Why do criminal lawyers *pretend* not to notice that the requirement for the criminal standard of proof to be convicted of rape has been dispensed with?

Peter Jones understands the rule of law & the way it's being trashed in favour of a twittocracy (Ched Evans etc) http://t.co/4sBp9eTLR0
— Jon Holbrook (@JonHolb) January 15, 2015

@JonHolb Strange no lawyer has noticed that the criminal standard of proof was ignored in the case of Ched Evans http://t.co/4WUhk8BmL5
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@ntfem @JonHolb Ched didn't even commit a crime. Sex with a drunk person is not illegal.
— J M B (@JahMMARastafari) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Men should b on notice it is open for women to accuse them of rape if they have cause to regret consenting to sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Men should be on notice that women they have sex with can *retrospectively* withdraw consent and cry regret rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Stupid sluts are more likely to be tricked into giving sex and they are therefore more likely to cry regret rape.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Juries have been specifically told to *prefer* the evidence of the complainant as a matter of course.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Lawyers haven't noticed men can now be convicted of rape without accuser satisfying criminal burden of proof.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Libtard lawyers collectively pretending not to notice that requirement to satisfy criminal standard of proof gone.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: the legal profession is libtard and libtard lawyers just love all this PC crap.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: the overwhelming majority of the judiciary are now LIBTARD. The matriarchy squats over men.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Make no mistake: beta males more likely to be accused of rape cos women more likely to feel regret rape with them.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb If formerly powerful men have now been imprisoned for historic sexual offences beta males even more vulnerable.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb This, gentlemen, is government by matriarchy of pornocrats. All sluts are pornocrats and all men submit to sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari If lawyers like @JonHolb pretend not to get what I am saying, they are just pretending and being in denial.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Denial, it has to be pointed out, is a feminine vice, open only to women, but British men have turned to women.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb How many established legal principles have now been crushed by the vaginal muscles of the matriarchy?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Double jeopardy is an established legal principle that has been crushed by the vaginal muscles of the matriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The requirement to satisfy a criminal standard of proof 2b convicted of rape has been crushed by the matriarchy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari What other liberties will the matriarchy crush while lawyers like @JonHolb affect not to notice that this is happening?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Oh, and that @spectator piece @JonHolb said demonstrated Peter Jones understanding is too damn feeble and oblique.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Peter Jones only refers to the rule of law and Ancient Athens cos he knows the feminazis won't get it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The judiciary is not so independent when even female judges can be punished for criticising any female complainant
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Have you noticed how @JonHolb has consistently declined to discuss this point though I have raised this with him before?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb The only lawyer who does talk about the criminal standard of proof being eroded for rape is @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari Note: @JonHolb is male, @BarbaraHewson female and cos she is privileged she dares to speak out, while men cower afraid.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Just as long as you know that you men can be banged up any time and have your lives destroyed by some lying slut.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb REGRET RAPE = when a slut wishes she had not consented to sex after drinking too much or he never calls again
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb We know who is in power by those we are not allowed to criticise, and we are not allowed to criticise SLUTS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Judge Joanna Greenberg is being punished for daring to criticise a schoolgirl SLUT. http://t.co/gr2uyHnMtj
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb Sluts and Slut Single Mothers are of course BEYOND CRITICISM in libtard Pornocratic Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

@JahMMARastafari @JonHolb So revered are sluts in Britain that British men will destroy long-cherished legal principles to please sluts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 16, 2015

What the wrongful conviction of Ched Evans means for the criminal standard of proof that protects our liberties

Barbara Hewson has blocked me on Twitter. What did I say to upset her?

@BarbaraHewson @guardian Troubles, Troubles, Troubles ....
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 3, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @Barristerblog "the requirement for independent corroboration in sex cases has been removed" http://t.co/PPEP1o9Re0
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 3, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Hmmm. Would we still want to if it meant the Troubles kicking off again?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 3, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Is the average juror getting stupider and stupider? http://t.co/9TDVHjNNhR
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 3, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Is there a Terrorist Injuries Compensation Board or similar in NI?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 3, 2014

@roryyeomans @BarbaraHewson Just pay victims off with a sum that wouuld make them half wish the perp wd do it again. http://t.co/MsdTPqns8z
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson I have a theory about how this has happened: the knee-jerk submission of male members of the judiciary to the feminist agenda
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Judge Leonard's judgment would be a basis for Clifford's appeal. I like to think he will make the best of his time in prison.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson The British are forgetting their legal traditions. http://t.co/rMtTM5E5ro explains why.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Do you think Oscar Pistorius is guilty of killing Reeva Steenkamp with the intention of killing her?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Could I interest you in a little Secular Koranism? http://t.co/AMHS0DXqii
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @rabbitaway @spikedonline @SexualOffences There exists a legal principle against retrospective legislation now forgotten.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@roryyeomans @BarbaraHewson Gerry Adams comes out of his arrest looking even more statesmanlike http://t.co/OEKZNAgjfp
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@Fox_Claire @BarbaraHewson @RoyLilley Keep elder abuse within the family and don't subcontract it out.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 5, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @barbara_hewson You are mentioned at http://t.co/YJujnyVI5K onthe @peter_levy Show. @brit_battleaxe spoke after me.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

@EricHardcastle @BarbaraHewson @rabbitaway @felicitygerry @HuffingtonPost It was a kind of quasi prostitution situation, I suppose.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

@samchadderton Perhaps Max Clifford should have asked @BarbaraHewson @barbara_hewson to represent him for a better result.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

What are your thoughts on Barbara Hewson's suggestion that abortion be legalised at any s... — I am cool with that. http://t.co/2HRfUN5VF1
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

Juries need to be taught about the reality of rape, says DPP. We used to call this jury nobbling, now it's education: http://t.co/Un3k2khO3T
— Jon Holbrook (@JonHolb) May 6, 2014

@JonHolb @spikedonline The last DPP was an unashamed Labour supporter, the current one is female who does not even bother hiding her bias.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

@JonHolb @spikedonline If women these days think nothing of having sex with men not their husbands it is arguable rape has lost its sting.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

@JonHolb @spikedonline Rape should be considered a personal injury, quantum calculated, and the element of contributory negligence imputed.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 6, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @LRB Her mother-in-law hated her, and her husband beat her. Bad reproductive choice.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@BarbaraHewson What is your view of Monica Lewiinsky's decision to talk about her past? Should sluts be shamed for the good of society?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@paulscottrobson @BarbaraHewson Should the victims of Max Clifford be treated like unpaid prostitutes and his payment to them index-linked?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@paulscottrobson @BarbaraHewson If victims of Max Clifford r treated like unpaid prostitutes then crime is obtaining services by deception.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@BarbaraMercer76 @guardian Should victims of Max Clifford be compensated as if they were unpaid prostitutes? http://t.co/4EFgIciDJt
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@paulscottrobson @BarbaraHewson I am suggesting how they should be paid off so his disabled daughter gets something. http://t.co/KUx2BkKH3b
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@paulscottrobson @BarbaraHewson What do men ever want from women but sex anyway? If you give it to them unasked will they say no?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Did success of accusers of Max Clifford prompt two women to accuse Oxford Union President? http://t.co/xZ9BuzYry2
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Why is the N word worse than other derogatory terms for other races?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 7, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Harriet Harman had #PIE connections while @JeremyClarkson only said rude word. Female privilege rules over frightened men.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 8, 2014

What exactly is @xmaseveevil1 - a rather vile serial killer name - is claiming what I and @BarbaraHewson ever said that makes us "vile"?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@MYSADCAT @BarbaraHewson Is it obvious to others why our legal system should be skewed in favour of men like Rolf Harris than his accuser?
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@xmaseveevil1 How is standing up for legal traditions that protect our liberty "vile"? @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@xmaseveevil1 You need to say why it is "rubbish" that a deceased person cannot have a fair trial. @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@xmaseveevil1 u need 2 say how it is possible to give dead people a fair trial for alleged crimes they committed when alive. @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@xmaseveevil1 Do you intend to be hiring mediums so dead people can attend court and swear to tell the truth? @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@xmaseveevil1 Or do you just intend to establish a rule that assumes all accused dead men must be by definition guilty? @BarbaraHewson
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @IrishTimes One must wonder at the benefits of universal education when what most plebs want to read is shit and mind-rot.
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@BarbaraHewson @Barristerblog @DavidRoseUK Why in the interests of justice Rolf Harris should be found not guilty http://t.co/axcskIJRiJ
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@BarbaraHewson It is already illegal to evade tax, so why should it be also illegal to AVOID tax? http://t.co/BUmBof2ydQ
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@BarbaraHewson The Voice of Reason: How I propose rape claims be dealt with http://t.co/ZixKlovfy8
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 10, 2014

@BarbaraHewson Defending English legal tradition http://t.co/BwE2kmEpNU
— Claire Khaw Ra (@ntfem) May 11, 2014

Or this at http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/113426525313?

I suddenly fight the idea of shacking up with two blond anti-feminist lawyers deliciously exciting.  I know I been rather disapproving of gay marriage and civil partnerships and have vowed to abolish them when I come to power, but I cannot help but think this is a scenario that is just the stuff of a US sitcom in the style of The Golden Girls, but set in London ...  

I just have a horrible feeling that if I invited Ann Coulter to visit Barbara and me in London to stay with us in our little shack-up she might be sent right back home across the herring pond under an exclusion order drawn up by the Home Secretary herself.

Poor Barbara, she probably had the frighteners put on her because I was tweeting at her so much she felt had to block me because certain threats have been made about her future at her chambers or her future in her profession or something, if she did not do something to show her disapproval of me and my views. But stick with me, babe, I will work something out in the end.