26:00 If you get it sooner, the quicker you will get herd immunity.
37:00 "Religion is a placebo effect."
1:32:00 Noahide laws and the Chabad synagogue
1:42:00 Vincent praises Judaism!
1:44:00 Stefan Molyneux
1:48:00 Murder
1:49:00 Reciprocity
1:54:00 The law of the jungle and science
1:56:00 Natural law and the "real Natural Law" according to Church of Entropy
2:10:00 Church of Entropy babbles about quantum physics and Stefan Molyneux
2:24:00 Doooovid says Stefan Molyneux's arguments are basically Noahide ie
2:25:00 that even if you don't believe in God, you should be a Noahide anyway.
2:27:00 JF is a Cultural Relativist using the Frankfurt School argument.
2:28:00 Minimising suffering
2:30:00 "Low benefit content"
2:31:00 Taxicab geometry
2:43:00 Church of Entropy defends JF.
2:53:00 The streaming careers of Luke Ford and JF
2:59:00 The low quality content of Luke Ford
3:07:00 Doooovid, has found a niche as Jew of the alt-right.
Luke Ford was doing a bible show?
Luke Ford can't go professional because he hasn't got it in him.
Like JF, Luke is a sociopath, but a sociopath who has converted to Judaism. JF has greater integrity because he virtually calls himself a sociopath by declaring himself to be a nihilist.
Doooovid has found yourself a niche as Jew of the alt-right.
Luke, because he cannot stick to any identity properly, is just known for being a random guy of uncertain identity and mental health known for his OCD streaming and sociopathy.
Mentally ill and morally deficient streamers don't get very far. Luke and I could have a really great series of interviews, but I don't think he is prepared to have a sustained conversation with anyone at all, least of all me.
3:11:00 Molyneux has disabled comments on his video.
3:13:00 Church of Entropy complains about censorship when she can appear and post on my channel while she does not feel I am entitled to the same reciprocity. She even does this crazy thing of posting in my live chat and deleting her comments afterwards.
3:31:00 No debate topic
3:33:00 Obviously, if you can't agree on axioms, you would have to debate whose axioms are to prevail.
3:35:00 I have already done what Dooovid is saying is the most difficult of all:
1) Win the debate according to my own rules/definition.
2) Win the debate according to the rules/definition of my opponent.
This means that according to their own axioms/principles/rules, they should do what I say.
This means:
a) governments governing in the national interest should support Secular Koranism because it is divine civic nationalism
b) Muslims should support Secular Koranism because it is a new school of sharia as interpreted by me, an agnostic, ex-Liberal, ex-Conservative and ex-feminist
c) Diaspora Jews should support Secular Koranism because it is Noahide-observant and Israeli Jews should support Secular Koranism because it is technically a theocracy
d) Christians should support Secular Koranism because it is in conformity with the Ten Commandments
e) Hindus should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Hinduism
f) Buddhists should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Buddhism.
g) Liberals should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Liberalism
h) Conservatives should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Conservatism
i) Libertarians should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Libertarianism since what we ought to have is liberty after all the necessary laws are in place
My invitation in 2017 to Stefan Molyneux for a debate on the logic of theocracy
j) the Chinese Communist Party should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Socialism with Chinese characteristics
k) the US should adopt Secular Koranism because the First Amendment is based on quran.com/2/256
l) Nationalists should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of either ethno- or civic nationalism since Judaism is divine ethno nationalism and Islam divine civic nationalism. (Presumably, this is why there is a boycott on me and my streams. Mark Collett has actually said to me that neither he nor his associates will ever have me on their streams because he already knows none of them can use truth, logic or morality to defeat any of my arguments.)
m) Church of Entropy should support Secular Koranism because there is nothing in it that is inconsistent with the principles of Entropism
n) atheists should support Secular Koranism because it guarantees their freedom of belief and gives them lower taxes, more rational government and greater economic and social stability through a stable family life
3:38:00 According to Church of Entropy, it doesn't matter who has the sounder argument, the winner is the one who appears to have won.
I have won against Church of Entropy because she imposes draconian acts of censorship on me eg by refusing to have me on Week In Review, hiding me in her live chat as well as deleting my comments, while I allow her on my streams, to post in my live chat and never delete her comments.
I even allow her to be horribly rude to me on my streams because I am a patient long-suffering woman who cares about white people and wants to save them from their degeneracy, to the point of martyrdom.
Listen to Church of Entropy telling me to "Shut up" three times on my stream and refusing to let me tell Spacepan about the Noahide laws.
Church of Entropy shouts at me three times to "Shut up!" at 1:32:00, 1:56:00 and 2:01:00
Game, set and match to Claire Khaw!
4:11:00 Human beings are K-selected because they practise marriage, but obviously not the ones who are bastards and whose parents would be treated as sex offenders under quran.com/24/2
4:13:00 I am featured.
No comments:
Post a Comment