Claire Khaw to buy the BDP for £5K?

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103693334657#_=_
Q:  would you be willing to buy the BDP for £5k
A:  To whom would this sum be payable? Kevin Scott?

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103693741441#_=_
Q:  £5k split between the committee and they all resign
A:  How many on the Committee? It does sound quite an interesting offer.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103693950849#_=_
Q:  What is wrong with paper sales? Political supports starts at a grassroots level — bottom-up. Even Nigel Farage has publicly adopted the approach of Paddy Ashdown, which established the Liberal Democrats at local level first.
A:  I am just saying I want a more sophisticated and direct way of communicating with the party's potential supporters.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103694116993#_=_
Q:  would you change the bdps name to the britain first party as the idea of putting the national interest above all is encapsulated in the idea of putting britain first?
A:  I don't like Britain First because it sounds so fringe party. If I could easily change the name I would call it the British National Independence Party - to be shortened into the B-Nips.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103694135169#_=_
Q:  We are not sure if you are just grandstanding or are serious, you need to show us you are serious what do you do for a job? are you some joker on benefits?
A:  Serious about what?

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103694036609#_=_
Q:  If you bought the British Democratic Party and the Committee resigned, how would you build up the party in terms of popular endorsement from scratch?
A:  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/what-i-will-do-for-bdp-once-i-buy.html has a few ideas. Clearly, I would invite the more talented ex-BNP members who would countenance working with me and are OK about how far they can be ethno-nationalists as I have outlined at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/what-ethno-nationalist-says-when-he.html

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103694317185#_=_
Q:  when we say £5k we mean cash all at once, if you get my drift, not £1 a week for the next million years, are you an attention seeking time waster?
A:  I don't even know if you are even in the BDP. *You* could just be winding me up! If you are really serious then get in touch with me by email, please. andromeda07734@yahoo.co.uk

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103695201409#_=_
Q:  we are not interested in a time waster like you, your ex associate Dave Jones has reliably informed us that you are on benefits please do not disturb us again, should you be able to find somebody genuine with £5k who will sponsor you, feel free to get back in touch with proof
A:  Get in touch with *whom*, please?

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103695592321#_=_
Q:  post something with proof on facebook that somebody reputable has agreed to put up £5k, preferably a nationalist with a good reputation, if this happens it will be done for mutual publicity purposes
A:  If you just get in touch with me by email and convince me you are not some mischief maker who is not even a member of the BDP let alone a committee member, we can take this further. I have already given you my email.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103695745665#_=_
Q:  the burden is on you to prove you are not a mischief maker, we have nick name for you "The Grandstander"
A:  I will just ask Adrian Davies then. He is the Treasurer after all and he would know whether the Committee are really willing to sell.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103696455297#_=_
Q:  btw you get to keep that civic adrian as part of the deal, we do not want him
A:  Thank you very much.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103697054849#_=_
Q:  If Kevin Scott agreed to sell you the BDP for half of the value of your house, would you sell your house to raise the funds for the purchase of the party?
A:  I think I must be seen to be doing a good deal, *and not be obviously mad*, to make a go of the lame duck BDP. Buying the BDP for obviously more than what it is worth would suggest I am mad, would it not? Is there any nationalist in the land who thinks Kevin has it in him to make a go of it? Not even the people who have known him over the years and who say he is a good bloke.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103697243265#_=_
Q:  if kev sells it to you at least 30 of us will leave, the man has lost his mind, WE WILL NEVER STAND A GOOK, we do not like your sort even if you got the €€€€€
A:  So it is Kevin who wants to sell, does it? I don't mind if you go after I take over, because I am only interested in working with ethno-nationalists who want to work with civic nationalists and adopt a strategy of civic nationalism. To be honest, I want to attract a better class of nationalist capable of understanding my ideas anyway, so please don't stay on my account.

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/103696843905#_=_
Q:  is there any nationalist you can name that will put the money up, a man of sound reputation,obviously a civic
A:  I do hope that there will be civic nationalists who will want to be part of this political project, which is to rehabilitate the image of nationalism and turn it into an ideology that is acknowledged to be noble, rational and moral.

Mark Collett is such a nice young man. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/mark-collett-formerly-of-bnp-favours.html




It is possible that the person appearing to make the offer has no authority to do so.  What do you think, dear reader?  

Is Kevin Scott really the best Chairman for the British Democratic Party?

1. He has said on Facebook that he would vote UKIP in GE 2015.
2. He thinks civic nationalism is a dirty word fit only to be contained in quotes.
3. He is a Catholic who refuses to support marriage.
4. He is a Catholic who refuses to criticise feminism.
5. He would not respond to my communications on whether I could attend the BDP launch.
6. When Adrian Davies the Treasurer of the BDP asked him on my behalf if I could attend he continued to refuse, without giving a proper reason.
7. He did not deny writing http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1682 under the name of John Stevens.  
8. Does Kevin Scott have any new ideas at all?  
9. Does British Nationalism need the Neanderthal image of the more more "racial" and plebeian Northerners?  
10. If a new and improved form of British Nationalism  - especially the kind that aspires to be superior to the kind that Nick Griffin offers - is being offered by the BDP, is Kevin Scott - an unreconstructed ethno-nationalist - really the right person to represent it?
11. Can Kevin Scott understand let alone appreciate the subtle reasoning and the nuanced thinking contained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/what-ethno-nationalist-says-when-he.html?
12. Even if he grasps it, will he thank me for this device that I have conceived for allowing ethno-nationalists to be ethno-nationalists while pursuing the strategy of civic nationalism?
13. If he does not thank me and appoint me as BDP Media Spokesman, what does that say about Kevin Scott as a man, an activist and a British Nationalist?  
14. Is it really the case that Kevin Scott would rather the BDP came to nothing than allow me to make something of it by becoming its Media Spokesman?  
15. Does Kevin Scott not realise that I am the only one in the land capable of rehabilitating the image of British nationalism while affirming the right of ethno-nationalists to promote the interests of their own race? 
16. If the civic nationalist faction of the BDP (I think this only means Adrian Davies and me at this stage) were to take over, would it not lend British Nationalism a welcome aura of metropolitan sophistication?   
17. If Adrian and I were to take over the BDP we would become the foremost nationalist "couple" of Britain while Kevin Scott can only think of soliciting the votes of women in Gatehead and Newcastle who either cannot or refuse to understand why feminism has been so destructive to Britain.  Should such a man, who has done the equivalent of what Gerald Ratner did when he said his own jewellery was "total crap" when he said he would vote UKIP in GE 2015, be the Chairman of any political party?

I am collecting comments about Kevin from other nationalists.  

Here are the first few:

"Well, he is a pleasant enough chap. However his selection as leader of the BDP shows the level of dynamism I would expect from that party!"

"That party is a drinking club. It's where old nationalists who dislike Griffin can get together, write articles about how they dislike Griffin, have a beer and pretend they're an alternative when it suits them."

British Democratic Party launch reviewed

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/recording-of-the-first-part-of-the-saturday-9th-february-2013-meeting/

Kevin Scott, said that the new party would respect the rights of those legal immigrants and their descendants to remain in the UK without fear or hindrance. 

You would have thought they have learnt not to say things like that any more.   The lady doth protest too much!  This is from http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/british-democratic-party-launches-in-leicester/

The most important and interesting speech is Adrian Davies' who speaks approvingly of the success of Marine Le Pen and Front Nationale.  Her father Jean Marie has been nagging British nationalists to unequivocally embrace civic nationalists since 2004, advice that Nick Griffin would do well to follow.   The singular lack of urgency that characterises British nationalism is something about which British nationalists ought to be thoroughly ashamed.

Sadly, however, a singular lack of shame is yet another badge of British nationalism.

http://nationalistunityforum.co.uk/index.php/bdp-launch-part-2-audio/

The most interesting speech  from the above link is Andrew Brons', who confuses nationality with race.   He wants citizenship only to be given on grounds of nationality, and nationality as far as he is concerned is about race.

If only British nationalists would drag themselves out of the primeval swamp of ethno-nationalism and take a dip in the pool of inclusive nationhood as defined by the Islamic concept of a racially neutral ummah.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah

Someone suggested that members be made to sign up to the party's principles and  it had to be pointed out by Adrian Davies that BDP cannot exclude anyone on grounds of race, because that is now the law, unless they fancy spending a hundred thousand pounds or thereabouts disputing this in court.

The BDP is clearly more "racial" and more full of unreconstructed ethno-nationalists  than the BNP who have modernised to the extent that it now describes itself in its constitution at 3.2.1 in these terms:

"Our party is a party of British nationalism, both ethnic and civic".   

It is terribly disheartening that they still do not understand why civic nationalism is the only way forward.  To succeed, they must be ideologically more civic than the BNP, but they went the other way instead.   I suppose that is the reason why Kevin Scott the Chairman excluded me from attending without deigning to give a reason.

I just feel a bit sorry for these people who are now going to have their time and money wasted, because they do not see the point of having ideological clarity.  Most of them are grateful to have something to do after being kicked out of the BNP, I suppose.  They are taking the middle way between the NF and the BNP when what is required is for a party that takes the middle way between the BNP and UKIP.

Yes, they are dunces and dunderheads, mules and fatheads, and there is nothing I can do about it.

To be associated with a movement that is always shooting itself in the foot and putting its bloodied limb in its mouth is something I must continue to put up with, I suppose.  

Doubtless, if I were white and male they would be begging me to lead them.  However, because I am female and foreign, they will ignore everything I say, just because they wish to do the opposite of what I say.

Never mind, when things get bad enough, they will remember that I told them so, and come to me begging  me to be their leader.

As ever, I intend to be magnanimous in victory, and graciously accept.   To err is human, to forgive divine.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/327008697419786/
Who should lead the nationalist movement if not Nick Griffin?

National Culturalism won't work as a pillar of British nationalism

Nick Griffin and Jack Buckby, the proponent of "National Culturalism"

http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/jack-buckby-is-proud-to-be-britains-next-nick-griffin

It won't work because it is not about anything, and no one can define British Culture, not even British Nationalists.

Culture is fluid, and to ask what British culture is becomes a philosophical question, and British nationalists are not especially equipped to ask and answer them.

What do the British do anyway?  More importantly, what is it about British culture that British nationalists wish to preserve?

I have asked Jack Buckby and he got rather angry with me when he could not answer this question, and disengaged.  He has probably been warned off me by the Chairman of the BNP, who might have told him to steer clear of me as I am a bit of a Nazi ....

Nationalism needs to be for and against something that people can understand.  The white proletarian whine  about immigration and Muslims is not enough to attract the votes of the middle and business classes, but it seems these people do not even care, or do not know of the scale of the work to be done to make nationalism electorally respectable.

To be a national movement, nationalism must be inclusive.   This will make many nationalists baulk, for to them nationalism is about excluding foreigners and other races.

It must not only be racially inclusive, it must also offer something for people of all classes, races and religions.  (Currently, it is a party that wants socialism for whites only.)

There is therefore more than a hint of ideological retardation amongst nationalists, who want it to stay proletarian, antisemitic and white and then wonder why they are universally despised.   This sort of thing is OK for a social or activity club, but won't do at all for a political party.

So here are the key points of nationalism, as I see it:

1. Nationalism is for all of the nation, regardless of class, religion or race.  It is one-nation nationalism.  Indeed, you could call it National Socialism without the racism, antisemitism or militarism.  It is racially neutral.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah  (Is this motherhood and apple pie enough for you?)
2. Nationalism is better able to endure and can best be promoted in a single party state and a taxpayer-only democracy.  (It need not be totalitarian if you have a constitution that protects the rights of its members from the leader and his cronies.)
3. It is socially conservative.
4. Its purpose is to serve the long-term national interest.  (The long term is defined as our children or grandchildren not yet born.)
5. Its promotes the greater good of the greater number.
6. It is libertarian in purpose for it is contended that it would be in the long term national interest to have fewer laws and lower taxes.  (Tacitus: "The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government.")
7. It will derive its morality and legal principles from the Koran without compelling belief in anyone.   (2:256:  "There is no compulsion in belief, for truth stands clear from error.")  As you all throw your hands up in horror at the idea, may I just  point out that the Koran is actually a lot more lenient on criminals than the Old Testament?  How do you know it is horrible if you haven't read it?  Did you know that the Muslims have been perverting and distorting their religion for centuries with their ungodly Hadith that contradcits the Koran?  Now is the time for the white man to show he can do it better.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtYeeUsZ4xc&feature=player_embedded

This is a recording of the speakers at the launch of the British Democratic Party on 9 February 2013 showing in spades they are still not getting the point about ideology.   Only Adrian Davies gets it about respectability, and it is not merely kowtowing to PC liberalism and pretending to go along with it, he says.   Only I can do RADICAL civic nationalism because it is my intention to challenge the view that feminism is as an ideology either viable or moral.  With the official support of nationalists, I can start the ball rolling by getting media attention, because their declared support for me would be a story in itself.  Without their declared support, I can do nothing for them, being merely a bullet without a gun ...  

It would be nice to get intelligent questions for a change.

You can discuss nationalist matters at https://www.facebook.com/groups/327008697419786/

You are cordially invited to challenge my ideas on nationalism too.

1. Civic Nationalism is the only way forward as Front Nationale have shown in France.

2. While ethno-nationalism may be what you really want and think, civic nationalism is what it is politic to say.

3. Civic Nationalism will get nationalists more of what they want than ethno-nationalism ever will.

4. Civic Nationalism will avoid nationalists having to wade through the swamp of racist accusations so other important matters eg feminism, can be discussed.

5. If you accept the above then my involvement would be essential to show you are serious about Civic Nationalism.

6. Civic Nationalism can be radical and thought-provoking, without falling foul of the usual liberal taboos.

7. Only I can promote Civic Nationalism in a way that is attractive and appealing to the media and voter

8. Showing you are prepared to try new ideas and people is the only way of forward.

"If all you do is all you ever did, then all you'll get is all you ever got."

Nationalists who reject civic nationalism are like a poor man saying he will hire a chauffeur when everyone knows he cannot even afford the bus fare.