I define autism as the inability to control one's emotions and see the other person's point of view. We can in theory all be a little autistic at times.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Over the years many people have accused me of being autistic. If they think you are ineffectual, they call you autistic. If they think you are dangerous, they will call you psychopathic.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Autism is a term of abuse against socially awkward males by women who have no patience with shy men or men with difficult personalities or views.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
I think the normalising autism is a sign of degeneracy.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Geek traits are called autistic by women who have no interest in STEM or patience with shy men they don't want to have sex with.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
In a patriarchy, the alpha female is the partner of the alpha male.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Men who have no male friends are morally suspect.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
4:10:09— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Church of Entropy:
"ya it started as a sober discussion on autism then evolved into a demonstration of actual mental illness"
Was I really that bad?
4:10:29— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Church of Entropy:
"spiritual parasites come in, take over the discussion and rant for a long time with no self awareness of consideration of the host"
Was I really that bad?
You restore the patriarchy with the best religion with the clearest rules and the most powerful God.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
God abhors rebellion. Secular Koranism would lead Man away from rebellion.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
In the end Jen ejected me from the stream at 4:42:00, but this is one of her best ones, IMHO. I am afraid I swore and banged the table a lot. https://t.co/vGSgcnBXg3— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
This was also the second good conversation I had with @WLL2PWR even though in the end I was reduced to a foaming spitting mass of outraged desk-banging. He basically agrees with my diagnosis but disagrees with my cure.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
I just couldn't deal with the sperg any more when he asked me why he couldn't make Westerners worship Wotan and why he had to worship someone who wasn't even of his race. In a universal religion, it doesn't matter what race the prophet is as long the scripture includes you.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
What is the problem with worshipping a universal God who acknowledges your right to nationhood and contains all the rules to protect, establish and restore your patriarchy? https://t.co/6AwsZQ2N2T If the rules work and are fair enough, why insist Muhammad has to be German too?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
I could be two races and sexes at the same time if Western Man is prepared to entertain the idea that I am the incarnation of Solon https://t.co/W5jcwwfWar It would be nice if Jen could consider the possibility since she has hinted she may be the incarnation of a Hindu sage.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
I wonder if Western Man being saved by me - a product of the British Empire - as the incarnation Solon, the Athenian lawmaker, political reformer and poet, could be part of the redemption narrative @JOttoPohl1 was discussing earlier.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
Jews had Moses, Arabs Muhammad, so white people can have me. I suppose if I could be considered a prophetess of any sort, I could be considered the prophetess of the white people who have been so kind to me. If they buy my Solon incarnation, I would be everything they ever wanted— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
On the one hand Western Man can think of me as a dead white male come to redeem them, on the other, they can also see me as a female and a foreigner come to save them. I think this a most attractive and intriguing narrative, ripe with all kinds of further narrative possibilities.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
What pains me is the attitude of Church of Entropy who has taken an actively hostile attitude towards me because I have won all the arguments. She clearly perceives my ideas to be an existential threat to hers. I just wish she wouldn't associate with low status males though.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
If she had found someone with more subscribers to stream with, I'd've accepted that as the way of the world. To be abandoned for low status males is galling, unspeakable and infuriating. I prepare the state bedroom for her, she tells me she prefers sleeping on park benches ...— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 29, 2019
I was ejected by Church of Entropy at 4:44:00.
The highlights are at 3:44:00 and 3:51:40
The jizya is a conditional tribute which can be avoided by converting to Islam. I propose that this be imposed as a percentage of the conquered country's GDP obviating the need for a poll tax. War is only likely if the demographics support it ie a youth bulge. Over-population in the invading country and extreme weakness in the proposed invaded country would amount to an open invitation to invade.
FGM is unIslamic because women and men too of course should be given the free will to refrain from extramarital sex.
My questions for Rabbi Sacks
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/09/my-questions-for-rabbi-sacks-which-i.html
The belief in a Jewish conspiracy is caused by the defects of Christianity
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-belief-in-jewish-conspiracy-is.html
Can the Church regain its morality authority?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/can-church-regain-its-morality-authority.html
What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html
Does the Archbishop of Canterbury think the state religion of Britain is PC Libtardism?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/06/does-archbishop-of-canterbury-think.html
I don't know if Will is aware of my answer to the Jewish Question.
http://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-jews-should-deal-with-jewish.html
The ISIS interpretation of Islam comes from the Talmud
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-isis-interpretation-of-islam-comes.html
The Koran if interpreted correctly is neither excessively liberal or excessively Conservative. Nor is it excessively patriarchal or excessively matriarchal. It encourages businesses enterprise but enjoins charity. All races are equal and its creation story resembles the Big Bang and it forbids compulsion in belief. How the hell did the Muslims manage to mess up this great religion? By not reading and debating the Koran and trusting their 'scholars' to do it for them, by allowing the Gates of Interpretation, closed centuries ago, to remain closed. Otherwise, it would be the perfect ideology that is the middle way between capital and communism, the patriarchy and the matriarchy, for all humanity.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/aphorisms-of-claire-khaw.html
Controlled Opps mentioned the Kharijites but I don't see their relevance to this debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khawarij
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_blasphemy
Blasphemy in Islam is impious utterance or action concerning God, "Blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad and his companions (sabb al-rasul, sabb al-sahabah)", insulting an angel or to deny the prophethood of one of the Islamic prophets. The Quran admonishes blasphemy, but does not specify any worldly punishment for blasphemy. The hadiths, which are another source of Sharia, suggest various punishments for blasphemy, which may include death. However, it has been argued that the death penalty applies only to cases where there is treason involved that may seriously harm the Muslim community, especially during times of war. Different traditional schools of jurisprudence prescribe different punishment for blasphemy, depending on whether the blasphemer is Muslim or non-Muslim, a man or a woman. In the modern Muslim world, the laws pertaining to blasphemy vary by country, and some countries prescribe punishments consisting of fines, imprisonment, flogging, hanging, or beheading.
4:44:00 I had already answered Gandalf's question (ie Why should I, a German, worship a non-German deity?) twice before I was ejected by Jen. The answer I repeated twice was "Because the rules work."
IS AUTISM JUST A CONSEQUENCE OF BAD PARENTING OR DYSGENIC UNMARRIED MOTHERHOOD IN MOST CASES?
5:05:00 Autism is adults who still say "I want" showing that they are still not getting it. It is bad parenting to not tell your child not to begin a sentence with "I want." Please give up associating with people like that, Jen. Or, if you want to teach him something he really needs to learn, come down on him like a ton of bricks every time he says those trigger words: "I want." You are a bad parent if your kid does something that reflects badly on you eg Make people think "Didn't your parents ever tell you not to do X?"
FGM is unIslamic because women and men too of course should be given the free will to refrain from extramarital sex.
My questions for Rabbi Sacks
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/09/my-questions-for-rabbi-sacks-which-i.html
The belief in a Jewish conspiracy is caused by the defects of Christianity
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-belief-in-jewish-conspiracy-is.html
Can the Church regain its morality authority?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/can-church-regain-its-morality-authority.html
What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html
Does the Archbishop of Canterbury think the state religion of Britain is PC Libtardism?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/06/does-archbishop-of-canterbury-think.html
I don't know if Will is aware of my answer to the Jewish Question.
http://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2019/01/how-jews-should-deal-with-jewish.html
The ISIS interpretation of Islam comes from the Talmud
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-isis-interpretation-of-islam-comes.html
The Koran if interpreted correctly is neither excessively liberal or excessively Conservative. Nor is it excessively patriarchal or excessively matriarchal. It encourages businesses enterprise but enjoins charity. All races are equal and its creation story resembles the Big Bang and it forbids compulsion in belief. How the hell did the Muslims manage to mess up this great religion? By not reading and debating the Koran and trusting their 'scholars' to do it for them, by allowing the Gates of Interpretation, closed centuries ago, to remain closed. Otherwise, it would be the perfect ideology that is the middle way between capital and communism, the patriarchy and the matriarchy, for all humanity.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/aphorisms-of-claire-khaw.html
Controlled Opps mentioned the Kharijites but I don't see their relevance to this debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khawarij
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_blasphemy
Blasphemy in Islam is impious utterance or action concerning God, "Blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad and his companions (sabb al-rasul, sabb al-sahabah)", insulting an angel or to deny the prophethood of one of the Islamic prophets. The Quran admonishes blasphemy, but does not specify any worldly punishment for blasphemy. The hadiths, which are another source of Sharia, suggest various punishments for blasphemy, which may include death. However, it has been argued that the death penalty applies only to cases where there is treason involved that may seriously harm the Muslim community, especially during times of war. Different traditional schools of jurisprudence prescribe different punishment for blasphemy, depending on whether the blasphemer is Muslim or non-Muslim, a man or a woman. In the modern Muslim world, the laws pertaining to blasphemy vary by country, and some countries prescribe punishments consisting of fines, imprisonment, flogging, hanging, or beheading.
4:44:00 I had already answered Gandalf's question (ie Why should I, a German, worship a non-German deity?) twice before I was ejected by Jen. The answer I repeated twice was "Because the rules work."
IS AUTISM JUST A CONSEQUENCE OF BAD PARENTING OR DYSGENIC UNMARRIED MOTHERHOOD IN MOST CASES?
5:05:00 Autism is adults who still say "I want" showing that they are still not getting it. It is bad parenting to not tell your child not to begin a sentence with "I want." Please give up associating with people like that, Jen. Or, if you want to teach him something he really needs to learn, come down on him like a ton of bricks every time he says those trigger words: "I want." You are a bad parent if your kid does something that reflects badly on you eg Make people think "Didn't your parents ever tell you not to do X?"
— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
Chillstream - What is "Autism"? https://t.co/8QjA9s1JyA It's so cute the way she calls these internet bloodsports where people are ejected "chillstreams".
I think Jen seeks unconditional love. This bizarre quest seems to be the root of her behaviour. I think I am the person who has never met her who is closest to offering this to her, ironically! To offer my understanding of what I think this means would be an interesting exercise.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
I have never believed such a thing could exist and I think many people destroy themselves offering it or demanding it. After all, even God Himself does not get unconditional love.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
Her demand is that her followers must never have offended or questioned her. If they have, it is the sentence of having to build a time machine to turn back time to never have offended her. On the one hand, unreasonable demands, on the other the expectation of rejection.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
It has been said that most problems of politics is a problem of character. Problems of character are about people who are unable to reconcile their own ego with the dictates of Truth, Logic and Morality. I suspect her true objection to Secular Koranism is that it is not her idea.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
If she were mindful of the dictates of Truth, Logic and Morality, she would concede that she has lost the argument rather than pretend that my real intention is to persecute and exterminate polytheists. She has now appointed herself as Lady Protectress of Pagans. Ridiculous!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
The fact that she refuses to read the Koran if only to question Secular Koranism represents her true position no matter how morally and intellectually indefensible, because her over-arching desire to protect her own ideas trumps Truth, Logic and Morality.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
Instead of streaming with me, she prefers to associate herself with an autistic former Catholic of German ancestry who repeatedly wonders why Westerners cannot all be got to worship Wotan because he cannot see why he should worship Allah because Muhammad is not German!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
The other is the inventor of Aryan Hebrewism (ie Christians are really Jews and therefore God's real Chosen People because he was unaware that the Catholic Church had already deprived Jews of their chosen status). https://t.co/qPObLi9dCj— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
The inventor of Aryan Hebrewism is also the inventor of Subjective Absolutism which is no more than the idea that your ideas are an infant that must be protected from scrutiny and challenge even if they are intellectually and morally indefensible. I ask you!— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
She can already repeat my axioms in her sleep and has deconstructed Secular Koranism with a flowchart - an act of possession, thrilling in its boldness and analysis. But now she is back with spergs, degenerates and troubled young men because she has given up challenging my ideas. pic.twitter.com/i03e51IikB— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
And so we are back to the question of character. Your character is only as good as your principles you are seen to follow. Jen claims her principles are Truth, Logic and Morality. They are mine too and I know that I follow these principles better than anyone else I know.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) May 30, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment