Why the more cowardly nationalists are distancing themselves from me

As I have mentioned at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/why-oh-why-oh-why-did-nick-griffin.html, Nick Griffin has blocked me from following him on Twitter.

Jez Turner who organises the London Forum meetings told me on 24 March, the day of the last London Forum meeting that I was "suspended from attending the meeting pending investigations".   

He later made out that I was an informant for Hope Not Hate, but even my worst enemy, who threatened in the past to maim then kill me  - Cheryl Dunn - does not believe that of me.  (Thank you, Chez!   x x x  I hope that's all water under the bridge now that we have both been expelled from the BNP.)

I thought and thought and thunked and thunked wondering what the reason could have been.  It really could not have been racial reasons because, they must have known what race I was before I attended the the previous and only London Forum Meeting I ever attended http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/london-forum-21-january-2012.html before being banned. 

Since I also received an invitation to attend the subsequent one and was even invited to speak at another one which was to have taken place on 15 May for the British Nationalist Friends of Palestine on the subject of A Theocracy in Israel for Peace in the Middle East
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/my-proposed-talk-on-nakba-day-15-may_29.html I think I am not being illogical if I reason that it was nothing to do with race, as Hope Not Hate were suggesting it must have been.   

I think it is because of my Battlefield of Love blog http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/. Apparently, it is so heretical and blasphemous to liberal sensibilities that even the so-called British Far Right (who are already regarded as the enemies of liberalism) have distanced itself from me!

But I always knew that the FEMINISM was the real sacred cow of the sexually liberated (or should we say "addicted"?) white male.  They are so addicted to cheap sex and now worship Slut Single Mums so fanatically and unquestioningly that they will suffer to be castrated in her defence, at the expense of the long-term national interest.   

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/feminism-is-nationalist-concern.html explains how and why.

If you don't believe me, then go ask them.  

Anyone know a good libel lawyer?

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/article/1408/who-do-you-think-youre-kidding

"Claire Khaw, a Chinese BNP supporter was initially mooted to be the BNP's "shock/surprise" choice for their candidate. But Khaw had too much of a habit of publicly promoting the policy of murdering disabled people. So extreme was Khaw that some BNP members even threatened to murder her!"

I think Hope Not Hate will find itself in some difficulties proving that I had "a habit of publicly promoting the policy of murdering disabled people", since I never did any such thing.  

What I did in fact say (for which I was expelled) can be found at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2011/07/transcript-of-what-i-said-on-victoria.html

As far as I know, only Cheryl Dunn threatened to maim and kill me.

The BNP and its Abject Submission to Feminism AKA Slut Single Mums

If the BNP care for the white working classes at all, it would say something about how a national identity can only be sustained by the orderly transmission of property and traditions through the human institutions of Marriage and Family. Tragically, the leadership does not care enough to say these things to its membership, because most of them are illegitimate and won't appreciate having their parentage criticised.


Instead, they pretend everything is all the fault of foreigners and immigrants when the truth is that they are so despised that their own government doesn't even care enough about them to point out the error of their ways or give them decent schools.


Liberal governments, like liberal parents, offer no moral guidance because they fear to seem judgemental, prescriptive, authoritarian and do not want to suffer any loss of popularity by criticising sluts, which, let's face it, most women in Britain are these days.  Most men are, let's also face it,  regularly have sex with a woman whom they do not love or respect but who satisfies their minimum requirement of being ready and willing.


The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men, as we have seen.


Because women control men by giving them sex, men are now utterly in their power and dare not criticise the behaviour of any female colleague, for fear of losing their jobs (eg Sky Sports commentators Graham Keys and Andy Gray) or lose votes if they are male politicians.


Will the BNP have the courage to tackle feminism?


It seems unlikely, for they have seen fit to expel me for questioning feminism and its ideology of preserving the inalienable right of women to make reproductive choices that harm both themselves and society.  Riven Vincent is a married woman who has made a very bad reproductive choice - you could not have a more disabled offspring even if you tried, and she herself is now disabled.  (This woman knew 13 years ago that she had MS and even then went on to have her severely disabled daughter, who is now 7.)   Cheryl Dunn - a BNP activist known for being a slut single mum with disabled offspring brought my views to the attention of those attending the BNP EGM and so my mayoral goose was cooked. (I could have been the 2012 BNP London mayoral candidate before they suspended and expelled me.)


Of course I had no chance at all - the entire matriarchy was against me and baying for my blood.


But I at least dare to say what I think the problem is, unlike those who claim to represent the interests of the white working classes.  Or should I call them the white lower classes now since so few of the white working classes now work?