THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Islam means logos if logos means the peace you get from submitting to the inevitable ie Truth, Logic and Morality. You can ignore truth until it becomes unignorable. You can refuse to use logic until you fall into error and disaster. You can refuse to follow your moral principles until your body politic is lying on the ground decapitated by the Elephant in the Room: Feminism.
You can only comfort yourselves by pretending that you never cared about the statues anyway and hope your shops are not looted if you kneel to the God of Anti-racism, since the government will no longer uphold the law or protect your rights even if you are Big Business. How can the headless corpse of democracy and Christianity protect anything?
Perhaps the Jews will save us since they are the people who are supposed to martyr themselves if they are forced to kneel before idols, and idolatry is worshiping anything that isn't the Abrahamic God.
The Abrahamic God never forbade slavery in either the Torah or the Koran. It is enough that He forbade usury which leads to irresponsible borrowing and lending by individuals and governments. It is indebtedness that leads us into behaviour such as gambling and reckless imperial wars which ultimately leads to our own enslavement when we lose at gambling and at war.
1. Is Western civilisation failing because Christianity is an inferior religion to Islam?
2. Is the reason why the political system of the West has failed because its religion has failed?
3. What should replace failing Christianity and democracy?
4. What could replace Christianity and democracy?
5. Why did Christianity fail?
6. How many people who identify as Christians really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God?
7. Are the only people in the world prepared to claim that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God people who wish to enter the corrupt priesthood?
8. Is Catholicism now synonymous with paedophilia and sodomy?
9. Has paedophilia and sodomy been synonymous with the Catholic Church since the 1100s when the extremist requirement for priestly celibacy was made?
10. If you were gay, ambitious, clever and Catholic, wouldn't joining a Catholic seminary in order to have sex with likeminded Catholic men be an obvious career move?
11. Isn't relying on the rule of sharia law more effective in maintaining morality than relying on a corrupt priesthood considered to be synonymous with paedophilia and sodomy in the public consciousness?
12. Is there any prospect of the Catholic Church or any other denomination of Christianity regaining its moral authority in our lifetimes even if we were all born yesterday?
13. Is the reason why Christians are being murdered in Asia and Africa by Muslims because Christianity is now regarded as the religion of white people who want to turn our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah?
14. Is the West now a matriarchy?
15. Are all matriarchal societies primitive, declining, extinct or about to become extinct?
16. Are Western men leaderless because they live in a matriarchy?
17. Is it true that in matriarchy, all men - including POTUS - are lower in status than unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their often variously fathered illegitimate offspring?
18. How long has the West been a matriarchy? (Britain has been a matriarchy since 1974 when a Jew, Keith Joseph, regarded as Prime Minister in waiting, did not become leader of the Conservative Party after making his Edgbaston speech criticising unmarried mothers and saying they threatened the human stock of Britain.) https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron
19. What is the illegitimacy rate of your Western nation?
20. Is a patriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who wish to parent properly their legitimate offspring?
21. Is a matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of immoral unmarried mothers indifferent to the parenting of their often variously fathered illegitimate offspring?
22. The perfect patriarchy is 100% married parents. The perfect matriarchy is 100% unmarried parents. If you disagree, are you able to give a convincing reason?
23. If you continue to blame Jews for the failure of your religion and political system and not the corruption of your own politicians and political establishment as well as the morals of your own countrymen, are you ipso facto an antisemite by continuing to scapegoat Jews?
24. What kind of man are you if you you dare not propose the reintroduction of slut shaming because you fear to alienate your wife, daughter, mother, the mother(s) of your illegitimate offspring and other female relations, friends, employers, employees and associates?
25. If you continue to reject Islam as the obvious and moral choice to replace Christianity and democracy, are you not ipso facto an Islamophobe?
26. Does sexual corruption (condoning extramarital sex) lead to moral corruption (telling lies and unprincipled behaviour)?
27. Does moral corruption lead to intellectual corruption (the inability to use truth, logic and morality to solve and avoid problems)?
28. Does intellectual corruption lead to national, civilisational, imperial and global dementia?
29. If E Michael Jones were guaranteed a place in heaven by Muslims, would he reject the offer for a guaranteed place in hell under Christianity, such is his Christian chauvinism and determination to blame Jews and Muslims for all the failures of his religion, political system and the mistakes of so many centuries of Christian government? E Michael Jones says he would become Muslim if he thought Islam provided the solution As you can see from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVNe1OmRPbQ, E Michael Jones blames everything he hates about Western government which are specifically Christian and Western failures on Jews. Will he answer the following questions :
a) Who is responsible for the Liberal Jew?
b) Should Liberal gentiles apologise to Jews for corrupting their morals?
c) Should Jews apologise to gentiles for corrupting their morals when they are but a minority in the Liberal West?
d) If the scourge of the Liberal Jew is the fault of the Liberal Gentile, what should be done about this?
f) If the problem is Matriarchy, is the solution Patriarchy?
g) If the destination is Patriarchy, must the vehicle by Theocracy?
h) If sharia is already in the West for Muslims who wish to be subject to its jurisdiction, why not adopt it for more general use if it would restore the patriarchy and end the scourge of men behaving, speaking and thinking like the worst kind of immoral women?
i) If something should be done, must it be done?
j) If something must be done, should it be done as soon as possible to stop the problem from worsening?
k) Why are sexually, morally and intellectually corrupt incapable of answering any of these questions honestly?
l) Is the reason why Western men are incapable of answering my questions honestly because they are sexually, morally and intellectually corrupt as well as neurotic to boot?
m) Are these sexually, morally and intellectually corrupt men going through the Five Stages of Grief in coming to terms with the fact that their religion and political system have failed? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
n) Could these sexually, morally and intellectually corrupt men of the West get their skates on in coming to terms with acknowledging that errors have been made by their leaders to prevent further damage and more suffering?
IF JEWS DID NOT EXIST, THEY WOULD HAVE TO BE INVENTED
If Jews did not exist, they would have to be invented. The Jews of China during the time of the Cultural Revolution were of course the wealthy, the landlords, the business owners and university professors.
Jews are now synonymous and conflated with the liberal elite who want to sabotage Brexit and continue with neoliberalism, borderless nations and neocon foreign policy.
ANTISEMITISM WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST AS LONG AS THE GENTILE IS CAPABLE OF THE DEADLY SINS OF ENVY, ANGER, PRIDE AND SLOTH AS WELL AS SCAPEGOATING
There will never be an end to antisemitism as long as the gentile is capable of envy. The Reform Jew is as stupid as the Liberal Gentile. Of course Jews will be hated for as long as the gentile is capable of the deadly sins of pride, anger, envy and sloth. The lower he sinks, the more he will hate the Jew, and he is sinking fast into the moral sewage that came with the disease of feminism that he is now nearly up to his neck.
MUSLIMS REPRESENT THE IMMIGRATION THE WESTERN GENTILE HATES AND FEARS
The Western gentile hates Muslims because Muslims are totemic of his hatred of the immigrants who have come to his land, but he especially hates Muslims because they are so numerous and visible and now look upon him with undisguised contempt.
JEWS REPRESENT THE POLITICAL CLASSES THE WESTERN GENTILE DESPISES AND DISTRUSTS
The Jew represents to the antisemite his political classes who clearly care nothing for him. He thinks his politicians are either following orders from Jews or so stupid that they they do not know they are doing the bidding of Jews.
WHY JEWS KEEP GETTING THE BLAME WHEN IT IS FEMINISM THAT CAUSES IMMIGRATION AND PAEDOPHILIA
The problem is feminism but the antisemitic Islamophobe is too cowardly, lazy and intellectually dishonest to admit this because, however promiscuous and immoral his women, he will perceive them to be at least useful in that they represent potential sex partners for him, while the Jews and Muslims he hates do not. For this reason he would rather blame feminism, pornography and the failure of his religion and political system on Jews too.
MY PROPOSED REGISTRAR AND REGISTER OF JEWS FOR THE QUALITY CONTROL OF JEWISH TRIBAL MEMBERSHIP
May I ask Rabbi Bar-Hayim why the measures of herem are not longer used on Jews who commit Chillul Hashem? How about a National Register and Registrar of Jews in each country to keep members of the tribe in order? If they have broken the Sabbath, I am not suggesting that they be stoned, but they could certainly be struck off the Register by their rabbi so that as a non-Jew they escape the death penalty.
KAPUT CHRISTIANITY IS OBVIOUSLY IDOLATROUS SO THIS MEANS JEWS MUST ENCOURAGE WESTERNERS TO ADOPT ISLAM BECAUSE THEY MUST HAVE A RELIGION OR THEIR DEGENERACY WILL JUST DEEPEN AND ACCELERATE UNTIL THEY BECOME A FAILED STATE AND TAKE IT OUT ON JEWS
God if He created us clearly intended there to be Jews and gentiles. Judaism is for Jews only, and Islam for gentiles.
If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.
Islam is the only religion capable of regenerating the degenerate West anyway, since Christianity is kaput.
THE IDOLATROUS DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY THAT NO ONE REALLY BELIEVES IN, EXPLAINING WHY HYPOCRISY AND CHRISTIANITY GO HAND IN HAND
Not only is Christianity kaput, its absurd Doctrine of the Trinity is undeniably idolatrous. The doctrine is so absurd that these days most ignorant Post-Christians have no idea they are supposed to believe in this nonsense if they want to be properly Christian, and would reject it when told.
It is quite obvious which of the two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles is more in conformity with the Noahide laws and it isn't Christianity.
Perhaps Rabbi Bar-Hayim would like to pronounce on this.
ISLAM IS THE BEST FIT TO DO JUSTICE TO WOMEN AND MINORITIES, WITH JEWS BEING GIVEN A PRIVILEGED STATUS AS LONG AS THEY FULFIL THEIR DUTY TO THE GENTILE BY REMINDING HIM WHEN HIS LAWS FALL BELOW THE MINIMUM MORAL STANDARDS OF THE NOAHIDE LAWS EG WHEN HE STARTS PROMOTING - HORROR OF HORRORS AND ABOMINATION OF ABOMINATIONS - GLOBAL GAY MARRIAGE
Islam is after all the only religion that allows the gentile to be fair to his women (without being undermined by Cultural Marxism AKA Feminism) and minorities with Jews having a privileged status of being People of the Book. Muslims cannot after all deny that Islam is built on the foundations of Judaism and Christianity.
Once the West decides to adopt Islam at the suggestion of Jews and has returned to good moral order, the danger of pogrom-inclined antisemitism will abate.
If every gentile became a Jew, then Jews would no longer be God's Chosen People, would they? Judaism is an exclusive club and not for everyone. Islam is a more a political party in a one party state.
THE MORAL AND RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION OF THE JEW TO GENTILE WHICH HE MUST START PERFORMING PRONTO
I am afraid I have to remind you that Jews also have a duty to impose the Noahide laws on the gentile.
Rabbi Schneerson:
"We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher" (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
Islam already gives a special status to the People of the Book and acknowledges that it was built on the foundations of Judaism and Islam. It acknowledges all the prophets of the Bible including the Virgin Birth. Even better, Islam bans usury, which means it will stop both Jew and gentile individuals and governments from getting into trouble ever again over the irresponsible lending and borrowing caused by usury. The gentile had a terrible habit of borrowing money from Jews under usurious terms and then expelling them from their country when they knew they could no longer repay their debt.
You do not seem to have noticed that economic policy neoliberalism and its progressive ie sexually liberated views backed by the military force of neoconservatism is also a quasi-religion which is globally implemented.
JEWS CAN ONLY BE THE LIGHT OF THE NATIONS IF THEY SPEAK TRUTH TO LIBTARDS AND TELL THEM RIGHT OFF
Jews will be looked on as the light of the nations when and if they are perceived to have done something useful for gentiles, instead of being perceived to be the creators and proponents of neoconservatism.
Prominent U.S. Jews, Israel Blamed for Start of Iraq War
The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history.
JEWS HAVE A DUTY TO TELL THE GENTILE THAT HIS DEGENERACY IS ACUTE AND CAN ONLY BE REVERSED BY ADOPTING SECULAR KORANISM
Nothing is guaranteed, but Islam offers a better chance of moral regeneration for the West than continuing with its current satanic rotten modern culture with the abomination of abominations, gay marriage! If moral regeneration is achieved and the patriarchy restored, then Jew and gentile will enjoy small good rational government again. If we continue marinating in its current moral sewage, things will get worse for both Jew and gentile until the West is nothing but a series of failed states falling like dominoes to chaos, disorder, war and revolution.
Sorry about it ending rather abruptly when I was talking about white genocide, but I am sure you get the gist of it. I don't know why that keeps happening.
The bit you missed was me complaining that he says he is too busy to discuss Heidegger and authenticity with me.
Jewish motives in encouraging uncontrolled immigration for the Western gentile are hinted at in Mark Collett's video questioning the validity of egalitarianism and feminism.
Is it true that Jews are guilty of malign encouragement to encourage the gentile to become degenerate so he may be more easily tricked and exploited? This must be what is meant by the stumbling block.
Leviticus 19:14:
You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God - I am your Lord.
If this is true that Jews are forever putting before the stupid and blind gentile stumbling blocks, why does the gentile allow this to happen?
Because his political classes are stupid or in collusion with the Jews?
Because his political classes don't care about him?
Or is it because Christianity and liberal democracy are both kaput?
After all, the rules of Christianity come from the Old and New Testament and both promote patriarchal moral values.
Temple Judaism was suffering from a parasitic priesthood in the same way as 21st century Christianity. This ended in Jews who being deprived of their homeland for 2000 years when the Romans expelled them Israel.
Christians are in the rather more fortunate position of being able to use Islam to protect themselves from usurers. Usury is of course the source of Jewish power over the gentile.
The banning of usury would also benefit Jews by preventing them from getting into trouble with the gentile when he realises he can no longer pay back what he owes to the usurious Jew and takes the usual course of action over the centuries: pogrom.
It is odd that Jews are not already promoting Islam as a religion for the gentile since it is their religious obligation to remind the gentile that his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.
The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism wrote:
'We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher' (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
It seems obvious to me that people are their own worst enemies and cause themselves terrible suffering when they break their own rules. But this problem is easily solved: Jews just have to acknowledge that they owe the gentile a duty of care ie warning and reminding him when his laws no longer conform to the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws. Those who call themselves Christians need to be honest about whether they really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
If they really believe it, they are perhaps too credulous. If they only pretend to believe it to keep their positions in the Christian priesthood, they are obviously corrupt.
If they reject the Trinity as a patent absurdity while still believing in God, then they are closer to being a Muslim than a Jew.
Even an atheist is closer to being a Muslim than he is to being a Christian who is not only required to believe in God's existence, but that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God.
Idolatry is the worship of anything that is irrelevant to the worship of the Abrahamic God be it an idol or any idea that is conflict with the laws of the Abrahamic God found in scripture. Is there anything in the New Testament that says we are to worship Christ as the co-equal of the eternal and omnipotent Abrahamic God? Surely this is blasphemy. Christians have been guilty of idolatry for 2000 years.
Michael Servetus was burned at the stake in 1553 for denying the Trinity.
Calvin said of Servetus:
Servetus has just sent me a long volume of his ravings. If I consent he will come here, but I will not give my word; for if he comes here, if my authority is worth anything, I will never permit him to depart alive.
It was Calvin who arrived on the cunning plan of allowing Christians to practise usury and then blaming Jews when it all went wrong. He was of course an antisemite. Of Jews he said:
I have had much conversation with many Jews: I have never seen either a drop of piety or a grain of truth or ingenuousness – nay, I have never found common sense in any Jew.
Is usury an idol the Post-Christian worships, along with democracy, feminism, fornication and Mammon?
Jews are forbidden from practising usury on each other.
Exodus 22:25–27, Leviticus 25:36–37 and Deuteronomy 23:20–21
Muslims are forbidden from practising usury on anyone at all. There is an absolute prohibition against practising usury in the Koran.
Thoughts that occurred to me while listening to E Michael Jones who no longer speaks to me though we did speak twice.
BEWARE A CORRUPT PRIESTHOOD, JEWS AND CHRISTIANS! MUSLIMS ONLY NEED TO BEWARE A CORRUPT JUDICIARY
The Pope and Curia are managing the decline of the Catholic Church and feeding off its corpse. Judaism failed Jews in Ancient Israel when they had a corrupt priesthood. The Saducees were the ancient equivalent of the liberal elite, and the Pharisees were the ancient equivalent of Trump supporters. Israelis would be well-advised not to rebuild the Third Temple, if they know what's good for them. Islam is the religion that recognises the logic of having the laws of a society conforming to its chosen moral system. Therefore the closest people to a priesthood Islam would have is the judiciary. While judges can also be corrupted, the fact remains that legal decisions are open to public scrutiny and subject to appeal. What goes on behind the scenes in any priesthood are dark and dirty secrets.
WHITE IDENTITY HINGES ON RELIGION, BUT POLITICS IS IS DOWNSTREAM OF CULTURE WHICH COMES FROM RELIGION BECAUSE CULTURE IS SHAPED BY LAW AND PRACTICE
Whites will have no identity until and unless they have a religion that maintains minimum standards of sexual morality. The first step towards achieving this goal is to have a media that is prepared to discuss these things openly and honestly. It is for this reason that White Nationalists need the support of non-whites, Muslims and Jews already in the West also concerned about the way things are going. It is wrong to assume that Muslims who are already US citizens want more Muslim immigration the way it is wrong to assume all white people would relish all their family descending on them at the same time. Insistence on racial exclusivity will impede this goal. It is therefore imperative that the alt-right be represented by its most telegenic, fair-minded and impartial white men. Richard Spencer may be dreamy and easy on the eye, but my view is that someone like Dennis Dale is needed. I find myself warming to him even as I know that he is a White Nationalist only concerned about the welfare of white people. My other favourite White Nationalist is Ann Coulter even though I know she is a bit of a neocon. I know most white people can't help being neocons because they understandably subscribe to the idea of Western imperialism which is of course what gives them their racial pride. However, all empires decline, especially if their religion and political system start to fail and senior politicians are in denial. The key to redemption is the ability to acknowledge one's mistakes and undergo the process of Teshuvah. Humility is therefore the key to redemption.
TESHUVAH
The Four Steps of Atonement
In Jewish tradition, the process of atonement has four clearly defined stages:
Step 1, Regret. Realize the extent of the damage and inwardly adopt of feeling sincere regret.
Step 2, Ceasing. Immediately stop the harmful action.
Step 3, Confession and restitution. Verbalize the mistake and ask for forgiveness, either from God or from the wronged party. If possible, the wrong must be righted through compensation. If the sin is against God, acts of charity may be considered as restitution.
Step 4, Resolution. Make a firm commitment not to repeat the sin in the future.
THE UNBELIEVABLE ABSURDITY OF THE TRINITY
If you want my honest opinion, Jews run circles round Christians because Christianity is so stupid.
If you believe in the Trinity, you are stupid. If you only pretend to believe in it, you are corrupt.
If stupid and corrupt people and their stubbornly chauvinistic descendants suffer, it is for a reason. Jews always ask themselves what they have done to deserve their suffering, and this earns them brownie points to heaven, if they arrive at the correct answer. Is that not correct, Luke?
"The Private Member's Motion has been proposed by the Rt Rev’d Josie-Josiah Jimplecute, Bishop of Breadford, a diocese that has seen the highest number of Muslim immigrants to the UK. Bishop Josie-Josiah, the CofE’s first openly transgender bishop, has been pioneering Alpha for Allah, a course for Christians wanting to become Muslims."
The Trinity is of course the Achilles heel of Christianity. Catholic Kevin Grace still desperately clinging to his Catholicism loathes and fears me. If Christianity were not a failure, I would be prosecuted, incarcerated or perhaps burned at the stake for blasphemy.
This is basically deep down what Kevin Grace would like to do to me to shut me up: conduct an Inquisition. This was basically how Christians would "win the theological argument" against Jews and Muslims in previous centuries and against the Unitarian heretics of Christianity.
Just like Kevin Grace said of himself at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/06/kevin-michael-grace-on-red-hen-coming.html, Christianity has now had its innings.
MY PROPOSED CATEGORISATION OF JEWS
Jews should be divided between (1) the secular and (2) the observant . Amongst the observant, these should be further divided between (a) those who are merely ritually observant and (b) those who take the trouble to defend their religious principles through politics.
The best Jews are of course the 2b Jews. Can you think of any?
The most influential Jew in the world is Rabbi Sacks, who has blocked me on Twitter.
I think the reasons are because of the following posts.
E Michael Jones lumps all Jews together in a bid to smear them collectively for his Catholic convenience. How would you feel if the rest of the non-white world decided to exterminate white people to cleanse the earth of the dysgenic ideas of liberalism and feminism, just to make a point, because they can?
WHY CATHOLIC PRIESTS ARE SO GAY
Why are Catholic priests mostly gay? Because, if you were an ambitious gay Catholic man, you would be heading straight for the Catholic seminary, wouldn't you?
WHY JEWS SHOULD PROMOTE ISLAM AS JEWS
E Michael Jones is disingenuous when he pretends he is not white. The world is really divided between Jews and gentiles and Jewish power is derived from the practice of Judaism. Jews are indestructible because they are indeed God's Chosen People who will always be protected by God to make a point. The point being made here by God is that your religion and political system should always be strong enough to accommodate Jews as minorities in your country and the only religion that can accommodate a Jews as a minority and still do justice to both Jew and gentile is Islam.
CHRISTIAN USURY AND THE REAL PURPOSE OF CALVINISM
It was Calvin who arrived at the clever idea of Christians practising usury and blaming Jews for it when things go wrong.
The binary system was chosen only because it is quite easy to distinguish the presence of an electric current from an absense of electric current, especially when working with trillions of such connections.
E Michael Jones has re-posted my video on his YouTube channel and you may wish to go there for a more Catholic reaction.
My second discussion with E Michael Jones
Topics discussed:
Iran
Yvonne Ridley
The Pill
feminism
Nation of Islam
Methodists
Iranian Revolution
sexual morality
demographics
Methodism
John Wesley
Steve Bannon
Islam
Jamaica
Confucius
theocracy
William Hogarth
Catholic Church
moral relativism
Libido Dominandi
Turkey
logos
St Augustine
chastity
Thomas Aquinas
Plato
Same video as above but with comments from Catholics who follow E Michael Jones
What do atheists like about their religion of ecology and environmentalism?
They like Nature, they like animals and they are atheists who believe in sexual liberation.
Sexual liberation means the widespread practice of recreational extramarital non-procreative sex.
Because environmentalists believe that the world would be a better place with fewer humans, it gives its adherents the perfect excuse not to marry and have children. Spouses are annoying, inconvenient and expensive and so are children, especially if you want to educate and bring them up properly.
Because Nature is indeed beautiful, Western environmentalists are predictably moved by its grandeur and beauty, more than they are moved by the almost incomprehensible Doctrine of the Trinity that their ancestors once paid lip service to. Environmentalists have Christian ancestors and therefore the religion they reject is Christianity, whose doctrinal requirement is to believe that Christ is also God Himself and His son, which is patently absurd.
Having rejected Christianity, they are unlikely to go for Judaism or Islam either. Christianity in practice only requires people who call themselves Christians to claim that they believe in the Trinity to be in good standing with their corruptible and corrupt clergy who mostly don't believe in it either, while adherents of Judaism and Islam actually have to do things good Jews and Muslims are supposed to do ie refrain from indulging in extramarital sex and celebrate their traditions over and above guzzling chocolate eggs at Easter and indulging in drunkenness and gluttony at Christmas.
Environmentalists also like animals. Many of them are spinsters with cats who indulged in sexual liberation on the cock carousel until they realised they had ruined themselves for marriage before settling down to a life of pets.
Environmentalism is the product of our Culture of Consumption, or, if you prefer, our Culture of Sex and Shopping. We know this because Environmentalism has no solutions other than recycling. It certainly dares not touch the vexed issue of usury which turbo-charges our consumerism. The worship of Mammon is about creating desire for a consumer good where none previously existed, impelling its victims to lend and borrow irresponsibly to satisfy a desire that will soon be replaced by another desire for another consumer good, reducing us to mere fungible units of consumption, without identity and without principle who become the disposable units of a disposable culture. As well as individuals, governments also lend and borrow irresponsibly and their victims are its citizens, at sea in a swamp of empty consumption, simultaneously indulging in all of the Seven Deadly Sins at an unprecedented rate.
Environmentalism is silent on usury, but Islam, which would ban usury, is not.
The Bible and the Koran condemn profligacy and waste, but what is waste if not throwing away perfectly useful things just because they are no longer new or fashionable, to buy something else we don't need with borrowed money we don't have?
Waste is of course supremely environmentally unfriendly when you think of all the factories producing things nobody really needs belching out pollution caused by its energy-consumption.
Have you noticed that Britain's only Green MP 's constituency is in Brighton, the gay capital of Britain? Gay sex is the cheapest form of sex you can get, cheaper even than hiring a prostitute. Gay sex is the cheapest form of sex because gay couples who have sex with each other are most likely to enjoy the sex act for the sake of the sex act, while heterosexual couplings require seduction, domination, submission or the exchange of money for sexual services. Marriage is the most expensive form of sex,while fornication is the second most expensive.
To perpetuate the matriarchy, feminists have to ensure that most of the sex that takes place in society is extramarital sex, and this is why they get so offended about my proposal to shame sluts, as quran.com/24/2 requires.
To become a patriarchy again, gay sex and fornication have to be criminalised while marriage is reconsecrated and prostitution tolerated once more.
You may have noticed that feminists want to in effect ban prostitution by criminalising the punter for buying sex, which is much more intolerant and restrictive than the Koran. The Koran at least tolerates prostitution provided you do not compel your slave girls. http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=24&verse=33
So there we have it: patriarchy is about keeping the price of sex high which is eugenic and in the long term national interest, while matriarchy is about keeping the price of sex comfortably low for degenerates and atheists who refuse to make the sacrifices required for marriage and family values, who don't care about their children, descendants, society, nation or civilisation after they are dead. The political system that most favours the perpetuation of the matriarchy is of course liberal democracy, because it ensures that government can never think beyond the next election, which is always less than five years ahead of the present. This means they can never think of promoting the long term national interest, which explains why politicians are invariably stupid, corrupt, short-termist, unprincipled, cowardly and damnably irresponsible.
Worse, the Fourth Estate - the media who are supposed to call to account the government as well as analyse and report stories and opinion - have been co-opted into the exercise of defending this political system, probably because they are also mostly sexually corrupt and stuffed with feminists and LGBTs.
You pays your money and you makes your choice: are you a rational and decent person or a hedonistic degenerate bent on filling your boots before you die with no thought for posterity?
If you are the former, you would feel morally obliged to choose a one party theocracy. If you are a degenerate, you would of course be happy with things exactly the way they are. You would not be capable of telling the Noble Lie or wish to perpetuate it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_lie
This is the offence:
"Denying claims of anti-Semitism Dr Gould quoted Edward W. Said: "The
task of criticism...is to make distinctions...To oppose Zionism in
Palestine has never meant, and does not now mean, being anti-Semitic.""
It's Palestine? Dr Gould writes Israel out of the story. That's inherently antisemitic.
Claire KhawYou do know that the more Jews complain about anti-Semitism, the more people will hate Jews, don't you?
The
more you succeed in repressing the right of the gentile to express
their views on Jews *in their own land*, the more they will hate you.
I
really don't know what you people think you can achieve by calling for
ever more repressive laws against the gentile *in his own land*.
I
had thought Jews were a clever and wise people. A clever and wise
people would know that laws forbidding gentiles from hating Jews *in
their own land* would only provoke and generate the very hatred they are
trying to suppress.
Perhaps the gentile will one
day accuse Jews of provoking anti-Semitism against themselves and then
they will be hoist by their own petard.
Barnaby MarderOf
course, anti-Semitism is always the fault of the Jews isn't it.
Personally, I've always tended to the view that anti-Semitism is the
fault of anti-Semites.
Andrew CrosbieThere
is a word in Scots that describes you and Dr Gould. Toerag. Translated:
a stinking piece of rag on the foot. If we are stupid and sit back and
allow anti-semitism to flourish we could be criticised. I have no
intention of remaining quiet. Gould is paid indirectly from the public
purse. She should be sacked.
Claire KhawAlexandra N Boyd
You either believe in free speech or you don't. So you're saying Jews
are beyond criticism? What have they done to deserve this status?
Rabbi Zvi Solomons"The free speech of the goyim is nothing to you, I suppose." I've
never heard a Jew say such a thing -"of the goyim" forsooth. You're
creating an alien language which you seem to want to father on us.
Alexandra N BoydI
believe in free speech but if your free speech is used to bully and
call out people then it's only right for people to defend themselves
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsCliar
most people learn hatred. That's not an opinion by the way. It's
proven. The only way to deal with learned hatred is to meet people from
the group you are so scared of.
The hatred of Jews
has many origins. I suggest you read "Anti-Judaism" by Prof David Niren.
It's a good study of the phenomenon of which you appear to be a part.
Claire KhawHow
curious that you have no understanding of how your behaviour is
perceived by others at all. Absolutely no idea. A lack of imagination,
perhaps.
Claire KhawI
am sorry you don't like my tone. Am I required to always address you
people in humble tones of self-abnegation or else be accused of
anti-Semitism?
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsCliar
the next time you use that term on my page you're blocked. It would be a
shame to go over that line but I have limits. Stop baiting Jews.
Alexandra N BoydYou are very good at trying to twist a persons written word Claire , that is very sad , I am sure there is no need for that ? Anyway I am out of this I
have a good conversation going with my nearly 4 year old and I can
promise you it is much more important to hear her opinion on things that
happened in her day than waste my time on a lady who twists and turns
things ! I wish you a very nice evening!
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsCliar I don't know what she did. But denying the Holocaust should not be a crime. Professor Deborah E. Lipstadt also holds this position.
Claire KhawDenying the Holocaust should not be treated as a crime, but you lose all your other rights because everything will be rigged against you from then on. Yep.
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsWhy? Nobody can take such a person seriously. It's no different from denying the roundness of the world or that electricity is electrons and not little people running around.
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsAs you know I have her as an e"friend" for purposes of information and instruction -a kind of memento moroni. She's less instructive than some of the other fascists though.
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsIf Jews find your words antisemitic then you are an antisemite. Just asvif blacks or asians find your words racist. Or gays find your words homophobic.
Daniel Leons-MarderI won't engage with Khaw. However, the article is stupid in that the question for the court is whether in the course of her Antisemitic statements, she has crossed the criminal threshold. Not whether she is Antisemitic.
Anyone who does not see how she is Antisemitic is beyond help.
Daniel Leons-MarderIt will be noted by reasonable observers that there is no proposal to do such a thing coming from the CAA, but merely an intention to bring a citizen who may have crossed the criminal threshold before a court of law.
Claire KhawIf the prosecution succeeds, then Holocaust Denial will in fact amount to the offence of being grossly offensive, which is getting what you want through another door.
Claire KhawIf Holocaust Denial is considered to be grossly offensive, you have a Holocaust Denial law. I think you can understand that even as a law student.
Daniel Leons-MarderNot really. Driving one's own car out of a repair joint has been ruled as theft. It doesn't make it always the case. You don't understand how common law works, clearly.
You are also an , unrepentant and irrelevant ex BNP member and unworthy of anything but ridicule.
Daniel Leons-MarderI don't let BNP lowlives dictate conversations. The case will scrutinise whether her holocaust denial falls within the definition of an existing law, just as R v Turner determined whether or not the D's actions fell within the definition of an existing law.
Claire KhawHolocaust Denial is like climate change denial or the debate on whether God exists. It is reasonable to take the contrary view. Most people in this world are not Jews. It's just something to bear in mind, that's all, when you are behaving and thinking in this knee-jerk Judeo-centric way.
Daniel Leons-MarderRabbi Zvi Solomons it's difficult to see someone completely pervert the very idea of...well, law. But you're right - I have no more desire to converse with illiterate hate-mongers.
Arthur WeissRabbi Zvi Solomons No - I'm complaining about making decisions of this magnitude on statistical blips where a 2% swing would change the vote. That's not democratic. That's despotic!
Adina JudithYou're not an anti-Semite because Jews hate you.
Your behaviour/words are anti-Semitic because you believe Jews deserve or provoke the antisemitism they experience. It is anti-Semitic to believe that Jews shouldn't stand up against bias and should be grateful and a bit meek because it's not really their country
of a suspect. Originating in the late 1970s, the codes are based on a police officer's perceived view of an individual's ethnicity based on a visual assessment, as opposed to that individual's self-definition.
Adina JudithFirstly, I don't hate you. I'd even guess that most on this thread don't hate *you* as a person.
So let's discuss views and statements, not people.
If I have understood you, you think that if people who are Jewish hate your views for any reason, those people will accuse you of anti-Semitism.
Can we think about this the other way around:
If you hate me, do you assume I'm necessarily anti-IC5 prejudiced?
If not, then your statement implies Jews allege anti-Semitism when it's not there.
Think about something else: I am a person who is Jewish. Let's say I hate your opinion on mental health or asylum or football teams. Does that make you anti-Semitic?
Finally, perhaps I am reading this the wrong way. Perhaps you are telling me that as long as I hate you, you will choose to remain anti-Semitic. I believe I can solve that problem as I do not hate you. With our shared humanity as common ground, perhaps we should meet up for a cup of tea? I'd love to get to know you and I hope you'd enjoy meeting a person who is Jewish. What do you think?
Adina JudithIt's not leftist to say that putting victims at fault for the bullying they receive is wrong. You wuldnt allow it in a school playground so why do you do it here?
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsNope. I'm worried that she'll get depressed that she's wasted years of her life on worthless ideas and might need help getting over that thought.
Baruch Solomon"It's Palestine? Dr Gould writes Israel out of the story. That's inherently antisemitic."
No Zvi. Dr Gould was not writing Israel out of the story. He was quoting Edward Said. Edward Said may nor may not be guilty of "inherent antisemitism" but to accuse Dr. Gould of "writing Israel out of the story" is at best lazy thinking and at worst intellectually dishonest.
Rabbi Zvi SolomonsWell that's exactly where we disagree. Saying the words "opposing Zionism in Palestine" is inherently antisemitic. It denies that Israel is there, and at the same time denies that it has a right to be there. It's the ultimate revisionist argument: we wish things weren't so, so the are therefore not so. It's damaging to live in such fantasy.
Baruch SolomonMy point is that Dr. Gould didn't say it; he quoted someone who did, and ostensibly at least, his reason for quoting Said was not to advocate renaming Israel Palestine but to distinguish between opposition to Zionism and antisemitism.
Again, if you want to call Dr Gould anti-semitic for opposing Zionism then fair enough but it isn't fair to imply that he, rather than Edward Said, wrote out Israel.
Baruch SolomonSorry, I didn't read your last comment properly. You were talking about "opposing Zionism in Israel" this time. I don't personally believe you have to be antisemitic to be anti-Zionist but it helps.
Aron SterkI disagree. In quoting Said, Gould was giving an "authority" for HER own position. Opposing zionism in 'Palestine' means opposing Jewish self-determination in Israel. It is exactly the writing out of the legitimacy of Israel and is antisemitic.
Daniel Leons-MarderThese people just exist in their tiny, state-subsidised, far left bubble. Having three letters after your name is meaningless unless they happened to write their thesis on contemporary antisemitism
Aron SterkOn the plus side I am glad to see that this government is taking seriously that denial of Jewish self-determination in Israel is inherently antisemitic.
Aron SterkI see the three academics supporting this shamelessly use the fact that they lost family in the Shoah to 'privilege' their own antizionism ...
As you can see, the debate just went round and round and got nowhere.
It is easier, in my view, to simply start from the position that Jews are indeed a superior race. This then perfectly explains why they are hated: because they are envied.
Why are Jews a superior race? — They have been worshiping the right God for longer than all other tribes, races an… https://t.co/ECJyY8q7Sh
The gentile's hatred of Jews is simply the hatred a bad student has for a good student and the reason why swots are bullied, get their glasses broken and their books torn up by the school bully.
It will never be eradicated because human nature is what it is. There will be the school dunce and there will be the school swot. There is no point making everyone Jewish because not everyone wants to or can be Jewish, and because Judaism is far too high maintenance for the degenerate gentile.
One cannot help thinking that people who are stupid tend to get exploited anyway and there is certainly no doubt that Christianity does make people stupid and exploitable. Christians are so stupid that they don't seem to know that Christianity is kaput and no longer fit for purpose.
Not only does Christianity make people stupid, feminism and democracy make them even more hopelessly degenerate, moronic and imbecilic. Not only are the gentile politicians of democracies stupid, they are expected to work even harder, because they are both expected to govern and pander to the idiotic beliefs and demands of the electorate. The only surprise is that such a system has not already imploded under both its combined external and internal pressures.
If Western nations are being always exploited by Jews they have only themselves to blame.
Let me tell you this: if China decided to have a multi-party system, it would soon be having a Jewish problem too.
Islam tries to drag Christians up from their degenerate stupidity by postulating that the law should be in harmony with morality and morality in harmony with Koranic principles. Koranic principles are really not that different from Biblical principles since both are about promoting patriarchal moral values.
Even better, Islam forbids usury, which would at one stroke curtail Jewish power over the gentile by allowing the gentile to declare an Islamic Revolution and thereby default on all his debts incurred with Jewish financiers contracted under the Godforsaken system of fractional reserve banking.
A one-party theocracy governed under the principles of Secular Koranism would make Jews better Jews and Christians less helplessly stupid, immoral, sexually liberated, hypocritical, gaily married and corrupt. Churches would of course be allowed to worship freely and Christians in Britain would continue to be allowed to believe in the absurdity that Christ is simultaneously God Himself and His Son, but the Church of England itself will have to be disestablished in one final act of separation of Church and State. The monarch can continue to be the Head of this Church if she or he wants, and I am sure Charles will make something of this role when his time finally comes.
When you have eliminated the impossible ie Judaism and Christianity as a religion considered capable of maintaining the morals of the gentile, then what's left, however improbable, must be the answer ie Islam.
If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".
Think of Secular Koranism as the Chicken Tikka Masala of religion I have specially concocted to suit Western tastes.
