No, Claire, you have a psychotic obsession with me because I blocked you on Skype. You're an Asian White Supremacist who supports Sharia.— Davis M.J. Aurini (@Aurini) October 5, 2017
I blocked Claire because she's psychotic. She's an old cat lady who embraced radical politics.— Davis M.J. Aurini (@Aurini) October 5, 2017
What do you think of Davis Aurini calling you "an Asian… — If being White Supremacist just means wanting white peo… https://t.co/aqamEtflIq— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
@ntfem Why are you so obsessed with me?— Davis M.J. Aurini (@Aurini) October 6, 2017
It is just my modus operandi, don't worry about it, Davis. I often wonder why you are not more successful, and I think I have worked it out.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I know you were on YouTube way before Millennial Woes and he has overtaken you in subscribers. That made me wonder why.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
You were kind enough to have me on your show at https://t.co/Oof4TV36Wc and I remain grateful to you for that. I thought it went quite well.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I was going to appear a second time but things did not go quite as well. I thought it was very inconsiderate of you to make me wait till 3AM— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
If I had been hosting a talk show and knew it was 1AM your time, I would have had you on first and then let you go to sleep.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Instead, you subjected your listeners to an hour long monologue. I listened to it with a Facebook friend and we both thought it was terrible— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
The long and short of it was that by the time you had got to the end of your monologue, I no longer felt like listening to you.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
When I spoke to you about it afterwards, you were most ungracious about it, and not at all apologetic, after which you blocked me.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
One of the things you said about our first convo at https://t.co/Oof4TV36Wc was that it lacked focus, so I listened to it again yesterday.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
The problem as I see it was that you are far more interested in putting forward your point of view than in letting your guests makes theirs.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I listened to https://t.co/Tx3IPAyphI and I thought you were being very dismissive of John Steele whose excellent points you didn't address.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/a-pagan-odinist-questions-effectiveness.htmlI couldn't help noticing that he was right about Papal Infallibility and you were not, but you basically bullied him and showed impatience.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I wondered why you carried on doing it and realised you didn't care about getting more subscribers. It was just your way of socialising.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I was talking to John Collins and realised that going live on YouTube is just a cheaper way for guys to socialise, and drink and smoke.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
You before you blocked me on Skype that our last convo "didn't seem to have any kind of focus", but I don't think the fault was mine.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
What would have made our first convo better was if you had asked me more focused questions, but there was one good one at the end.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
This was at 1:52 about the BNP.
I made a few points you could have responded to, instead of treating it as your opportunity to say something else completely unrelated to it— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I was talking to a male friend whom I think is practically autistic and he has your habit but in a far more noticeable irritating way.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Basically, I would say something to him, and instead of responding by agreeing or disagreeing, he would say "Oh, that reminds me of X."— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I held back on the one party theocracy with you in our convo, but did mention Islam twice. You get defensive when challenged on Xtianity.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
You got defensive when John Steele and I challenged you on Christianity, and would change the subject. Later, you admitted it did seem weak.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
At the 15th minute Auirini talks about "the weakness we see in Christianity these days, the lack of virility, the lack of engagement with the real world ..."
You're not the only Christian I have challenged on Christianity, of course. I'm in communication with E Michael Jones, the Catholic activist— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
The cause of your conflicted attitude towards me: you don't feel up to defending Christianity but still sort of want me on your show.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Your listeners would be entertained by me, but your reluctance to do this this is cos of your unease at your inability to defend Xtianity.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Having me on your show again would raise your profile and increase the number of your subscribers, but you just want a quiet life probably.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I predict you will keep complaining about feminism and the failure of Christianity to your listeners as you refuse to consider my solutions.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Why do you think I am scrabbling for publicity amongst low-grade YouTubers? Because MSM have made a point of ignoring me.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
The reason why you have decided not to have me on your show is the same reason MSM have decided to ignore what it dislikes: abuse of power.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
MSM make a point of suppressing and ignoring all questions being asked about the way we are governed, rather than facilitate debate.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
You and other YouTubers eg Millennial Woes are making a point of not discussing and addressing the issues I raise cos you are not up to it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
If you're doing your livestreaming to get more subscribers, you have a duty to have me on your show for the entertainment of your listeners.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
You have the excuse of a full time job and don't have the time to prepare and do the research you need to deal with me. The others don't.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I know Millennial Woes regards getting more subscribers to validate his position, but he does not want to go out of their comfort zone.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
E Michael Jones the Catholic campaigner can't answer any of my questions but insists I become a Catholic anyway! https://t.co/dmq1PkMF8f— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
E Michael Jones says he would become Muslim if he thought Islam provided the solution
Mind you, I have asked @rabbisacks the same questions at https://t.co/A7wrLUE5jG and he has also ignored my questions.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I am not so socially unaware that I am really surprised my proposal of a one party theocracy would cause consternation and distress.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I was hoping that in the West there might be at least an intellectual prepared to challenge my ideas and demonstrate some flaw in them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
By flaw, I mean some fact I am relying on which turns out not to be true, or some conclusion that I have made that was not in fact logical.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
If you have ideas you can't defend, then they are probably indefensible. If they are indefensible, then surely you had better abandon them?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I have already made this point to @StefanMolyneux, but he is wobbly on this and won't have me on his show again. https://t.co/YeW9rl24uP— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
It seems there is no intellectual in the entire West who can answer my simple questions honestly. It is pretty sad, don't you think?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I'll have to give up on you and concentrate on Jewish intellectuals who at least pride themselves on their intellect and won't avoid debate.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
When the establishment and those who are against it refuse to debate important issues or answer simple questions, something is very wrong.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
My position: Xtianity & democracy have obviously failed. My solution: a one party theocracy. TELL ME WHY I AM WRONG. https://t.co/iHx0aJMP8i— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I am sure I have brought you new subscribers.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
Aggravating and alienating people who are nice to her? Sounds like High School.— Davis M.J. Aurini (@Aurini) October 6, 2017
I don't think it was nice of you to keep me waiting till 3AM after subjecting your listeners to an hour long monologue, Davis.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I don't think it was nice of you to block me after I told you exactly why I was not hanging around any more at 3AM to get on your show.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
The trouble with you, Davis, is that you are more interested in hearing your own voice and own point of view than in solving problems.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
I am still being nice to you, Davis, in that I am drawing attention to you and the topics you discuss on your show without any expectation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 6, 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment