THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
1:01:00 Jay now claims he is a Christian Scientist.
1:02:00 1) you are an antisemite who rejects the Noahide laws because they are Jewish
Jay is denying the status and existence of God's Chosen People. Judaism has very helpful ideas.
1:04:00 2) you are an Islamophobe who rejects my proposed Koran-based theocracy because the Koran is the Holy Book of the people you hate
1:06:00 alt-right
1:07:00 3) you are a racist who thinks I have no right to propose a solution because I am not white even if no white person is proposing a solution at all other than pogrom or submitting to the matriarchy
1:12:00 4) you are a sexist who thinks I have no right to propose a solution because I am not a man even if no white man is proposing a solution at all other than pogrom or submitting to the matriarchy
1:14:00 I am a Rubik's cube to Jay.
1:17:00 5) you are a neurotic who cannot acknowledge that Christianity is kaput even when you have previously admitted this
1:30:00 How many Christian principles are legally enforceable?
1:31:00 6) you are so intellectually dishonest that you refuse to admit that Christianity is kaput because you don't want to be asked if it should be replaced and if so, by what
1:34:00 Islam cannot work without sharia.
1:35:00 7) you have already acknowledged that religion is important but not so important that your society needs religion because
i) you think your magic white skin will protect you from all evil
ii) you just don't want to acknowledge the problem because you think you can get still get away with denying that you need a religion or pretending that Christianity is working until you pop your clogs
1:37:00 Having the right religion
1:39:00 8) you are an atheist who claims Christianity is still working to make people take you more seriously
9) you are a lying nihilist who wants to pretend Christianity is still working because you think can get away with this lie until you pop your clogs.
1:42:00 I called my new school of sharia Secular Koranism for a reason.
1:43:00 The consequences of Christianity for Western Man
ALT-RIGHT: people who can no longer believe mainstream Conservatism can solve the problems created by half a century of liberal policies. (Antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism is only optional, not compulsory.)
WHITE SUPREMACIST - white non-unionised/formerly middle class man alarmed at his precipitate loss of status in his own country in relation to women and immigrants fearing becoming a minority in his own country or a second class citizen.
WHITE SUPREMACY - WASP superpower supremacy which is predicated on military supremacy, which is not forever.
Confucius:
"A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish. When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded. When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot. Therefore a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that in his words there may be nothing incorrect."
I am honoured and delighted that @churchofuntropy has shared her recipe for Bailey's Chocolate Cheese Cake with me! I had never heard of such a thing till she mentioned it, Jenn's cake/poker/Adonis/sexual manners/Sex in the City story starts at 6:00. https://t.co/LUU0iFiqTehttps://t.co/099fgZ7c5I
58:00 Propertarianism, Periodic Tablism, Secular Koranism
What if David Beckham converted to Islam? I am in fact trying to sell Secular Koranism to the elites. Is the government trying to get us to convert to Islam?
Jacinda Ardern would be treated as a sex offender under quran.com/24/2
Everyone - left, right and centre - wants a one party state
1:15:00 I don't know which Muslim country is most compliant with the laws of the Koran.
1:16:00 Jenn says ISIS.
1:18:00 I rail against people who don't follow their own rules.
1:20:00 Jenn's poison recipe
1:27:00 Religion and politics, morality and telling the truth, keeping one's promises
1:29:00 Our impulse to cheat and breaking our own rules
1:30:00 Checks and balances, the balance of power, the judiciary and their legal decisions are subject to an adversarial system, and also to appeal
1:33:00 We have a moral duty to use the best available system or use the least worst system.
1:34:00 The US constitution is being flouted daily.
1:34:30 The patriarchy must be restored for there to be leadership from above to do the right thing. Currently, the US is a matriarchy, which means even POTUS will be too afraid to criticise unmarried mothers. In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than the unmarried mother.
1:35:00 The welfare state is a sacred cow.
1:36:00 The statelemate and sclerosis of the West can only be overcome by a one party state.
1:37:00 Greg Johnson says he would be prepared to accept the bribe of universal basic income being offered by Andrew Yang. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-state-of-alt-right.html
1:41:00 The intellectual elite
1:42:00 Trickle down knowledge
1:43:00 The natural elite
1:48:00 I invite Jenn to publish her manifesto.
1:49:00 The persecution of Falun Gong https://www.dailynews.com/2014/07/14/why-china-fears-the-falun-gong/
1:59:00 Truth, Justice and Integrity
2:01:00 The pursuit of justice should replace the pursuit of happiness in the US constitution.
2:02:00 The supreme virtue is Wisdom.
2:57:00 DOOOOVID INDUCES IDENTITY CRISES ALL ROUND WITH HIS META-ANALYSIS OF THE ALT-RIGHT:
"I don't think Luke actually knows any white people in real life. If he does it would be fewer than five.
Frame Game is [the alt-right's] imaginary Jewish friend. You actually don't have a Jewish friend.
Brundle is the alt-right's imaginary white friend.
Luke is a despised reporter generally despised by white people.
Church of Entropy is the lone white woman. There is a pack of hounds looking for a lone white woman ... "
3:03:00 Why Dooooovid preaches multiculturalism
Is esoteric Doooovidism the future?
Most of Doooovid's enemies are Jews who classify themselves as white.
3:04:00 "Claire is scared that Doooovid's going to get white people to turn against minorities and the Jews ..."
Philip Daniel in the chat:
"Some of my fellow Jews just provide great fodder for antisemites and Judeophobes ... and yet they think they're doing a great service to the Jewish people through their efforts!"
I agree with Philip. I think I probably regard Doooovid and Luke through Jewish eyes, which is why I cringe at the hubris of Jewish triumphalism and supremacy Doooovid seems to be constantly provoking.
3:05:00 "Two camps in the Luke Community"
I don't think what matters is not so much what people feel but what solutions they support.
My view is that is that Brundle enjoys conflict and his videos are more about generating conflict and getting people expressing hatred against each other as a form of entertainment rather than focusing on solutions. This is what Luke does too to attract more subscribers. They are more into bread and circuses AKA bloodsports rather than focused political debate.
In this regard Doooovid and Kyle are hate figures wheeled out to generate hatred. I have described Doooovid as an Aunt Sally Jew guaranteed to attract people who want to hate-watch him and Brundle who is like a boxing promoter agrees with this description.
54:00
@Brundlefly14 Crying his heart out in 'I Got a YouTube Strike' because the Greenville baby liar got reported. Amusing. I'll make it clear: it was my team. And if you so much as step one toe out of line, we will take action accordingly and make you taste the ban hammer.
3:09:00 "Luke Ford and Brundle is basically trying to make money."
"Luke wants to marry a female version of Kyle."
"A female version of Kyle is not going to think like Brundle, she is going to think like Kyle."
3:10:00 Doooovid on those who want Luke to renege on his conversion and return to Christianity
Status-seeking Luke only converted to Judaism to gain a higher status so he is not going to return to despised Christianity and lose the protection of his Jewishness when accused of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism because of his association with the alt-right. If becoming Muslim offered him a higher status, he would convert to Islam, and I think he would not hesitate to do so if he knew this was guaranteed. Luke has actually very few fixed beliefs but, for as long as he wants to stream, he will remain Jewish or even convert to Islam if he thinks it would give him more subscribers, but he will never ever return to failed, despised and idolatrous Christianity because he has seen what happened to his father over obscure Christological debates that I doubt Luke even understands or cares about now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMZ_ONO9JkM
3:11:00 and 3:16:00 The natural disposition of a Jew is to disagree with other Jews. That was the one sentence answer to that question I would have made if I had been Doooovid giving a one sentence answer. Impossible, I know!
Should we conflate Jews with Judaism?
Should we conflate a set of correct directions with lost travellers who failed to follow them properly?
3:19:00 According to Doooovid's independent and scholarly interpretation of YouTube's Community Rules, "Patrick Little is more advocating policy whereas Brundle is more borderline advocating violence."
"Patrick Little is the model antisemite."
3:26:00 I am a barnacle on the ship of Jenn!
3:31:00 I confuse Brundle's stream that attracted the strike in which Doooovid did not appear with other streams in which Doooovid did appear where he did repeatedly say that violence was inevitable.
I am very disappointed that none of my questions I hoped Andy Nowicki would be asked in the chat were either asked or answered.
1) Pogroms can be avoided by good laws under good government. Perhaps you and Andy can discuss what good laws might be. The law under a patriarchy is fairer than under a matriarchy, I would suggest. Would you ask Andy what laws he would change if he could and whether he is in favour of a one party state?
2) Could you ask Andy what is the most radical change of law he would contemplate publicly advocating?
3) Would Andy agree that the West is now a matriarchy?
4) How would Andy feel about restoring the patriarchy and if he were to go about restoring the patriarchy, which laws would be the most necessary to effect this restoration?
5) How does Andy feel about slut-shaming?
6) Does Andy think there are too many female undergraduates?
7) Does Andy think SJWs are male undergraduates thirsty for sexual access to entitled middle class female undergraduates?
8) Is masculinity negatively affected by female promiscuity?
9) Has Andy warned his children about presenting him with any surprise illegitimate grandchildren?
10) Would Andy disown or disinherit his offspring if either of them presented him with surprise illegitimate grandchildren?
11) Would Andy support the abolition of no fault divorce?
12) Has Andy noticed any notable developments in the alt-right recently?
13) Would Andy agree that masculinity is a state of mind prepared to and capable of defending patriarchal moral values?
14) What does Andy consider to be masculine values?
15) Has anyone told Andy that ambiguity is a feminine trait and a feminine stratagem that I have noticed he is using?
From 1:28:00
I confront these Christian men about their failure to discuss restoring the patriarchy and am told that Andy Nowicki actually refuses to acknowledge the existence of the patriarchy.
White men are leaderless because the West is a matriarchy. In a matriarchy, all men are lower than the unmarried mother and any male leader would only be appointed by the matriarchy. Such appointed leaders would never dare to criticise unmarried mothers and we know who is in power by those we dare not criticise.
Worse than that, white men are not even talking about restoring the patriarchy. In a patriarchy, beta males would choose their alpha male leader who would look after their interests in exchange for their loyalty and support.
White men dare not talk about restoring the patriarchy because they are afraid of their immoral women and their running dogs. They are terrified of losing status through losing sexual access to their immoral women, and dare not admit it.
Being atheists, white men have no principles they dare defend against the matriarchy because atheism and childlessness makes them short-termist cowards who cannot think beyond their next sexual encounter. The alt-right, being a marginalised movement of marginalised and unmarriageable men, will not have the moral or intellectual authority to persuade anyone other than others who feel the same sense of hatred, anger and outrage that their government does not care about them. In the meantime, they refuse to discuss practical solutions.
Racism, Antisemitism, Islamophobia and Pogromism are now the quasi-religions of the alt-right. A religion would contain rules and solutions, but the alt-right have no solutions other than Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism. The alt-right who congregate to discuss their racism, antisemitism, Islamophobia and their anticipation of conducting their yearned for pogrom - which are but expressions of their feeling weelings - only do so to bond with each other while sharing horror stories of immigrant crime.
Why won't anyone already in the political establishment help these marginalised men? Apart from cowardice, they don't see these marginalised men as useful allies or in any way socially useful. Let us imagine that all the non-white immigrant workers have been expelled, as Greg Johnson predicts, after white men agree and then co-operate to remove them. Can you imagine these elderly embittered men or the young NEETs doing the jobs the immigrants used to do? Of course not. They have nothing to offer anyone in the political establishment to fight for you. Even if these men offered their loyalty and support - which so far they have not thought of doing - they cannot be trusted to deliver.
Preston Wigginton, the White Nationalist Texan who runs a business, actually admits that it is hard to get anyone white and indigenous to do the work his business requires them to do. There is no work ethic amongst whites now.
In fact, it has been pointed out by the historian David Starkey that whites have become black.
Only a revolution would overthrow the matriarchy and restore the patriarchy. Is the alt-right even admitting that Christianity and democracy have failed? Are they discussing what Christianity and democracy should be replaced with? Have they acknowledged that however perfect a political system is in theory, it cannot come into being if politicians are incompetent and corrupt? If establishment politicians are incompetent and corrupt, all the more so anti-establishment figures like Curt Doolittle, Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer.
What are the big ideas of the alt-right? Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism!
They don't even have the honesty to discuss the failure of Christianity, much less face the truth that the only legal system capable of protecting them from Liberal Jews and the indifference and contempt of the liberal elite for a working class that is no longer fit for purpose is Secular Koranism.
In fact, the liberal elite no longer want to even have the bother of making the working classes work, because they want them to be replaced by robots. Yuval Harari, the Israeli academic, gay and gaily married, has said as much in his books, in particular Homo Deus. It is a work of surpassing arrogance if you know what Homo Deus means.
The Abrahamic God is the most powerful God conceivable, Judaism is for Jews only, Christianity is kaput, and Islam is the only possible religion for you if you are a gentile wishing to remain a gentile who wishes to worship the Abrahamic God without being guilty of the idolatry of Christianity.
If you believe in the Abrahamic God and wish to obey His laws, you would know that He has forbidden idolatry in the Ten Commandments and through His Chosen People who are religiously obliged by the Noahide laws to forbid idolatry.
If you accept that God has forbidden idolatry, then you must expect Him to punish it, especially if you have been guilty of it for 2000 years. If you deny that Christianity is idolatry, you would have to prove that worshiping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the Abrahamic God is not in fact idolatry.
How is the US going to change its laws even if every member of the alt-right converted to Christianity? It is only Islam that accepts the logic that your laws should be in harmony with the principles of your chosen moral system, whatever they are. Any lawyer and social scientist should understand that laws are the algorithms of human behaviour.
There are people in North America who imagine Claire Khaw living in the Tower of London emerging like a cuckoo to ring, Quasimodo-like, the bells of Big Ben heralding the Great Western Age of Secular Koranism, to be heard by all who hear its chimes on @bbcworldservice The bells!
I like to think the BBC have notices to its staff warning them never to interview me. If they interview me not knowing who I am, they must on no account ever air that interview. This message was passed out to the rest of the co-opted liberal world media to impose a news blackout.
I am the elephant in the room of feminists, neo-liberals and neoconservatives. They have all warned each other never to engage with me in case they get sucked into an honest and rational debate where truth is acknowledged and logic operates.
To whom shall I submit myself for signs of prophethood whose judgment will be sound, I who am dubbed the Grandmother of the Global Alt-Right who hunger to live in nations whose political establishment is not in the power of the Globalists, who just want to trust their government?
Moses was about the rule of law for Jews. Christianity gave gentiles the opportunity to sample a bad imitation of Judaism held together by the absurdity of the Trinity. Islam synthesised the best of both for gentiles everywhere establishing further the rule of God's law.
I do not claim to supersede the last prophet, of course not. My role as a minor prophetess is simply to warn and remind the world of available solutions to their current problems that people must not proudly reject simply because neither they nor their ancestors thought of it.
Secular Koranism will not make your Secular Koranist Western Nation the same as your neighbouring Western nation. It is unimaginable that a French judiciary operating Secular Koranism would apply and interpret its principles in the same way as, say, the Irish judiciary.
The chief qualification of a prophet is a message of correction with an explanation of historic events in a narrative consistent with the existence of a divine plan of instruction. The lesson for the Abrahamic faiths: do not be wilfully blind to truth, logic and morality.
So far, not a single valid objection has been raised other than that it will not be popular and to expect resistance. Is there a single coherent plan, other than the status quo, pogrom or Propertarianism? Could Richard Spencer or Greg Johnson really be the Moses of the alt-right?
The most effective way of getting leading lawyers to read the Koran is to bribe them blatantly to list improvements in society and government they would expect to take place under Secular Koranism in a one party theocracy abolishing the principle of parliamentary sovereignty.
Peak degeneracy as exemplified in the now deleted Luke Ford stream featuring the fake Orthodox Jew organ grinder and his goyim monkeys is discussed with distaste. Jim Goad and Nick Fuentes were summoned to display themselves for the delectation of the organ grinder's alt-right subscribers while excrement-like matter poured from their foul drunken mouths mouths. Nick Fuentes also bitched about Richard Spencer.
The rest of this conversation concerns Secular Koranism, of no interest at all to any degenerates will only come here to hear the Fake Jew stream being discussed here.
"I unironically came to sympathize with the alt right through Sargon of Akkad. He’s a good guy and an excellent gateway to further ideas." https://t.co/GAholfjuB6
"Luke's interviewing style is perfect. In essence: "I shat myself in third grade, did you ever shit yourself? Are you shitting yourself now?"" https://t.co/GAholfjuB6
"If you want proof that evil rules the world, note that Luke’s getting 2x his usual views for .5x the quality of content! #demiurge" https://t.co/GAholfjuB6
Baked Alaska says Sam Hyde donated $5k to find Baked's attacker at Charlottesville and Baked blames Richard for not doing enough for the AR wounded. https://t.co/GAholfjuB6
Shit stream of peak degeneracy on @lukeford continuing to purvey porn - this time of shameless marginalised white men in their clothes not having sex with anyone at all, drunk and talking shit. https://t.co/JaVrooTrM1
If you want a reason to be concerned about Western degeneracy, look no further than this scum stream purveyed by former purveyor of porn and now a convert to Orthodox Judaism, Luke Ford.
I am pleased to note that I have been put in time out for my spicier comments about the former purveyor of porn and the sociopath, Luke Ford. It is always satisfying to learn that one's message has been received and understood.
The one warning him about not using the mikveh because it would only necessitate a thorough disinfection requiring the trouble of reconsecrating probably did the trick.
The thing to note about these sad bad mad white men displaying copious amounts of toxic masculinity is that they have no shame and no standards, being degenerate. I urge everyone to view this stream with a sick bucket nearby and to acknowledge peak degeneracy.
Their appearance, language, deportment, dress and choice of topics is revealing of their low status and character. The fact that they shamelessly went public is another conclusive sign of white degeneracy and decline. Will they soon be uninhibited enough to defecate in public?
For someone hoping to start a revolution and trying to convince people to swap their heritage religion for another, albeit dumbed down, with only the sadistic bits left in, you don't half make a lot of enemies. Might be a fatal flaw. :)
It is actually necessary to make enemies in my line of business and my trade is prophecy. One's identity and purpose is defined by the character and motives of one's enemies.
Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?
CK:
A lot of Mein Kampf is about German matters of Germany in the 1930s. Its preoccupations would be quite different to the alt-right of the West now because alt-right is preoccupied with immigration and Nazi Germany didn't have an immigration problem, did it?
LF:
So let me just run it by you again. I'll just go point by point. Hitler had a biocentric worldview perspective on life: first of all a referenced nature so that is identical with the alt-right's perspective. The alt-right and its leaders are overwhelmingly atheists.
CK:
Hitler pretended to be Catholic. In his table talks he he actually favoured Islam because he thought Christianity was a stupid religion, although he was confirmed as a Catholic, so there were lots of things that he wanted to do but he knew he couldn't. He wanted to abolish usury. He did know something about Islam and thought it was a more masculine ...
Both Hitler and Himmler had a soft spot for Islam. Hitler several times fantasized that, if the Saracens had not been stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread through the European continent—and that would have been a good thing, since “Jewish Christianity” wouldn’t have gone on to poison Europe. Christianity doted on weakness and suffering, while Islam extolled strength, Hitler believed. Himmler in a January 1944 speech called Islam “a practical and attractive religion for soldiers,” with its promise of paradise and beautiful women for brave martyrs after their death. “This is the kind of language a soldier understands,” Himmler gushed.
LF [pretending I had gone off topic when what I said was exactly on point because he did not like me suggesting that Islam is the answer because Christianity is kaput]:
OK, Claire, I need you to stay on topic. So Hitler had a biocentric worldview. His perspective on life was first of all referenced in nature. He contended that before anything else we must attend to nature the world of living things in their environments and is not separate from or above nature but rather a part of nature we need to come to grips with how our nature actually operates, we must align our lives with nature, we must obey nature's laws. That is the alt-right's perspective.
CK:
Is it? I wasn't aware of that. I didn't even know Hitler said all of that. It sounds very vague.
LF:
You know, it sounds pretty clear to me. I mean I don't know what to say if you don't see that that's the that's the building block for Social Darwinism ....
CK:
Is it arguing for Social Darwinism or something like that is that? Is that what you're saying?
LF:
I don't know how you can get more clear than this: Hitler had a biocentric worldview that we must ...
CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean German-centric?
LF:
Does biocentric mean German-centric? Really that's what you're asking me? Biocentric is very clear, Claire, it means a worldview based in nature that humans must align themselves with nature, obey nature's laws that we're not separate ...
CK:
What does that mean? Does it mean empire?
LF:
Because we are in nature, frequently our choice is either kill or be killed ...
CK:
OK, so he started acquiring empire and it ended badly so maybe that's not always the best thing.
LF:
I'm not talking about whether this is the best thing to do, I'm asking if you can come up with any significant differences between ...
CK [answering the question immediately and succinctly]:
The alt-right are not about war but about pogrom.
LF [pretending I had not answered the question because he didn't like my answer]:
OK, you've got to stay on topic Claire. When I ask a question you've got to respond to the topic. We can't just go spinning off. Glib, do you want to jump in ...
[Glib and LF talk and I was invited again to comment on what they had just said, which wasn't about anything much in particular as far as I could tell.]
1:10:00
CK:
... biocentricism meant social Darwinism: eugenics ... was that what you meant?
LF:
I give up I can't be any more clear than than I was ...
CK:
Can somebody explain to me then? I don't think people understand either. By nature do you mean nature raw in tooth and claw?
LF:
Yes, that's that that's the beginning of the Mein Kampf worldview. It's the beginning of the Dissident Right worldview. The Dissident Right is not a theistic movement. The main intellectuals of the alternative right - Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Kevin Macdonald - they're all atheists. They all have a a social Darwinian perspective on life which I'm trying to see how there's any difference from that and the worldview of Mein Kampf.
CK:
Well, Mein Kampf is really more about culture and sociology even because Hitler does write knowledgeably and some compassion about how the poor used to live and and architecture and and lots of other things but you know if you read Greg Johnson's White Nationalist Manifesto, there is actually very little about culture. It's basically "I'd like to kick them out and I want to kick all of them out by 2060" and that's it. Mein Kampf is a more rewarding read. I would suggest for White Nationalists and compare what the white man was in the 1930s and what he he is now. In fact, recently I was watching these videos of these schizophrenics in lunatic asylums in America and it struck me how articulate even these mentally ill people stuck in asylums were compared to the tongue-tied people you have now.
It really was astonishing. Obviously, something bad has happened to to the white race and and and this catastrophic drop in in IQ and obviously it's all to do with religion in the sense that the least that a religion can make you do is make you marry before you have children and parent or children properly - that is the very least. Forget all the frilly bits like not eating pork and shellfish and that kind of thing. That's the very least your religion should do for you and and if you won't enforce that then your population will age and become stupid and weak and people will come in and take your stuff, and that's what's what's happening now.
[Luke Ford mutes me and turns to Glib again to talk about nothing much in particular.]
For a whole variety of reasons, some to do with medical developments like birth control, in vitro fertilisation and other genetic interventions, some to do with moral change like the idea that we are free to do whatever we like so long as it does not harm others, some to do with a transfer of responsibilities from the individual to the state, and other and more profound changes in the culture of the West, almost everything that marriage once brought together has now been split apart. Sex has been divorced from love, love from commitment, marriage from having children, and having children from responsibility for their care.
The result is that in Britain in 2012, 47.5 per cent of children were born outside marriage, expected to become a majority in 2016. Fewer people are marrying, those who are, are marrying later, and 42 per cent of marriages end in divorce. Nor is cohabitation a substitute for marriage. The average length of cohabitation in Britain and the United States is less than two years. The result is a sharp increase among young people of eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse, stress related syndromes, depression and actual and attempted suicides. The collapse of marriage has created a new form of poverty concentrated among single parent families, and of these, the main burden is born by women, who in 2011 headed 92 per cent of single parent households. In Britain today more than a million children will grow up with no contact whatsoever with their fathers.
This is creating a divide within societies the like of which has not been seen since Disraeli spoke of “two nations” a century and a half ago. Those who are privileged to grow up in stable loving association with the two people who brought them into being will, on average, be healthier physically and emotionally. They will do better at school and at work. They will have more successful relationships, be happier and live longer. And yes, there are many exceptions. But the injustice of it all cries out to heaven. It will go down in history as one of the tragic instances of what Friedrich Hayek called “the fatal conceit” that somehow we know better than the wisdom of the ages, and can defy the lessons of biology and history.
In every nation and every government there will be in every nation every government will have a rent a mob and Antifa is our one now.
Antifa are probably part of the Deep State.
2:29:00
Claire, is the left simply more committed than the right?
CK:
Yes, simply because it's easier for them because they're already in charge at the top of the tree. Trump is trying very hard to dislodge them but he hasn't the manpower, I guess. There is no other big idea. I keep going on about religion simply because it has this kind of moral authority - an instant appeal to people. If the alt-right is just about race and immigration it's not a big enough [idea]. If you wait for everybody to be affected to support you then then it'll probably be too late, so you need some Universalist idea that's capable of appealing to people but I guess the alt-right are the last people prepared to support marriage and family values.
****************************
Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption.
Moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption.
Intellectual corruption leads to your leaders not being able to submit to the truth, exercise logic or conform to the moral rules necessary for you to keep your society in existence and in good health.
This is the only explanation I can think of for Luke's strangely obstructive behaviour when I tried to answer his questions, which the others also noticed.
IN THE COMMENTS
kissmyass682
Why'd Luke get so aggro with Claire? He went from 0 to a 100, is there some history there?
Claire Khaw
Not that I know of, except that, possibly, he didn't like the way my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"
Matvei Daniilovich
Wow, luke actually got a little triggered with Claire.
Claire Khaw
Since I never got to answer the question properly before he muted me, I can only think that it was because he did not like the direction my answer was going to his question "Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?"
Alejandro Black
Loved Luke’s Modafinil rage with Khaw
Claire Khaw
I don't think that was anything to do with drugs.
Lou Duva
Very odd.
Claire Khaw
@Lou Duva I thought it was a bit odd too, but I think it was because he did not like the direction my answer to his question was going"Is there any significant difference between the worldview of Mein Kampf and the world view of the alternative-right?" From what I can make out, Luke was implying that both Mein Kampf and the alt-right want a pogrom. He knew I would say that the answer lies somewhere in between the status quo of liberal democracy and the pogrom the alt-right are proposing ie the civic nationalism of Secular Koranism and he didn't want me mentioning that again on his show.
Secular Koranism because I don't expect to be in a position to convert the Western political establishment to Islam! All I am saying is that legally qualified people who have passed an examination in Koranic Knowledge which I shall set can apply and interpret the principles of Secular Koranism in such a theocracy. Secular Koranism is legal system, not belief system. A legal system is like EU law. You don't have to agree with the EU to practise EU law, just understand how it works.
The alt-right is not a membership organisation so I cannot be a member or be expelled from it. It is more like the leaderless hippy movement so I cannot really be refused membership. Richard Spencer cannot control the definition of alt-right which he will want to say is only open to white gentiles and closed to non-whites. Since I hang around in those circles, I will inevitably be associated with it. It doesn't bother me that I cannot become an official member to a movement that is in any case leaderless. As a civic nationalist I will be called "alt-lite" by the more racially conscious whites who are unashamedly antisemites and Islamophobes, but since as a civic nationalist I propose a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism as the only way to restore the patriarchy, calling me "lite" anything is probably a misnomer.
From 57:00 you will hear me try to explain the role of religion in dealing with Cultural Marxism which we should really call Feminism which established itself after the Sex Revolution. Keith Joseph, Margaret Thatcher, grooming gangs, child prostitution, marriage and family values are discussed amongst other things.
7:55 OMG. White people are going to regress into paganism after the White Nationalist Revolution? And this woman is going to be the High Priestess of the Pagan Pantheon? What are the deities of this pantheon? I quite like Aphrodite.
22:08 I was going to come on to tell you that you have no choice but to adopt Islam if you want to restore the patriarchy, because Christianity is kaput.
All civilisations rise in patriarchy and fall in matriarchy. The West is now a matriarchy.
Lasse Anckarman · 23:39 Islam is stronger than Judaism. That's the reason for the hilarious anti-Islamic propaganda from Jewish media.
Claire Khaw · 15:05 Lasse Anckarman Islam is stronger than Judaism because there are more potential Muslims than there will ever be potential Jews. But the choice is between quality over numbers.
Lasse Anckarman · 0:00 Claire Khaw Hardly. Islam is stronger because it is a religion of love, not a hateful worldwide program for world control.
Claire Khaw · 0:15 Lasse Anckarman Jews do not feel they have a duty to convert the world to Judaism.
29:22 Judaism is divine ethno nationalism, Islam is divine civic nationalism.
33:14 Judaism is the most successful form of ethno-nationalism in human history. Jews managed to get their homeland back after 2000 years of exile.
Therefore only an Abrahamic faith with instructions about how to deal with Jews would be adequate for the gentile to guide him on how to deal with his women and minorities.
That would be Islam, I am afraid, because Christianity is kaput.
9:51 You need to restore the patriarchy and I believe only Islam would restore the patriarchy, because only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest.
Christianity is the most schismatic religion in the world.
The gentile needs to be protected from the Jew and Islam will do the job because it would ban usury, the source of Jewish power.
The Abrahamic God is the link between all the Abrahamic faiths, obviously, with each claiming that their method of worship is best and yields the best results.
The success of the Jews is undisputed: after 2000 years of exile, they got back their own homeland.
The failure of Christianity is obvious too, since Christianity is now associated with the religion of white people who want to spread gay marriage all over our global village and turn it into Sodom and Gomorrah.
If God exists, He would want to punish those who identify as Christians for 2000 years of idolatry.
The assumption of the Abrahamic faiths is that the world is divided between Jews and gentiles and that Judaism is for Jews only. Gentiles have only Christianity and Islam to choose from.
Since Christianity is kaput, and this cannot be denied because the West is now as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human, there is clearly no alternative.
Hinduism and Buddhism are more alien to Western traditions than Islam.
If you are arguing that the West does not need a religion that promotes patriarchal moral values ie that supports marriage and family values, then please make it.
With what form of words would you advertise for an alt-right leader? — Telegenic, charismatic, legally-trained, principled and presidential man with life experience complete with loyal wife and children who are credit to him required as leader of the al… https://t.co/ZegseWvUUs
https://t.co/TtrnoPTLbm The alt-right getting this is about as probable as Richard Spencer and Gre… — I am sure you are right. But hey, if you don't ask, you won't get. Being legally trained, I treat prayers to God as a kind … https://t.co/fbwas14swC
The doctor in questions is an Orthodox Jew. Clearly, uncontrolled immigration discombobulates and upsets Jews too who are confused about whether they are white and if so whether the alt-right would accept them. They are like immigrants concerned and disturbed about immigration. https://t.co/MBRi6gNwVU
In my case, I don't think I am white but "identify as white" in the sense that I am deeply aware of how and why the tyranny of the totalitarian and dysgenic Feminist State would anger them as men. I don't need to be white to use my imagination.
The most important thing to bear in mind is that immigration is now such a problem that *Orthodox Jews in the West* are having an identity crisis! They want to complain about immigration so much they join white nationalist groups. In extemis, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
To restore the patriarchy, shame sluts. To shame sluts, use https://t.co/jtJmkTuWSa Sluts are the soldiers of feminism by bribing susceptible men with fornication they cannot refuse.
Once it is generally agreed that sluts must be shamed for the good of society, feminism would become an army without soldiers. Sluts and socialists are the eternal enemies of society.
If you are reading this, I assume that you are an atheist who recognizes that modern culture is a disaster and that Islam is a morally promising alternative. Your problem is that you cannot accept Muslim beliefs. I will address this problem.
First I will address atheism. Atheism means believing that there is no god. The problem with this is that most atheists don't have a coherent definition of god, and to take a position on the existence of something that you haven't properly defined is simply silly. The main attribute of god that atheists object to is that is god is supernatural. Yet pantheists define a god that is not supernatural. I believe that the Old Testament idea of God is not supernatural either. The definitions of "god" found in dictionaries reflects the Christian nature of our society, not the historical use of the concept of god. A more reasonable definition of god is a global force or set of forces that cannot be described scientifically. For example the forces that shape human history can be considered god if you believe that history is shaped by a consistent set of forces. Because people are unsatisfied with concepts that aren't described and explained, god has historically been described through personification and explained as supernatural. But these are not necessary attributes of god. The key point of the idea of god is that just because one cannot describe a force mathematically or explain the mechanism of the force doesn't mean that the force doesn't exist. Forces that cannot be described or explained (yet) are still real and must be respected. This is the concept of god. The concept of monotheism is that there is one consistent set of forces that applies across time and space. This consistent set of forces we call the one God. This concept makes science possible. It also makes it possible to study history to determine which moral systems worked. If you accept what I have written so far, then you are no longer an atheist. You can now honestly say that you believe in God, but that your view of God differs from the Muslim view. This is a big step forward, big enough to allow you to participate in a mosque without fundamental conflict.
The next step is to honestly consider Islam. It is only fair and reasonable for you to consider Islam with an open mind. You should attend mosque regularly. There will certainly be people there who will explain to you why they think you should accept Islam. Consider what they say. And read the Quran. As you gain understanding of Islam, it will become clear to you whether or not this is something that you can believe. If you can accept Islam, then you are done, no need to read more. But if you can't accept Islam, continue reading.
Even if you can't accept Islam, you should still support Islam because it is the only major moral force in the world today. As a believer in monotheism, you are still closely aligned with Islam. To fit in, avoid undermining the beliefs of Muslims with pointless debate. Instead, focus on areas where you agree. I also recommend that you do daily prayer at home. The purpose of prayer is not to benefit God, but to benefit yourself by reminding yourself of the importance of religion. I do one 4-repetition prayer in the Muslim form each day. Doing daily prayer will prevent you from feeling like a hypocrite in the mosque, and will make prayer in the mosque more natural.
If you find yourself in this position, as a non-Muslim attending mosque and supporting Islam, then I hope you participate in this forum. There aren't many of us and we can give each other advice.
But the main thing is to take the first 2 steps above. Reject atheism and start attending mosque. Do not be intimidated by Islam, and don't settle for being part of degenerate modern culture.
