour of a twittocracy (Ched Evans etc) http://t.co/4sBp9eTLR0
— Jon Holbrook (@JonHolb) January 15, 2015

@JonHolb Strange no lawyer has noticed that the criminal standard of proof was ignored in the case of Ched Evans http://t.co/4WUhk8BmL5
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@ntfem @JonHolb Ched didn't even commit a crime. Sex with a drunk person is not illegal.
— J M B (@JahMMARastafari) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Men should b on notice it is open for women to accuse them of rape if they have cause to regret consenting to sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Men should be on notice that women they have sex with can *retrospectively* withdraw consent and cry regret rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Stupid sluts are more likely to be tricked into giving sex and they are therefore more likely to cry regret rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Juries have been specifically told to *prefer* the evidence of the complainant as a matter of course.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Lawyers haven't noticed men can now be convicted of rape without accuser satisfying criminal burden of proof.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Libtard lawyers collectively pretending not to notice that requirement to satisfy criminal standard of proof gone.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: the legal profession is libtard and libtard lawyers just love all this PC crap.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: the overwhelming majority of the judiciary are now LIBTARD. The matriarchy squats over men.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: beta males more likely to be accused of rape cos women more likely to feel regret rape with them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb If formerly powerful men have now been imprisoned for historic sexual offences beta males even more vulnerable.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb This, gentlemen, is government by matriarchy of pornocrats. All sluts are pornocrats and all men submit to sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari If lawyers like @JonHolb pretend not to get what I am saying, they are just pretending and being in denial.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Denial, it has to be pointed out, is a feminine vice, open only to women, but British men have turned to women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb How many established legal principles have now been crushed by the vaginal muscles of the matriarchy?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Double jeopardy is an established legal principle that has been crushed by the vaginal muscles of the matriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The requirement to satisfy a criminal standard of proof 2b convicted of rape has been crushed by the matriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari What other liberties will the matriarchy crush while lawyers like @JonHolb affect not to notice that this is happening?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Oh, and that @spectator piece @JonHolb said demonstrated Peter Jones understanding is too damn feeble and oblique.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Peter Jones only refers to the rule of law and Ancient Athens cos he knows the feminazis won't get it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The judiciary is not so independent when even female judges can be punished for criticising any female complainant
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Have you noticed how @JonHolb has consistently declined to discuss this point though I have raised this with him before?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The only lawyer who does talk about the criminal standard of proof being eroded for rape is @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Note: @JonHolb is male, @BarbaraHewson female and cos she is privileged she dares to speak out, while men cower afraid.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Just as long as you know that you men can be banged up any time and have your lives destroyed by some lying slut.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb REGRET RAPE = when a slut wishes she had not consented to sex after drinking too much or he never calls again
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb We know who is in power by those we are not allowed to criticise, and we are not allowed to criticise SLUTS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Judge Joanna Greenberg is being punished for daring to criticise a schoolgirl SLUT. http://t.co/gr2uyHnMtj
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Sluts and Slut Single Mothers are of course BEYOND CRITICISM in libtard Pornocratic Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb So revered are sluts in Britain that British men will destroy long-cherished legal principles to please sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

What the wrongful conviction of Ched Evans means for the criminal standard of proof that protects our liberties