Monotheism and the one-party state is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more

Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.

The harvesting of monotheism

1) The Jewish diaspora was the ploughing of the field when Jews headed West.

2) Christianity was the planting of the seeds in three global Christian empires.

3) Islam would be the global harvest.

How to fight the Culture War

To change the culture, you change the law.

Andrew Breitbart: "Politics is downstream from culture."

Me: "Culture is downstream from law.

Law should be downstream from morality.

Morality should be downstream from religion.

Our religion should be chosen wisely and with care, for the advancement of our civilisation.

When the old religion breaks down irreparably, do not be too proud to replace it with something better that is the latest model which comes with an instructional manual and a guarantee.

If Monotheism were a car, Islam would be Monotheism Mark III."

You fight the Culture War by defining its terms, telling people about it and being the Recruitment Sergeant for Sanity. 

It is because Christianity has failed that Europe is being saturated with Islam, for nature abhors the moral vacuum Christianity has become. https://t.co/WbwSWxcn7F

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Islam has already won the argument if your "liberal" reaction is to ban a religion you hate and fear. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Islam is only in the West cos Christianity has long departed. It departed when Westerners ceased to believe Christ is also God and His Son. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

How powerful Islam must be if it can make so many Americans give up their First Amendment. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Banning Islam is analogous to the lazy wanting to ban the idea of industry. Others will be industrious who will then supersede the lazy. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Banning Islam is analogous to the nymphomaniac banning the idea of chastity as a cure for her sex addiction. https://t.co/yuBm2vCcB3

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

The distinction between religion and politics is a distinction without a difference. https://t.co/AyOWSEaRDg

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Unlike Christianity, Islam does not need to be quarantined from the state because it guarantees religious freedom. https://t.co/cvvWIHbY4u https://t.co/AyOWSDTgeG

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

While I do not deny that Islam is authoritarian, it is, unlike feminism, not totalitarian. https://t.co/AyOWSEaRDg

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) April 2, 2017

Why it is Abraham I would choose to interview

Questions I would ask Abraham:

"Did you really make it up about God telling you to sacrifice your son? Would you call that a Noble Lie?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_lie

"Abraham, would you agree that the reason why Akhnaten failed to convert the Egyptians to monotheism was because this new singular deity he proposed lacked a moral dimension?  You, however, succeeded where he, a Pharaoh, failed.  The God you created was not only singular and omnipotent, but was also perfectly moral, all-loving and all-knowing who loves all His creation, which is infinitely more seductive than a merely all-powerful but amoral God.  The lot of mankind afterwards was to embark on the philosophical definition of this thing called morality, would you not agree?"

"How far if at all do you think academic philosophers in the West have been wisely focused in their given task of advancing human wisdom and morality, or do you think that they are in fact unaware of what it is that they are supposed to do?"

Why monotheism is more advanced and efficient than paganism in protecting your society

If most people believe in a unique omnipotent and moral God they would obey the same rules for morality as other people who believe in the same God.

If there are many different gods competing for worshipers  then people will have their different ideas about doing things and will believe that their version is the correct one. Then they will start fighting amongst themselves.

Another people, who are more united and socially cohesive will become stronger, especially if they all agree to obey the same rules, will come along and defeat the divided and quarrelling group.

The most important of these rules is the sanctity of marriage and the prohibition against extramarital sex.  Indeed, this is common to any civilised and advanced society.  Presumably this is because the repeated lessons of history have told man time and time again that when society desecrates marriage and tolerates extramarital sex, anomie, atomisation and degeneracy is the result.

When that happens, it is defeat, death and doom for that society, nation or civilisation, as we have seen with the Fall of Rome.

That is why monotheism was such a quantum leap for mankind. Whether or not you accept the existence of an omnipotent unique and moral God, you will not be able to conceive of an entity more powerful than Him.

God's existence or otherwise is immaterial, since  He will come into existence in the minds of a nation the moment enough people decide to believe in Him.  Once that happens, God can be applied as an instrument of government.  Indeed, as an instrument of LIBERTARIAN government because a godly people require fewer laws than an ungodly people.

It can easily be established that a theocracy can easily have fewer laws and lower taxes than a liberal democracy kowtowing to the whims of feminists and Commie Pinko SSMs.

It was monotheism that allowed societies to preserve their traditions and values for longer than other more primitive pagan traditions.  This is why the Chosen People, the people who invented God remain in existence to this day with a clear sense of their identity and traditions, while other tribes and civilisations have come and gone.  No one denies that Christianity and Islam came from Judaism, certainly not the Koran.

I suspect that the Jews will end up preserving their identity better than the Chinese will, even  though the Chinese have on the whole retained their territorial integrity, just because their religion makes such a point of doing so.   That was the whole point of the Sabbath, after all.  The Sabbath is there to give Jews the time to think about being a Jew and to be with other Jews in order to reinforce their idea of being Jews.   It is also sacred, as suggested by the death penalty prescribed in Exodus 31:15 for breaking it.    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus+31%3A15&version=NIV

The Jews preserve the integrity of their traditions because they respect the institution of marriage and family.  Christians no longer do so.  Indeed, it could be said Christians no longer even acknowledge what the Bible says, but chop and change to suit the times.  They have a holy book, but have all but interpreted out of existence anything that might smack of moral rigour hoping to be all things to all men and women in their desperation to get bums on pews.  These "Cultural Christians" think observing all the outward signs of Christianity, such as singing hymns, going through the motions of worship in buildings they know as churches will be enough to save them even as they promote gay marriage, which is another form of the extramarital sex they refuse to condemn.  It seems they are all afraid to condemn the most pernicious practitioner of extramarital sex - the Slut Single Mum.    Imagine, a society in which even the alpha males of the political establishment are afraid to criticise the worst of their women, because they all have the vote and there are so many of them!  It must be on its last legs and ripe for invasion.  Indeed, it has already been systematically colonised even as its government denies that this is what is in fact happening.

The colonisers are the Muslims who practise their religion with more rigour than either the Jews or Christians.  Their holistic approach is why their numbers are increasing while the numbers of Jews and Christians shrink.  Muslims from Asia practise their religion more than Jews and Christians because they have not yet been so corrupted by centuries of consumerism, liberalism and feminism in the West.

However, perhaps even Muslims are not immune, for we now have Muslim MPs join the equally morally useless Catholic MPs in voting for gay marriage.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/breakdown-of-mps-against-gay-marriage.html

Clearly, it is only a matter of time before even the Muslim become as degenerate as the non-Muslim, with their daughters mostly SSMs giving birth to variously-fathered feral bastards and their sons gaily marrying each other.

There are two possible outcomes to this scenario:

1. the Muslims go native and become good SSM-fearing and gayly marrying liberal bastards like the rest of the degenerate British, or
2. the Muslims establish a Caliphate before they themselves become hopelessly degenerate

Should Britain have a more Chinese style of government?

http://www.scmp.com/news/18th-party-congress/article/1083153/transcript-xi-jinpings-speech-unveiling-new-chinese

Is one-partyism and multi-partyism analogous to polytheism and monotheism?

Is not monotheism more advanced than polytheism?

What is the point of letting the stupid, parasitical, the immoral, irresponsible and venal vote?

No more than 10% of any populace deserve the vote IMHO.  If you give the rest the vote they will only vote for whoever bribes them most.

The long-term national interest is better served by directing our leaders to govern on the behalves of those who are not yet born than trusting to the tribal leaders of amoral political parties to ignore party interest in favour of the long-term national interest.

Let the revolution against the government for the parasitical sluts and their variously-fathered feral bastards begin now!  Let the rotten stinking carcass of demented feminism be buried! 

Secular Koranism

I would like it said that Secular Koranism is a novel and coherent fusion of atheism, agnosticism, monotheism, non-racist civic nationalism, libertarianism, direct democracy, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

I would also it said that I am the High Priestess of Secular Koranism.   

Judaism Explained before Easter

A recent decision by Orthodox Jews to bar a child of a mother who is a convert to Judaism from attending a Jewish school because the child was insufficiently Jewish explains exactly why Christ had such a problem with Judaism.

Unfortunately, he paid for his audacity with his life. His followers invented the story of his Resurrection and the "theory" of the Holy Trinity to make Christ's ignominious death less upsetting for those disposed to become Christians.

The Koran explicitly acknowledges Christ for extending monotheism to gentiles. Christ's crime, as seen by the Jewish priests, was in wishing to spread the benefits of monotheism to those not members of the Jewish tribes. It was Christ acting to end the Jewish monopoly on monotheism that resulted in his execution.

Muhammad developed on Christ's theme, ie that faith alone - not race - is sufficient to avail oneself of the benefits of monotheism. Christ must have concluded that, in order for a better world to be created, monotheism must not remain the exclusive preserve of the Jewish tribes. The Islamic concept of "ummah" - a community of Muslims united by a common belief that does not exclude anyone on grounds of race - is an excellent expression of this ideal. This is far more powerful, in the opinion of this atheist, than the racial exclusivity of the Jews and the Trinitarian incoherence of the Christians.

It would seem that Christianity and Islam share the same aim, that of making monotheism more accessible to others not born into the faith, while Orthodox Judaism has a tendency to be exclusive and restrictive. While Judaism requires a typical male convert to undergo circumcision - an eye-wateringly painful operation in the apprehension of the average male - Islam does not require this.

It was really all a dispute about intellectual property and copyright, folks!