The Culture War and the status quo

The Culture War is between the good guys and the bad guys. The good guys are the ones who are guided by truth, reason and morality. The bad guys are the ones who defend the status quo of feminism, and feminism is a disease of the mind that will destroy your civilisation.

If you want to continue your race, society, nation and civilisation you need to produce the next generation and parent your offspring properly. Marriage is the rearing of the next generation in optimum conditions. If you don't care about that, you must be one of the following:

1) You have no intention of becoming a married father.

2) You have no prospect of becoming a married father.

What if you would like to become a married father but have no prospect of becoming one?

Then you should want to effect the economic, political and social changes that would make it easier for men in theory capable of becoming married fathers to become married fathers. Currently, the law in the West punishes white heterosexual men while protecting the groups privileged by intersectional feminism.

There are really only two choices: patriarchy or matriarchy.

Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy that of unmarried mothers.

Which society is more likely to continue in existence for the preservation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation?

If there were a war between a society that is a patriarchy and a society that is a matriarchy, which would win?

Whether or not you have any prospect of becoming a married father, you are morally obliged to support patriarchy, if you care about truth, logic, morality and the continuation of your tribe, society, nation and civilisation.

If you don't, then you would support the status quo. The status quo is to remain in the EU and to continue with neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Supporters of globalist neoliberalism and neoconservatism would be the ones trying to impeach Trump and to stop the Republicans from winning the midterm elections in November. In Britain they would be the ones working to sabotage Brexit who hate and fear Trump and his supporters.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/08/why-feminists-are-nihilists.html

How to fight the Culture War

To change the culture, you change the law.

Andrew Breitbart: "Politics is downstream from culture."

Me: "Culture is downstream from law.

Law should be downstream from morality.

Morality should be downstream from religion.

Our religion should be chosen wisely and with care, for the advancement of our civilisation.

When the old religion breaks down irreparably, do not be too proud to replace it with something better that is the latest model which comes with an instructional manual and a guarantee.

If Monotheism were a car, Islam would be Monotheism Mark III."

You fight the Culture War by defining its terms, telling people about it and being the Recruitment Sergeant for Sanity. 

It is because Christianity has failed that Europe is being saturated with Islam, for nature abhors the moral vacuum Christianity has become. https://t.co/WbwSWxcn7F

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Islam has already won the argument if your "liberal" reaction is to ban a religion you hate and fear. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Islam is only in the West cos Christianity has long departed. It departed when Westerners ceased to believe Christ is also God and His Son. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

How powerful Islam must be if it can make so many Americans give up their First Amendment. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Banning Islam is analogous to the lazy wanting to ban the idea of industry. Others will be industrious who will then supersede the lazy. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Banning Islam is analogous to the nymphomaniac banning the idea of chastity as a cure for her sex addiction. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference. https://t.co/AyOWSEaRDg

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Unlike Christianity, Islam does not need to be quarantined from the state because it guarantees religious freedom. https://t.co/cvvWIHbY4u https://t.co/AyOWSDTgeG

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

While I do not deny that Islam is authoritarian, it is, unlike feminism, not totalitarian. https://t.co/AyOWSEaRDg

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Why America is responsible for the abomination of gay marriage and must fix it to redeem itself

Declare the Culture War now, Trump and Bannon, or all will be lost. 



Gabriele Kuby:

You get tool kits on how to change the culture. The US Foreign Office gives tool kits to every embassy and money ... how to change the culture in which they are, ja? So it is a plan of social engineering, all the money of this world is behind it. The referendum in Ireland for same sex marriage, one US citizen gave them US$25 million dollars to do it. All the money is on the other side and you know the knowledge is there of social engineering, how to start civil movements. It can all be staged, it can all be manipulated and manufactured. And since you have all the powers of this world behind it for this agenda .... What do you do if you uproot people, with no national identity, no religious identity, no family identity, they don't even know if they are a man or a woman, you can do anything with them, and I think there is actually a World Government approach to aim at that and the leak of the email account of George Soros who is one of the billionaires of this earth proves he is after all of that. It is not a theory, it is reality, there's the proof. But we are Christians and the powers of evil are there, but I firmly believe that Reason and Nature are stronger.

How billionaire George Soros is trying to hijack the Catholic Church for his progressive agenda

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Our-World-Soross-campaign-of-global-chaos-464770 

From 8th minute

English anthropologist J D Unwin Sex and Culture OUP 1934

"The limitation of sexual opportunity must be regarded as the cause of cultural advance. Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom. The evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation." Christian moral norms are a restriction of sexual opportunity - a very severe restriction. Sex only within marriage. Unwin concludes "When a culture lets go of the restriction of sexual opportunity, it steps down from the stage of history, simply because it has not enough energy to keep it up."