Translate

Friday 6 October 2017

YouTubers complain about Claire Khaw

My purpose is to denounce feminism and promote my solution of a one party theocracy, as a non-white female using my feminine privilege on behalf of men suffering under feminist oppression. (I am actually performing a service for you, guys!)

What I hope men will do is tell me exactly why my solution cannot work either in theory or in practice. If you cannot find any flaw with the facts and logic I have relied on, you should out of respect to truth and reason admit that I am right.

No, it is not enough to say you don't like my solution or that it will never catch on. This is because I already know you don't like it. I already know why a patient suffering from a gangrenous leg would dislike the idea of amputation.

In challenging my ideas, please deal with the following points:

1) Nationalism cannot exist without patriarchy.

2) Patriarchy cannot exist without traditional marriage ie the enforcement of its most important rule: the forbidding and punishing of extramarital sex

3) Patriarchy cannot exist without theocracy ie the existence of laws that forbid and punish extramarital sex

4) Man created God for the above reasons.

5) Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.

6) Matriarchy is a society that priorities the preferences of the never married single mother.

7) All advanced societies are patriarchies.

8) All primitive and declining societies are matriarchies.

9) Discovering that you live in a matriarchy is discovering that your society has terminal cancer.

10) If the problem is matriarchy, the solution must be patriarchy.

11) If the solution is patriarchy, the solution must also be theocracy.

12) If the solution is theocracy, the solution must also be Islam and an Islamic Revolution.

13) Christianity is now indistinguishable from liberalism and this must mean it is no longer fit for the purpose of maintaining morality and patriarchy.

14) Once you have eliminated the impossible then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the solution.

15) Islam is the most advanced version of the Abrahamic religions because it guarantees freedom of belief with https://quran.com/2/256

16) If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

17) Because Christianity required its adherents to declare a belief in an absurdity as an article of faith, it was bound to fail when it became legal to deny the Trinity.

18) Because Christianity relies on a corruptible clergy to maintain morality, it was bound to fail in an environment of sexual liberation.

19) Because Islam assumes that law should conform with morality and morality conform with religion, it understands that it is the law that limits our immorality.

20) The Koran warns urges us to use reason and warns us against adhering to the religion of our ancestors just because it is the religion of our ancestors. https://quran.com/2/170

21) I am not Muslim but agnostic, but if it is really the case that Christianity is irreparable, hadn't we better replace it with Islam?

22) Wouldn't the Koranic prohibition against usury significantly curtail Jewish power?

23) Are gentiles in the West and their politicians more gullible and exploitable if they live in a matriarchy?

24) If Westerners lived in a one party theocracy promoting patriarchal moral values, wouldn't this mean that they and their government would not be so easily led into irrational and self-destructive policies?

You can ask me me questions at https://ask.fm/oneparty4all



John Collins:

The people who are trying to forestall demographic chaos or who are in fear of demographic chaos plays itself out in the form of right-wing extremism.


John Hooker: "Change, even from worse to better, is not made without inconvenience."

How solutions are not at all the solutions that have been proposed by any Western government. I don't deny that they are revolutionary. If we are being governed by matriarchy, the solution would be patriarchy. My solutions are being addressed to the government for its consideration and I have already anticipated the objections and problems, and I only just want them challenged and discussed. I am aware that successful social and political reformers are rare indeed, but Solon was one. Freedom is what you ought have after after all the necessary laws are in place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solon

 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/reforming_acts_01.shtml

Old Chinese saying:

The people are the grass, and the law the wind. When the wind blows, the grass will bend.
The moral imperative of theocracy

Should law conform to morality and if so what kind of morality should it conform to and why?

at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)