Questions Christian men of the West are too afraid to ask each other

I am very disappointed that none of my questions I hoped Andy Nowicki would be asked in the chat were either asked or answered.

1) Pogroms can be avoided by good laws under good government. Perhaps you and Andy can discuss what good laws might be. The law under a patriarchy is fairer than under a matriarchy, I would suggest. ​Would you ask Andy what laws he would change if he could and whether he is in favour of a one party state?

2) ​Could you ask Andy what is the most radical change of law he would contemplate publicly advocating?

3) Would Andy agree that the West is now a matriarchy?

4) How would Andy feel about restoring the patriarchy and if he were to go about restoring the patriarchy, which laws would be the most necessary to effect this restoration?

5) How does Andy feel about slut-shaming?

6) ​Does Andy think there are too many female undergraduates?

7) ​Does Andy think SJWs are male undergraduates thirsty for sexual access to entitled middle class female undergraduates?

8) ​Is masculinity negatively affected by female promiscuity?

9) Has Andy warned his children about presenting him with any surprise illegitimate grandchildren?

10) ​Would Andy disown or disinherit his offspring if either of them presented him with surprise illegitimate grandchildren?

11) ​Would Andy support the abolition of no fault divorce?

12) ​Has Andy noticed any notable developments in the alt-right recently?

13) ​Would Andy agree that masculinity is a state of mind prepared to and capable of defending patriarchal moral values?

14) ​What does Andy consider to be masculine values?

15) Has anyone told Andy that ambiguity is a feminine trait and a feminine stratagem that I have noticed he is using?

From 1:28:00

I confront these Christian men about their failure to discuss restoring the patriarchy and am told that  Andy Nowicki actually refuses to acknowledge the existence of the patriarchy. 

On Andy Nowicki being love-bombed

Cautious temperament: scepticism of sluts.

Men should choose their women anyway. If she is love-bombing you, she is choosing you.

Oh, but hey, shouldn't you be the one doing the love-bombing?

Passive effeminate men who are too cucked to shame sluts or chase a woman get love-bombed by women with an agenda.

Aw, she was only looking for a father figure and this was you!  It has been said that women really want to marry a man like their father, if they were fortunate enough to have loved their father. If you were female, you would want to be with a male partner taller, wealthier, wiser and higher status than you. If you had married her and fathered children with her and divorce were still stigmatised, she would have to lie in the bed that she made after she became bored and irritated by you. As things are, our Tinder culture makes us think there is something better round the corner and that there is nothing wrong in dropping our current long term relationship in search of a better one.

To be frank, I am surprised that as a nationalist and Catholic you have not yet discussed the mortal sin of fornication and its degenerative effect on your society. Perhaps you do not know that fornication is a mortal sin?

You are still not getting it that the rules of behaviour should be that men should court women and not the other way around. If she is throwing herself at you, she is probably a slut and a crazy lady asking to be fucked by some loser whose loserdom she does not quite realise at the time. So what will happen is that she will either get tired of you when she sees your clay feet, or you will tire of her.

What this has to do with stoicism I don't know, because stoicism is all about putting up with shit cheerfully because you have no choice.

If you know you have made a mistake, recognise it and don't repeat it. What's there to be stoical about?

If you live in a society where women always make the first move because men are so feminised they dare not risk rejection, then you are already marinating in the sewage of degeneracy. Rather than be stoical about it, why not speak against it?

I have already made this point in your previous three videos on the subject, but you don't seem to get it. Maybe it is because you want to make videos on the same subject over and over again like you never heard what I said because that is what your viewers prefer - a sad sack mooning about lost love. Oh, but you could make a video in response to what I have said if you're just into making videos for the sake of making YouTube videos, so why won't you? Well, you could make a video about why not! Haha!