https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/05/why-i-dont-support-tommy-robinson/
Was a publicity stunt worth the risk of setting a gang of child rapists free? That’s a breathtakingly selfish decision. I don’t see any way of avoiding the conclusion that #TommyRobinson is morally reckless and probably a bit stupid. #TommyRobinsonArresthttps://t.co/IHXH64TSMl— Counter-Currents (@NewRightAmerica) May 28, 2018
" ... white advocates around the world need to guard our credibility, not squander it in what is essentially a white chimp-out based on the false premise that Tommy Robinson is a martyr for freedom of speech and the pursuit of justice for the victims of Muslim pedophile gangs." https://t.co/z2jj76lnKm— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018
[contradicting himself] I do think people should be assumed innocent till proven guilty but in this case we are talking about a men who possibly rape children ... accusations of rape, abducting children, threats to kill and drugging children. Is it right that these men are allowed to walk free and the public are not allowed to know who is possibly guilty of doing these sorts of crimes. It does pose a huge risk to the British public.
Tommy Robinson talks about how he is offended daily by niqabs, drug-dealers, child rapists etc but no one cares whether we are offended by these things and by we presumably he means native white British people.
Then very interestingly, he talks about a group of parents who have started patrolling the city in the north of England to stop the grooming gangs because they have concluded that they can't rely on the police to stop the grooming gangs, and he says he is going to visit city that night - Friday night - to talk to them about it, to interview them.
The establishment would not want news of that reaching the general public because it is the beginnings of self-reliance, street action and possibly vigilantism. They fear the implications of that. The implication is white solidarity against Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. The problem for the establishment and the powers that be is that once the whites have collectivised at that local level, it will be much harder for the establishment to maintain the status quo.
Millennial Woes suggests that it was only when the Sikhs decided to defend their girls with violence did the police see fit to to intervene.
There has been this tacit informal code of silence - of omerta - on parts of the British media about politically inconvenient events and also politically inconvenient truths. They just decide that's off the agenda, and that's been going on for the last ten years. It is very obvious that there is this judicious editing going on. It is one of the reasons why the alternative media exists at all. The fact that is this news agenda which is British but also international - and you say it is transnational has become increasingly obvious - definitely since the turn of the millennium. Media outlets act in concert deciding what they are going to report and how they are going to report it. It could be entirely instinctual. It might not be a coordinated network, it might be that they agree - it's in the air, that's the meme, that's how we are going to report it. What we have now is a formal codification of the news agenda on the part of the government just saying "That man, that story did not happen" and that's a very sinister development. It's scary, because if the British judiciary and by extension the British government can order the media not to report this story, then they could do it with any story. This gagging order on reporting on Tommy Robinson's imprisonment is a good thing, because it makes explicit what a lot of people have known subconsciously for years: the non-reporting of events and the slanted reporting of events. We've just got used to it. We've come to accept it and even expect it. This is what they do and how they behave. The media is incredibly biased and they are able to lie to us and say black is white.
That there is no parental authority is the greater scandal, more than unsupervised schoolgirls falling victim to sex predators of this race or that religion. Sex predators will be sex predators, but why won't white British parents parent their adolescent daughters properly?— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018
Britain today is a country where the following ten things happen:
- Publishing a joke video in which your dog does a Nazi salute will transform you into a convicted criminal, as happened to Count Dankula.
- Advocating for the survival of the white race will get you branded a racist, Far Right, extremist, hater, Neo-Nazi etc and you will be barred from entering Britain, as happened to Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer and Martin Selner, simply because you like your race and want it to survive. Can you imagine that happening to someone of any other race?
- Intending to interview Tommy Robinson will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Brittany Pettibone.
- Criticising Islam even with satire will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Lauren Southern.
- Voicing anti-immigration, anti-multiculturalism, anti-Islam or anti-diversity opinions could get you a 6 year jail sentence, if the Sentencing Council have their way. That's the direction the establishment is heading in, and it's pretty hardcore.
- Singing songs about the Holocaust will transform you into a convicted and jailed criminal, as happened to Alison Chabloz.
- Singing songs about Jewish power will transform you into a convicted criminal after Jewish groups have used their power to get you convicted.
- Giving a speech about Jewish power, including the unique power to have their own police force will get you jailed for a year, after Jewish groups have used their power to get you jailed.
- Disobeying a court order about something trivial will get your thrown in jail for 13 months within a matter of hours.
- The media can be gagged from reporting to the public that you have been imprisoned, and anyone on social media who does so, could be arrested.
All of the above (with the exception of No 5) have happened in the last few months in Britain. So the British government has a plan for Britain. The plan and also their determination to stick to and implement that plan are becoming increasingly clear. The plan involves the future of Britain and the future of British society, and that involves what you might call the legacy population of Britain, namely the native British people. The government's plan means the transformation of British society and thereby the dispossession of the British people. What they want to transform Britain to is not clear: it could be a coffee-coloured Islamic theocracy, or it could be a coffee-coloured secular police state, or maybe they oscillated between the two goals, unsure which of them is more feasible or desirable, but either way their plan requires the measures we are seeing now.
Any expression of dissent from this political paradigm is now treated as a crime, and this includes causing offence, even if only perceived, not intended, to non-white groups in Britain with whom the government intends to transform Britain - culturally, racially, genetically. It also includes any causing of offence to Jews as a group. You can make your own mind up as to why the British government is so eager to placate Jews as a group. At this stage, I am not even sure it even matters what the original reason for that was because we are heading into chaos. We are heading towards what you might call anarcho-tyranny, but beyond that, decades of chaos and bloodshed. But in the meantime, we aren't supposed to even talk about the issues which will animate the decades of bloodshed and chaos. We are not even supposed to talk about it. That's why they want to put people in jail for six years if they do so. We are just supposed to pretend that everything is fine and that we're all on board with the government's plan for the country, for us, and our grandchildren. How delicately the fetters have been placed under our lips over the last few decades. But now suddenly we feel their weight upon us - silencing us, suffocating us.
The British establishment is radicalising itself against the native population.
The government of Britain does not care about the native people of Britain. It has put in measures to make sure that they are mixed out of recognition and bred out of dominance in their own homeland.
It has also put in place measures to ensure that they daren't complain about this. So make no mistake: this is not just cultural, it's not just religious: it is racial, genetic, permanent.
The government of Britain is trying to destroy the native people of Britain, and it's doing everything that it can to stop them talking about it.
I will leave it up to you to decide whether the civic nationalists have a solution for this situation, whether the Conservatives, Jordan Peterson-style individualists or progressives have a solution for this. Or, whether these groups are just delusional, weak wastes of your time.
Alexander Mercouris talks about the Deep State in Britain:
"Theresa May is a very weak Prime Minister."
Alex Christoforou suggests that Tommy Robinson's jail sentence could be in effect a death sentence due to the fact that many prisoners are Muslim who would wish to do him harm or even kill him.
"The fact that these particular gangs are made up of Pakistani men is significant but not in the way racists would have us believe," says one child protection expert who asked not to be named. "While the BNP would have us believe that abusing white girls is an endemic part of these men's culture — which it absolutely is not — the truth is that these men are aware that the police do not want to be accused of racism in today's climate."
In 2004, Channel 4 withdrew Edge of the City, its controversial documentary made by Annie Hall that depicted parents trying to stop groups of young Asian men grooming white girls as young as 11 for sex. It had been seized on by the BNP as a party political broadcast.
Colin Cramphorn, the then Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, joined groups such as Unite against Fascism in calling for the documentary to be withdrawn. Channel 4 complied, saying that the issue was not censorship but timing because of the proximity with the local and European elections. But many argued at the time that the delay in transmission had strengthened the case of the BNP.
After the film was withdrawn, one of the mothers sent Annie Hall a text message: "It's a real shame when votes come before young girls' lives."
For many white girls growing up in fairly traditional communities, the unfamiliarity of boys and men from different ethnic backgrounds can be exciting and attractive.
"The man I thought was my boyfriend used to dress really well and always smelt nice," says Sophie, "and I thought it were dead nice the way he talked, and even his manners seemed better than boys I were used to."
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." https://t.co/1aoe8rmGSR via @BrainyQuote— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 28, 2018
UKIP was founded in 1991. The British people have been working towards Brexit peacefully for a quarter of a century, and were finally given an EU referendum in 2016, which they won. But even when you play by their rules and win, the stinking matriarchy will still make sure you lose.
After pointing out that it is obviously the intention of the liberal elite to deprive the British people of their hard-won Brexit, Stefan Molyneux says:
If a people are not roused to action by the systematic torture, rape and in many ways and reproductive destruction - it comes across to me as an act of war to - to destroy young women to that degree where they may not be able to have children, not be able to pair bond or get married in any productive or efficient way, that is almost a genetic war against the domestic population. If that wasn't enough for a people to do something ... if that's not enough for change, then I really don't know what is.
Is Molyneux referring to Muslims or the disease of the mind that is feminism?
No comments:
Post a Comment