Julie Bindel and Belinda Brooks-Gordon discuss decriminalising prostitution and my Koranic solution

https://t.co/97pm8fcGqH The best bit: 40th minute when @BelindaBG posited the *exquisite* idea of criminalising listeners of @BBCWomansHour

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

If the listeners of Woman's Hour were criminalised, would the crime rate go down and evil and sin diminish significantly in the West? I rather think it would.

The confusing discussion between decriminalising prostitution,whether for both men and women or only women begins at the 33rd minute.

Julie Bindel wants the supply of sex to be controlled by fornicating sluts who pretend it is for free but load the service they provide with all kinds of expensive hidden charges for men eg CSA. Belinda Brooks-Gordon believes in protecting honest prostitutes (ie women who sell sex by giving an up-front price before the service is provided) by decriminalising prostitution for both men and women in designated areas believing that doing so would result in fewer prostitutes being murdered by their punters. Bindel basically doesn't care if more prostitutes are murdered by their punters as long as fornicating sluts control the supply of sex.

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour Without prostitutes men have no protection from what is in effect FORCED MARRIAGE https://t.co/vcoZP6Cb10

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour A prostitute talks about her attitude to work https://t.co/lh6F4xegdT

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour Feminists want prostitutes dead while the Koran tolerates brothel-keeping https://t.co/Qcgrzm4Gq8

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour The simple solution to the problem of sex predators of all races https://t.co/U6IoGDhzLr

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour How to discourage Slut Single Mummery while still allowing sex to stay cheap https://t.co/Q4aFbKB81j

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour The moral case for legalising brothel-keeping https://t.co/zIe5A8qaPx

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour Verse in Koran implicitly accepts the existence of brothels https://t.co/UdPvLOoV1E

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@BelindaBG @bindelj @BBCWomansHour Letter to Business Secretary on prostitution https://t.co/MqY6QbRGaK

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

@bindelj @BelindaBG Honest prostitutes should be a degree above fornicatresses who give sex for free https://t.co/LBfDAm40Ko

— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) January 21, 2016

When will Claire Khaw appear on Woman's Hour?

My advice to Muslims in the West about how to become less hated: by not fearing to be hated even more

https://www.facebook.com/notes/yamin-zakaria/write-to-your-mp-and-others-regarding-the-potential-threat-from-the-far-right/238362692862747

Write to your MP and others regarding the potential threat from the far-right
by Yamin Zakaria (Notes) on Wednesday, 27 July 2011 at 18:17
Below is a copy of the letter that I sent to my local and European MPs, maybe you can alter it and send it to your local MPs (http://www.writetothem.com/)  and create a certain level of public opinion.

------------------------------------------------

Dear Sir/Madam

In light of recent events in Norway, and the subsequent revelations of Anders Breivik’s link with the far-right movement (EDL), we are naturally worried about a potential terrorist act in the United Kingdom.

We would urge the government to take pre-emptive measures under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and curtail the activities of movements like the EDL. This is an excellent opportunity to show that such legislation (PTA) was not construed to be applied selectively against Muslims in the UK. This will help to build bridges and marginalise the radicals on both sides.

The government should look for signs of radicalisation and its sources; hence, those who are particularly violent and vocal in the EDL should be detained in Belmarsh. It might be better to hand them over to the Americans who have acquired a certain level of expertise in interrogation (‘torture’); water-boarding may indeed prove to be useful in saving innocent British lives.

This would send a message that any terrorist or potential terrorist would be subjected to these sorts of preventative measures. In addition, it would be prudent to take measures against the conveyor belt of far-right terrorism by monitoring the voices of BNP, UKIP and other commentators who stoke hate towards the Muslim community. For example, Melanie Phillips is well-known for her venomous comments, and such hate will eventually translate into violence. Would nasty comments towards the black community be tolerated? Hence, why are the Muslims selectively subjected to this kind of treatment?

In this recent case in Norway as well as the Oklahoma bombings, the media initially speculated that the act was the work of the Muslims, tarring the entire community, creating suspicion and doubt. Therefore, the media should also be given clear directives how to deal with sensitive topics so that communities are not divided and ethnic minorities are not marginalised and subjected to verbal assault; the need for this has become self-evident in the light of the recent scandals (hack-gate).

 Yours sincerely

Yamin Zakaria (www.radicalviews.org) 

Below is my response to this Muslim proposal to put the Far Right under observation as stringent as Muslims are currently being subjected to.

Breivik was a loner concerned about immigration, knowing that it would irretrievably change Norway. He did it all himself after he decided that participating in the political process was futile. Writing to your MP or even monitoring the activities of the Far Right won't help either, since Breivik did it ALL BY HIMSELF as did the others who joined a political party, left it, and then went on to plan and commit acts of terrorism ALL BY THEMSELVES.

We are not even allowed to ask what else he could have done to make his point, are we?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/controversial-new-group-for.html

I created a Facebook group asking precisely that question and it was deleted. 

As for the parties you call Far Right, they cannot manage a piss-up in a brewery. Nick Griffin exists to make money out of the white working classes who dislike immigration and do not see why they cannot complain about it without being called evil racist Fascist Nazi extremists. 

If you were white working class and not very educated you might even be a member of the BNP because you wish to assert your right to complain about immigration. 

How would Muslims like their homelands to be full of immigrants while being forbidden to complain about them?

I have already come to the conclusion that the reason why Britain is full of immigrants is simply because if feminism resulting in white British women not having enough children who are brought up by their mothers or taught in their schools to become productive citizens and employees a sane employer might wish to hire. 

Instead of addressing the problems of education and widespread illegitimacy (which would mean

(1) dealing with the teaching unions and perhaps shooting them in front of their families, as Jeremy Clarkson once suggested
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/8930717/Jeremy-Clarksons-execute-strikers-joke-sparks-21000-complaints-to-BBC.html 

(2) criticising the Feminazis such as Dame Jenni Murray (possibly the most evil woman in Britain) as well as her sidekick Jane Garvey at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007qlvb as well as Justine Roberts and Carrie Longton of Mumsnet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumsnet#History successive governments have in fact conspired to facilitate yet more immigration to appease their voters who are employers who need labour NOW. They cannot wait until after feminism is discredited, or when white British women decide to have enough children and bring them up properly, or when the education system is sorted out.  Michael Gove has been defeated on his proposals to raise standards of education, has he not?  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/michael-gove-forced-into-humiliating-uturn-over-ebacc-8484074.html

The government already know that five years - which is the length of a term in office - is not enough to sort that mess out. So they continue to sweep the dust under the carpet.

The white working classes hate Muslims because Muslims are visible and obviously different, while it is not immediately obvious that one of their own is a promiscuous woman and a mother of illegitimate variously-fathered feral children who go to sink schools and leave without qualifications making them unemployable and only fit for a life of crime and welfare dependency.

It is feminism which has created the need for immigrant labour, by lowering the standards of mothering and education in our Culture of Excuses and Entitlement.

It is easier for the white working classes to hate Muslims than to hate their own women -  however promiscuous - because most men who are not in a position to support a wife or are too mean to pay a prostitute will always welcome a cheap source of sex from any promiscuous female minded to give it to them cheap or free.  Men are only after one thing, after all!

The BNP are not prepared to criticise SSMs because most of their membership are the sons of SSMs. 

It would of course help if Muslims are prepared to criticise SSMs, but I have a feeling most Muslims do not want to be even more disliked than they are already. In this way, Muslims are slowly becoming like Jews, who want to prove that they are superior to every race because they are the only ones who follow the commandments of a moral and omnipotent God. Those who do not follow what their God commands will soon find themselves becoming weak and degenerate, in just the same way that a bright student who is not studious will inevitably fall behind to even an average student who is studious.  In the same way, Muslims will also eventually lose their traditions in an environment that is so clearly hostile to social conservatism ie the institutions of marriage and the family, that British Muslims too will be mocked for coming from the land that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland. 

While Muslims who now have the protection of their religion think gay marriage and being unmarried mothers will never happen to them, are they so sure it will not happen to their children and grandchildren? Most Muslims go to the same schools as the white non-Muslims  who are so gay, so promiscuous, so sexually liberated and welfare-dependent after all.

If Muslims want to be less disliked, they will have to demonstrate to the white working classes that it is their lack of religion and family values that makes them weaker than the newly-arrived Muslim immigrant. In short, they will have to warn the people whom they know hate and fear Muslims about the destructiveness of feminism to the institutions of marriage and the family.

However, I am sure no Muslim is prepared to do that. 

I am sure that the instinct of most Muslims is to say of the white non-Muslims whom they know  hate them: "Let them get weaker and more morally rotten, since they hate us so much. Nothing would please us more than to see them rot before our eyes in their stew of moral corruption of alcoholism, sexual liberation and gay marriage - all fueled by liberalism and feminism", while entirely forgetting their duty to enjoin good and forbid evil, as the Koran commands.  

It should be noted that Breivik has been identified as anti-feminist at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/27/breivik-anti-feminism  It is interesting that Muslims refuse to integrate into Western society because they don't want their children and grandchildren to end up as sexually liberated SSMs nor their sons gaily marrying each other nor ending up being divorced and homeless and having to return to live with their parents while deprived of access to their grandchildren by a spiteful ex-daughter-in-law.  The Far Right and Muslims face a common enemy: extremist feminism that desecrates the institutions of marriage and family.  It is the dead weight of feminism (which supports the right of women to be as promiscuous as men) that prevents frightened white men from criticising the worst of their women, who are promiscuous, parasitical and degenerate,even if they are in government and a member of the Cabinet.   The condition of the married white middle class liberal male politician is indeed pitiable and contemptible, for we now have politicians who are these days too afraid of discussing politics.   British Muslims may be forgiven, perhaps, for indulging in what the Germans would call  schadenfreude, and wishing to see the white man, who has bombed and invaded their countries and stolen their oil suffer just a little bit more.  However, what hurts the white man will eventually hurt them too, for they too live in the land of white people.    

I really do not think calling for more restrictions on the free speech of both Muslims and anyone who wishes to complain about immigration is going to help Muslims.  The white working classes need someone to hate for being overtaken and replaced by immigrants.  They need to hate someone whom their own government actually prefers to them.   After all, their own government cares so little about them that it refuses to even warn or advise them for their own good.   The political classes have so much contempt for the white working classes that they would rather throw money at them than tell them a few home truths or risk their careers by offending their slut and bastard voters whom no sane British employer would hire as an employee.

If Muslims want to improve things in Britain rather than merely have their revenge of the Far Right, they should point to the cause of Western malaise, instead of encouraging the government to impose more restrictions on all our freedoms - talk about going native!

Why should Muslims be afraid of offending the worst of women - the unmarried mothers of illegitimate offspring whose children are not a credit to them?  

They have gone native, or forgotten their Islamic duty to enjoin good and forbid evil, as the Koran commands.   Perhaps it is right that Muslims who neglect their duty to Allah do not prosper.  

Or they would go and like https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379?fref=ts

Dame Jenni Murray giggles when ex-wife says on air she used ex-husband's toothbrush to clean toilet

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01qjjxs

Fleet Street Fox

Fleet Street Fox writes a popular anonymous blog revealing the workings, attitudes and shenanigans of a tabloid newsroom. Having used her blog to give her a way to voice her own opinions, journalist Susie Boniface finally confirmed her true identity just a few days ago.  She explains why she revealed who she is, and discusses her new book and what the future holds for Fleet Street Fox.

The Diaries of Fleet Street Fox, published by Constable on February 21 2013.

http://www.fleetstreetfox.com/

https://twitter.com/fleetstreetfox
Fleet Street Fox blocked me ages ago from following her on Twitter, so you can guess what sort of a woman she is.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/04/tweeters-who-have-stopped-me-from.html has an un-updated list of tweeters who have blocked me on Twitter.

Who needs porn to corrupt the morals of the nation when we already have BBC Woman's Hour?

Feminism causes paedophilia and means DYING ALONE

Lonely UK: Number of middle-aged people living alone rises dramatically as marriage continues to decline

• Almost 2.5m aged 45-64 have no spouse, partner or children living with them
• 
  
• Amount has grown 50% since the mid 1990s
• Number of loners has pushed up demand for housing

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2226138/Lonely-Britain-A-MILLION-people-live-1996.html#ixzz2B4tDYRQ2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Feminism also mean reporters in the Daily Mail use "amount" when they should use "number" cos the female-dominated teaching profession does not see fit to teach British school children grammar, cos most teachers are grammatically ignorant.

As Montaigne said, "Grammar is the logic of language," but what do these feminists - these selfish evil women who are determined to cling to their privileges at the expense of men, the young and the old - care about that, or the long-term national interest?

Isn't it time to tell feminism to fuck off, or challenge the matriarchy to a debate?

Go on then, ask Dame Jenni Murray if you can appear on Woman's Hour to question feminism and see what  happens.

You might even find yourself being accused of paedophilia, who knows.  This is what these women do.

Say or do anything they don't like or hurt their feelings and you will be accused of racism, extremism, sexism, paedophilia or whatever shit they can find to chuck at you.  

These days you are called a Far Right extremist Nazi Fascist racist sexist if you express any view that puts you into the category of a social conservative.

Ask yourself this question:

Was there such a fear of paedophiles before feminism became our ruling orthodoxy?

FEMINISM CAUSES DEGENERACY, PAEDOPHILIA AND FUCKS UP YOUR CIVILISATION.   

FEMINISM IS THE MATRIARCHY FUCKING UP THE FUTURE OF YOUR CHILDREN AND THE NEXT GENERATION, BECAUSE THEY CAN.

WHEN WILL YOU GET IT TOGETHER TO TELL FEMINISM TO FUCK OFF?