Translate

Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bible. Show all posts

Friday, 15 September 2017

My questions for Rabbi Sacks which I hope he will answer


Is there a lecture on The Relevance of the Koran for Law and Ethics in Society Today? If not, is there one to come?

Has Rabbi Sacks read the Koran?

Why did China decline? The way all civilisations decline, when they stopped being outward looking, started breaking their own rules and no longer allowed free speech. The advisers of the emperor were traditionally were allowed to speak their mind, but later they were tortured for doing so.
The Mandate of Heaven was in fact a theocracy, was it not? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandate_of_Heaven

The Abrahamic God is the most powerful idea conceivable, and this was what the West worshipped. But so too is the Islamic God the Abrahamic God. What went wrong for them?
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3114/muslims-ijtihad
 
"During the twelfth century, nevertheless, there were still attempts to use rational and deductive reasoning. In Muslim Spain, for instance, Averroes (aka Ibn Rushd, 1126-1198 CE), one of the founders of secular reasoning in Europe, refused to accept the closing of the Gates of Ijtihad. He continued to use Arabic translations of classical Greek sources, and preferred strictly rational methods to decide matters in contention. As in the Muslim world the Gates of Ijtihad had been closed, however, his rulings proved unacceptable."

Western hegemony is based on Western military supremacy, the idea of full-spectrum global dominance - a US military doctrine. Niall Ferguson, mentioned by Rabbi Sacks, "now distances himself from the neocons". https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/20/niall-ferguson-interview-civilization

Western military supremacy was of course achieved through warfare amongst European nations. The more you fight, the better you get at it. Scientific advance is always accompanied through warfare because necessity is the mother of invention. Not only did Christians conduct the Crusades against Muslims, they massacred each other too in the European Wars of Religion. After having started two World Wars, military supremacy inevitably followed.

"The place in the world where Christianity is growing fastest today is China" - Communism is materialist which means it is an ideology that does not take into account abstracts us as spirituality and contentment. Things and resources being finite and our desires infinite, demand will always outstrip supply and cause greed, envy, anger, conflict, division and perhaps eventually the disintegration of the group. Perhaps it will not be long before the Chinese establish their very own Church of China?

If your proposition is that the West is most successful because it worshiped the most powerful God, what happened to the Muslims who also worshiped the same God? It seems that all adherents of Abrahamic faiths have at some time in their histories lost their way after breaking their own rules. When Jews broke their own rules they suffered invasion, conquest and exile. I am sure this applies to all the other Abrahamic faiths. Christians have now so utterly forgotten their Christian principles they no longer talk about sin or hell and indeed are no longer even Christian and should be more accurately described as Post-Christian. In 2014, it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury is so theologically ignorant that he did not even know that he was supposed to believe in the Trinity, the indispensable ingredient of being Christian. This was when he confessed to sometimes doubting God existed, but was absolutely sure about the existence of Jesus, as if that were enough.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/archbishop-canterbury-justin-welby-questions-whether-god-exists-n206261
 
It seems from his utterly imbecilic comment that he was not even aware that neither Jews nor Muslims denied the existence of Jesus.

Rabbi Sacks mentioned morality and the law and discussed the problem of what we should do when the law entitles us to do that which we know to be immoral.

QUESTIONS FOR RABBI SACKS

1) What should we do when we know our government is promoting policies that we know to be evil because they undermine the institutions of marriage and the family such as no fault divorce, the civil partnership, gay marriage as well as encouraging transgenderism in primary school children?

2) Is our government being actively evil, or just confused and misguided?

3) If our government is evil, then it must be overthrown. If it is merely confused and misguided, is decades of policies promoting sexual liberation in an environment of indiscriminate universal suffrage the cause of this confusion?

4) Is it possible for these policies to be corrected under the current political system?

5) If we come to the conclusion that it not possible for these policies to be corrected under the current political system, what should we do?

6) If our solution to the problems created by policies designed to promote sexual liberation and gender confusion as well as undermine the institutions of marriage and family is not allowed under the current political system, will we be accused of extremism?

7) If we are accused of extremism, bigotry, intolerance and hate speech, what should we do?

8) Are we governed by Amalekites if our government promotes policies that break all the principles of the Noahide laws?

9) Do Jews have a religious duty to exterminate Amalekites or at the very least denounce them?

10) If someone comes along claiming to have a solution to these problems, should this person be regarded as a potential Mashiach even if they are neither male nor Jewish, but possibly descended from King David who had 700 wives and 300 concubines?

Wednesday, 28 May 2014

Was Elliott Rodger a victim of liberal parenting?

Deuteronomy 21:18-21 
“If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear.

Exodus 21:17 
“Whoever curses his father or his mother shall be put to death.

Proverbs 23:13-14
Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you strike him with a rod, he will not die. If you strike him with the rod, you will save his soul from Sheol.

Matthew 15:4 
For God commanded, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.’

Proverbs 13:24 
Whoever spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is diligent to discipline him.

Leviticus 20:9
For anyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death; he has cursed his father or his mother; his blood is upon him.

Exodus 21:15
“Whoever strikes his father or his mother shall be put to death.

Proverbs 15:5
A fool despises his father's instruction, but whoever heeds reproof is prudent.

http://www.openbible.info/topics/disobedient_children

http://www.islamweb.net/emainpage/index.php?id=65221&page=articles The Koran does specifically say that honour killing is not allowed and so may be considered more liberal than the Old Testament.  

Thursday, 7 March 2013

A Christian Feminist is an oxymoron

My letter to His Holiness urging him to convert to Islam and renounce usury


Your Holiness,

ON THE QUESTION OF YOUR CONVERTING TO ISLAM AND ABOLISHING USURY WORLDWIDE

As you must already know, the most powerful religion of the West is now failing.  It has lost its moral authority under the weight of so many scandals and cannot possibly recover because no liberal feminist atheist secular Western politician has the will to defend the Church.  Indeed, these depraved heathens actively desire the destruction of social conservatism and religion in their mania to enjoy their sexual liberation uncriticised.

In another age, a non-matriarchal government might wish to defend the Church, but no longer, infested as it is by atheists, homosexuals, liberals and feminists who feel only contempt and disgust for social conservatives and the institution of marriage.   Such is the depravity and dementia of the typical Western politician that in Britain we have Catholic MPs voting for gay marriage.

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=17017

"Out of the 82 Catholic MPs, 47 - almost 60 per cent - were in favour of same-sex marriage. Of these, 32 are Labour, 12 Conservative, two Liberal Democrat and one SDLP."

If Your Holiness or your successor can see your way to excommunicating and naming and shaming them as consigned for eternal damnation unless they repent, it would serve as a timely warning for others tempted to follow in their sinful footsteps.

It cannot be denied, therefore, that Christianity has lots its moral authority and is no longer able to maintain the morals of the West.

Soon the morally, economically and intellectually bankrupt and demented matriarchal West will be the laughing stock of the world, because their politicians are afraid of the worst of their women - the fornicatresses with illegitimate offspring who have the vote.

They are always the ones who keep voting Democrat if they are American and Labour if they are British.  These immoral women tend to be bad mothers who send their children to bad schools, whose children will reach adulthood being the opposite of a productive citizen.

The Catholic Church which has lost is moral authority can do nothing even as the West is overwhelmed by sluts and bastards with the vote.  Of course, the  liberal feminist political establishment will fall over themselves to pander to them by bribing them with the taxes of the productive.

Also, the West is now financially crippled by the weight of the debts incurred by decades of irresponsible borrowing.

Soon, it will no longer be able to service its debts without resorting to hyper-inflation.  As you are German, I need not remind you of what happened when a nation experiences the kind of hyper-inflation that wipes out the savings of the middle classes.

The only way the West can default on its debts now is to abolish usury.

The only way to abolish usury is for the entire West to convert to Islam and appeal for this abolition to be GLOBAL.

A small step in that direction,  would be for Your Holiness to convert to Islam and urge the West to renounce usury.

When you have done so, you could also urge your successor to do so too.

Should you do all this, you will find that the scandal about homosexual and paedophile priests will just fade away and be replaced by praise for your courage and your vision.

You really have nothing to lose now anyway.   Like the Balkans, the Trinity is not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.   The Trinity is after all the Achilles heel of Christianity, and what rational priest would want a religion with an Achilles heel that is already so well-known?

You would do mankind a greater service by calling for the worldwide abolition of usury as  a Muslim convert.

It is quite clear to me which scripture is clearer and more humane, and which states its position against usury more clearly.

OLD TESTAMENT

The following quotations are from the Hebrew Bible, 1917 Jewish Publication Society translation:

If thou lend money to any of My people, even to the poor with thee, thou shalt not be to him as a creditor; neither shall ye lay upon him interest. (Exodus, 22:25)[27]

And if thy brother be waxen poor, and his means fail with thee; then thou shalt uphold him: as a stranger and a settler shall he live with thee. Take thou no interest of him or increase; but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt not give him thy money upon interest, nor give him thy victuals for increase. (Leviticus, 25:35-37)

Thou shalt not lend upon interest to thy brother: interest of money, interest of victuals, interest of any thing that is lent upon interest. Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto, in the land whither thou goest in to possess it. (Deuteronomy, 23:20-21)

NEW TESTAMENT

"Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury."
—Matthew 25:27

"Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.."
—Matthew 25:27

"…Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow. Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?"
—Luke 19:22-23

KORAN

Those who charge usury are in the same position as those controlled by the devil's influence. This is because they claim that usury is the same as commerce. However, God permits commerce, and prohibits usury. Thus, whoever heeds this commandment from his Lord, and refrains from usury, he may keep his past earnings, and his judgment rests with God. As for those who persist in usury, they incur Hell, wherein they abide forever (Al-Baqarah 2:275)

God condemns usury, and blesses charities. God dislikes every disbeliever, guilty. Lo! Those who believe and do good works and establish worship and pay the poor-due, their reward is with their Lord and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve. O you who believe, you shall observe God and refrain from all kinds of usury, if you are believers. If you do not, then expect a war from God and His messenger. But if you repent, you may keep your capitals, without inflicting injustice, or incurring injustice. If the debtor is unable to pay, wait for a better time. If you give up the loan as a charity, it would be better for you, if you only knew. (Al-Baqarah 2:276-280)

O you who believe, you shall not take usury, compounded over and over. Observe God, that you may succeed. (Al-'Imran 3:130)

And for practicing usury, which was forbidden, and for consuming the people's money illicitly. We have prepared for the disbelievers among them painful retribution. (Al-Nisa 4:161)

The usury that is practiced to increase some people's wealth, does not gain anything at God. But if people give to charity, seeking God's pleasure, these are the ones who receive their reward many fold. (Ar-Rum 30:39)

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-we-abolish-usury/351776538265174

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-the-Pope-convert-to-Islam/141277252691901

Yours faithfully


CLAIRE KHAW

Monday, 18 February 2013

Old Pope and New Pope should convert to Islam and call for the worldwide abolition of usury and go down in history as the men who abolished usury


The New Testament contains references to usury, notably in the Parable of the talents:

"Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury."
—Matthew 25:27

"Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.."
—Matthew 25:27

"…Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow. Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?"
—Luke 19:22-23

The Koran has the following verses:

O you who believe, you shall not take usury, compounded over and over. Observe God, that you may succeed. (Al-'Imran 3:130)

And for practicing usury, which was forbidden, and for consuming the people's money illicitly. We have prepared for the disbelievers among them painful retribution. (Al-Nisa 4:161)

The usury that is practiced to increase some people's wealth, does not gain anything at God. But if people give to charity, seeking God's pleasure, these are the ones who receive their reward many fold. (Ar-Rum 30:39)

While Jews are allowed to practise usury on other tribes, Muslims are forbidden to practise usury at all.  Christians have always been the, er, piggy, in the middle.

Catholicism and Christianity in general, being mostly stuffed to its rafters with feminists, liberals and Commine Pinko Paedo priests, is no longer fit for purpose, so it should be dumped in favour of a religion more fit for the purpose of maintaining the morals of the West, before its people fall into the slough of irreversible degeneracy and disgrace.

Usury is clearly harmful since it encourages irresponsible borrowing and lending in individuals and governments.  This, as well as LIBOR manipulating shenanigans, is the cause of the credit crunch.

There is no point in the Pope converting to Judaism because that would perpetuate the status to quo.

The only religion for the new and old Pope to convert to would be Islam which states unequivocably as I have shown above that usury is forbidden.

I propose that the papal candidates be interviewed for their views on usury and whether they are prepared to stick their neck out and propose its abolition.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21415639

Below are the candidates considered papabile.



  1. Angelo Scola, Italy
  2. Marc Ouellet, Canada
  3. Christoper Schoenborn, Austria
  4. Odilo Scherer, Brazil
  5. Leonardo Sandri, Argentina
  6. Peter Turkson, Ghana
  7. Luis Tagle, Philippines
  8. Joao Braz de Aviz, Brazil
  9. Timothy Dolan, United States
  10. Gianfranco Ravasi, Italy
  11. Óscar Andrés Rodríguez Maradiaga, Honduras
  12. Cardinal Jaime Lucas Ortega y Alamino, Cuba

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-the-Pope-convert-to-Islam/141277252691901 has polls about Popes.

Muslims the world over should extend the dawah http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah to the old and new Popes to reinforce this point.  The point is to tell them they can still be Pope, but Pope of Islam.




Sunday, 6 May 2012

Koran clearer than the Bible about the punishment for extramarital sex


A good day out for the family and a chance to explain to your children the facts of life?


Compare the confusion specified at http://www.answering-christianity.com/bible_adultery.htm with the simplicity and clarity at:

024.002 
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment. 
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment. 
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.



Thursday, 6 January 2011

In the beginning there was the Word

In the beginning there was a Consciousness that wished to communicate itself to all who had a consciousness and who also wished to communicate with others who had Consciousness. 

That is why words are important.

If we respect this Consciousness, we should take care to speak, spell and express ourselves logically and accurately.

Grammar is the Logic of Language.

God, if He exists, would be supremely rational and logical.  

And that is why we suffer when we think irrationally, express irrationally and act irrationally - in other words when we do not practise what the Buddha recommended: "Right thought, right speech, right action."

So fuck the female-dominated "progressive" teaching establishment who are part the Demented Matriarchal Liberal Establishment who doesn't think grammar, punctuation and spelling are either necessary or desirable and who are no longer capable of teaching it.  Fuck them to fucking hell.

Mark Parker entertains doubts

26:00  Psyop is just another word for state propaganda. 35:39 @DigitalGnosis ​​I dont believe Homer was a person Homer was a pagan. There wi...