THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
How I am described these days by the less respectful members of the nationalist community: "she's a famous loon from England. Used to hang out with the BNP." https://t.co/SJQJIjYniG
My proposal for better government in 32 minutes, but a synopsis of the salient points is provided in the description because I understand the pressures on your time. Please share if you think I raise important and urgent issues which need to be addressed ASAP. https://t.co/jFdrkULdfG
All I am proposing is that the person in charge answers my questions. Hmmm. I wonder how long it will take for them to decide who is to answer my questions assuming that they do decide to answer them? Perhaps they could appoint a lawyer to stand in for them. @JonHolb
Justice in Chinese society was literally of cosmic importance. Traditional Chinese thinking considered man and nature organic elements of a seamless cosmic web. Injustice of any kind did not simply rend the web in one place but placed tension on the entire structure. To restore equilibrium, the injustice had to be perfectly redressed, no more, no less. To ignore the injury was to risk catastrophe. As one late-Qing official wrote, “The recent natural disasters and interferences with heavenly harmony [i.e., the droughts and famines of the late 1870s and early 1880s] are a product of the countless number of cases where no appeal could be made, where there were no impeachments of the delinquent officials, and where consequently the innocent suffer deep injustices in the underworld”
The Mandate of Heaven or Tian Ming (Chinese: 天命; pinyin: Tiānmìng; Wade–Giles: T'ien-ming) is a Chinese political and religious doctrine used since ancient times to justify the rule of the King or Emperor of China. According to this belief, heaven (天, Tian)—which embodies the natural order and will of the universe—bestows the mandate on a just ruler of China, the "Son of Heaven" of the "Celestial Empire". If a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy, and had lost the mandate. It was also a common belief among citizens that natural disasters such as famine and flood were signs of heaven's displeasure with the ruler, so there would often be revolts following major disasters as citizens saw these as signs that the Mandate of Heaven had been withdrawn.
MY PROPOSAL
1. Appoint a representative to ask questions on behalf of the heterosexual male and express their concerns and fears
2. Offer to serve as this representative
3. If some other representative is preferred, to decide on the best way of choosing this representative.
4. Alt-right YouTubers with more subscribers than me might wish to do this themselves. Mark Collett and Millennial Woes - who won't allow me on their platform to explain my ideas - to come to mind. If they think they can do a better job, they should of course go right ahead.
5. My most important question is "Why can't we have a one party state if it would work better for the government and the governed?" Frank Field, Nick Morgan and Anna Soubry have already hinted that they want a one party state, so let's all talk about it openly and honestly.
In fact, the one party state is probably the only thing that the Far Left, the Far Right and the political establishment can agree on, so let's all go for it!
6. What is the National Interest? It means national sovereignty and a nation governing itself independently and not being an EU vassal state.
7. Would the Noahide laws promote the National Interest?
Rabbi Sacks:
The Noahide covenant is universal, with its seven basic moral commands. These are the minimal requirements of humanity as such, the foundations of any decent society.
Rabbi Sacks should be asked if Britain is a decent society according to the Noahide laws. We won't bother with Chief Rabbi Mirvis, who is obviously an establishment man, whatever and whoever the establishment is.
We should ask my favourite rabbi, Rabbi Mizrachi, how much if at all we resemble Sodom and Gomorrah and whether it is just a matter of time before God if He exists gets angry enough to zap us.
We should also ask Rabbi Sternbuch in Israel what he thinks.
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:
We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
1. If all EU member states held a referendum about whether to leave or remain in the EU, what do you think would be the result?
2. Is democracy the best form of government when we know most voters are neither wise nor informed and only choose which bribe from which party to accept?
3, Should the franchise be narrowed to taxpayers only?
4. Should MPs be paid more if they are seen to defend the national interest?
5.. What is the national interest?
6. Are liberal democracies preferable to alternative forms of government and how can this be decided?
7. Does everything about feminism undermine marriage?
8. Is it only under a patriarchy that enough good strong men are produced to defend the national interest?
9. Should the patriarchy be restored even if the only way of doing this is the shaming of sluts and slut-fuckers with https://quran.com/24/2?
10. Is obedience to God's laws the only way of restoring the patriarchy?
QUESTIONS FOR UKIP:
1. Is Christianity kaput?
2. If Christianity is kaput, does it need replacing?
3. If Christianity should be replaced, what should it be replaced with?
4. Which of the following religions is closest to British traditions and why?
a) Islam b) Hinduism c) Buddhism
5. If Christianity should be replaced, should it be replaced as soon as possible?
What disadvantages are there in this one size fits all one party theocracy?
The rules are really fair enough and the only reason why you might still reject it is because you are an Islamophobe. An Islamophobe is by definition someone who hates and fears irrationally. If you deny that your hatred and fear of Islam is irrational and that you see no circumstances under which it would be irrational to hate and fear Islam and Muslims, then you are definitely an Islamophobe. If so, please get in touch with to discuss it on my channel, especially if your name is Gerard Batten.
One of the features of Islam is that it regulates institutions and makes it contractual. Slavery is an institution like marriage and prostitution. The Koran makes marriage contractual, has never forbidden slavery and allows you to have slave girls who can choose to manumit themselves through prostitution.
24:33
And let those who find not the financial means for marriage keep themselves chaste, until Allah enriches them of His Bounty. And such of your slaves as seek a writing (of emancipation), give them such writing, if you know that they are good and trustworthy. And give them something yourselves out of the wealth of Allah which He has bestowed upon you. And force not your maids to prostitution, if they desire chastity, in order that you may make a gain in the (perishable) goods of this worldly life. But if anyone compels them (to prostitution), then after such compulsion, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (to those women, i.e. He will forgive them because they have been forced to do this evil action unwillingly).
The taking of slave girls is a well-established convention of war going back to Trojan times.
In Greek mythology, Briseis, a daughter of Briseus, was a princess of Lyrnessus. Briseis was said to have had long golden hair, blue eyes, and fair skin and she was considered to be very beautiful and clever. Her husband was Mynes. When Achilles led the assault on Lyrnessus during the Trojan War, she was captured and her family (including her father, mother, three brothers and husband) died at his hands. She was subsequently given to Achilles as a war prize to be his concubine. In the Trojan War, captive women like Briseis were regarded as slaves and could be traded amongst the warriors.
Achilles' surrender of Briseis to Agamemnon, from the House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii, fresco, 1st century AD, now in the Naples National Archaeological Museum
Islamophobes will see no contradiciton in claiming that Achilles was both semi-divine and heroic while regarding Muslims practising the same ancient and well-established convention of warfare as barbaric and base.
Batten calls Islam "totalitarian" and equates it with Nazism and Communism even though it has been said that 2:256 of the Koran was the basis for the First Amendment.
It is in fact Christianity that is "totalitarian" since the Doctrine of the Trinity is all about establishing the principle that if you don't believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the eternal and supreme Abrahamic God, you ain't Christian and only good Christians go to heaven.
He goes on to say that all Muslim countries are "repressive regimes and in conflict internally". Libya was doing fine until NATO decided to topple Gaddafi and steal its oil. It is not exactly unknown for the West to practise a system of divide and rule to get the different factions of a country fighitng each other and pay mercenaries to destabilise and overthrow established governments who are not deemed democratic by the West.
Russia is technically a liberal democracy, but that does not prevent Western media insisting that Putin is a dictator operating a repressive and corrupt regime.
Batten says Muslims are responsible for "industrialised sexual exploitation for money for their own perverted purposes". Is doing something for money a perverted purpose? He claims Muslims have "an ideological justification" for being pimps (which is another term for sex trafficker). I wonder which verse in the Koran he is referring to!
Islam, he says is a "death cult". What is a "death cult" anyway? While Islamophobes are happy to equate "death cult" with Islam, the more objective might care to remember that Islam is one of the three Abrahamic faiths. Can the Islamophobes who call Islam a "death cult" give another example of one, or was the term invented specially and only for Islam?
UKIP would repeal hate speech guidelines, abolish the Equality Act of 2010, shut down the Equalities and Human Rights Commission and the government Equalities Office. (I am actually in favour of this.)
Sheppard's current research is medical and involves a compound that is applied to the skin. It was going very well until he was arrested on suspicion of making racially aggravated complaints about an African the Council has moved in nearby. Seeing his equipment and materials, he was re-arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000. There is video somewhere of his area flooded with blue lights, while Sheppard was held under 24-hour watch. His computers have been taken away again.
Jez didn't mention the letter containing the Balfour Declaration at Waddesdon. (It was just a non-committal thank you letter from Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild for his donation to the Conservative Party, hardly a testament signed in blood.)
Joshua Reynolds turned this portrait of Emily Bertie Pott into a grand history painting by combining portraiture, classical literature and social comment. Thaïs famously encouraged Alexander the Great to burn the Palace of Persepolis. In the 18th century, she was associated with women like Emily, an infamous mistress of Charles Greville.
Burning of Persepolis Thaïs apparently came from Athens and accompanied Alexander throughout his campaign in Asia Minor. She came to the attention of history when, in 330 BC, Alexander burned down the palace of Persepolis, the principal residence of the defeated Achaemenid dynasty, after a drinking party. Thaïs was present at the party and gave a speech which convinced Alexander to burn the palace. Cleitarchus claims that the destruction was a whim; Plutarch and Diodorus recount that it was intended as retribution for Xerxes' burning of the old Temple of Athena on the Acropolis in Athens (the site on the extant Parthenon) in 480 BC during the Persian Wars.
Jez Turner: "Liberalism caused Islam."
How did liberalism cause Islam? Or do you mean feminism and Western government policy caused immigration and Islamophobia?
UKIP leadership election
Jez supports Anne Marie Waters, I support John Rees-Evans, Arron Banks supports David Kurten.
Joshua Bonehill's new prison (non-smoking) address
Liberals snobbishly think it beneath them to admit to being affected by the same things that adversely affect the indigenous proletariat. I have concluded that the problem is really social snobbery and the operation of the English class system. If the ruling classes were antisemitic, sexist and racist, the sheeple and the political establishment would also be unquestioningly antisemitic, sexist and racist too as indeed they once were. At the end of the day, most members of society are sheeple and only a very small minority are capable of independent thought, and this includes nationalists and members of our political establishment who are exemplars of mediocrity, cowardice and hypocrisy. It is always from this minority that our future leaders will come from.
The oft-repeated accusation of Jews feeding gentiles the poison of liberalism is repeated here. Let me make it clear that while I have the greatest respect for the religion of God's Chosen People, I do not see that they should escape criticism and mockery from gentiles altogether.
It is of course the fact that the gentile in his own land cannot mock Jews that is responsible for so much antisemitism in the West.
While Jews suffer from the temptation of the strong and clever in bullying and exploiting the weak and stupid, I feel gentiles have to take some responsibility for their own predicament. Even if the Jew were always offering cups of poison to the gentile, there is still no reason for the gentile to always accept it and drink from it quite so eagerly and quickly.
Jews who urge feminism on the deranged and gullible gentile are never observant and orthodox Jews, are they?
Should any tribe be judged by the worst of its criminal members?
Can it not be argued that the matriarchy of the West has itself corrupted the morals of the Jews?
If the unscrupulous and immoral use the vulnerabilities of our irrational political system and immoral political ideology against us, shouldn't we take some responsibility for this for using such a rotten system and being fixated on an erroneous ideology because we are too proud, afraid or lazy to question it?
Is there something in the culture and politics of the gentile Westerner - some unpatched vulnerability in his software - that makes him particularly susceptible to these temptations to vice and degeneracy?
Very disappointingly, Jez does not discuss feminism at all.
There are some who blame Jews for feminism and use as authority for this proposition that prominent feminists are Jewesses, but I question this. Clever people are invariably attracted to politics and Jews being a superior race (because they have kept their traditions by caring whom they marry unlike the modern and degenerate gentile who no longer practises marriage) are a clever, tenacious and cohesive people who have risen to prominence because they are superior in talent and culture. What does not kill you makes you stronger, after all. Judaism is for Jews only, because it is so high maintenance that no gentile wants to be burdened by its practice unless s/he is lucky enough to find a Jew prepared to marry him or her and because of this have to convert.
If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite". Both Judaism and Islam require from its adherents observance and practice of their traditions while Christianity only requires that Christians tell the lie that they believe in the absurdity of the Trinity, namely that they believe that Christ is simultaneously God Himself and His Son.
In our age of universal education, requiring belief in the Trinity as an article of Christian faith is now too much to ask, which is why the demand is no longer made.
Congregations are made to repeat the Nicene creed uncomprehendingly at church services, and this will have to do as lip service to the creed. Christian fundamentalists understand the nature of this corrupt bargain but cultural Christians do not, because this demand was never made of them, and few people who call themselves Christians were actually confirmed in adolescence.
For this reason, Christian principles have been progressively diluted and this explains why Christianity is now indistinguishable from liberalism. Christianity has failed Westerners, because they are now infected by the virus of feminism which will destroy even their desire to be cured from it.
They are suffering from a kind of dementia, it seems, so debilitating that most of the alt-right seem to be of the mind that they do not want a leader, and refuse to discuss this any further. They do not want a leader because they wish to escape the trouble and inconvenience of being led, because being led implies an arduous journey that they do not wish to embark upon, for they are desirous of staying at home in order to make their alt-right YouTube videos complaining about Jews, Muslims and immigration without ever lifting a finger to propose a practical political solution. Most of their videos consist of a daydream of a post-pogrom all-white West some indefinite time in the future. They do not want a leader because they do not wish to experience again the disappointment of being betrayed by their inadequate and dishonourable leaders, and they have all been inadequate and dishonourable.
The sad fact is that Western Man is now so emasculated by feminism that he now behaves like a woman.
Men often complain about women who tell them their problems and who become offended when a practical solution is offered. In reality, all the complaining woman wanted was your attention, your sympathy and your shoulder to cry on. She does not really want to leave her husband, break up with her boyfriend or change her job, because complaining about it with your attentive sympathy is enough to stop her from doing any of those things, for now.
The alt-right have become the woman who is offended because you have presented them with the solution that they do not wish to go to the trouble of implementing.
As Livy said, "We can neither bear our vices, or the cure for them."
The cure is patriarchy reinforced by a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism, and this none of them can bear to hear, because it means they have to reconsecrate marriage and punish extramarital sex.
Even in a patriarchy married sex is the most expensive form of sex, and most of these men know they are poor and unmarriageable. The prospect of fornicating with a fornicatress is the opium of what passes for their "religion". The idea of getting sex from a prostitute is probably too uncomfortable and expensive for them.
I am not so out of touch that I do not know why they detest my cure. Indeed, I have been told that my cure is worse than the disease, as Livy hinted.
All this has happened before, and it will happen again. The Chinese even have a term for it: Yin and Yang which explains the eternal battle of the sexes.
Denial is a feminine vice and the men of the alt-right have become women in denial.
Rabbi Sacks on why a weak sense of identity makes formerly Christian gentile Westerners angry and frightened. Jews never lost their traditions and identity because their religion itself is about reminding them of their identity, which is why they remain the most cohesive and powerful of tribe of all the tribes of the world, even as they lived in gentile lands after being expelled from Israel by the Romans all those centuries ago.
Is UKIP going to mention the problem of singly parented schoolchildren dragging educational standards down? Estonia, Czech Republic and Poland are not stuffed to their rafters with singly-parented illegitimate offspring of feckless unmarried mothers like Bristol and the rest of the UK is, are they?
If you feel things in your country are not what they should be, this is the consequence of decades of
feminist foreign policy (ignorance, indifference and insouciance about causing and provoking Muslim terrorism)
feminist immigration policy (indifference to beta male and working class complaints about immigration because feminists in charge were invariably middle class and white, and women tend to despise men who are in the class below them and direct their compassion towards other races when they are not married to men of their own race as a manifestation of their thwarted maternal instincts)
feminist economic policy (obsession with "growth" in GDP fuelled by spending and borrowing as an erroneous measure of success)
feminist educational policy (prizes for all and mixed ability teaching)
feminist social policy (no fault divorce)
feminist employment policy (equal pay, maternity pay leading to paternity pay and other rules designed to favour non-white and LGBTs at the expense of white men while making Western labour hopelessly uncompetitive)
feminist criminal policy (refusing to punish criminals properly because feminazis want to display their compassion unless the accused are men accused of rape)
UKIP is just as cucked as the rest of the parties about challenging the status quo of prioritising the female preference at the expense of men and the next generation.
If most females are promiscuous, feckless and immoral, then you have a problem, don't you?
Britain has been a matriarchy since 1974 when Keith Joseph got cucked by Slut Single Mothers.
The best thing Michael Gove could do now is to join UKIP and try as best he can to get as many of his supporters to join too.
Adam Afriyie, MP for Windsor
Henry Bellingham, MP for North West Norfolk
Nick Boles, MP for Grantham and Stamford
Conor Burns, MP for Bournemouth West
Alberto Costa, MP for South Leicestershire
George Eustice, MP for Camborne and Redruth
Michael Fabricant, MP for Lichfield
Suella Fernandes, MP for Fareham
Nick Gibb, MP for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
John Hayes, MP for South Holland and The Deepings
Andrea Jenkyns, MP for Morley and Outwood
Robert Jenrick, MP for Newark
Daniel Kawczynski, MP for Shrewsbury and Atcham
Jack Lopresti, MP for Filton and Bradley Stoke
Andrew Mitchell, MP for Sutton Coldfield
Nicky Morgan, MP for Loughborough
Bob Neill, MP for Bromley and Chislehurst
Dominic Raab, MP for Esher and Walton
Jacob Rees-Mogg, MP for North East Somerset
Rishi Sunak, MP for Richmond (Yorks)
Anne-Marie Trevelyan, MP for Berwick-upon-Tweed
Ed Vaizey, MP for Wantage
Shailesh Vara, MP for North West Cambridgeshire
Angela Watkinson, MP for Hornchuch and Upminster
John Whittingdale, MP for Maldon
That is an awful lot of persuading to do but, as Boris Johnson knows, Michael Gove can be a very persuasive.
I know these Tory types will gasp and stretch their eyes at having to deal with all the plebs and BNP-types at UKIP, but it will be very educational for them. If they succeed they shall certainly be thanked. They should think of it as the populares route to power.
Although not in the party for at least five years to be eligible to stand, there is much these MPs could be doing as members of UKIP to formulate the policies that will serve as an alternative to the soft soap Mayist Labourist Conservative Party manifesto for the 2020 election.
