Why paganism is regression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varg_Vikernes

You cannot be Pagan and anti-racist. You cannot be Pagan and homosexual or even tolerate homosexuality. You cannot be a Pagan and not want to have only as racially healthy children as possible. You cannot be a Pagan and believe in "free love". You cannot be a Pagan and at the same time be what Christians call a "humanist". 

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml

Coming from a culture that practices it, I see the appeal of paganism. It is the emotions that come with being before your object of worship that is the pull. However, the intellectual effort of directing your mind towards contemplating your relationship with an eternal, omnipotent and perfectly moral God is the one that is potentially more morally and societally rewarding, especially if it comes with an instruction manual that supports marriage and family values.

Ultimately, the survival of our civilisation and our race is a question of breeding.

It is about maintaining the quality of the national and racial gene pool and this must be about concentrating the minds of the females who are the gatekeepers of the genetic quality of the next generation. If you give them the choice of having recreational sex with men not their husband they will mostly not make up their minds about whom to marry and end up dying bitter and childless. Women in their 20s even now command access to the most marriageable men. Modern culture makes even the most beautiful of them forego this for careers that will end up hating which in the end eat up their best child-bearing years and having to make do with a less marriageable husband. Refusing to acknowledge our mistakes because of pride and lust for fornication means this terrible mistake will not be corrected until things get much worse.

However, if it were to be corrected, it would mean the end of Western civilisation as we know it, because it cannot be corrected under the current system of liberal democracy in the Feminist State.

This seems to fit in with what he has said at http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml so why not just tell his fellow Scandinavians to support traditional marriage and family values?

But how is this possible if the rest of society lives under laws that actively subvert these principles?

When the rest of the world goes down the drain because of consumerism, capitalism, internationalism and the Judeo-Christian religions it doesn't really matter, because the Pagans will remain uncorrupted and strong, living in their own healthy and self-sufficient societies in the countryside. Nobody and nothing can destroy our culture or race if even only a few of us remain true to our religion, and they cannot pollute our minds with their Asian filth either, if we live in communities where everybody are enlightened - by the Pagan mysteries. If we don't let them they cannot take us down with them when they fall into the abyss and their modern Sodom/Gomorrah destroys itself. The Pagans will survive the downfall of civilization because they don't participate and because of that remain pure.

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism07.shtml

Varg ends by saying that even if most Scandinavians die in our modern day Sodom and Gomorrah, there will still be pagans left to repopulate Scandinavia. There is a certain irony that a pagan should use a place first mentioned by Jews to to represent the curse of sexual immorality on his people to make this point!

We can get the benefit of God's without actually having to believe in Him as long as we can see that patriarchy cannot exist without theocracy. If our laws support marriage and family values then it is theocratic in that limited sense since all the five world religions support marriage and patriarchy.  Once the laws are in place, then general belief would follow.

We owe it to ourselves to use the best available resources to solve our problems. If matriarchy is the problem, the patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination then theocracy must be the vehicle.

Theocracy must be the vehicle because only the seal of approval of an eternal, omnipotent and perfectly moral God would stop us from changing our laws and the established meanings of words like marriage to suit the preferences of the immoral, frivolous and irrational.

If we have to choose a theocracy, there is only one obvious choice anyway.

As for White Pride, white people could get the credit of being the race to reform Islam.