Why paganism is regression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Varg_Vikernes

You cannot be Pagan and anti-racist. You cannot be Pagan and homosexual or even tolerate homosexuality. You cannot be a Pagan and not want to have only as racially healthy children as possible. You cannot be a Pagan and believe in "free love". You cannot be a Pagan and at the same time be what Christians call a "humanist". 

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml

Coming from a culture that practices it, I see the appeal of paganism. It is the emotions that come with being before your object of worship that is the pull. However, the intellectual effort of directing your mind towards contemplating your relationship with an eternal, omnipotent and perfectly moral God is the one that is potentially more morally and societally rewarding, especially if it comes with an instruction manual that supports marriage and family values.

Ultimately, the survival of our civilisation and our race is a question of breeding.

It is about maintaining the quality of the national and racial gene pool and this must be about concentrating the minds of the females who are the gatekeepers of the genetic quality of the next generation. If you give them the choice of having recreational sex with men not their husband they will mostly not make up their minds about whom to marry and end up dying bitter and childless. Women in their 20s even now command access to the most marriageable men. Modern culture makes even the most beautiful of them forego this for careers that will end up hating which in the end eat up their best child-bearing years and having to make do with a less marriageable husband. Refusing to acknowledge our mistakes because of pride and lust for fornication means this terrible mistake will not be corrected until things get much worse.

However, if it were to be corrected, it would mean the end of Western civilisation as we know it, because it cannot be corrected under the current system of liberal democracy in the Feminist State.

This seems to fit in with what he has said at http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism01.shtml so why not just tell his fellow Scandinavians to support traditional marriage and family values?

But how is this possible if the rest of society lives under laws that actively subvert these principles?

When the rest of the world goes down the drain because of consumerism, capitalism, internationalism and the Judeo-Christian religions it doesn't really matter, because the Pagans will remain uncorrupted and strong, living in their own healthy and self-sufficient societies in the countryside. Nobody and nothing can destroy our culture or race if even only a few of us remain true to our religion, and they cannot pollute our minds with their Asian filth either, if we live in communities where everybody are enlightened - by the Pagan mysteries. If we don't let them they cannot take us down with them when they fall into the abyss and their modern Sodom/Gomorrah destroys itself. The Pagans will survive the downfall of civilization because they don't participate and because of that remain pure.

http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/paganism07.shtml

Varg ends by saying that even if most Scandinavians die in our modern day Sodom and Gomorrah, there will still be pagans left to repopulate Scandinavia. There is a certain irony that a pagan should use a place first mentioned by Jews to to represent the curse of sexual immorality on his people to make this point!

We can get the benefit of God's without actually having to believe in Him as long as we can see that patriarchy cannot exist without theocracy. If our laws support marriage and family values then it is theocratic in that limited sense since all the five world religions support marriage and patriarchy.  Once the laws are in place, then general belief would follow.

We owe it to ourselves to use the best available resources to solve our problems. If matriarchy is the problem, the patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination then theocracy must be the vehicle.

Theocracy must be the vehicle because only the seal of approval of an eternal, omnipotent and perfectly moral God would stop us from changing our laws and the established meanings of words like marriage to suit the preferences of the immoral, frivolous and irrational.

If we have to choose a theocracy, there is only one obvious choice anyway.

As for White Pride, white people could get the credit of being the race to reform Islam.

On British Nationalists who claim they are pagan

I ask this question because the late Jonathan Bowden once claimed he was a pagan in this video.

Are our gods part of our national identity?

Does Jonathan Bowden say he is a pagan not because he really is a pagan but because he feels that to say so makes him more of a nationalist?

Worshiping pagan gods has the effect of excluding the foreigner. I find it difficult to imagine that Bowden really did worship Celtic gods.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Celtic_deities

I hope that nationalists will forgive me for saying so, but I am almost certain that Bowden's professed paganism was really a nationalist affectation.

It is the last refuge of the beleaguered nationalist, I suppose. The foreigner is now here. Many of them speak better English than the indigenous British, and they also have more money and their women are not known to be mostly uniformly promiscuous. The British nationalist has nothing left but the ancient gods of his forefathers. By claiming to worship them and calling himself an Odinist, he can in this way exclude the foreigner.

After all, the gods of Ancient Britons are his alone. They are his alone because no one wants them, and so he feels safe in claiming these as his, knowing that he will enjoy some security of possession.

A good leader on the other hand would choose the best religion for his people.

The best religion for maintaining morality and thus obtain social cohesion is Islam, in my opinion, but it is the religion of the people they consider backward and barbaric, so that is out of their question.

Imagine a football team competing against another. One football team has team members who enjoy wine, women and song to the exclusion of everything else, and the other trains hard. Because the former hates the latter with such fervent intensity, it refuses to do what the latter does, ie train hard. This is why they keep losing to the other team, and will continue to do so until they drink themselves to death or die of some fatal STD.

In this video, Bowden pronounces that Islam is "very right wing". It is "right-wing" in the sense that it is socially conservative, and being a social conservative is no different to being a fascist or a Nazi these days, as we all know.

Verily, God will not change the lot of those who will not change what is in their hearts. https://quran.com/13/11

If they knew any Classical history, they would have noticed that the Romans adopted the Greek pantheon lock stock and barrel, and renamed the Greek gods in Latin. That was enough to effect the acquisition.

Sadly, however, the typical British nationalist has no interest in religion, philosophy or ideas. He knows he hates his government who let in the immigrants whom he also loathes, and that is the extent of his thought processes.

Nationalists are not interested in listening to new ideas or discussing them, nor in pursuing the logic of any conclusion, if it means attracting any sort of opprobrium from fellow nationalists. They know, of course, how nasty, vicious and malicious they can be to each other.

When they are displeased with each other, they will be accused of being a nonce or a Red, excluded from meetings or expelled from their party, and that will be the end of their political ambitions.

What they like doing is campaigning incompetently and losing elections, holding little meetings that discuss but do not decide, running their parties in an amateurish and unprofessional way and discussing their conspiracy theories.

Like women, all they want is a good whinge. They do not trust themselves to rigorously implement any solution with consistency or competence, you see.

When women whinge at you about their trials and tribulations, they only want a listening ear and a sympathetic demeanor. If you dare to suggest a practical solution they will be offended and angry at your presumption and make a point of punishing you for it.

Nationalists are really no more than white niggers, as a white and nationalist female Facebook friend pointed out to me today.

Sophia Stewart 11 October 14:51 This is why Nationalists will never get anywhere. A bunch of useless whining white niggers.