Curt Doolittle:
How do men argue differently from women? Men argue strategically and women argue tactically. Men argue empirically and women argue emotionally. Men worry about the long term, women only care about the short term. The feminine method of argument has a structure and grammar. Male argument is about science and law, female argument is about morality.
Western males have invented truth, apparently. This is very ethno-centric and obviously untrue suggesting that non-Western males cannot tell the different between falsehood and truth. Doolittle says men will speak the truth though the heavens fall, but women will do the opposite. Women will make an excuse for anything and have no sense of reciprocity. But this is not true, is it? You can also tell that a male politician is lying by the fact that his lips are moving.
We compromise with our women because we have to reproduce. We could do what the Muslims do to their women. We just have to put violence on the table and say 'Well, the end result is that this is no longer good for us. Conservatives have these values and they are better than your values empirically. Our values are eugenic, productive and evolutionary. Yours are dysgenic and unproductive and also damaging to the planet for that matter, so I don't see why we should co-operate any more. So the idea that we should keep the government of the United States or any of our governments intact rather than break them up so the people who want to go right go right and the people who want to go left go left and libertarians go wherever they choose is a great idea, but the idea that we are going to tolerate this any more, it's just off the table, so we'll just take it off the table. The eugenic people can go one way and the dysgenic people can go another. And we're able to do that. We no longer have to compromise, so we can separate.
ARISTOCRATIC EGALITARIANISM sounds an oxymoron. Why not say meritocracy?
Naval powers get excessively libertarian and commit suicide, military powers tend to get excessively Conservative and fail to compete technologically.
Thalossocracies are by definition scattered empires and harder to keep together. Compare Britain to Russia and China.
1 comment:
Though Curt Doolittle may have some useful things to say (truth as the basis for sovereignty and thus cooperation, testimonial truth definitions) he's largely outing himself with his conflagrated gender and genetics biases. This is why brainless radicals adore him (though he may or may not have a stake in that, I don't know).
Also, why limit oneself to one set of ideas (koranism, biblism, whatever ism, in that Curt is right that those are just a frameworks for justifying parasitism).
Nevertheless, it is refreshing to read some critics on Curt's proprieratrianism.
Post a Comment