The Battle for Barking revisited post Obama

To my surprise I find this evening that I never saw this documentary, although many of the scenes are familiar to me as clips on YouTube, especially the one of Bob Bailey - an impressive streetfighter - in a scuffle with some Asian youths. 

The word elegiac comes to mind  though of course the music was added later after the results were known.

"Always cry out in pain as you strike your enemy" was the tactic clearly being employed by Labour not short of funds or the minds of bright young researchers working for them or large numbers of the immigrant community organised to frighten other voters into not voting BNP.

My memory is a little hazy now, but I remember trying to tell them to be nicer to the immigrants and not frighten them too much with anti-immigrant rhetoric, but as usual, I was ignored. They couldn't have done what Trump did to win the Presidential election by being nice to legal immigrants, because they didn't have it in them to be like that, for class reasons, probably. Anyway, when Margaret Hodge told the immigrant community that the BNP would if elected throw their babies out of helicopters she was instantly believed. (This is actually a very old Labour tactic. In the 1980s I met a Sikh woman - the sister of my BBC journalist ex-friend - who seemed to believe that voting Tory would mean being "sent home on the first banana boat", because this was what the local Labour Party had been repeatedly telling her. Years later, this ex-friend informed me that her mother had moved to Ascot to get away from her West London neighbourhood that now had too many Asians.)

How sullen, abusive and violent the immigrant community were to my mates in BNP activists was quite telling. It is how nasty people might treat abandoned children because they know they can get away with it, because they already know no one cares about them.

"Why did British people die in the Second World War?" one BNP-supporting householder asked.

"They died to let everyone come in and take over."

My disqualification as Jury Team London MEP candidate

I was was disqualified as Jury Team candidate on Wednesday 15 April 2009 on grounds of contravening the following rule:

"I agree not to support any policies discriminating on the basis of race, colour, gender, sexual orientation, disability or religious or other belief."


The full text can found at http://www.juryteam.org/agreement.php

It came to the notice of Dillon Sharp the Press Officer that I was proposing to strike a bargain with the BNP. If they voted for me in sufficient numbers to secure me the nomination, I would vote for a BNP MEP on 4 June, I said.


This is all on record at the British Democracy Forum at

http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/

where you will find my comments.

You may also be interested to know that Bob Bailey, the BNP MEP candidate in question, in fact agreed to ask his members to support me and said he voted for me.

If I am guilty of anything, it is of horse-trading, which is not in fact prohibited.

Re-read the term that I am alleged to have contravened, and you would see that "other belief" could include National Socialism, voodoo, human sacrifice, etc.

The person who drafted this term is clearly not a lawyer, or unfit to practice law. Sir Paul was obviously not paying attention when he approved that clause.

I have received neither an answer or an apology from Sir Paul after bringing this to his attention, only a guilty silence.

A request from one of my supporters to have his 25p returned to him after my unjust and unwarranted exclusion has so far not been acceded to.

Someone who declined to vote for me declared that it was probably a telephone scam.

Perhaps it is.

If you wish to acquaint Sir Paul with your views, his email is paul at paulrjudge.com and his website is at http://www.paulrjudge.com/

Dillon Sharp, the Press Officer who disqualified me may be contacted at

press@juryterm.org

call 07538 280 041 (24 hours a day)

Such high-handed and disgraceful treatment has made me even more determined to do business with the BNP, whom I believe would have an interest in promoting direct democracy, unlike the sham movement of Sir Paul, who which only allows Direct Democracy for those who do not contravene his incoherent and nonsensical rule.

Direct Democracy is also something that would be in the interests of Muslims too, even if they do not as yet know this.

I have requested two fatwas on whether Direct Democracy could ever be unIslamic, but perhaps they are unfamiliar with the concept and unused to such a comprehensive question. I have asked for Tim Winter's but he is neither saying yes nor no. Perhaps he means maybe.

It is worth remembering that the most despised groups in the country, ie the Muslims and the BNP, who were against the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, were right on this all along.

In fact, it would be in all our interests, if only enough people understood the concept through exploring it at http://www.1party4all.co.uk/

For those still worried about letting the loonies in by voting BNP, may I point out that the loonies are already in charge.

Michael White of The Guardian even agrees with me, bless him, and he was right all along that the Jury Team are a complete waste of time.

Apparently, MPs expect at least 4 or 5 BNP MEPs.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/18/electoralreform-bnp-far-right

He also says that it would be a good thing for the country if the BNP do well. If the BNP are analogous to a stick, then the use of this stick to protest against the policies of the Lib-Lab-Con is the only option we have now of making our feelings known, whatever our race or religion.

Call it entering the British National Suicide Voting Pact if you must, but sometimes, suicide is the only honourable option.

I thank Sir Paul and his sham movement for making this ringingly clear to me.

Vote BNP in the Euro elections.
You know you want to.