Pls read -BBC John Humphreys' interview. A man of his stature wants 2 shut down sexual harassment discussion claiming it has gone too far...this is why it took 40 years for perpetrators to be exposed. He wants their abusive assaults put back in closet. #sexualperpetratorsexposed https://t.co/fW4kDNIFIl— Dr. Jan Halper-Hayes (@Biz_Shrink) November 2, 2017
John Humphrys:do an interview on sex harassment without using the words "witch hunt" or "gone too far." You are part of the problem #r4today— Sophie Walker (@SophieRunning) November 1, 2017
So you are in favour of this witch hunt and want men in politics replaced by over-promoted mediocrities who are women. Will govt improve?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
So you want stale and unprovable accusations by women against men to be treated as if they were convictions? If not, what?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
If you see everything in shades of grey, it means you will always be dithering like a woman and never acting decisively and unambiguosly.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
While ambiguity is a feminine stratagem and protects women when sending out mating signals, men acting like women is a Very Bad Thing.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Not engaging with me is actually a sign of cowardice, actually, but that is again another feminine stratagem designed to protect her.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
If you are not saying stale and unprovable accusations of sexual misconduct should be treated as if they were convictions, what r u saying?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
There is a reason why computer code is created in binary, or it would never obey a command if it saw everything in your shades of grey.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
What don't you understand? I would be *delighted* to explain.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
You were clearly suggesting that an allegation of sexual misconduct 40 years ago should be treated as if it were a conviction, were you not?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
If someone made an allegation of sexual misconduct against YOU that took place 40 years ago, should it be taken seriously?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
You do realise that allegations of this nature are UNPROVABLE, don't you?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
You do realise that it is in most cases *impossible* to prove a negative? For example, that you were not at X doing Y?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Do you really want senior men in politics walking on eggshells in fear of being named and shamed and having any accusation taken seriously?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Do you think voters will have more trust in their government when they already know male MPs are too afraid even to defend their own rights?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Unless you have an alibi, it will be impossible for you to prove that you were not at X murdering Y last night, for example.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
You are a psychologist, yet you dismiss what I am saying without even trying to understand it because you don't like where it's going.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
I'd be very happy indeed to explain to you till you do understand, but I fear you will disengage before light dawns. I get this all the time— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
So you expect men to sit around looking pretty while women make all the moves, do you? That would be the safest course for them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
What do u think women will do when they r expected to make all the moves on men? Complain about rape if their advances are rejected perhaps.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
If I have said anything untrue, illogical or immoral, then surely it is open to people to point this out. I invite them to do so!— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Ha! It is OK to grope a woman in a taxi if the woman WANTS you to grope her. But how will you know if she wants to UNLESS YOU TRY?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
If a masculine paw is placed on your knee, u cd perhaps remove it or tell him to desist if u dislike it. Are women really incapable of this?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Do women not have elbows/the ability to tell men to cease and desist? Or female relations to advise them how to deal with the opposite sex?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Things are rather different now. The woman is now automatically believed and the man automatically considered guilty.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
I am only trying to get you to explain your position and had imagined you would find it useful to be given opportunities to explain it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
VIA DIRECT MESSAGE
JHH:
I am not going to publicly engage. I don't have time for this. My focus is that a few weeks of calling out the perpetrators is not a witch hunt. 40 yrs victims named and slut shamed. One month of perpetrators exposed and a man wants to close it down??!!??!!!
CK:
I am sure you get this all the time, but I don't because I know how to handle myself with men.
Women give off signals ambiguity because they are themselves uncertain, and this MABYE to men means MAYBE YES, so keep going. They have to, don't they, if they want the prize?
The solution is to make the rules CLEARER for both sexes.
There used to be the three dinner rule for sex. Don't accept the third dinner if you know you won't have sex with him, and all that. Things have moved on since then, haven't they?
JHH:
Claire. I am done. Stop contacting me in this. Please
[Note the implied threat: "If you won't stop answering back you're hurting me and if you won't stop hurting me you are a mean bad person giving me the excuse to disengage from you and end this uncomfortable discussion with you asking me questions I cannot answer honestly without losing the argument."]
CK:
I thought you would say that. That is precisely the problem with all this. You will never allow yourself to answer a question honestly, and you have no sense of justice at all. You will do and say what the law allows until it no longer allows you to do so.
JHH:
No. I am now going to block you because I do not appreciate the accusations and assumptions. I now know why so many people have told me to stop being nice to you.
[Have I accused Jan Halper-Hayes of anything? Couldn't she have denied any accusation I have apparently made against her, or said that my reasoning was faulty or that what I concluded was incorrect and given reasons? Nope. And men will side with her because she's so much prettier and much more ladylike than me, I bet!
"I was being so nice to you even though my cosy little female circle said you were a bad mean person because I am so kind, compassionate, feminine and tolerant, but I cannot forgive you for presenting a rational argument relying on undisputed facts and asked me simple yes/no questions I cannot answer without losing the argument.
Oh, and this is how political debate will be like from now on, now that female MPs are purging Parliament of male MPs, unless they are gay.]
When are white men finally going to wake up to the fact that it is their women who DESPISE them and want them EXTERMINATED? https://t.co/vWkc6ozjEz— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
These women won't stop and they are stopped. Cancer doesn't stop till it is cut out or the patient dies. Do bear that in mind, men. https://t.co/LUVq8nsI8e— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
What white women will do to white men will be what happened in story of The Fisherman and His Wife. Do you know the story, libtard?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
Will Michael Fallon be replaced by yet another over-promoted female mediocrity in this stinking matriarchy? When will men fight back? NEVER?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
We are governed by emasculated infantilised cucks incapable of even defending themselves. Their cowardice is contemptible and sickening.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
This is our glorious democracy: feminazis, over-promoted mediocrities over-promoted just because they are women and the castrated cucks.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
Will it be another over-promoted female mediocrity who will accuse yet another male MP of yet another historic sexual offence? Probably. https://t.co/R7LFiG9h9e— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
We will soon turn into a bee colony where only males with the largest sex organs capable of pleasuring the queen will be permitted to live. https://t.co/TqtzMi02mw— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
Men could just stage a coup d'état if they only dared to organise and co-operate with each other but it seems they prefer to hang separately https://t.co/5C9t4qNH1u— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
It is really astonishing that male MPs are just allowing themselves to be replaced without demur. They have voted to abolish themselves.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
Did some feminazis conspire amongst tthemselves and say "Hey, why don't we just get male MPs to commit suicide so we can take their jobs?" https://t.co/x9c3QCu97q— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
And, unbelievably, this was what the male MPs allowed to happen! @PhilipDaviesUK @ZacGoldsmith @michaelgove @BorisJohnson @GregClarkMP https://t.co/PG5JhGSR2h— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 1, 2017
What I said was that white middle class women despise white men in the class below them and white middle class men fear their women.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Because white middle class men fear their wives and the women at work, male MPs will not even defend their own interests.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
We can tell male MPs lack even this most essential feature of a functioning patriarchy: male solidarity.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
We therefore know we are now in effect governed by a coven of witches and their familiars.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
I am taking about how middle class men in Labour are afraid of the women in their party and won't stand up for working class men.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Yes, I do live in a sad little country of emasculated men incapable of even protecting their own rights from their treacherous women.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
White male MPs, you should know white women hate you and want to destroy your race, nation and civilisation. Why aren't you fighting back? https://t.co/mHlIlbHwdR— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
Jenni Murray: "Julia Hartley-Brewer, She of the Knee ... "— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 2, 2017
I have just put my hand on my own knee, I feel both ashamed and violated. #Kneegate— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 1 November 2017
Having 'white nuclear family' promotes white supremacy, says New York professor, report says https://t.co/yZXzzXBF4Z #FoxNews— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) 2 November 2017
No comments:
Post a Comment