I was was disqualified as Jury Team candidate on Wednesday 15 April 2009 on grounds of contravening the following rule:
"I agree not to support any policies discriminating on the basis of race, colour, gender, sexual orientation, disability or religious or other belief."
The full text can found at http://www.juryteam.org/agreement.php
It came to the notice of Dillon Sharp the Press Officer that I was proposing to strike a bargain with the BNP. If they voted for me in sufficient numbers to secure me the nomination, I would vote for a BNP MEP on 4 June, I said.
This is all on record at the British Democracy Forum at
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/
where you will find my comments.
You may also be interested to know that Bob Bailey, the BNP MEP candidate in question, in fact agreed to ask his members to support me and said he voted for me.
If I am guilty of anything, it is of horse-trading, which is not in fact prohibited.
Re-read the term that I am alleged to have contravened, and you would see that "other belief" could include National Socialism, voodoo, human sacrifice, etc.
The person who drafted this term is clearly not a lawyer, or unfit to practice law. Sir Paul was obviously not paying attention when he approved that clause.
I have received neither an answer or an apology from Sir Paul after bringing this to his attention, only a guilty silence.
A request from one of my supporters to have his 25p returned to him after my unjust and unwarranted exclusion has so far not been acceded to.
Someone who declined to vote for me declared that it was probably a telephone scam.
Perhaps it is.
If you wish to acquaint Sir Paul with your views, his email is paul at paulrjudge.com and his website is at http://www.paulrjudge.com/
Dillon Sharp, the Press Officer who disqualified me may be contacted at
press@juryterm.org
call 07538 280 041 (24 hours a day)
Such high-handed and disgraceful treatment has made me even more determined to do business with the BNP, whom I believe would have an interest in promoting direct democracy, unlike the sham movement of Sir Paul, who which only allows Direct Democracy for those who do not contravene his incoherent and nonsensical rule.
Direct Democracy is also something that would be in the interests of Muslims too, even if they do not as yet know this.
I have requested two fatwas on whether Direct Democracy could ever be unIslamic, but perhaps they are unfamiliar with the concept and unused to such a comprehensive question. I have asked for Tim Winter's but he is neither saying yes nor no. Perhaps he means maybe.
It is worth remembering that the most despised groups in the country, ie the Muslims and the BNP, who were against the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, were right on this all along.
In fact, it would be in all our interests, if only enough people understood the concept through exploring it at http://www.1party4all.co.uk/
For those still worried about letting the loonies in by voting BNP, may I point out that the loonies are already in charge.
Michael White of The Guardian even agrees with me, bless him, and he was right all along that the Jury Team are a complete waste of time.
Apparently, MPs expect at least 4 or 5 BNP MEPs.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/mar/18/electoralreform-bnp-far-right
He also says that it would be a good thing for the country if the BNP do well. If the BNP are analogous to a stick, then the use of this stick to protest against the policies of the Lib-Lab-Con is the only option we have now of making our feelings known, whatever our race or religion.
Call it entering the British National Suicide Voting Pact if you must, but sometimes, suicide is the only honourable option.
I thank Sir Paul and his sham movement for making this ringingly clear to me.
Vote BNP in the Euro elections.
You know you want to.
THE VOICE OF REASON Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Why do Christians not follow the morality of the Bible? Because the Church itself does not follow Biblical principles and is only interes...
-
Key: CK = Claire Khaw CD = Claudia Dalgleish EB = Eddy Butler MC = Mark Collet TC = Tess Culnane CD on Facebook This past month... -
Beta males will never get female attention if it is OK for women to have premarital sex. If you want beta males to have a reasonable ...
12 comments:
I'll remain anonymous for now as I can see that to reveal my beliefs would cost me my very well paid job. Its that bad these days really isn't it? I applaud you for your actions, and I have been following the voting on the jury team with interest. It would seem the text vote system is already being abused, namely by pakistanis/indians etc getting people to vote from their countries by sending them sim cards registered over here! Considering you can get sim cards for just 99p, they feel this is a small price to pay to get ino the final candidature. They'll probably fix the votes again liek they've been doing in Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester, and certain parts of London. So I've decided not to bother with Jury Team anymore, and shall in fact be voting BNP.
Of course it is pointless because concepts like jury team are just another vehicle for the one world dictatorship ----- you can hold all the views you want as long as they are ones they approve .
The irony is that groups like jury team , just like ZanuLabour ,are anti democratic and dishonest in their presentation , whilst groups such as the BNP are inevittably honest because of the core of their origin which is love of land , people and Creator , and indeed it is the BNP which is therefore most likely to present a populace with a democratic government structure which does not discriminate internally but permits the internal to discriminate externally . Of course not to do so suits the international capitalist fascist and stalinist alike , and proves exactly where juryteam , just like liblabcontrick party are and what national and international interest they serve.
Chris Forster
BNP West London Organiser
I trust the first comment here will receive maximum publicity.
Having observed the electoral behaviour of Asians in the East End, this sort of gerrymandering among those registering a vote in the Jury Team selection process does not surprise me in the least.
Anyway, the system of selecting candidates by anonymous text message is wide open to abuse - and is probably only a fund-raising scam by this new party in any case.
Good luck, by the way, with your suggestion on British Democracy Forum that the attractive South East candidate, Lynn Tofari, should be kept just slightly ahead of the other candidates with BNP support.
She might repay the favour by voting BNP in the election itself.
Now there´s a novel idea..
Jeff Marshall, BNP
I will just say to Anonymous that I would have done the same thing in their place because the rule is One Mobile One Vote.
The contest is surely a How Many People Do I Know and What I Can Get Them To Do For Me exercise. Fair enough.
By the time the whole thing is over, the Jury Team will be so discredited that these Asians will have found that it was all a waste of their time and money too.
The Asian strength does however show that family is important. Because of the welfare state, the institution of the British family has effectively disintegrated, and that is why the typical Brit will always lose to the typical Asian. Those who subscribe to traditional values will always win over the great unwashed, the offspring of promiscuous women who will be singly-parented, the comp-"educated" pupil, who are invariably illegitimate, intoxicated, innumerate and illiterate ....
They are going to win until and unless we embrace their values and become more like them. Strange paradox, eh?
It seems I got it wrong. It is Michael Guest who is leading candidate with 94, while Lyn is currently 69 - an interesting number for such an attractive lady, I must say.
He seems a worthy candidate and needs no assistance. I shall suggest that he join the Democracy Forum so that he may comment on my bargain with the BNP.
It is the Jury Team who have transgressed the first rule which is that you should not discriminate on grounds of belief. If you cant be free to believe in whatever party you like then you are not only discriminatory yourself but are also hypocritical too.
The Government are imposing their own Racist agenda on people when they deliberately discriminate against ANYONE because of colour because that is exactly what real discrimination is all about. Discrimination is also about white people as well as coloured people and anyone who says different IS RACIST.
The true non-discriminatory person and even non-racist person does not even recognise race nor colour nor belief, nor religion as an issue. The true non-discriminatory person is color blind as well as religion blind, as well as belief-blind, and ANYTHING ELSE BLIND TOO. The very moment that you start loading the scales and treating people as different they become different.
The Government don’t directly say that the BNP is racist because they know they are not, otherwise they would announce it openly. After all, blatant racism is supposed to be illegal in certain areas.
What they do however is insinuate it and allow others to make the slanderous and libellous claims about them. It is a case of character assassination and defamation by stealth. It is testament to the effectiveness of Government Propaganda that such things are believed. If the BNP are racist for simply wanting to support the 'indigenous people' of this country, then what about the 'black power' movement and other such radical groups?
By deselecting Andromeda the Jury Team have announced themselves to be partial as well 'Politically Correct' which is a pseudo Marxist idealogy used for undermining and subverting a country.
I have no recollection of any other political parties in our recent history that vilifies a minority party, such as the BNP to such an extreme extent. The Question you need to ask is why? What are they afraid of? Could it be that they know that good many people in this country will be supporting them and they are afraid? It can only be that. The government has a secret agenda of its own and it has nothing to do with the interests of the people of this country. The BNP are only concerned with their own race and the fact that its demise and lack of ability to govern itself for itself is being systematically destroyed by a malicious regime which is nothing to do with democracy nor which has any interests in the welfare of people; ANY PEOPLE.
Below is the comment I received from SCOTT CRAIG of the Jury Team whose profile you will find at
http://www.juryteam.org/candidate-profile.php?id=10043
"I don't know how you can possibly object to being thrown off the ticket for making a Faustian pact with the BNP. Why on earth would you make a trade off such at this, effectively 'selling' your vote in exchange for the support of an odious, loathsome political party? The point of having more independet candidates and politicians is just that - they are independent. Did you plan on informing your voters that if they vote for you, you in turn plan to vote for the BNP? It's not an interesting question, it's banal and actually an old story - people making deals with the devil to get themselves elected. I thought that was what we were trying to get away from with this project.
And please, no lectures that the BNP actually aren't racists, they're just misunderstood. It doesn't hold up to much scrutiny."
Actually, Scott, I do not deny that the BNP are racists.
What I am actually saying is that EVEN RACISTS should also participate in the political process, and that political process should be direct democracy.
Unlike you, I am not saying that only people who agree with me can stand for office.
If what you say ain't totalitarian, then I don't know what is.
The term Liberal Fascist comes to mind ...
DARREN STREVENS who can be found at
http://www.juryteam.org/candidate-profile.php?id=10236
wrote in the following terms to me.
"Thank you for your email describing your removal by the JuryTeam. I have some questions.
1. Do you think it appropriate that a member of juryteam is actively supporting another party?
2. Would it not have been more honest for you to simply be a BNP candidate? I am assuming that you did not try that route first.
3. While I support the right of BNP members to hold whatever views they wish and express those views if they so choose, there is an obvious racial bias associated with the BNP which is prohibited by the JuryTeam rules. Do you sincerely believe there is no racial overtone to the BNP policies?
4. If you look at your reply to your disqualification, do you feel that you have been entirely 'professional'? I suggest you have been somewhat petty and to be honest, if you are going to behave in the way you have, regardless of the actions of JuryTeam, I would not want to be associated with you.
I am sorry if I come across as abrupt, but i really believe that democracy is broken in the UK and your negative influence on an attempt to restore democratic legitimacy to UK and EU politics is only going to have negative consequences.
Please have a think about your motivations to be part of JuryTeam and how you have reacted to your dismissal and let me know what you really stand for.
As to the JuryTeam's conduct in this matter; If we are truly making a stand for a new type of politics, a public announcement should be made if any candidate is removed. If we are going to represent something new and better, we should be willing to be open with the public. 'warts and all'. Only that way can trust be restored. If you have constructive criticisms of JuryTeam, I would be happy to know your thoughts, as I intend to provide feedback to them myself, and would be happy to include any reasonable suggestions you may have."
Thank you for copying the Jury Team in on our exchange. It shows a degree of impartiality on your part.
To answer your questions:
1) My point is that I am not "actively supporting" another party. I let it be known that I would vote BNP if I won as a result of BNP support.
Please note that my plan to vote BNP was only contingent upon my winning. If I did not, I would not.
Since my candidate was abruptly withdrawn I do not in fact know
a) whether they would have voted for me anyway
b) whether if they had voted for me they would have voted for me in sufficient numbers to make me win
Only if I had won would I have had to carry out my part of the agreement, please note.
2) I am not a member of the BNP. Indeed, I cannot be a member of the BNP since I am not of the white race.
3) I am aware that there is a definite racial bias in favour of the white race in the BNP constitution. However, what I am saying is, in spite of that, they too should have their views represented, if they do not enjoy multi-culturalism or having their neighbourhoods taken over by foreigners. I know that I myself would not like it if the racial composition of my neighbourhood changed dramatically and suddenly. Would you?
Do please read the clause I am alleged to have contravened. It says:
"I agree not to support any policies discriminating on the basis of race, colour, gender, sexual orientation, disability or religious or other belief."
What do you think "other belief" means?
Any sensible reading of the clause means that I agree not to discriminate on any grounds whatsoever, because "other belief" implicitly includes the BNP or any other unpopular belief such as voodoo, human sacrifice, National Socialism etc.
Do you not agree, Darren?
No, I do not think my response has been petty since I deny contravening any of the rules at all. What I did was to cause anxiety to poor Little Dillon Sharp, the Press Officer who is in charge of running the campaign. He saw the letters B N P and became frightened.
He withdrew me, uncertain of his ground, but said I could appeal by letter.
What a clever device to dismiss, delay and destroy, eh?
If you did not know it before, you should now take note that PR people are even more morally cowardly than politicians. If you were not, it is time to take note now.
Of course you already know that PR people advise politicians.
You therefore have fools and knaves advising fools and knaves.
Great way to run a country, eh?
Below is the comment I received from RICHARD CHESTER whose profile you will find at
http://www.juryteam.org/candidate-profile.php?id=10534
"You should have known better than to try a stupid trick like that .
The whole idea of the Juryteam is not to carry unneccessary baggage.
If you are determined to cause trouble you are better off in the BNP."
He has 4 votes as at 11:04 hrs on 19 April.
This says more about the modis operandi and true motives of Jury Team than it does about you.
You should be grateful they have saved you from spending quite a few years, at great personal cost to you, supporting such a group - only to be badly let down in the end. Like I went through with UKIP. Bargain with them?? You've had a lucky escape!
One thing you can be sure of then - Jury team candidates will be impossible to rely on for voters who want out of the EU and an end to mass immigration. Looking more and more like an establishment plant, is this Jury Team. Last few elections such diversionary parties have sprung up, been duly media hyped, only to disappear again soon after their job is completed and the established parties remain as established as ever!
I'm not saying you should join the BNP either (why should you? I haven't!). But you should be able to vote for who you choose in a free society. Instead of having all sorts of work, political and social obstacles put in your way.
Got here by accident. No idea what the Jury team or has to do with the BNP....
If the BNP get voted, it would ruin this country very fast.
What would the BNP do? Force everyone to buy British? Would consumers buy a £16 hammer made in the UK or a £3.50 hammer made in China?.
Would they put taxes on imported hammers?. So the British hammer is £16 and the Chinese hammer is £17?
Or perhaps they expect British workers to earn the same wage as Chinese works so that Britiain is again competitive in manufacturing?.
The simple fact is the BNP live in the past glory of the Empire.
They are not the future. Immigration is an issue, but the BNP don't have the answers!
And frankly, if the BNP come to power, it will be the ruin of this country..... You will see the fastest foreign investment withdrawal in the history!. This country depends on foreign money. We are a global interconnected world!.
Would the UK be able to attract businesses?. Would Japanese businessmen build a car plant in UK? or would they head elsewhere in Eurpoe. Perhaps where they or their colleagues will not be the subject of racism?
It would be quite a while before we are in any danger of having a BNP government. If I may say so, your attitude is unnecessarily alarmist. I am not saying that the BNP are a party ready for government, and there is no danger of that.
They are useful as barometer of voter discontent and of showing how cross we are with the Big 3.
Voting BNP is the only way we can get the political classes to listen to us and act upon our wishes.
Post a Comment