Translate

Showing posts with label Stefan Molyneux. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stefan Molyneux. Show all posts

Sunday, 22 March 2020

Church of Entropy shouts at me three times to "Shut up!" at 1:32:00, 1:56:00 and 2:01:00




3:00  Costco at Thurrock
4:00  Coronavirus COVID-19 - Science & Karma with Church of Entropy - Appreciation for Health Providers  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LzpatX6UPY
7:00  Philosophical discussions on deductive and inductive reasoning reasoning
8:00  France's Macron threatened UK entry ban without more stringent measures - report  https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/coronavirus/frances-macron-threatened-uk-entry-ban-without-more-stringent-measures-report/ar-BB11wzzL?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=UP97DHP
9:00  How Italy became the ground zero of Europe’s coronavirus crisis
Italy has more cases of Covid-19 and more deaths than anywhere outside of China, despite being one of the first countries in Europe to institute a travel ban. What went wrong?
https://www.wired.co.uk/article/coronavirus-italy
13:00  The U.K. backed off on herd immunity. To beat COVID-19, we’ll ultimately need it.  https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/03/uk-backed-off-on-herd-immunity-to-beat-coronavirus-we-need-it/
14:00  Having our numbers thinned
15:00  Gay marriage and transgenderism
17:00  Covid-19 cannot be contained.
18:00  Reasons for God's punishments
19:00  Philosophical discussions
20:00  What is to be done?
21:00  Church of Entropy appears in the chat.

22:00

My comments under the video:

The HardKhaw Prawn
@Stefan Molyneux I would like to challenge you with the proposition "A one party theocracy is the antithesis of the status quo, therefore a one party theocracy is the solution to the problems of Western government."

I actually thought the debate was a waste of time. I imagine that the Tower of Babel was built on the Word Salads of J F Gariepy and others of his ilk.

It is logically impossible to rape a woman who commands you to rape her. As for whether there could be a rule where women are routinely raped, this would only happen in war when a country is invaded by marauding soldiers when people expect this sort of thing to happen. It is unthinkable that there would ever be a rule amongst men that women are routinely raped in peacetime, since to allow that to happen to the women of other men would mean that you would allow that to happen to your own women too. It is unthinkable that anyone owning property would agree to the theft of their own property unless the concept of communal property were to take hold which requires rules and their enforcement. The Noahide laws are the universal minimum standard of morality.

A should or shouldn't debate would have been more productive than a "WTF are you talking about?" debate.

They couldn't agree on the definition of morality, and that was why it went awry.  Morality is a system of rules designed to keep the group together and apart from others.

JF was basically saying that he subscribed to no moral system on any permanent basis. If he felt he had to kill you, steal from you or commit sexual offences on you or your women, he would do so if he felt the circumstances justified it or felt he could get away with it.

Now all we have to do is decide for ourselves who we would rather choose as our leader.

Universal - applicable to all decent and rational human beings.

@Stefan Molyneux May I suggest you frame the rematch in the form of a leadership contest? Then we will have no doubt who will be the winner!
26:00  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/03/the-incoherence-of-church-of-entropy_22.html
32:00  Multiple Truth Hypothesis
38:00  Why aren't we doing better?
41:00  The Black Death was pretty global.
42:00  Sin attracts God's punishment.
43:00  Italy as Ground Zero
58:00  Former Scottish Government official defends 'barbaric' claim coronavirus could be 'useful' in killing off bed blockers
Prof June Andrews faced a social media backlash for arguing that a pandemic could help the NHS by clearing record delayed discharge levels
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/03/06/former-scottish-government-official-faces-backlash-arguing-coronavirus/
1:01:00  Passport  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passport
1:04:00  Everything happens for the best and we live in the best of all possible worlds.
1:05:00  These things are sent are try us.
1:06:00  An Islamic attitude to death in the time of the Black Death
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death#Middle_Eastern_outbreak
1:07:00  Christianity is kaput, therefore politicians are corrupt.
1:08:00  Before we die, we should try to make sense of what went wrong with our lives and society.
1:11:00  Church of Entropy were in a stream this week at https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/03/is-claire-khaw-tradthot-and-what-is.html
1:12:00  Stefan Molyneux and J F Gariepy's debate on Universally Preferable Behaviour v Moral Nihilism.
1:13:00  Redefining nationalism as government in the national interest
1:14:00  Pandering to the hatred and ignorance of low information, low status and low education mentally ill people abandoned by their government because they were singly-parented badly-educated NEETs with no purpose.
1:15:00  The tactic of waiting for me to die of Covid-19 rather than engage in an honest and rational debate with me about why Christianity is kaput and the distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference and why the only rational and moral choice is a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism to restore the patriarchy while guaranteeing freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256

1:18:00  CHURCH OF ENTROPY joins.
1:19:00  Yogi
1:20:00  We discuss the Molyneux/Gariepy discussion on Nihilism v Universally Preferable Behaviour. Church of Entropy is angry and incoherent.

1:12:54
Randall McMurphy
​she's afraid of you Claire and your cunning
1:13:33
Randall McMurphy
​deep down she knows she's inferior to you
1:14:13
Randall McMurphy
​and here you are in her chat
1:15:11
Randall McMurphy
​not talking about me
1:15:32
Randall McMurphy
​Claire she needs you MORE than you need her
1:16:16
Randall McMurphy
​and sitting in the audience watching it is almost like what serial killers do when they revisit their kill
1:18:22
Randall McMurphy
​BOOM!! CLAIRE WINS!!!
1:19:22
Randall McMurphy
​@The hardkraw prawn how did it feel to win? getting ppl to do what you want 😂
1:20:05
Randall McMurphy
​Yogi Bear
1:20:34
Randall McMurphy
​is this person certified in yoga?
1:20:56
Randall McMurphy
​that's just your opinion
1:21:11
Randall McMurphy
​I'm sure they say the same about you
1:21:49
Randall McMurphy
​it depends on the person and THEIR perception of it
1:22:19
Randall McMurphy
​yet Claire can still get you to do her bidding
1:22:45
Randall McMurphy
​because CLAIRE is master and you are grasshopper!!!
1:23:22
Randall McMurphy
​but Claire wins because you do her bidding
1:23:54
Randall McMurphy
​@The Hardkraw Prawn call her grasshopper
1:24:19
Randall McMurphy
​CLAIRE you are master of her mind!
1:24:44
Randall McMurphy
​maybe.. maybe not grasshopper
1:25:38
Randall McMurphy
​you can not advance until you snatch the stone from her hand
1:26:22
Randall McMurphy
​grasshopper you need to learn your lesson otherwise you will be consumed by bigger predator
1:26:46
Randall McMurphy
​your weaknesses show

1:39:00  Church of Entropy thinks Randall McMurphy is Jay Walker.

1:41:00  The best way for Molyneux to win the debate

1:42:00  SPACEPAN joins.

1:45:00  Axioms
1:46:00  The Noahide laws
1:48:00  Christians are not Noahide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LzpatX6UPY&lc=z23gxzdqdxndtbguuacdp4325egqdjhtzlp0moq4uv5w03c010c.1584874183923865
1:51:00  The debate lacked a proposition so it ended in the nihilist refusing to concede the premise of the absolutist ie that there are Universally Preferable Behaviours.

1:53:00  The difference between a valid and sound argument

1:55:00  The Theist/Deist debate everyone said I lost
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-debate-everyone-said-i-lost-with.html

Can you find a sound argument in this proposition by Church of Entropy?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/08/can-you-find-sound-argument-in-this.html

Are the three arguments I believe to be sound in agreement of what you believe to be a sound argument?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/08/are-three-arguments-i-believe-to-be.html

1:57:00  Spacepan speaks on valid and sound arguments.

1:58:00  A formal debate

1:59:00  Spacepan helpfully explains the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln%E2%80%93Douglas_debates

2:00:00  https://ask.fm/oneparty4all

2:01:00  Vincent Bruno's not interested in argument, only in showtime.

2:04:00  Invalid arguments, valid arguments and sound arguments

2:05:00  The debating rules Spacepan helpfully suggested

2:08:00  Spacepan liked quran.com/2/256

2:10:00  http://cdn.media.freedomainradio.com/feed/books/UPB/Universally_Preferable_Behaviour_UPB_by_Stefan_Molyneux_PDF.pdf

2:11:00  The logical necessity of a Hypothetical Supreme Being

2:16:00  What is not forbidden is allowed.

2:17:00  What society is Church of Entropy modelling herself on?

2:21:00  What is "Talmud for gentiles"?

2:22:00  Christianity is right at the bottom of the ranking of Noahide-observance because of its idolatry and supreme blasphemy.  https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2020/02/noahide-ranking-of-other-four-world.html

2:23:00  Christ was crucified for blasphemy and idolatry is a Jewish idea.

2:24:00  Idolatry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idolatry_in_Judaism
at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, 23 August 2019

The Deep Nastiness of the "Incel" Slur - and the Damage Caused by "Alpha Males"



6:00  Patriarchy should be defined as a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers wanting to properly parent their legitimate offspring.


Matriarchy should be defined as a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their illegitimate offspring they casually conceived.


Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.


All advanced civilisations are patriarchies. All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.


The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents


The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents


All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.


The West is a matriarchy and the quickest way to correct this disaster is to restore the patriarchy through the slut-shaming laws of quran.com/24/2


If you disagree, may we know your alternative?

at No comments:
Labels:

Tuesday, 20 November 2018

Stefan Molyneux says no to religion but I, an agnostic, say yes to theocracy



To choose to believe in God, become aware of the benefits a society would enjoy if it obeyed God's laws.

If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution.

If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle.

The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents
The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.

All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.

All civilisations rise in patriarchy and decline in matriarchy.

Jews are the most powerful and successful tribe in the world and managed to get their homeland back after being exiled for 2000 years.

Christianity and Islam are based on Judaism.

Since Christianity is kaput and Judaism is for Jews only, there is only one rational and moral choice because Hinduism and Buddhism are too alien to Western traditions.

If you became Muslim there would be no need for a Sabbath so no need to worry about getting up early on Sunday to go to church. Muslims only have Friday prayers which is afternoon/evening.

You must know that not everyone has the intellectual capacity to be philosophers. The law limits our immorality and our laws should be in harmony with our chosen moral system which, if we are rational, should be a patriarchy supporting marriage and family values ie be a slut-shaming society that does not tolerate sex outside marriage.

Other than Islam, what else would regenerate the degenerate West and restore the patriarchy that made the West great?

The Abrahamic God is supreme, eternal, omnipotent, omniscient and perfectly moral as well as the most powerful God conceivable.



Stefan Molyneux agrees with Claire Khaw on nationalism, patriarchy and marriage
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/12/stefan-molyneux-agrees-with-claire-khaw.html

Have a smaller state, have a theocracy that will eradicate feminism
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/04/have-smaller-state-have-theocracy-that.html
at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 3 July 2018

Why the West needs to have a one party theocracy imposed on it ASAP or the IQ of Western politicians will fall to even more disastrous levels


at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Monday, 28 May 2018

Millennial Woes: "The British establishment is radicalising itself against the native population."




https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/05/why-i-dont-support-tommy-robinson/


Millennial Woes:

[contradicting himself] I do think people should be assumed innocent till proven guilty but in this case we are talking about a men who possibly rape children ... accusations of rape, abducting children, threats to kill and drugging children. Is it right that these men are allowed to walk free and the public are not allowed to know who is possibly guilty of doing these sorts of crimes. It does pose a huge risk to the British public. 

Tommy Robinson talks about how he is offended daily  by niqabs, drug-dealers, child rapists etc but no one cares whether we are offended by these things and by we presumably he means native white British people.  

Then very interestingly, he talks about a group of parents who have started patrolling the city in the north of England to stop the grooming gangs because they have concluded that they can't rely on the police to stop the grooming gangs, and he says he is going to visit city that night - Friday night - to talk to them about it, to interview them.  

The establishment would not want news of that reaching the general public because it is the beginnings of self-reliance, street action and possibly vigilantism. They fear the implications of that. The implication is white solidarity against Pakistani Muslim rape gangs. The problem for the establishment and the powers that be is that once the whites have collectivised at that local level, it will be much harder for the establishment to maintain the status quo. 

Millennial Woes suggests that it was only when the Sikhs decided to defend their girls with violence did the police see fit to to intervene.

There has been this tacit informal code of silence - of omerta - on parts of the British media about politically inconvenient events and also politically inconvenient truths. They just decide that's off the agenda, and that's been going on for the last ten years. It is very obvious that there is this judicious editing going on. It is one of the reasons why the alternative media exists at all. The fact that is this news agenda which is British but also international - and you say it is transnational has become increasingly obvious - definitely since the turn of the millennium. Media outlets act in concert deciding what they are going to report and how they are going to report it. It could be entirely instinctual. It might not be a coordinated network, it might be that they agree - it's in the air, that's the meme, that's how we are going to report it. What we have now is a formal codification of the news agenda on the part of the government just saying "That man, that story did not happen" and that's a very sinister development. It's scary, because if the British judiciary and by extension the British government can order the media not to report this story, then they could do it with any story. This gagging order on reporting on Tommy Robinson's imprisonment is a good thing, because it makes explicit what a lot of people have known subconsciously for years: the non-reporting of events and the slanted reporting of events. We've just got used to it. We've come to accept it and even expect it. This is what they do and how they behave.  The media is incredibly biased and they are able to lie to us and say black is white. 


Britain today is a country where the following ten things happen:

  1. Publishing a joke video in which your dog does a Nazi salute will transform you into a convicted criminal, as happened to Count Dankula.
  1. Advocating for the survival of the white race will get you branded a racist, Far Right, extremist, hater, Neo-Nazi etc and you will be barred from entering Britain, as happened to Jared Taylor, Richard Spencer and Martin Selner, simply because you like your race and want it to survive. Can you imagine that happening to someone of any other race?
  1. Intending to interview Tommy Robinson will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Brittany Pettibone. 
  1. Criticising Islam even with satire will get you barred from entering Britain, as happened to Lauren Southern. 
  1. Voicing anti-immigration, anti-multiculturalism, anti-Islam or anti-diversity opinions could get you a 6 year jail sentence, if the Sentencing Council have their way.  That's the direction the establishment is heading in, and it's pretty hardcore. 
  1. Singing songs about the Holocaust will transform you into a convicted and jailed criminal, as happened to Alison Chabloz. 
  1. Singing songs about Jewish power will transform you into a convicted criminal after Jewish groups have used their power to get you convicted. 
  1. Giving a speech about Jewish power, including the unique power to have their own police force will get you jailed for a year, after Jewish groups have used their power to get you jailed. 
  1. Disobeying a court order about something trivial will get your thrown in jail for 13 months within a matter of hours. 
  1. The media can be gagged from reporting to the public that you have been imprisoned, and anyone on social media who does so, could be arrested. 

All of the above (with the exception of No 5) have happened in the last few months in Britain. So the British government has a plan for Britain. The plan and also their determination to stick to and implement that plan are becoming increasingly clear. The plan involves the future of Britain and the future of British society, and that involves what you might call the legacy population of Britain, namely the native British people. The government's plan means the transformation of British society and thereby the dispossession of the British people. What they want to transform Britain to is not clear: it could be a coffee-coloured Islamic theocracy, or it could be a coffee-coloured secular police state, or maybe they oscillated between the two goals, unsure which of them is more feasible or desirable, but either way their plan requires the measures we are seeing now.  

Any expression of dissent from this political paradigm is now treated as a crime, and this includes causing offence, even if only perceived, not intended, to non-white groups in Britain with whom the government intends to transform Britain - culturally, racially, genetically. It also includes any causing of offence to Jews as a group. You can make your own mind up as to why the British government is so eager to placate Jews as a group. At this stage, I am not even sure it even matters what the original reason for that was because we are heading into chaos. We are heading towards what you might call anarcho-tyranny, but beyond that, decades of chaos and bloodshed. But in the meantime, we aren't supposed to even talk about the issues which will animate the decades of bloodshed and chaos. We are not even supposed to talk about it. That's why they want to put people in jail for six years if they do so. We are just supposed to pretend that everything is fine and that we're all on board with the government's plan for the country, for us, and our grandchildren. How delicately the fetters have been placed under our lips over the last few decades. But now suddenly we feel their weight upon us - silencing us, suffocating us.  

The British establishment is radicalising itself against the native population.   

The government of Britain does not care about the native people of Britain. It has put in measures to make sure that they are mixed out of recognition and bred out of dominance in their own homeland. 

It has also put in place measures to ensure that they daren't complain about this. So make no mistake: this is not just cultural, it's not just religious: it is racial, genetic, permanent.  

The government of Britain is trying to destroy the native people of Britain, and it's doing everything that it can to stop them talking about it.  

I will leave it up to you to decide whether the civic nationalists have a solution for this situation, whether the Conservatives, Jordan Peterson-style individualists or progressives have a solution for this. Or, whether these groups are just delusional, weak wastes of your time. 


Alexander Mercouris talks about the Deep State in Britain:

"Theresa May is a very weak Prime Minister."

Alex Christoforou suggests that Tommy Robinson's jail sentence could be in effect a death sentence due to the fact that many prisoners are Muslim who would wish to do him harm or even kill him.  

Gangs, Girls and Grooming: The Truth by JULIE BINDEL

"The fact that these particular gangs are made up of Pakistani men is significant but not in the way racists would have us believe," says one child protection expert who asked not to be named. "While the BNP would have us believe that abusing white girls is an endemic part of these men's culture — which it absolutely is not — the truth is that these men are aware that the police do not want to be accused of racism in today's climate."

In 2004, Channel 4 withdrew Edge of the City, its controversial documentary made by Annie Hall that depicted parents trying to stop groups of young Asian men grooming white girls as young as 11 for sex. It had been seized on by the BNP as a party political broadcast.

Colin Cramphorn, the then Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, joined groups such as Unite against Fascism in calling for the documentary to be withdrawn. Channel 4 complied, saying that the issue was not censorship but timing because of the proximity with the local and European elections. But many argued at the time that the delay in transmission had strengthened the case of the BNP. 

After the film was withdrawn, one of the mothers sent Annie Hall a text message: "It's a real shame when votes come before young girls' lives."

For many white girls growing up in fairly traditional communities, the unfamiliarity of boys and men from different ethnic backgrounds can be exciting and attractive. 

"The man I thought was my boyfriend used to dress really well and always smelt nice," says Sophie, "and I thought it were dead nice the way he talked, and even his manners seemed better than boys I were used to."




UKIP was founded in 1991. The British people have been working towards Brexit peacefully for a quarter of a century, and were finally given an EU referendum in 2016, which they won. But even when you play by their rules and win, the stinking matriarchy will still make sure you lose. 

After pointing out that it is obviously the intention of the liberal elite to deprive the British people of their hard-won Brexit, Stefan Molyneux says:

If a people are not roused to action by the systematic torture, rape and in many ways and reproductive destruction - it comes across to me as an act of war to - to destroy young women to that degree where they may not be able to have children, not be able to pair bond or get married in any productive or efficient way, that is almost a genetic war against the domestic population. If that wasn't enough for a people to do something ... if that's not enough for change, then I really don't know what is.  

Is Molyneux referring to Muslims or the disease of the mind that is feminism?



at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 7 December 2017

Claire Khaw joins the debate with Ewan Jones and Belinda Brown on traditional values


Comments by Claire Khaw

Feminism undermines marriage and patriarchy making the birth rate decline, causing marital breakdown, widespread bastardy as well as immigration and paedophilia.

Christianity is kaput because it failed to protect the West from feminism.

Feminism promotes fornication distracting men and women from marriage, the parenting of legitimate children who will be a credit to them allowing the patriarchy to be fatally undermined.
The C of E was created to be a Creature of the State. The state is now liberal.

Atheists are sexually liberated, social conservatives are mostly socially conservative because they believe in following Biblical and Koranic principles which only allow married couples to have sex with each other. Clearly, people's beliefs are a predictor of behaviour. The link between feminism and widespread bastardy and degeneracy cannot be denied.

Christian clergy are hopelessly infected and compromised by feminism. Half of Catholic clergy are gay, according to Michael Voris. Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption. Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption. Moral corruption retards a society's ability to use obvious solutions for obvious problems.

Belinda Brown to Claire Khaw

Argghhhh no I am not socially conservative because I follow biblical principles - that is just not how it works. You are a Muslim and you think that Christianity works like Islam we follow principles rigidly  from a book -  that just isn't what being a Christian means....No we don't  'only allow married couples' to have sex with each other' (and stone them if they aren't married as in Muslim countries). That is not Christianity.  Love thy neighbour as thyself pretty much sums Christianity up - but don't go exploiting that!  And my social conservativism comes from thinking very carefully about life and reading a great deal. Not from following biblical principles. An awful lot of committed Christians are not socially conservative.

Claire Khaw  to Belinda Brown 

Are you saying that your principles did not come from your Christianity? You have admitted to being an Anglo-Catholic in the video. I have never said I was Muslim and have made a point of saying I am agnostic. What is the point of being a "committed Christian" - whatever that means - if you don't follow Biblical principles? Thank you for finally admitting that your hostility towards me was always motivated by Islamophobia.

Belinda Brown to Claire Khaw

My hostility towards you is motivated by your tone which  seems rigid and authoritarian  and I don't like it and I saw a picture of you with guns and swastikas and I know we all doing stupid things but that is majorly stupid. I checked the meaning of Islamophobic  and it is " dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force" - I don't think I am prejudiced but I do dislike Islam as a political force -  so I can't deny being Islamophobic if that really is the definition. But it isn't why I am hostile to you. And leave me be about my faith and what I believe.

Claire Khaw to Belinda Brown 

To be seen to adhere to any principle these days is to be accused of being "rigid and authoritarian". You have allowed your political opponents to entirely dictate the terms of debate, which is a big mistake. So what are your solutions that are not so "rigid and authoritarian" bearing in mind that all laws are coercive because they punish those who break them?

Those photographs were taken with publicity in mind intentionally linking me to both civic and ethno-nationalism and it is as a nationalist philosopher that I wish to be identified. When reasonable, moral and truthful Jews, gentiles and journalists are prepared to concede I am not an anti-Semite because they cannot find anything I have ever said that identifies me as being a hater of Jews, there might be a chance of  having a rational debate about what to do for the best.

If we are going to talk politics, then it is necessary to discuss our beliefs on what we think is true, logical and moral.

Belinda Brown to Claire Khaw

I don't have solutions I just want to see an end of feminism - that is all and I am glad that you are not anti-semitic. I'm not great on morals. I do my best.

Claire Khaw to Belinda Brown 

We don't have to be morally perfect to discuss what the rules should be since all morality is list of things we should and shouldn't do and whom to defer to. Christianity and Islam are offshoots of Judaism which when practised incorrectly failed the Jews which resulted in their expulsion by the Romans from their homeland. They had a corrupt clergy - the Saducees - who were keener on amassing privileges for themselves than in maintaining morality. Islam at least accepts the logic that your laws should follow the morality of your chosen political ideology. The Koran and Bible both promote the same patriarchal moral values but patriarchy cannot exist without general obedience to the most important rule of marriage: the forbidding and punishment of extramarital sex.

Without patriarchy, there will not be enough good and strong men produced to defend the national interest, and this is where we are now.

Christianity's role was to be the antivirus against the virus that is Feminism. Instead of being a locked gate, Christianity was a swinging door. While all the artefacts of Christianity still survive, very few Christians believe that Christ really is the Son of God. And even if they did, what good would this do anyone if all the most important laws of God found in both the Bible and the Koran are ignored and subverted?

To see the end of feminism, we would have to repeal feminist legislation. To repeal feminist legislation would require a revolution because this would require the abolition of no fault divorce as well as the repeal of the Equality Act 2010. No political party seems bold enough to ask for any of this.

Christianity has been failing for centuries: since the Americans decided they had to quarantine the church from their state, and since the Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813. It did not fail overnight but has been failing for over 200 years. It is time to acknowledge its failure so it can be replaced, because it must be replaced.

https://www.facebook.com/ewan.jones.3344/posts/10101089126555684?comment_id=10101089135517724&reply_comment_id=10101090958105244&notif_id=1512651494257038&notif_t=feed_comment_reply


Hi guys. I've released a new video. Link below.
Ewan Jones and Belinda Brown discuss traditional values. How these values have been lost in western society. How feminism has successfully destroyed traditional values and the family itself. And how traditional values are vital for ensuring a society is able to survive and to flourish.



Comments
Ewan Jones https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cBZDMQpbcc


The Importance of Traditional Values : A conversation with…
Ewan Jones and Belinda Brown discuss traditional values. How these values have been lost in western society. How feminism has successfully destroyed traditio...
youtube.com
4 December at 09:25
Miles Scott i wanna come on your show

4 December at 09:47


Miles Scott OW your happy now but were gonna talk about why libertarian ideology is fundamentally flawed

Like

Reply

112

4 December at 09:51

Miles Scott show me the successful libertarian society?
4 December at 10:12

Miles Scott My man needs to read up on his history
4 December at 10:15
Claire Khaw Miles Scott Even Stefan Molyneux admits that theocracy would be a better way of bringing about a minimal state when I suggested it to him.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/.../should-law...

Should law conform to morality and if so what kind of morality should it conform to and why?
Claire Khaw and Stefan Molyneux discuss whether law should conform to morality and if so which morality and why. https://t.co/bypUkwyKwF ...
thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com


Miles Scott Theocracies are never small government states lol


Claire Khaw Are you saying early USA was not peopled by Christians who took their religion seriously?


Miles Scott I'm saying that to describe the early United states as "small government" takes the relative nature of government at the time and directly compares it to now. Not really a accurate historical statement


Miles Scott Small government and theocracies don't work well.....a theocracy by definition has massive control and is directed involved in the lives of its citizens


Miles Scott Histocal statements are relative.....


Claire Khaw Miles Scott quran.com/2/256 guarantees freedom of belief.



Al-Qur'an al-Kareem - القرآن الكريم
The Quran translated into many languages in a simple and easy interface.
quran.com


Miles Scott Oh jeez..... you think just because they let you believe what you want living under a caliphate is to be considered "small government"


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Liberty is what you ought to have after all the necessary laws are in place.


Claire Khaw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah are the minimum moral standards of what a country's laws should satisfy.



Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia
The Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: שבע מצוות בני × ×—‎ Sheva Mitzvot B'nei Noach), also referred to…
en.wikipedia.org


Miles Scott You don't understand theocracies


Claire Khaw Miles Scott What don't I understand about them?


Miles Scott In the conservative/ libertarian view its pretty much the "biggest" government you can have bar commmism


Claire Khaw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums would give citizens of an Islamic State the constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate income tax of 20%.

Khums - Wikipedia
In Islamic tradition, khums (Arabic: خمس‎ Arabic pronunciation: [xums], literally 'one fifth') refers to the historically required religious obligation of any Muslim army to pay one-fifth of the spoils of war, the money collected from non-believers after a military campaign; this tax was paid ...
en.wikipedia.org


Miles Scott And most of communism actually stems from religious communism. Like Anabaptists


Miles Scott Jesus Christ there is more to the size of government than the fucking income tax.....


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Conservatives no longer know what Conservatism is. As for Libertarians, they can't organise a piss up in a brewery.


Miles Scott See your coming at this from a political ideology perspective rather than a historical one


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I am against Communism and so is God.


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I don't know what you mean by this.


Miles Scott Theocracies are "big government" I thought that would be self evident


Claire Khaw I am in fact proposing a one party theocracy.


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Have you read the link I posted about my conversation with Stefan Molyneux?


Miles Scott It's not something that I can easily explain over text Nitesh Lall would be a decent steam?


Miles Scott But you want "small government"....


Miles Scott Yes he doesn't understand theocracies either....


Claire Khaw This was what Stefan Molyneux, a libertarian, said to me:

"When laws are founded on religious dogma then they tend not to multiply beyond all reason because they are limited by the fact that if the religious dogma does not ask for certain things to be enforced then it is tough to make the case that it should be. When religion is very strong, the laws tend not to multiply.

The Ten Commandments versus the Federal Registry which has hundreds and thousands of new regulations every year.

When you get rid of the big laws, you don't end up with now laws, you end up with infinity of little laws.

If people obey moral rules, you don't need a big government.
If people respected the family, we wouldn't need the family court.

If people respected property, we wouldn't need the criminal court."


Claire Khaw Miles Scott So you have made a study of theocracies, have you?

Like
Reply3 hrs
Manage
Claire Khaw What are your educational qualifications in this subject?


Miles Scott Well if you study history you will mostly be studing theocracies. So yer


Miles Scott You know because a "small government" totally has an inquisition.


Claire Khaw For example?


Claire Khaw Miles Scott What does that mean?


Miles Scott If you what to talk about it more we can talk on discord in like an hour


Claire Khaw Where can I find your podcasts?


Miles Scott I don't record podcasts about history. But if you want to talk about this and I can explain to you the aspects of theocracies that are antithetical to "small government" I'm fine to do that but I need to eat breakfast and start my pritners


Claire Khaw There are two versions of God's laws contained in the Bible and the Koran. I choose the latter because this version has fewer and clearer laws and its punishments are less harsh.


Miles Scott Because it's extremely clear there are many things about any theocracy that your just not aware of.


Claire Khaw Such as?


Miles Scott No theocracy ever could be described as small government by today's standards. Our government is much smaller today


Miles Scott Like I said we can talk about it on voice chat if you want I can't explain well in text


Nitesh Lall Miles Scott i will be happy to discuss this on stream or discord. Claire Khaw and Ewan Jones are welcome to join too


Claire Khaw Nitesh Lall So you do podcasts? I have a YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/Andromeda07734



Claire Khaw
youtube.com


Nitesh Lall Yeah i do, not very often any more. I will post a link later, most were about social issues but i plan to do some more about bitcoin soon


Miles Scott We can talk for a few minutes then have a discussion for your channel


Miles Scott Because if want small government theocracies are the exact opposite


Claire Khaw Miles Scott "When laws are founded on religious dogma then they tend not to multiply beyond all reason because they are limited by the fact that if the religious dogma does not ask for certain things to be enforced then it is tough to make the case that it should be. When religion is very strong, the laws tend not to multiply.

The Ten Commandments versus the Federal Registry which has hundreds and thousands of new regulations every year.

When you get rid of the big laws, you don't end up with now laws, you end up with infinity of little laws.

If people obey moral rules, you don't need a big government.
If people respected the family, we wouldn't need the family court.

If people respected property, we wouldn't need the criminal court."


Miles Scott What's your background?


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Not all theocracies are the same, because not all deities are the same. Different deities demand different religious duties of their worshipers. You could in theory have a liberal deity.


Miles Scott No theocracy can be described as small government. From a libertarian perspective absolutely none of them in any century on any continent


Miles Scott A theocracy is a top down authoritarian government by definition


Claire Khaw Miles Scott We need a hierarchy or chaos and buck passing is the consequence.

http://en.rightpedia.info/w/Claire_Khaw explains by background.



Claire Khaw - en-Rightpedia
Claire Khaw is a political blogger based in the United Kingdom. She is a former member of…
en.rightpedia.info


Miles Scott Ok now I understand you even less


Miles Scott Yer...... you got some confusing things on her man


Claire Khaw Feel free to ask me questions on https://ask.fm/oneparty4all



Claire Khaw (@oneparty4all). Ask me anything on ASKfm
Get in touch with Claire Khaw (@oneparty4all)…
ask.fm


Claire Khaw I am a minor internet celebrity really.

https://www.vice.com/.../which-type-of-mangina-are-you



This Woman Who Hates Women Just Made My Day
The hateful madness of Claire Khaw says…
vice.com


Miles Scott Why are you infront of a Nazi flag? Dafq


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Because as a nationalist philosopher, I wished to be associated with both civic and ethno nationalism whose principles are similar really.


Claire Khaw I am also using that photo to test the journalistic integrity of Western media. I have never said anything that could be used against me as evidence that I hate Jews and have the greatest respect for God's Chosen People. Indeed, I have Jewish friends. If people continue to pretend I am an anti-Semite, they do so for dishonourable reasons of their own to disguise their cowardice and lack and integrity.


Claire Khaw Oh dear. Have I frightened you all?


Miles Scott A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Are you referring to my knowledge or yours?


Claire Khaw So you are not going to have me on your show after all? I wonder if Ewan will take the same position.


Miles Scott From everything I've seen here and your links you don't understand the things you advocate for


Ewan Jones Claire, I won't have you on my show.

Sad
Claire Khaw Why not?


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Please explain.


Miles Scott There is no substantive political discourse to be had with someone who doesn't understand her own positions


Claire Khaw Miles Scott What about my own position do you think I do not understand?

Like
Reply2 hrs
Manage
Miles Scott You don't understand theocracies small government or democracy for a start


Claire Khaw Miles Scott What about theocracies and democracy do I not understand?


Miles Scott I don't have time for the multiple lectures worth I would need to give. You should do some more reading that's all I'm going to say


Ewan Jones Claire - All the links you've been posting I think adequately explain why I won't have you on my show.


Claire Khaw You identified yourself as a nationalist, Ewan.


Claire Khaw Are you saying you have to agree with me before you have me on your show?

I think you had already decided not to have me on your show before I even posted those links. I asked you the question yesterday, after all.


Miles Scott You don't understand what nationalism even is.....


Claire Khaw Miles Scott What about nationalism don't I understand?


Miles Scott Ewan Jones and I don't agree on many things but we understand our own and each others position. Politically and philosophically to have a conversation


Claire Khaw Ah, so you are like those libtards who only "debate" with people they already agree with!


Miles Scott I don't agree with Ewan.....on most things.....


Claire Khaw Miles Scott So what's the problem? You think you might lose the debate? Is that why you are backing off?


Miles Scott You should go take some political science classes


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Why? I already know they are a waste of time.


Miles Scott There is your problem right there. It's very clear they you have a habit of Saying radical things and not understanding why people are upset. It's clear you don't understand what your even saying


Claire Khaw Listen, Miles, if you lose the debate it means your beliefs are wrong, or how you argued for them was inadequate. If you cannot defend your beliefs, then they may well be indefensible or your arguments are inadequate. Are you too scared to try?


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I know intellectual cowards who can't argue themselves out of a paper bag are easily frightened.

What have I said don't you think I understand?


Claire Khaw How have I upset you, Miles?


Miles Scott I'm not upset. I just can't have a conversation with someone who doesn't understand what she is advocating for. When you show me you do I'll be happy to have a conversation with you about your ideas


Miles Scott You don't understand basic political terms and philosophy of your own positions


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I am indeed advocating a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism

Why not have a one-party state if it makes more sense?


Miles Scott The fact you don't understand what's wrong in terms of political philosophy with what you have just said. Shows me everything I need to know.


Claire Khaw You would have thought that Ewan Jones would be more supportive of me being a libertarian and all, particularly as I have been on the Stefan Molyneux Show twice.

We could be discussing the question below on his show:

Is feminism dangerous to our liberties?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/.../discussing...



Discussing whether feminism is evil with Stefan Molyneux
Stefan Molyneux says feminism is evil. Claire…
thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Why don't you explain it to me since you know all about political philosophy?


Claire Khaw http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/.../stefan...



Stefan Molyneux agrees with Claire Khaw on nationalism, patriarchy…
The nation state is something libertarian Stefan Molyneux is now increasingly more comfortable with. https://t.co/82YrjiJoJR — Claire...
thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com


Miles Scott Sure but I'm going to change you £30 per hour if want me to teach history philosophy and political philosophy to you


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I don't think I have anything to learn from someone who is too scared to even have a discussion with me now.


Miles Scott Your using Molyneux as a badge of legitimately of your ideas to someone who doesn't ascribe to his personal philosophy nor finds his intellect impressive.


Miles Scott I'm not scared to have the discussion you are not equipped to have it. When you are I'll be happy to


Claire Khaw Miles Scott "Your using Molyneux as a badge of legitimately of your ideas to someone who doesn't ascribe to his personal philosophy nor finds his intellect impressive."

Actually, I know it is a waste of time talking to someone who confuses "your" with "you're".


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Who do you find more impressive than Stefan Molyneux?


Claire Khaw Miles Scott When do you think I will I be equipped to have a debate with you?


Miles Scott See you don't understand what I'm saying you think I'm praising him. I'm not.....


Claire Khaw Miles Scott Who are you referring to?


Claire Khaw http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00fdkhv

You can listen to me on the Victoria Derbyshire Show from the 26th minute. I am very entertaining, aren't I?



'David Cameron has let parents of disabled kids down', 02/03/2011,…
The mother of a seriously disabled six year old girl says she no longer believes David Cameron is on the side of parents with disabled children.
bbc.co.uk


Miles Scott I am not interested


Claire Khaw Miles Scott I understand your reasons of nervousness and inadequacy.

It will do me no good appearing on the YouTube channels of the inadequate, boring and nervous anyway.

After all, I am something of an internet celebrity known for my formidable debating skills.

Even BBC presenters are wary of me.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/.../httpwww.html



Etonians, free speech and The Socialist Worker discussed on the…
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b048j0g0 Discussion starts at 1:21, I come on at 1:26. John Glen MP and Bobby Friedman spoke before me. ...
thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com


Miles Scott I wonder why....


Claire Khaw It is disappointing though. I know people who won't have me on their show are scared of the bad publicity, the disapproval of their narrow mediocre little circle of small-minded YouTubers or afraid of being made to look stupid in the face of my formidable debating skills.

It is a pity so many people treat their ideas like a new born baby not capable of withstanding an investigation of truth and logic. This is probably why the West is failing, being mostly peopled by inadequate mediocrities afraid of a rational debate because they are afraid of what people might think of them. Pathetic.

Such people will never get their country back however much they call themselves nationalists, and will never get the fewer laws and smaller state they claim they want no matter how much they call themselves libertarians.

You would have thought libertarians believed in free speech and rational debate, but they don't. They are just as easily frightened of social disapproval as frightened insecure narrow-minded females who have received very little education. It is pitiful to watch so many men behaving like women even as they complain about feminism.


Claire Khaw What is the point of talking about traditional values if you are not even going to talk about how you are going to change the law as it is currently is, which is the opposite of traditional family values?

How can you change the law if you are too afraid of saying what you think they should be?

Since Ewan has admitted that Christianity has failed, it is obvious that the next subject to be discussed is what should replace it. I have already proposed Secular Koranism. Obviously, I don't expect everyone to agree with me at once, but I would have thought Ewan outlining his objections would be quite entertaining to hear. He would certainly get more subscribers and publicity if he had me on his show.


Miles Scott What do you think my politics even are....


Claire Khaw You seem to think you are a libertarian.


Claire Khaw Perhaps we could have a similar chat, Ewan.

Like
ReplyYesterday at 10:54
at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...