40:00 Elliott is triggered by all this taking of the knee that he can no joke around about lockdown and the rioting any more.
41:00 Elliott basically cucks to liberal opinion and basically gets away with it by joking around with his "duality"
42:00 Inexplicably, Church of Entropy talks about "the bliss of religious submission". Inexplicably, Elliott says "Yeah." Does he mean the bliss of religiously submitting to the BLM God?
We all want the world to make sense.
50:00 Elliott mentions Luke Ford talking about me at https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/06/sunday-stream.html
1:00:00 Inexplicably, I am accused of totalitarianism and virtue-signalling.
1:06:00 Restrained aggression
1:08:00 A, B or Other. "So what you are saying is ... ?" But that still triggers them.
1:10:00 They are beyond reason now anyway.
1:11:00 The best way of getting through to an SJW is to ask them a simple question with an obvious answer they cannot answer honestly without giving their position away, and leave it hanging there. Questioning this is questioning their identity.
1:12:00 There is no reasoning them out of this. This is the culmination of what they have believed in for the last 20 years.
1:21:00 Church of Entropy has already forgotten the name of George Floyd.
1:22:00 Conform to their narrative or be seen as their enemy.
1:28:00 Is Elliott really thinking of offering himself as a sacrificial lamb on the altar of Truth, Logic and Morality?
1:50:00 A mysterious woman offers to educate Church of Entropy about her sexuality and how to serve her and her black masters.
2:01:00 Acknowledging people's feelings
2:14:00 People with religious identity
2:16:00 My being hidden from Cotto-Gottfried is mentioned.
5 comments:
"The bliss of submission" refers to the ecstatic realization after one surrenders the ego to its source. It's fundamental to all religious life; it's the core of all organic, abiding religious traditions. As an intellectual, you see this as just a set of words that can be deconstructed like any other set of words. But, to other people, such as Jennifer Scharf and myself, these words point to something beyond the words themselves. So, we're basically at the same old impasse. Your utilitarian worldview reduces religion to a mundane function on par with auto mechanics. You're incredulity points the poverty of your own life experience.
Religion has two purposes: private and public. The private is spiritual, the public is legal and moral. You are completely ignoring the public purpose of religion and only talking about submitting to the idea of kneeling before your Deity of Expediency. I had you down as an atheist anyway.
B follows A
To create a religion as solution to a public problem puts the cart before the horse and explains the resistance to SK that you receive.
"I had you down as an atheist anyway." You jump to conclusions.
Islam already exists. Secular Koranism is a one size fits all legal system that will restore the patriarchy while guaranteeing freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256. You reject it either because you are an atheist or an Islamophobe. All who reject Secular Koranism are atheists and Islamophobes who refuse to make the sacrifices necessary to restore and protect the patriarchy.
Anyone with a solution > someone with no solution and only complains
A theocracy with the rule of law> a theocracy with no rule of law
Jews > antisemites
Muslims > Islamophobes
Monotheism > idolatry
I don't quite see why having a better understanding of the nature and purpose of religion than you points to the poverty of my life experience. I am a political activist, so you would expect me to concentrate on the public purpose of religion. Spirituality is the reward we get when we believe we are following our moral principles properly. What are your moral principles and what is your religion?
I answered the question you asked. I didn't sign up for a day long interrogation.
Post a Comment