Should feminist mother be allowed to deprive conservative father of access to their children over a political disagreement?

https://johnallmanuk.wordpress.com/2015/10/01/secret-trial/

@John_Allman Answer to both questions is NO or a malicious wife could deprive her husband of his children over just a political disagreement

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 20, 2015

Indeed, a malicious Muslim ex-wife could say that her ex-husband is a Radical Muslim, plans to join ISIS and take their children, urging the court to give her the benefit of the doubt.

The answer to both questions is NO because otherwise a malicious wife could deprive her husband of his children over a difference in opinion about gay marriage, abortion or any other policy that departs from government policy. This means fathers in effect have no rights over their children at all. If this is the kind of society the British judiciary is happy to live in and perpetuate, then we will all know by the end of the three-day trial in December 2015.

@John_Allman Are the couple married?

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) October 20, 2015

Would this make a difference?

I would say yes, because a married couple with legitimate children should have more rights over each other and their children than unmarried parents over their illegitimate offspring. That is, if the government is minded to support the institution of marriage. Western governments, drunk on the sexual licence promoted by feminism have been instrumental in desecrating the institutions of marriage and family for decades. They now run Big Sister government and their voters, also addicted to extramarital sex as an inalienable human right, seem happy to go along with this.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/10/19/whatever-happened-to-sex/

But not all corruption is financial or money-motivated. Spiritual corruption is even more dangerous as it erodes the character of people. Once people’s concerns do not go beyond themselves and their own feelings, a culture is dead. 

Unseemly gloating at forced resignation of Cornish councillor who dared to criticise the disabled (and by extension the matriarchy)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-21612089

http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/special_needs/a1693893-Claire-Khaw-not-the-only-one-with-outdated-views-on-disabled-children

Why are someone's views wrong just because they are 'outdated'?  Has this woman not heard of the eternal verities of human existence?

However, it amuses and gratifies me to be used as some sort of baseline for being Politically Incorrect.

At https://twitter.com/search?q=Colin%20Brewer&src=typd can be read the unseemly gloating of malicious vengeful women on Twitter.  They are squawking really to have the poor man hung, drawn and quartered as a warning to any other male person presuming to criticise women who make irrational and negligent reproductive choices that are harmful to the long term national interest.

What do these women care about the long-term national interest, eh, as long as someone else pays?  

Like the indigent and irresponsible, they are always generous with the money of other people.

Colin Brewer: an apology not enough for vengeful malicious women who regard themselves as beyond criticism.  They probably secretly want him hung, drawn and quartered, or perhaps even burnt at the stake for presuming to criticise women who make bad reproductive choices.  This is Britain under a FOUL AND DEMENTED MATRIARCHY.  Destroy feminism before it destroys you, your society, your nation and your entire civilisation and the future of your children and descendants.