@ProfJCharmley @DouglasCarswell @UKIP I think my one-party theocracy idea based on Secular Koranism is more radical. http://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith I am really talking about the PERCEPTION of Islam and Christianity as a source of social conservatism.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith Being an agnostic social conservative I am more interested in the religion that most promotes this.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith
Judaism = Thesis
Christianity = Antithesis
Islam = Synthesis
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley It is not so much the numbers of recorded Muslims or Christians but how effective Islam is at promoting social conservatism.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley If the Pope is washing feet of single mothers while Muslims not afraid to condemn sluts, then it is clear which is stronger.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley As I have said, the efficacy of a religion is how good it is at making you more successful against competing groups.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith All the Abrahamic faiths are meant to promote patriarchal moral values = marriage = forbid extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Christianity is a really rather primitive religion, when you think about it - pretending to drink blood and eat flesh ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The distinction between politics and religion is a distinction without a difference.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Both the Bible and the Koran contain the laws of the Abrahamic God which its adherents are supposed to obey.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You will find that the Koran has a verse that goes much further than that, and even defines neighbour. http://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley All societies need a religion to protect its citizens from the degeneracy and decline caused by tolerating extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Christians pride themselves in their unworldliness, I suppose, since they believe they will be saved if they believe ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley If you want to translate God's laws into UK legislation, do it from the scripture which states it most clearly and humanely.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley I do assure you that all the punishments in the Koran are noticeably less harsh and clearer than those found in the Bible.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The Koran also trumps the Bible by purporting to be the directly revealed Word of God in Arabic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The Bible is hearsay recorded by many scribes, the Koran is taking dictation from God in Arabic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley As long as you believe in the absurdity of the Trinity, you will be saved, for only Christians shall be saved.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley If one doesn't literally believe that Christ is also God, then one is not a Christian, and shall not be saved. Absurd.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Of course, the doctrine of the Trinity is no longer even stated as a requirement, as long as the Christian mumbles the Creed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You don't have to study theology to know that Christians are incorrigibly hypocritical.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley It is bemusing how liberals regard with horror and shock the idea that anyone should wish to take their religion seriously.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@Sundancer_UK Laws are based on state ideology. Religion is state ideology.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You really should not assume the existence of something you know you cannot prove and which you already know others doubt.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The Trinity is so absurd that totalitarian laws had to be passed to stop people from questioning or denying it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley I do not assume there to be an afterlife, but it is clear what moral purpose laws said to be God's serve.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Christians are more hypocritical because they think belief in the Trinity and confession is their get-out-of-hell-free card.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Christianity, liberalism and feminism having failed, Islam will now fill the vacuum. Understandably you would be afraid.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The problems of gvt r due to failure of Xtianity. The sooner it is acknowledged Xtianity is a boiler 2b replaced the better.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Not even the Jews observe the sumptuary requirements now. Jews are cleverer and Muslims stronger in mind than Christians
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Juidaism and Islam are religions that have proper laws and moral codes, while Christians just make it up as they go along.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Islam replaced as a device to maintain morality a corrupt and corruptible clergy with the rule of law based on the Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Christianity can no longer now exist in a vacuum when all around it is PC Liberalism, degeneracy and sexual liberation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley It shd be obvious that the rule of law is more efficacious in maintaining morality than a corruptible and corrupted clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The doctrine of the Trinity is the Achilles heel of Christianity, and you know it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley u either agree with God's universal n eternal laws, or man-made laws. If the former u shd have the courage of ur convictions.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley ur hypocrisy lies on the one hand in saying u believe in God but on the other ignoring His laws in favour of PC Libtard laws.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley All the Abrahamic faiths promote the same patriarchal moral values. Islam is just the most advanced version of this.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Whether or not you agree with sharia law, it is more effective in maintaining Islamic morality than a corruptible clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Islam DISPENSES WITH a corruptible clergy and uses instead THE RULE OF LAW. Evidence of sophistication, I would have thought.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley While the rule of law can in its turn also be subverted, the rule of law is harder to subvert than a corruptible clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Islam is obviously more sophisticated in the way that a 4 wheel drive is better than a 2 wheel drive at climbing hills.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley I'll let you in on a BIG SECRET: the Koran is not followed, NOT EVEN BY MUSLIMS.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You probably haven't noticed how the UK legal system ignore its own rules eg criminal standard of proof, double jeopardy etc.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You are talking about Christianity in the sense of the existence of churches, clergy in cassocks etc rather than its morality
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley What is the point of everyone believing Jesus is God if they are all LGBTs gaily married to each other who die without issue?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The Koran even warns those who cling to the religion of their ancestors simply because it is the religion of their ancestors.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley You say you believe in Christianity, but not enough to follow the laws of the Christian God.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Most people I know are Cultural Christians, and theologically ignorant.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley How many people who call themselves Christians would sincerely declare that they believe Jesus is God?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The bums on pews in church probably have no idea of the requirement to believe Jesus is God in order to be Christian.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley If you told these Cultural Christians they must believe Jesus is God or else not be saved they would tell you to get stuffed.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The West is suffering from dementia, declining n senescent dying of parasitic diseases because it is riddled with parasites.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The parasites to which I refer are the parasitic slut single mothers that no male politician will now dare to denounce.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Will any Catholic now denounce fornication as a mortal sin? Most Catholic women r prbly fornicating sluts or Slut Single Mums
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/cpdxky/medieval-lives-birth-marriage-death--series-1---2-a-good-marriage
20th minute. Fornicators were whipped in a public place "in the usual way".
@ProfJCharmley I believe the English in the Middle Ages England suffered corporal punishment if convicted of having had extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonial_American_bastardy_laws#Bastardy_in_English_Common_Law
The balance of our population, our human stock is threatened. A recent article in Poverty, published by the Child Poverty Action Group, showed that a high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring them up. They are born to mother who were first pregnant in adolescence in social classes 4 and 5. Many of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness which are more important than riches. They are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels for drifters. Yet these mothers, the under-twenties in many cases, single parents, from classes 4 and 5, are now producing a third of all births. A high proportion of these births are a tragedy for the mother, the child and for us.
Yet what shall we do? If we do nothing, the nation moves towards degeneration, however much resources we pour into preventative work and the over-burdened educational system. It is all the more serious when we think of the loss of people with talent and initiative through emigration as our semi-socialism deprives them of adequate opportunities, rewards and satisfactions.http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/101830
Yet proposals to extend birth-control facilities to these classes of people, particularly the young unmarried girls, the potential young unmarried mothers, evokes entirely understandable moral opposition. Is it not condoning immorality? I suppose it is. But which is the lesser evil, until we are able to remoralise whole groups and classes of people, undoing the harm done when already weak restraints on strong instincts are further weakened by permissiveness in television, in films, on bookstalls?
@ProfJCharmley Of course, but if laws are written down they have more permanence than the strictures of a corruptible clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Of course not, but a fatwa has the effect really of obtaining Counsel's Opinion.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley I have acknowledged it is possible to subvert the rule of law but this would be harder to do than with a corruptible clergy.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The workings of the Curia are opaque to say the least when you compare it to the rule of law as it operates in courts.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Whether you believe Jesus is God is morally irrelevant compared to whether you believe premarital sex is a mortal sin.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@ProfJCharmley The efficacy of any religion is linked to how well it supports the institution of marriage. That is my main point really.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@Nebraska71 @ProfJCharmley Christianity is the least effective of all the Abrahamic faiths.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 29, 2015
@Church_Militant @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday When God mean referred 2 His "church" in Matthew 16:18 He meant His laws/morality
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Church_Militant @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday If the church built by Peter has failed then Islam will take over.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith Islam acknowledges the prophets of Judaism and Christianity as prophets of God.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday I offer a message of hope for the West, while you are saying put up and shut up.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday The church that Peter built on that rock no longer works to maintain morality.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday The church that Peter built on that rock is now corrupted by sexual liberation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday The church that Peter built was to protect its congregation from extramarital sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday The church that Peter built now promotes extramarital sex and sexual liberation.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith Did you not listen to @BBCR4Sunday yesterday? Catholics who support marriage were criticised.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2015/03/25/cardinal-nichols-urges-priests-not-to-conduct-synod-debate-in-press/
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @Michael_Voris Those who wish to change orthodox teaching come from WITHIN THE CHURCH and even lead it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant The evidence can be found in the videos of @Michael_Voris complaining about homo clergy promoting homo sex.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley It cannot be denied @Michael_Voris is complaining the Catholic Church is treading on the same road to perdition as the C of E
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday Catholic Church a centralised/hierarchical institution led by an infallible Pope.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Michael_Voris If the Catholic Church is treading the same path of perdition of the C of E then surely it is failing too?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Church_Militant @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith We are talking about the chasm between theory and practice, are we not?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Church_Militant @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith People don't like reading scripture, they prefer to be told what to think by corruptible clergy
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Church_Militant @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith @BBCR4Sunday If you criticise the Pope are you implicitly challenging Papal Infallibility?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant Islam says the Koran has the dictated Word of God which is the final authority on earth. Much simpler, eh?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
On Papal Infallibility:
@AdamCC92 @ProfJCharmley @ALucieSmith @Michael_Voris It just means the Pope is supreme authority on Catholic morals, but not God's laws.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant There is no dispute about the wording of the Koran, actually.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris If you want God's laws stated clearly and directly, refer to the Koran, not the Bible.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris I know Muslims also use the Hadith but I am a Secular Koranist. http://t.co/2HKPKUbYSZ
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris You do not even have to be Muslim to be a Secular Koranist, me I'm agnostic.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris It is possible to be a Jew and a Secular Koranist, as well as Christian, Buddhist and Hindoo ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris You could be agnostic, atheist and even polytheist and still be a Secular Koranist.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris Secular Koranism is not a belief system but a legal system like EU law.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris Who wd b a Secular Koranist? Anyone who is a social conservative n thinx libtardism has gone too far
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant If Islam is "Judaism Lite" then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley Think of Secular Koranism as the Chicken Tikka Masala of Sharia law for the UK. @anjemchoudary's is vindaloo or phal.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @AdamCC92 @Michael_Voris Everything that should be enforced in the Bible is already clearly stated in the Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
Indeed, Quran is verbatim BOOK of GOD.Unlike Bibles, in Quran GOD talks U directly
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
Top Christians Bible Scholars admit that Bible has been corrupted. Shud one take moral codes from?
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant If the Koran says "all animals are equal" Hadith says "but some are more equal than others."
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
Quran is a simple+plain book like 1+1=2 and not in need of any further interpretation or any Scholar
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
In fact Prophet & 4 Caliphs ordered to burn and ban all Hadiths>#Proooooooof
https://t.co/jeLPSu4qci
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ntfem but once you add the Hadith and the interpretation you get complicated ask Sunni and Shia @Church_Militant
— John Charmley (@ProfJCharmley) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant From 1200 yrs, the biggest enemy of Islam& we Ignorant Muslims are Carcinogen-Mullahs+Imams+Clergy
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
Quran has its own built-in dictionary & is ABSOLUTELY not in need of any external THEOLOGICAL source
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
As you can tell from @Truth_Tellerzz's tweets, he is a Koranist. Koranists tend to be treated like heretics @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ntfem @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
Hadiths> fabricated by defeated Zoroastrian Pseudo Imams 250 yrs after Prophet. Hadith>Mere Gossip
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant Koran = dictation from God transcribed in Arabic. Hadith = hearsay from a range of sources
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant We can have Pakistani Secular Koranism, US Secular Koranism, French Secular Koranism etc.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant Islam does not need a reformation but the excision of any Hadith that contradicts the Koran.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant We can have Russian Secular Koranism, Saudi Secular Koranism, Thai Secular Koranism too ...
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant Secular Koranism allows any nation to have its own version of it.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant And finally, my solution to bring about peace in the Middle East: ISRAELI SECULAR KORANISM!
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@ntfem @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
All hadiths R forged-crap.Even the hadiths that donot contradict Quran were forged. we have evidence
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ntfem @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
Divine System of Quran is indeed a Secular Sys: It says: allow every one to practice his religion
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ntfem @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
Who make Islamic law from Hadith Books is Infidel>>>>Quran 5:44.
Law valid onlty from Quran> 6:114
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ProfJCharmley @ntfem @Church_Militant
"No legal position of hadith+sunna up tp 722 A.D in Islam (Professor on Islam, Joseph Schacht)
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@ntfem @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant
Quran makes CLEAR, Drop invitation of Islam and U are done. No force is allowed to convert others
— Tamur Shaltut (@Truth_Tellerzz) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant Too bad so many are blinded by their prideful chauvinism. Catholics most chauvinistic of all
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant The Koran should be a read as a contract between God and Man, so do read the small print.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
@Truth_Tellerzz @ProfJCharmley @Church_Militant The nation that interprets Secular Koranism in the best way will be the most successful.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) March 30, 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment