Translate

Showing posts with label Englishness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Englishness. Show all posts

Tuesday, 14 June 2016

Pakistani-born academic in Britain tells the English to shut up about the Anglo-Saxonism




Tariq Modood:

The minimum I would wish to urge upon a centre-left that is taking English consciousness seriously is that it should not be simply nostalgic and should avoid ethnic nationalism, such as talk of Anglo-Saxonism.

Modood's background: He even claims "to be strongly motivated ... to work for the well-being of Muslims in Britain, as well as the well-being of British society." He was in the race relations industry and now presumes to tell the English how to think of themselves as well as to shut up about their Anglo-Saxonism. He says " public intellectual engagement is the gold standard." I wonder if he is going to engage with me at all. What do you think, Dear Reader?










at 2 comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Claire Khaw on Englishness and how the English should adopt her virtues


at 2 comments:
Labels: , ,

Sunday, 11 May 2014

Defend English legal tradition: find Rolf Harris and Max Clifford not guilty (even if they really did do it)

"I see nothing wrong with giving fuckable women the benefit of the doubt because they have at least given me the pleasure of thinking about fucking them while finding men more successful than me to be guilty with whatever offence they are charged with because I like doing down people more successful than me."


  • Agree
  • Disagree


The more disgraceful and serious the crime you are being accused of, eg paedophilia, sex with the under-aged, the LESS you will be deemed to need the protection of the law that requires an accused to be treated as innocent till found guilty BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT after a fair trial.


  • Agree
  • Disagree


Should the requirement to prove the guilt of an accused BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT be dispensed with, especially if he is being accused of a sexual offence?


  • Yes
  • No


Should the requirement to prove the guilt of an accused BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT be dispensed with?


  • Yes
  • No

What is making the uncorroborated testimony of those complaining about sexual assaults that took place decades ago admissible but the dispensing of this requirement?

Why should the criminal justice system give men like Rolf Harris the benefit of the doubt rather than the kind of women who accuse him?

FB Person 1
Why are you so determined to defend old pervs?

FB Person 2
They should not give anybody the benefit of doubt. If there is evidence, let a trial follow; if there is no evidence, throw out the accusations immediately.

Claire Khaw
It is this idea of the burden of proof in criminal cases. Why do you think such cases would have been thrown out in pre-feminist days?

The "evidence" to which you refer to is nothing more than the dubious testimony of slags who are angling for a bit of compo.

Wow, they have changed the burden of proof in criminal trials and the fucking thickos don't even get it.

Some of these fuckers are even law students!

Yep, I can imagine all these degenerate thicko fuckers looking at the slags in court and thinking "I'd fuck her" and find in her favour, and looking at the accused and thinking "I have always hated him" and finding him guilty.

In a CRIMINAL TRIAL you should be given the benefit of the doubt if you the prosecution cannot satisfy the legal requirement to prove his or her allegations BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.

Are you too degenerate to even get that now?

If you are going to make admissible the UNCORROBORATED TESTIMONY of slags angling for a bit of compo then you are in effect dispensing with the requirement of the prosecution to prove its allegations BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT.

Screwy degenerates seem to think defending a legal principle is "defending old pervs". That is cos he can see what he thinks is an old perv but he cannot see a legal principle or hold it in his hand. Degenerates find it difficult to understand abstract ideas.

If they can't fuck or eat it or hold it in their hands then abstract ideas such as legal principles are USELESS, right?

FB Person 3
All men are presumed innocent until he has been declared guilty ~ Article 9 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen 1789. This principle is the backbone to all modern democracies, constitutional monarchies and republics.

Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat ["the burden of proof is on he who declares, not on he who denies"]

"And Abraham drew near, and said, Wilt thou also destroy the righteous with the wicked? Peradventure there be fifty righteous within the city: wilt thou also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are therein? That be far from thee to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from thee: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? And the Lord said, If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes. And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes Peradventure there shall lack five of the fifty righteous: wilt thou destroy all the city for lack of five? And he said, If I find there forty and five, I will not destroy it." ~ Genesis 18:23-32.


Talking about the English legal system, do you think the leader of the English Democrats, Robin Tillbrook, who is in fact a solicitor, understands or cares to defends the principles of the English legal tradition?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN8AFwaN0rk&feature=youtu.be
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW8vrbbwR2o&feature=youtu.be are examples of 21st century Englishness as represented by the English Democrats. If that is what passes for Englishness these days, I would rather be a Welsh rarebit.

This dishonest man opposes Sharia Law.  He does not know that Sharia Law exists because English Law allows Sharia Law to be applied by arbitrators, and that parties to a dispute are at liberty to appoint arbitrators to settle their disputes, and so bypass the English courts.  Anyone who has heard of the Arbitration Act 1996 would know this. If he does not know this, then one must wonder at his professional competence.

If he has heard of it and is campaigning against Sharia Law, then this would suggest that he means to deprive Muslims of the ability to settle their disputes with other Muslims through the process of arbitration, which I would have thought is a fundamental human right.

Perhaps he does know all this but thinks so little of the intelligence and education of the members of his party that he cannot be bothered to explain all this to them.

This woolly bland man - the perfect example of a charisma-free zone - thinks English nationalism can ape Scottish nationalism by being centre left and following in the wake of Alex Salmond.  He, like Shrek, seeks the break-up of the Union.  Shrek has the possibility of becoming King of Scotland, while Robin Tillbrook does not even have the hope of getting more votes than the now hopelessly eclipsed BNP.

Tillbrook has the prospects of the slug aspiring to run a marathon, and perfectly represents the masculinity and Englishness of the degenerate 21st century English politician.

Poor old Tillbrook, who seems unaware that the political concept of Britain was always an English project, and does not care to defend the English legal traditions that protect the rights of the accused, probably because he fears that he may be accused of being a defender of paedophiles, as Barbara Hewson and I have been.

The ability to articulate and defend a principle is a badge I wear with pride, even if this concept is lost to the degenerates in high places and low that now populate this country.

The Englishman prepared to lower the burden of proof at the behest of slags angling for a bit of compo against men they envy because they are more successful than they are is truly beyond contempt.

Envy is of course one of the Deadly Sins.  All the Seven Deadly Sins have the effect of making a society less cohesive than it otherwise would be, but most Englishmen these days have dispensed with God because they are now "good liberals" under the impression that liberalism is the most culturally and racially superior ideology in the world. We know how corrupt these liberals are when they can no longer defend what is really a liberal Western tradition - that of treating an accused as innocent till he is found guilty after a fair trial.

The Bhagavad Gita:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil." 

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rolf-Harris-is-NOT-guilty-beyond-all-reasonable-doubt/581502161968627?fref=ts 
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

Martin Amis - next BNP leader?

Martin Amis says white skin still seen as key attribute of being English


http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/mar/17/martin-amis-white-skin-english-attribute-multiculturalism

It is understandable that white people should feel they need to have an identity that is EXCLUSIVELY theirs, and they know that their skin cannot be taken away from them.

Amis is a man of the past struggling to keep up with the times. What happened to his sister is was both tragic, disgusting and pitiable.

Englishness is described by him as follows:

"But a Pakistani in Preston who says 'I'm an Englishman' – that statement would raise eyebrows, for the reason that there's meant to be another layer of being English. There are other qualifications, other than being a citizen of the country, and it has to do with white skin and the habits of what is regarded to be civilised society, and recognisable, bourgeois society."

What is civilised?  And what passes for being bourgeois these days?  I take being middle class to mean having enough money to hang on to your liberal values and inflict upon your children the curse of liberal parenting.

Sally Amis is a fine victim of liberal parenting, is she not?

Sally Amis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_Amis‎Sally Myfanwy Amis (17 January 1954 – 8 November 2000) was the ... Sally fell headfirst from a table in the garden onto a stone floor, fracturing her skull; there  ...

I should have kept a copy of that Wikipedia entry of Sally Amis' childhood, but it seems to have been changed and now goes straight into The Pregnant Widow by Martin Amis perhaps as a result of what I wrote at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/peter-hitchens-wont-condemn-low-sexual.html

What happened to his sister could happen to any Englishwoman these days, even if she is middle class.

Amis' reference to "recognisable bourgeois society" is puzzling in the extreme.

Would he call the following "recognisably bourgeois"?

'The problem was [Martin Amis's sister's] drinking  -  I'd had no idea how mad it was, and it was getting progressively worse,' says Nigel [Sally Amis' ex-husband], who is now an amateur botanist and a leading authority on wild flowers, particularly irises. 

'The way it took a hold of her was terrible to watch. She liked cooking and I could see that she desperately wanted to be a normal wife, but she couldn't control the drinking. 

'I'm convinced that if she became pathologically promiscuous after we parted, it was drink that led her into it, not the other way round.' 

Drink was one of Kingsley's major vices, but, unlike his daughter, he never cracked open a bottle or ripped the top off a can of Special Brew before breakfast. 

Sally was barely into her mid-20s but she had slid into alcoholism. With her brief marriage in ruins, she returned to the grey streets of Kentish Town, where she regularly met men in its many pubs and bars. 

'She especially loved the Irish, but the trouble was it was mainly Irish chaps who weren't quite right,' says her mother. 'They were men who were drinking too much  -  builders and the like.' 

One of these hard-drinking Irishmen was Martin O'Vessay, whom she met after emerging from a spell in hospital being treated for alcoholism. The result was a child. 

'She didn't like to be alone  -  that's why she did it,' declares Lady Kilmarnock, a frail 79. 

'I don't think she particularly wanted to be made love to, she just wanted company.'

Martin Amis said this week that he thought 'what she was doing was seeking protection from men; but it went the other way and she was often beaten up, abused...' 

Says Lady Kilmarnock: 'Yes, she was knocked about by some of her boyfriends, but she also knocked one or two of them about a bit as well. She could irritate them terribly by being contrary, and they would lose their tempers.' 

As for Sally's baby, both Lady Kilmarnock this week  -  and Martin Amis after his sister's death  -  strenuously deny that the child was the result of a 'one-night stand'. 

They insist that O'Vessay and Sally were living together for a period of weeks, or even months.

Indeed, Lady Kilmarnock says she met him twice and 'didn't like him at all'. 

Sally herself, talking six months before her death, told a different story. She said that after meeting O'Vessay, who had also received hospital treatment for alcoholism, 'I made a terrible mistake of staying with him one night and getting pregnant. 

'I didn't want to be pregnant, but sometimes you feel lonely and you want a cuddle and want to feel warm. But he left me the day after. Three weeks later, I found I was pregnant. 

'I didn't want to destroy a life  -  it didn't seem right. When I told Martin (O'Vessay), he said he didn't want any responsibility. I had the baby on Christmas Eve.' 

Sally's daughter Catherine has turned into the one gloriously happy element of her story. Unable to cope with looking after a baby, within three months Sally had given her up to foster parents.

A year later, Catherine was adopted by architect David Housego and his wife Helen, a teacher, who had been trying for years to have baby. A year after they took Catherine into their Ealing home, Helen Housego became pregnant and gave birth to Louise. 

On Christmas Eve 1996, Catherine's 18th birthday, the Housegos decided Catherine should know that she was 'Kingsley Amis's granddaughter'.

Dunno about you, but this sounds like a plot from Eastenders or Brookside. (For those who are not familiar with British soaps, Eastenders is about the urban proletariat of London, and Brookside was set in Liverpool, an English city known for the infamous depravity of its denizens.)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231509/Was-Martin-Amiss-sister-killed-Sixties-sexual-revolution--drunken-fathers-neglect.html

I wonder if Martin Amis and his ilk can really be made to understand why the Muslims they despise so  much don't want to integrate into this kind of degenerate shit that he calls "civilised and recognisably bourgeois" in his quaint liberal way.

Bourgeois values are middle class values which I understand to mean the practice of sexual restraint, as advocated by all the Abrahamic faiths.  Those who are currently still wealthy but who do not practise sexual restraint nor teach or  urge upon their children such dull restrictive ideas for fear of seeming illiberal and judgmental will be blamed for being instrumental in pushing their descendants into the gutter.

History will not remember them kindly.

Like fishes, a civilisation rots from the head down.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/nov/20/martin-amis-novel-feminists-sister Is Amis still sucking up to the feminists now, I wonder.  
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, 23 February 2012

The way forward for the English Democrats


The British Empire was an English Empire. The colonised were colonised by the English, not the Scots or the Welsh, who rode on the coat-tails of the English when they acquired their empire.

The idea of Britishness and the incorporation of this national entity called Britain was *entirely* the project and accomplishment of the English, who were once clever and strong enough to do things like this.

Too bad the 21st century Englishman does not even have the historical knowledge or the honesty to admit that to talk up English nationalism is to talk down British nationalism.

The BNP is also an English political party.

It was the English Labour Party who started the slippery slide of devolution into national disintegration. It should be up to the English to sort out this mess, but they are just not up to it now, are they?

They should be ashamed of themselves, but they no longer have any pride and feel no shame.

What is English culture? Stuffing ourselves at Xmas, eating chocolate eggs at East, complaining about foreigners, whingeing about our government, watching footie, TV, sex and shopping.

Oh, and morris dancing for those who fancy this sort of thing.

What is the English psyche? Prevarication, denial, hypocrisy and ingrained cowardice that they no longer have the pride to be ashamed of, endless tolerance of Slut Single Mums and unlimited compassion for the criminal, unproductive, disabled and inadequate . It would be better then if the English go the way of the dodo if that is all they are going to be.

Now that the English have become so contemptibly decadent and emasculated, led by a baby-faced compassionate Conservative who is a warmongering Etonian shit, together with his effeminate and homosexual Cabinet, it is no surprise that the Welsh and Scots want nothing to do with the English.

There are also ancestral hatreds because it cannot be denied that the English did lord it over the Welsh and Scots, and probably did kick them around a bit when they were really Top Dog in the UK.

If the English reformed themselves however, then the Scots and Welsh might want to be British again.  Indeed, the only reason why some of the Muslims become radicalised and start wearing burkas and growing beards is because they wish to dissociate themselves from the depraved and egregious English who are well-known to be worship and be afraid of Slut Single Mums whom they dare not criticise.  They could perhaps reform themselves by uncompromisingly promoting family values supported by marriage, but do these emasculated and effeminate Englishmen dare do this in Slut and Bastard England?

Probably not.

Indeed, Eddy Butler (formerly of the BNP) has told me that I am not being properly English because I uncompromisingly promote family values supported by marriage and regularly criticise Slut Single Mums.

I also know that the manifesto of the English Democrats is drafted in order to avoid criticism and controversy.  This means it is a just the political equivalent of cold porridge.

This is certainly not the kind of effete Englishness any self-respecting foreigner would want to be associated with.   My kind of England would be an England where an Englishman's home is his castle, where eccentric views are tolerated instead of Slut Single Mums and the causes of crime.  My kind of England would an England in which the exercise of free speech is the norm, where people are civil, discreet, sober and proud of being English, not the pitiable Politically Correct sexually incontinent, drink- and drug-addicted obese learning disabled illegitimate, illiterate and innumerate, mentally ill dysfunctional wrecks most of them seem to be these days.

The reason the English are no longer proud of being English any more is because they have nothing to be proud of, except perhaps the cheapness and promiscuity of their females (so cheap and easy that they attract sex predators of all races to prey upon English schoolgirls in English cities with high concentrations of non-white British citizens), the egregious quality of English motherhood and the prevalence of porn, under-aged sex and paedophiles.   Indeed, many English employees and employers now pay the Paedophile Tax that is also called the CRB.

Can Englishmen win their battle against feminist emasculation?  Have they got the guts, brains and balls for it?  Are the English Democrats up to this sort of thing, with their leader who is the antithesis of charisma?

I rather suspect not.   If that is the case then their kind of Englishness is good to neither man nor beast, and certainly not the Englishmen and Englishwomen of England.  
at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, 22 September 2011

Why the English are disadvantaged in their quest for cultural identity compared to the Scots, Irish and Welsh


The English are particularly disadvantaged in this, because the Scots and Welsh define their identity by their common hatred of the English.

Stupidly and sadly, most of the idiot English are surprised that they are hated by the Scots, Irish and Welsh because they are so ignorant of their history that they have no idea what their ancestors did to the Welsh, Scots and of course the Irish, because they are not taught their own history by their female-dominated teaching profession about their wars of conquest of the other kingdoms of Britain.

Unfortunate and pitiable are those who are so ignorant of their own history that do not know why they are hated by others, like a disgusting and contemptible drunk with no memory of what he did or said the night before he collapsed on the streets and fouled his trousers.

The white man will be hated and pitied for so many more things in the days and years to come, chief of which is his fear of his even more contemptible women, infamous for their promiscuity and their incompetence as mothers and wives as well as the criminality, promiscuity, depravity and disability of their offspring.
at 1 comment:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

The meaning of suffering and the purpose of pain

30:34 @OOOTLAM ​​I wonder when YouTube will start selling Secular Koranism videos! 31:38 @OOOTLAM ​​The aspiration of humanity for theosis f...