Translate

Showing posts with label Jan Halper-Hayes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jan Halper-Hayes. Show all posts

Friday, 7 September 2018

Would I best serve the British people by becoming the third Mrs Boris Johnson?

I see that Mr and Mrs Boris Johnson are about to be divorced. I am happy to stand in as his new wife to make sure Brexit stays on course and give him the steadying hand he so clearly needs. It will have to be one of those open marriages, of course. I think it could work because I have always fancied myself as a political wife. If the future Prime Minister of Britain accepts my offer, I would be the third Mrs Johnson and wouldn't my friends, family, political associates and Facebook friends be proud of me!

Listening to my YouTube videos will give him an idea of personality and I welcome the opportunity of explaining those "German" photos of myself to the media and British people once and for all.

In the video below, I discuss my possible life as the wife of a future British Prime Minister. If Steve Bannon approves the match, then I believe it could work.



He won't need to waste time with the niceties of dating with me since I am happy to visit him at his home where we can discuss politics and his future career over a delivered meal of his choice. If I miss the last train home, I shall expect to be accommodated in the spare room which I intend to occupy for the rest of our married life.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/07/boris-johnson-and-marina-wheeler-announce-divorce

If you think Boris needs my steadying hand on his tiller, would you be so kind as to superimpose me next to him, please? It may help reinforce the idea that he and I are meant to be!

Thank you, person who helpfully did exactly this, who may wish to remain anonymous!




I wonder if Steve Bannon would approve of the match. The best thing to do is to let Jan Halper Hayes  (@Biz_Shrink on Twitter) know of this proposed match so she can pass the message to him.  Since I am now suspended from Twitter, I would be grateful for the help of readers of this blog in arranging the match.

If Steve Bannon is considering making me an offer too, he should not be shy.  
at 23 comments:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, 26 August 2018

The moral chaos of our matriarchy




I start posting from 2:19.

3:14 I discuss Jan Halper Hayes.

3:16  Our corrupt oligarchy and corrupt cartel

3:17   The biggest bloc vote is the female vote.
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2010/10/case-for-disenfranchsing-women-or-why.html

3:18   No fault divorce

3:19   Feminism impoverishes your nation and this leads to socialism.

3:20  Ann Coulter  http://genprogress.org/voices/2012/03/09/17660/ann-coulter-im-ok-with-revoking-womens-young-americans-right-to-vote/

3:21  Indiscriminate universal suffrage and the move to extend the franchise to 16 year olds

3:22  A broken clock is correct twice a day.

3:23  Robocop and the dominance of corporate America in American politics
https://tropicsofmeta.com/2014/03/24/what-robocop-tells-us-about-the-neoliberal-city-then-and-now/

3:25  Elections in a one party state, the US vassal states

3:27  Anti-trust laws

3:29  Democracy a sacred cow and civic religion

3:30  Religion is very right-wing

3:31  Should the failure of Christianity be blamed on Jews?

3:36  Free speech exists in greater strength in non-Western countries not destroyed by PC.

http://www.tvthrong.co.uk/tag/paul-merton-in-china/

Paul’s “brief encounter” with Lina is followed by dinner with a group of wealthy female socialites, who wax lyrical about the freedoms they enjoy in modern China. Host Vivian Chow surprises Paul with her views of the exaggeration of the western press: “To tell you the truth, I don’t think China even has any political prisoners,” she says.
3:39

Saudi Arabia seeks 'unprecedented' beheading for woman activist  
The accusations against a group Israa al-Ghomgham is part of include chanting slogans hostile to the regime and attempting to inflame public opinion. 
This is a political execution and is part of the Sunni-Shia feud and obviously to do with bombing of Yemen by Saudi.  

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/saudi-arabia-seeks-unprecedented-death-penalty-woman-activist-n902771

3:39:30  Americans flouting their own constitution
https://www.thenation.com/article/civic-virtues-gore-vidals-selected-essays/

3:40  The Chinese know they have more free speech than Westerners

Paul’s “brief encounter” with Lina is followed by dinner with a group of wealthy female socialites, who wax lyrical about the freedoms they enjoy in modern China. Host Vivian Chow surprises Paul with her views of the exaggeration of the western press: “To tell you the truth, I don’t think China even has any political prisoners,” she says.

http://www.tvthrong.co.uk/tag/paul-merton-in-china/

3:42:00  Lawyers don't care or notice that basic legal principles are being flouted.

3:43:00  Religious people notice when their religious principles are being flouted.

3:44:00

epistemologythe theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion.

What has epistemology to do with anything I said about no one in politics ever defending any principle?

noun: ontology; plural noun: ontologies
1.
the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being.
2.
a set of concepts and categories in a subject area or domain that shows their properties and the relations between them.

What has ontology to do with anything I said about no one defending any principle?

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/trope  What trope did I use?

What is a "Dennis Prager argument"?

3:45:00  Anti-trust laws ignored

3:45:00  Unprincipled politicians have given the West gay marriage. Unprincipled and probably gay religious leaders and philosophers did not care to challenge this.

3:45:30  Democrats threatened to impeach Trump because they can, even before he became President.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_Donald_Trump

3:46:00 There is no rule of law, therefore moral chaos is the norm

3:50:00  Patriarchy comes from patriarchs ie married fathers in control of their families, especially sons.

3:58:00  I am not proposing a return to brimstone and hellfire sermons. It is enough to punish Slut Single Mothers with quran.com/24/2 for having illegitimate offspring at a tariff of 100 lashes per bastard. 
at No comments:
Labels:

Thursday, 2 November 2017

American psychologist Jan Halper-Hayes refuses to answer my questions on sexual harassment




VIA DIRECT MESSAGE

JHH:
I am not going to publicly engage. I don't have time for this. My focus is that a few weeks of calling out the perpetrators is not a witch hunt. 40 yrs victims named and slut shamed. One month of perpetrators exposed and a man wants to close it down??!!??!!!


 CK:
I am sure you get this all the time, but I don't because I know how to handle myself with men. 
Women give off signals ambiguity because they are themselves uncertain, and this MABYE to men means MAYBE YES, so keep going. They have to, don't they, if they want the prize?
The solution is to make the rules CLEARER for both sexes.
There used to be the three dinner rule for sex. Don't accept the third dinner if you know you won't have sex with him, and all that. Things have moved on since then, haven't they?


JHH:

Claire. I am done. Stop contacting me in this. Please


 [Note the implied threat: "If you won't stop answering back you're hurting me and if you won't stop hurting me you are a mean bad person giving me the excuse to disengage from you and end this uncomfortable discussion with you asking me questions I cannot answer honestly without losing the argument."]

 CK:


I thought you would say that. That is precisely the problem with all this. You will never allow yourself to answer a question honestly, and you have no sense of justice at all. You will do and say what the law allows until it no longer allows you to do so.



 JHH:

No. I am now going to block you because I do not appreciate the accusations and assumptions. I now know why so many people have told me to stop being nice to you.

[Have I accused Jan Halper-Hayes of anything? Couldn't she have denied any accusation I have apparently made against her, or said that my reasoning was faulty or that what I concluded was incorrect and given reasons? Nope. And men will side with her because she's so much prettier and much more ladylike than me, I bet!

 "I was being so nice to you even though my cosy little female circle said you were a bad mean person because I am so kind,  compassionate, feminine and tolerant, but I cannot forgive you for presenting a rational argument relying on undisputed facts and asked me simple yes/no questions I cannot answer without losing the argument. 

 Oh, and this is how political debate will be like from now on, now that female MPs are purging Parliament of male MPs, unless they are gay.]


at No comments:
Labels: ,

Tuesday, 14 February 2017

What is the Logan Act for anyway?

A US constitutional historian would be required to explain the historical background for the nature and purpose of the Logan Act 1799 and what evil it was intended to avert. (It is something complicated to do with getting the Americans getting the French to fund the American War of Independence against the British, falling out with each other afterwards and to do with the ideological disagreements between the Federalists and the Jeffersonians. I imagine it is like the Scheswig-Holstein Question. The British statesman Lord Palmerston is reported to have said: “Only three people have ever really understood the Schleswig-Holstein business—the Prince Consort, who is dead—a German professor, who has gone mad—and I, who have forgotten all about it.")

I really cannot imagine any fair-minded and impartial moral or political philosopher desiring to serve the American national interest ever justifying keeping this damnable piece of legislation in existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act








http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08g0310
From 2:24 to 2:29

Nick Robinson:

He was one of Donald Trump's most controversial appointments: the former Three Star General who appeared at a banquet held in the honour of the Russian government, a banquet held in Moscow, where he appeared alongside Vladimir Putin. Now, though, Mike Flynn has been forced to quit as National Security Adviser over his contacts with - guess who - the Russians. We spoke to the Russian Ambassador to Washington before taking office - nothing wrong with that. What was wrong was that he initially assured everyone including those in the White House that he had not talked about lifting sanctions imposed by President Obama until that account was contradicted by other government officials. We're joined now by someone who knows the Trump team well - who was a member of the Trump transition team - Dr Jan Halper-Hayes. Morning to you.

JHH:

Morning. 

NR:

Wasn't Mike Flynn an accident waiting to happen?

JHH:

Well, y'know, we can put that negative spin on it, y'know, one of the things that is really critical is that our National Security Council is possibly in trouble because his deputy was fired last Friday, so the top two are gone, but Flynn was more like Patton - he great on the battlefield but he wasn't great in his management style and I think that the intelligent services really resented him because one of the things about the intelligence services is that they always exist no matter what the Administration so they tend to really like the power they hold on to. Flynn was really threatening that power. 

NR:

Are you suggesting that his enemies in the Administration - his enemies, as it were, who are officials who didn't come in with Donald Trump, that they got him?

JHH:

Well, I wouldn't say they got him, but actually they out and out recommended up front Sally Yates who quit over what you guys call it the ban, I don't, yes, the travel ban ...

NR:

Actually, Donald Trump called it the ban, but we'll move on.  

JHH:

Well, Sally Yates, Clapper and Brennan had all suggested that he was carrying on his relationship with Russia because of his business contacts were not highly advisable and so they recommended it but when Trump [inaudible] someone ... 

NR:

So let's go back to the idea of an accident waiting to happen, shall we? You say it was my spin. Senator John McCain, a Republican, advised against this appointment. Virtually anybody in the Republican Security establishment said that Mike Flynn was too close to Moscow.

JHH:

Well, there was that concern, there always is. Look, I frankly don't hold McCain in high regard with anything that he says because he is so out to get the Trump Administration and anyone who is associated with it so  ... 

NR:

The reason I am asking about it is to ask you whether Trump Administration will - and Donald Trump himself will learn from this mistake or will they assume that all he did wrong was say one thing to the Vice President and then something rather different later. 

JHH:

Well, y'know, always the cover up is worse than the crime. He shouldn't have lied. He shouldn't have lied about the discussion, and that was really the critical problem because if he did lie although yesterday Russia came out and said that they did not have a discussion about sanctions, so, y'know ...

NR:

And you believe Moscow's version of events?

JHH:

No, I'm not saying I believe. What it does is it makes me even more suspicious. It makes me more suspicious of whether he actually did or he didn't, but let's just say he did. He did it as a US citizen therefore he was in violation of the Logan Act because as a US citizen you cannot discuss any Administration business, so if he did that then he really needed to step down and ... 

NR:

Very briefly if you would, what is the lesson that needs to be learned? Don't trust your old chums, isn't it?

JHH:

No, I can't take that kind of spin on it. I just absolutely can't. I mean, we're going to have every Administration ends up having problems like this. There's always people who have vetted them as best as they can and who have done all the investigations of all the people they know and then people do something that messes something up, and so I don't think you can then smear the entire Administration. What can Mike Flynn learn from this? Tell the truth. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?utm_term=.b55eaa35d1b8
















































Why the Logan Act should be repealed By Edward A. Zelinsky 

How I would have answered the Nick Robinson question about what lessons should be learned

"The most important lessons to be learned from this sorry mess is that legislation that no longer serves its purpose should be repealed. Nobody is quite sure why Congress passed a piece of retrospective legislation in 1799 that seems directed solely at George Logan, a Quaker, and a Republican-Democrat Jeffersonian, by the Federalists. Suffice to say it was of its time and apparently enacted to deal with a man who was considered to be a "busybody" and "a great fool". It no longer has modern relevance and for this reason this legislation should not remain in existence for the sole purpose of being used by the neocon establishment against a Trump appointee just because he is a Trump appointee. "

http://theduran.com/this-is-a-great-10-minute-video-explanation-of-michael-flynn-resignation-and-how-the-us-deep-state-committed-treason/
at No comments:
Labels: ,

Monday, 30 January 2017

Jan Halper-Hayes reassures the British about her temperamentally-suited President


From 27th minute



From the 14th minute







Why Donald Trump Has the Perfect Presidential Temperament

Why Donald Trump Has the Perfect Presidential Temperament, Part II



at No comments:
Labels:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Maronite Christian ⁨@GBkishere⁩ tells us the story of his life

1:00  Sharia is the bitter medicine Westerners must take.  2:00  Maronite Christianity explained.  3:00  Adam and Eve 4:00 Phoenicians and z...