The Voice of Reason: 6 subjects mainstream media must discuss to prove it is not guilty of the feminine vice of denial

Friday 21 August 2020

6 subjects mainstream media must discuss to prove it is not guilty of the feminine vice of denial

2:00 What is propaganda?
3:00 Indoctrinating with what ?

4:00 People who believe that slavery exists under Communist China and who are basically prepared to believe any lie about China because they already hate China

5:00 Foreign policy
6:00 Tiananmen Square
7:00 Covid payouts in Australia till March 2021
8:00 The definition of slavery

9:00 Theocracy tolerates slavery but not Communism which is based on the idea of a workers' paradise.

10:00 Is the US government in control of US media?

11:00 China's media serves China's national interest. Does Western media serve the Western national interest? Does Israeli media serve the Israeli National Interest? Isn't Israel an American Protectorate and therefore not even a state that enjoys national independence?

12:00 Culture War between the religious and secular Jews
13:00 Whose interest should the media serve if not the national interest?
14:00 "Self-hating Jew" lives on disability benefit.
15:00 "Got It" is an ex-Muslim who says China is safer than the West and that he likes China more.

Does the media serve the national interest? If not, what or who should it serve?

18:00 Who should we listen to if not the media?
19:00 What purpose should the media serve?
20:00 The media should inform us and explain current events to us.
21:00 China's media is not allowed to trash its leaders.
22:00 President Trump being trashed by Western media. Whose interest is this serving?

23:00 Is liberalism in the national interest?

25:00 The media should be submitting to Truth, Logic and Morality.

26:00 No Western government is in control of its media.

27:00 Will Western media be answering my questions or facilitating a discussion around the six issues I raise?

29:00 Steve Bannon
31:00 The National Interest
32:00 The rules of religion
33:00 Aren't Christianity and Islam derived from Judaism?
34:00 Multiple Truth Hypothesis allows intellectuals to say "yeah but no".
35:00 The National Interest
36:00 Public intellectuals and nationalists
37:00 The truth

38:00 Jews are being confused with Liberalism.

39:00 Is Liberalism a Jewish creation or a gentile one? Will antisemites who themselves reject liberalism be blaming Jews for liberalism too? If you are an antisemite, you would not care about being fair to Jews and are happy to blame everything on Jews even as you know Jews cannot be blamed for liberalism since liberalism is of gentile origin. If there are Liberal Gentiles, why not Liberal Jews? If Liberalism must be banned, then it should be banned for both Jew and gentile. Antisemites should stop scapegoating Jews for liberalism which came from the ideas of the French Revolution.

40:00 Antiliberal antisemites when given the option of hating Jews or Liberalism always opt to hate Jews because their purpose is to blame everything on Jews even when they know that the cause of the problem is Liberalism itself, even as they know that Liberalism was never a creation of Judaism or Jews, even when they know that Jews are also victims of Liberalism.

41:00 Nationalists unable to discuss the national interest preferring to blame Jews, Muslims and other races

44:00 Putin: Russian president says liberalism 'obsolete'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48795764

Is Putin right? Is liberalism really obsolete?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bzrh6i8rppI&feature=youtu.be

47:00 Nigel Farage: I admire Vladimir Putin
Ukip leader praises Russian president's handling of Syria crisis, but describes Germany's chancellor as 'incredibly cold'
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/mar/31/farage-i-admire-putin

48:00 Leaders who govern in the national interest of the nation they lead

49:00 Balkanisation, liberalism, feminism, nationalism, the national interest

50:00 Will the feminised Western media discuss these subjects?

51:00 Catholics have the Pope, Anglicans have the Archbishop of Canterbury, Orthodox Christians have their Patriarchs, Jews have their Chief Rabbis, but who represents Muslims in Western nations of the West where they are a minority? Muslims living in any non-Muslim country should at least find a Muslim leader to represent their interests, but it seems they are too disorganised and atomised to do so. This means they will continue to have no effective representation.

53:00 Richard Spencer, Mark Collett, Anne Marie Waters

54:00 Adam Walker, Nick Griffin

55:00 New Culture Forum

56:00 News blackout on me and Secular Koranism

57:00 Denial is a feminine vice.

58:00 Losers and larpers

59:00 Islam cannot work without sharia.

1:00:00 Putin

1:02:00 My interpretation of the wife-beating verse
http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.com/2010/06/my-interpretation-of-that-wife-beating.html

1:05:00 Sharia is the engine of Islam.

1:07:00 Pretentious YouTubers like Moldbug and Jay Dyer who never say anything clearly because they don't want to be understood

1:08:00 Morons who confuse what is viable with what is popular

1:10:00 Ohm7: "No nation has voluntarily accepted Islam."

Under what conditions would he submit to the Truth, Logic and Morality of having a religion at least capable of maintaining a minimum standard of sexual morality?

Does Ohm7 submit to the moral imperative of choosing the lesser evil of the patriarchy?
Does Ohm7 accept that he is now living in a degenerate declining matriarchy?
Does Ohm7 accept that marriage and family values need to be supported by the government?
Does Ohm7 accept that Christianity is kaput?
If Ohm7 accepts Christianity is kaput, does he accept that it needs to be replaced?
If Ohm7 accepts that Christianity needs to be replaced, what else other than Secular Koranism should replace it?
What is so "absurd" about slut-shaming Secular Koranism once you acknowledge that matriarchy is the problem?
What better solution has Ohm7?

1:11:00 Secular Koranism does not need the support of Muslims who will doubtless object to it because I am not Muslim. If the Western political establishment decide to adopt it, why on earth would Muslims object? Secular Koranism is closer to Islam than the moral sewage of globohomo that Muslims and other social conservatives have been known to object to.

1:13:00 Muslims already submit to the globohomo moral sewage living in the West, so why not submit to Secular Koranism should Western governments decide to adopt it?

1:14:00 The Ten Commandments and the Noahide laws

1:16:00 I never said Islam was "truthful".

Seneca:

Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.

1:17:00 You don't have to believe in God to support Secular Koranism, as long as you want to become a married parent and live in a patriarchy. If you don't support marriage and family values even in theory as a spinster, bachelor or LGBT, then your opinion should be ignored anyway.

1:18:00 How theocracy can be useful to atheists

Stefan Molyneux the atheist, libertarian and Islamophobe agrees with me about theocracy.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/01/should-law-conform-to-morality-and-if.html

1:19:00 Unmarried parents should be treated as sex offenders. quran.com/24/2

1:20:00 Unmarriageable men would not be interested to restoring the patriarchy.

1:21:00 WHY GOD IS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE INSTITUTIONS OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY

All religions and political ideologies are moral systems. The difference between religion and secular political ideologies is that religions explicitly forbid extramarital sex while secular political ideologies allow it. Even if some secular political ideologies forbid it, they have a tendency to fail and will be replaced by another secular political ideology that will allow it and suffer the consequent degeneracy. Because the eternal and universal rules of marriage and family values need to be obeyed from generation to generation to avoid degeneracy, it is necessary that God be conscripted into establishing, protecting and restoring the patriarchy. There is no way round this, I'm afraid.

1:25:00 Muslims are not the same as Islam. Instructions in a book are not the same thing as the people who don't follow them properly.

1:26:00 A judiciary is less likely to be corrupt than a priesthood because legal decisions are argued over in open court under an adversarial system and can be appealed. Judges are always required to give a reason while the priesthood hides behind a cloud of hocus pocus.

1:30:00 Tomi Lahren

1:32:00 The difference between a legal system and a belief system: a legal system is just a system of rules you are obliged to follow, a belief system is a narrative you are obliged to affirm to be a member of the group.

1:33:00 Secular Koranism guarantees freedom of belief with quran.com/2/256

1:36:00 It seems I am not allowed to criticise Slut Single Mothers who have become a sacred cow to many Western men.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/About_a_Boy_(film)

Will Freeman lives a serene and luxurious lifestyle devoid of responsibility in London thanks to substantial royalties left to him from a successful Christmas song composed by his father. In an attempt to meet single women with children (who Will believes have low expectations in the men they date), Will begins attending a single parent support group, "SPAT", where he falsely states that he has a two-year-old son named Ned.

The topics mainstream media must discuss to prove it is not controlled by immoral and unaccountable women: