THE VOICE OF REASON
Solon, (born c. 630 BCE—died c. 560 BCE), Athenian statesman, known as one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (the others were Chilon of Sparta, Thales of Miletus, Bias of Priene, Cleobulus of Lindos, Pittacus of Mytilene, and Periander of Corinth). Solon ended exclusive aristocratic control of the government, substituted a system of control by the wealthy, and introduced a new and more humane law code. He was also a noted poet.
Christianity has no principle other than that of worshipping a dead Jewish man convicted of blasphemy by Jews. Not only do Christians worship an executed blasphemer, they worship Jesus as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe.
Is our global village being punished by God for 2000 years of blasphemy and idolatry practised by Christians with the global pandemic?
There are still 2.2 billion Christians worshipping idolatrously and blasphemously a Jew convicted of blasphemy. Worshipping someone convicted of blasphemy means affirming that blasphemy and this Christians have been doing for 2000 years.
Muslims could also consider atoning for omitting to admonish Christians for claiming that God has begotten a son as 18:4 of the Koran commands.
The Day of Atonement is now just around the corner. Will Jews now finally atone for their omission of not pointing out that Christians are not righteous gentiles because they are blasphemers and idolaters? And will Muslims also join them in so doing?
As for Christians, they can only atone by ceasing their practice of idolatry and blasphemy in the hope of avoiding the wrath of God, if He exists.
If you are an atheist always complaining about Jews and Muslims who appear to have taken over your country, should it not be patently obvious what the people you complain about have that you yourself lack?
If the idea of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God fills you with revulsion and the idea that your ancestors were forcibly converted into this religion fills you with rage, does this not mean that the religion of your ancestors was an illegitimate religion cooked up by con men who are now largely known for their sexual scandals as Creatures of the Liberal State? If there are only two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles and the one you are identified with has already failed, what should you do?
Perhaps you should wonder if the Abrahamic God if He exists is capable of a sustaining a rather cruel practical joke for 2000 years and wondering when you will notice that a trick has been played on you. If you were paying attention or cared about the principle of the thing, you would have noticed by now.
The principle of the thing is:
If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?
Isn't worshipping a man idolatrous?
Isn't worshipping this man as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God ipso facto idolatrous and blasphemous?
If Trinitarian doctrine sounds idolatrous and blasphemous, is it in fact blasphemous and idolatrous?
What do Jews and Muslims say about Christianity? What does the fact that Jews are forbidden to enter churches but allowed to enter mosques tell you about their attitude to what would be for them the capital offence of idolatry if the Torah were still followed? What was Christ crucified for? He was crucified for the blasphemy of saying that his papa was the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe and now exists outside it as pure spirit.
Atheists and nihilists who know what religion is for but do not wish to make the sacrifices their ancestors did - that of marrying and having legitimate children - will be avoiding the question. They avoid the question because the answer - that of replacing a broken moral system forbidden by God with one effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality - is obvious.
The non-Christian and non-Muslim gentile who says he or she believes in God is an interesting study.
The say they believe in the Abrahamic God but reject His laws found in the Bible or the Koran.
None of the prohibitions apply to them, because what the Jews and Muslims believe are the laws of God are just made up crap to these non-Christian non-Muslim gentiles.
They actually believe that they have a reasonable chance of getting into heaven while flouting God's laws on fornication, adultery and sodomy. For some reason that no one can explain, they don't think any of God's laws that they find inconvenient apply to them. What are said to be mortal sins in Christianity and what are said to be sexual offences in the Koran just don't apply to them at all.
This is yet another sign that Christianity is kaput, since no member of the priesthood would dare to correct them, because they think bums on pews is more important than the correct understanding of the nature and purpose of God's laws.
God is a sexual liberal and a feminist, apparently, just like them.
They have basically created God in their own sexually liberated image according to their own satanic sexually liberated preferences.
The combination of their ignorance and arrogance is breathtaking.
But most dismaying of all is the fact that they cannot be reasoned with, because they reject any truth, logic or morality that they find inconvenient with the rejoinder: "Who the fuck are you to tell me what to think?"
They are of course great believers in equality. Their ignorance is the equal of your knowledge.
Jay seems to think I am some sort of queenpin of child prostitution or leader of terrorist organisation when he says "regarding your terrorist or grooming gangs"at 6:4.
He then says I excused them at 7:56.
At 9:17 I accuse him of using the tactics of smear on me through making accusations but refusing to give particulars.
I share Cressida Dick's position on not assuming that Muslim terrorists commit acts of terrorism because of Islam. Some of them may well just be mentally ill, have a grude against society and want to go out with a bang through suicide by cop.
1:08:00 Islam is the more powerful Abrahamic faith for gentile
1:09:00 When people talk about multiculturalism, they mean immigration.
1:10:00 Notice how he sneaks in the words "Rochdale where your grooming gangs are" while I was talking about something else. People like him would say I must be guilty because I finished making my point without bothering to contradict him.
You may well wonder why I bother with people like that who are ready to casually traduce you and denounce you just because they say something they hate.
"In all 36,708 people in Luton voted for remain, 47,773 for leave (56%). Luton’s total turnout was 84,636 (66.32%) - 70,337 of those votes were made at polling stations."
"The vast majority of jobs on offer in Luton are low-skilled. Both white and Muslim Asian communities are worried by the wage depression caused by Eastern European migration."
1:16:00 Imagining a post-pogrom white nationalist future: 1970s had wildcat strikes, inflation, the three day week, the miners' strike bringing down a Conservative government.
1:17:00 What doesn't kill you makes you stronger
1:18:00 The demand for foreign labour was caused by a labourt shortage, the bad parenting of never married mothers which no member of the government dared to condemn other than Keith Joseph who subsequently had his career detroyed because no one would support him.
1:21:00 Jay refuses to support the restoration of patriarchy
1:25:00 "The Mark Collett school of thinking"
1:25:00 Jay: "Nobody wants to have children in a multicultural shithole"
1:27:00 Marriage is not a good bargain for men, but the only way to incentivise them is forbid fornication with quran.com/24/2 and to ban usury to make property prices affordable to ordinary couples.
1:33:00 Gay marriage is an insult to married parents rearing the next generation.
1:40:00 Are we closer to pogrom?
Richard Hooker: "Change is not made without inconvenience, even from worse to better."
Because I challenged the Islamophobic narrative of Muslims terrorists and Muslim sex predators committing their crimes because of their religion, I have been compared to Rose West and called "an enabler" of something or other. Anyone noticed to have expressed agreement with the points I have been making on Facebook have been denounced as "bottom feeders". I am also accused of wanting to integrate "Muslim sex perverts".
Much has been made of the fact that I said Muslim criminals would make the most of their opportunities for criminality in a culture of tolerating underage sex. (The Gillick case - establishing the concept of Gillick Competence - gave doctors the legal right to give underage girls contraception without telling their parents, if they thought the girl knew what she was doing. This House of Lords decision was made in 1985. Presumably, underage girls already knew that fornication could result in unwanted pregnancy, which was why they wanted to get the pill from their doctor.)
It seems that pointing out that a culture of tolerating underage sex would only make child prostitution inevitable has turned me into a terrorist sympathiser and a paedophile sympathiser.
It is interesting that the two people who think that Muslim sex predators and terrorists commit their crimes because of their religion refuse to condemn the practice of doctors aiding and abetting underage sex.
I keep asking them their position on Gillick competence, and they keep refusing to answer. I suppose I have to conclude that they want the status quo of continuing to condone underage sex while complaining about Muslims sex predators preying on underage girls. This is so they can continue to feel the righteous indignation they so enjoy feeling while promoting their unofficial religion of Islamophobia.
Doubtless, Tommy Robinson too would take the same position they do which is that doctors should continue being allowed to supply contraceptives to underage girls without fear of being charged with aiding and abetting underage sex.
My proposal of making extramarital sex a crime in particular of punishing unmarried parents with 100 lashes per illegitimate offspring as quran.com/24/2 prescribes is a bit too radical for them. But I just don't see why it wouldn't work or what else would work.
Widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting, Keith Joseph, Jew, as long ago as 1974 tried to warn the gentile that his "human stock is threatened" because of the policy of enabling and tolerating single motherhood. However, for his pains he had a woman beat him to becoming leader of the Conservative Party and after that Prime Minister.
If politicians who stick their necks out over a principle and tell the truth are badly treated, then the British public must not be surprised if none of them will do so again. The result is that we now only have unprincipled charlatans in charge trying to do as well as they can before they are removed from office.
It is my view that "organic response" implies a threat perhaps of violence. I have sought clarification, but this has been denied, followed by an invitation to join him in attending a Tommy Robinson rally at the Old Bailey on 2 October 2018. Probably, if I had been stupid enough to accept his invitation, I imagine that his plan would have beeen to "out" me to the assembled Tommy Robinson supporters and denounce me as "an apologist for Muslim terrorists and Muslim sex predators" and thereby cause me to fear for my safety so much that I would renounce Secular Koranism which he would record on his phone.
Is there just a hint that I should be able to do kung fu because he is planning something against me that might require the use of any martial arts skills I might have?
