My proposal for better government in 32 minutes

My proposal for better government in 32 minutes, but a synopsis of the salient points is provided in the description because I understand the pressures on your time. Please share if you think I raise important and urgent issues which need to be addressed ASAP. https://t.co/jFdrkULdfG

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 14, 2019

All I am proposing is that the person in charge answers my questions. Hmmm. I wonder how long it will take for them to decide who is to answer my questions assuming that they do decide to answer them? Perhaps they could appoint a lawyer to stand in for them. @JonHolb

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 14, 2019

If you want to know my ten questions for our oligarchy and my five questions for @GerardBattenMEP of @UKIP, please find it under the video in the comments. @PhilipDaviesUK @andrew_lilico @GiselaStuart @MarcusFysh may wish to discuss this tonight at their meeting.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 14, 2019

Justice in Chinese society was literally of cosmic importance. Traditional Chinese thinking considered man and nature organic elements of a seamless cosmic web. Injustice of any kind did not simply rend the web in one place but placed tension on the entire structure. To restore equilibrium, the injustice had to be perfectly redressed, no more, no less. To ignore the injury was to risk catastrophe. As one late-Qing official wrote, “The recent natural disasters and interferences with heavenly harmony [i.e., the droughts and famines of the late 1870s and early 1880s] are a product of the countless number of cases where no appeal could be made, where there were no impeachments of the delinquent officials, and where consequently the innocent suffer deep injustices in the underworld”

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies/article/ill-take-it-all-the-way-to-beijing-capital-appeals-in-the-qing/8D7BA946FB151C8BF342ACA1268CC270

The Mandate of Heaven or Tian Ming (Chinese: 天命; pinyin: Tiānmìng; Wade–Giles: T'ien-ming) is a Chinese political and religious doctrine used since ancient times to justify the rule of the King or Emperor of China. According to this belief, heaven (天, Tian)—which embodies the natural order and will of the universe—bestows the mandate on a just ruler of China, the "Son of Heaven" of the "Celestial Empire". If a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy, and had lost the mandate. It was also a common belief among citizens that natural disasters such as famine and flood were signs of heaven's displeasure with the ruler, so there would often be revolts following major disasters as citizens saw these as signs that the Mandate of Heaven had been withdrawn.

MY PROPOSAL

1.  Appoint a representative to ask questions on behalf of the heterosexual male and express their concerns and fears

2.  Offer to serve as this representative

3.  If some other representative is preferred, to decide on the best way of choosing this representative.

4.  Alt-right YouTubers with more subscribers than  me might wish to do this themselves. Mark Collett and Millennial Woes - who won't allow me on their platform to explain my ideas - to come to mind. If they think they can do a better job, they should of course go right ahead.

5.  My most important question is "Why can't we have a one party state if it would work better for the government and the governed?" Frank Field, Nick Morgan and Anna Soubry have already hinted that they want a one party state, so let's all talk about it openly and honestly.

In fact, the one party state is probably the only thing that the Far Left, the Far Right and the political establishment can agree on, so let's all go for it!

Frank Field wants UniGov
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/dec/08/government-debt-gilt-sales

Anna Soubry wants UniGov
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/18/anna-soubry-attacks-tory-whips-threats-over-brexit-votes

Nicky Morgan wants UniGov
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/foreign-affairs/brexit/news/100517/top-tory-mp-mulls-government-national-unity-theresa-may

Exclusive. New Government of National Unity Cabinet in full.
https://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2018/12/exclusive-new-national-government-cabinet-in-full.html

6.  What is the National Interest? It  means national sovereignty and a nation governing itself independently and not being an EU vassal state.

7. Would the Noahide laws promote the National Interest?

Rabbi Sacks:

The Noahide covenant is universal, with its seven basic moral commands. These are the minimal requirements of humanity as such, the foundations of any decent society. 

Rabbi Sacks should be asked if Britain is a decent society according to the Noahide laws. We won't bother with Chief Rabbi Mirvis, who is obviously an establishment man, whatever and whoever the establishment is.

We should ask Rabbi Aaron Bassous what he thinks about "fundamental British values".
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2018/04/rabbi-bassous-calls-all-jews-with-flame.html

We should ask my favourite rabbi, Rabbi Mizrachi, how much if at all we resemble Sodom and Gomorrah and whether it is just a matter of time before God if He exists gets angry enough to zap us.

We should also ask Rabbi Sternbuch in Israel what he thinks.

We don’t want LGBT+ students in our schools, leading Charedi rabbi tells Chief Rabbi
London-born Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch hits out after Chief Rabbi said schools must be 'a safe haven for all children'
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/we-don-t-want-lgbt-students-in-our-schools-leading-charedi-rabbi-tells-chief-rabbi-1.471563

Israeli Charedi leader accuses Chief Rabbi Mirvis of ‘blasphemy’ over LGBT guide
Rabbi Moshe Sternbuch claims the British Orthodox Jewish leader was “encouraging” homosexuality by releasing guidance against bullying
https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/israeli-charedi-leader-accuses-chief-rabbi-mirvis-of-blasphemy-lgbt-guide/


Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:

We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-noahide-laws/

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, is Islam divine civic nationalism?

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

The features and advantages of Secular Koranism are explained at
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

QUESTIONS FOR THE OLIGARCHY

1.  If all EU member states held a referendum about whether to leave or remain in the EU, what do you think would be the result?
2.  Is democracy the best form of government when we know most voters are neither wise nor informed and only choose which bribe from which party to accept?
3,  Should the franchise be narrowed to taxpayers only?
4.  Should MPs be paid more if they are seen to defend the national interest?
5.. What is the national interest?
6.  Are liberal democracies preferable to alternative forms of government and how can this be decided?
7.  Does everything about feminism undermine marriage?
8.  Is it only under a patriarchy that enough good strong men are produced to defend the national interest?
9.  Should the patriarchy be restored even if the only way of doing this is the shaming of sluts and slut-fuckers with https://quran.com/24/2?
10. Is obedience to God's laws the only way of restoring the patriarchy?


QUESTIONS FOR UKIP:

1.  Is Christianity kaput?
2.  If Christianity is kaput, does it need replacing?
3.  If Christianity should be replaced, what should it be replaced with?
4.  Which of the following religions is closest to British traditions and why?
a) Islam  b) Hinduism  c) Buddhism
5.  If Christianity should be replaced, should it be replaced as soon as possible?


What disadvantages are there in this one size fits all one party theocracy? 

The rules are really fair enough and the only reason why you might still reject it is because you are an Islamophobe.  An Islamophobe is by definition someone who hates and fears irrationally. If you deny that your hatred and fear of Islam is irrational and that you see no circumstances under which it would be irrational to hate and fear Islam and Muslims, then you are definitely an Islamophobe. If so, please get in touch with to discuss it on my channel, especially if your name is Gerard Batten.