"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 27, 2019
Read more at: https://t.co/xuP1dsa3Mz" https://t.co/GN1tvhvFiF via @BrainyQuote
From 1:38:00
Millennial Woes:
I don't think paganism is feasible as a solution because I don't think enough people believe in it or and I don't see it spreading fast enough. Christianity has had the stuffing knocked out of it to say the least over the last century so I don't know if it can recover or if it can recover in time. The other option is atheism which just is where we are now anyway and then the fourth option is Islam and there are people who think that we're just going to inevitably become Islamic and that has various implications. Would we be assimilated into the Muslim immigrants' demographic group in which case it would be their version of Islam that ruled Europe or would it be that we adopted Islam and modified it as we did with Christianity? Would it be our version of Islam? I might get some flack for saying this stuff or even for entertaining this. I'm just sort of putting it over there, just speculating on how are we going to resist Islam and what are we gaining by resisting Islam. Are we gaining nihilism and just more vapid consumerism or are we regaining strength and vitality somehow? Again, these are all questions that other people need to address and I can only put the question out there but I do think that it's something that we we can't afford to just ignore. I remember at the TBG in December there was a guy who really got very irate with me for suggesting that maybe Islam will be the only way out of the nihilism, out of globohomo, and if it will be so then the choice is "Do you want Islam or do you want globohomo?" so not a fucking nice choice but if you want to avoid that then you have to find a way to resist Islam and resist globohomo, and as I say, I don't see what that would be at this point. Maybe something will materialise.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
Justice in Chinese society was literally of cosmic importance. Traditional Chinese thinking considered man and nature organic elements of a seamless cosmic web. Injustice of any kind did not simply rend the web in one place but placed tension on the entire structure. To restore equilibrium, the injustice had to be perfectly redressed, no more, no less. To ignore the injury was to risk catastrophe. As one late-Qing official wrote, “The recent natural disasters and interferences with heavenly harmony [i.e., the droughts and famines of the late 1870s and early 1880s] are a product of the countless number of cases where no appeal could be made, where there were no impeachments of the delinquent officials, and where consequently the innocent suffer deep injustices in the underworld”
The Mandate of Heaven or Tian Ming (Chinese: 天命; pinyin: Tiānmìng; Wade–Giles: T'ien-ming) is a Chinese political and religious doctrine used since ancient times to justify the rule of the King or Emperor of China. According to this belief, heaven (天, Tian)—which embodies the natural order and will of the universe—bestows the mandate on a just ruler of China, the "Son of Heaven" of the "Celestial Empire". If a ruler was overthrown, this was interpreted as an indication that the ruler was unworthy, and had lost the mandate. It was also a common belief among citizens that natural disasters such as famine and flood were signs of heaven's displeasure with the ruler, so there would often be revolts following major disasters as citizens saw these as signs that the Mandate of Heaven had been withdrawn.
MY PROPOSAL
1. Appoint a representative to ask questions on behalf of the heterosexual male and express their concerns and fears
2. Offer to serve as this representative
3. If some other representative is preferred, to decide on the best way of choosing this representative.
4. Alt-right YouTubers with more subscribers than me might wish to do this themselves. Mark Collett and Millennial Woes - who won't allow me on their platform to explain my ideas - to come to mind. If they think they can do a better job, they should of course go right ahead.
5. My most important question is "Why can't we have a one party state if it would work better for the government and the governed?" Frank Field, Nick Morgan and Anna Soubry have already hinted that they want a one party state, so let's all talk about it openly and honestly.
In fact, the one party state is probably the only thing that the Far Left, the Far Right and the political establishment can agree on, so let's all go for it!
Frank Field wants UniGov
Anna Soubry wants UniGov
Nicky Morgan wants UniGov
Exclusive. New Government of National Unity Cabinet in full.
6. What is the National Interest? It means national sovereignty and a nation governing itself independently and not being an EU vassal state.
7. Would the Noahide laws promote the National Interest?
"The Noahide covenant is universal, with its seven basic moral commands. These are the minimal requirements of humanity as such, the foundations of any decent society. "
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:
We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, is Islam divine civic nationalism?
If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".
The features and advantages of Secular Koranism are explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html
On discovering that I am the top dog of ideas in the alt-right - Part 1
On discovering that I am the top dog of ideas in the alt-right - Part 2
No comments:
Post a Comment