Antisemitic pagans would be on the side of the Canaanites when Jews were wandering in the wilderness, invading and conquering the pagans of Canaan.
Islamophobic pagans would be on the side of the polytheistic Meccans if they could choose a side.
The Ummah and Orthodox Jewry should be asking Charles III as the Head of the Church of England how Christianity is not idolatry and how Jesus is God. How about that as a legal and peaceful way of waging jihad on your Christian overlords? The Church of England is the most powerful church in the world commanding the most territory. Britain still commands a huge expanse of territory that is technically still British which, being a US vassal state, it has put at the disposal of its American overlord.
The marine empire of America could not continue to exist without having the right to dock in Australia to refuel and rearm to disrupt the trade routes of China in the Straits of Malacca and the South China Sea (also not called the North Eastern Californian Sea!).
Should Britain put its territories at the disposal of the evil neocons who stole the election from Trump and therefore the majority of Americans who voted for him? I rather think not.
The fact remains that all NATO countries are US vassal states and this includes Israel which is an American colony.
It is time for Westerners both Jew and gentile to have a long hard think about who they are, what they are and, most importantly of all, what they want to be and should be.
Are they Christian monarchists or Muslim Republicans?
If they want to cling to the latter, what is the advantage of clinging to two anachronisms? The Age of Monarchy has come and gone, has it not? What were the American, French and Russian Revolutions about if not about replacing monarchy and thereby enjoying the benefits of a greater pool of political talent from which to recruit their next national leader?
Such things matter if you care about good government!
Who is a terrorist? One who terrorises for religious and political reasons.
Is there something inherently more moral about war and less moral about terrorism? Is state terrorism inherently more moral than non-state terrorism? And isn't terrorism just a poor man's war?
What we do know is that there will be no peace without justice, and it is now time for Muslims to make the arguments about why Koranic principles of governance would result in more justice than the absence of them.
What are these reasons? Let me make suggest making the following points to the King in your letter which should be addressed to
The Private Secretary to His Majesty the King, Clarence House, London SW1A 1BA
Below is my draft letter to the King.
Sir,
Concern for yourself and the peoples of the British Empire prompts me to write to you.
Your coronation reminded me of the divine right of kings supported by Christianity, and the ceremony of your anointment made clear its Judaic origins.
Jews are known for the position they have taken on idolatry and have rules forbidding them to enter churches which are places of abomination where idolatry is practised while allowed to pray in mosques with Muslims.
Assuming you believe in God and accept the Ten Commandments including the prohibitions against idolatry and blasphemy, what have you to say, as Head of the Church of England, about the worship of a man who was convicted of blasphemy?
I would ask the Archbishop of Canterbury this question but anticipate that he will not even acknowledge my letter much less answer the questions of how Christianity is not idolatry and how Jesus is God. It is only to be expected that Justin Welby would want to remain in his position until he can collect his pension and will be very firm in letting idolatrous and Trinitarian sleeping dogs lie.
It is concerning that even religious leaders have lost the capacity to even hypotheise that God if He exists might not agree with Christians that He is the co-equal of an executed blasphemer nor co-eternal and co-substantial with Jesus. To add insult to injury, Catholics have in their time claimed that the Creator of the Universe had a mother whose name was Mary, responsible for the Virgin Birth of the Creator of the Universe.
I write in the spirit of alarm and concern at the growing wickedness of the neocons who are now equated with Zionists and Jewry in general.
It seems that the neocons have made a mascot of Jews giving them an almost holy status that gentiles are expected to accept. If they do not, they are called Nazis and antisemites and even thrown in jail for mocking Jews as Alison Chabloz was. Was it for this her grandfather died in WW2?
This is all designed to provoke antisemitism in order to justify ever more draconian censorship that would be blamed on Jews to provoke more totalitarian censorship in a vicious cycle of antisemitism and censorship directed by the neocons who want to start a war against Iran in European waters intended to provoke a nuclear holocaust so no one will take over after the global American Empire has crashed and burned.
Such arrogant and destructive evil can be explained by the godlessness of the American ruling classes.
How can this be challenged and called out?
My suggestion is this:
Demand that the Archbishop of Canterbury explain publicly on record how Christianity is not idolatry and how Jesus is God inviting Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi and the Supreme Leader of Iran Imam Khameini to comment on his explanation.
This would be the best way of starting a theological conversation to put the world on notice that God if He exists could be very cross with Christians with their three global empires for their idolatry and blasphemy and very disappointed with Jews and Muslims for never having once questioned or challenged the idolatry and blasphemy of the Trinity.
If Christianity is unequal to the task of maintaining morality in the West, don't you think Islam might do the trick?
A book on Secular Koranism - a new moral and legal political system for the West and the rest is available on Amazon.
If you are wondering what you could be doing should you choose to abdicate, may I suggest that you become your own Archbishop of Canterbury to preach to your fellow Anglicans?
If you chose not to defend the faith of Anglicanism but prefer to convert to Islam, might I suggest a joint Carolean-Khavian School of Islam that will become a national and imperial success story of the Western and hopefully global adoption of Islam!
Your conversion to Islam would be a very powerful signal to Britons high and low that Islam has penetrated British royalty which would have significant political repercussions.
I have the honour to be, Sir, Your Majesty's humble and obedient servant
Claire Khaw
PS By the way, I am not Muslim.
No comments:
Post a Comment