Translate

Showing posts with label Ian Cowie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ian Cowie. Show all posts

Wednesday, 13 May 2015

How will the government define "extremism" and what are British values?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05tllvh

0715

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Jonathan Russell is the political liaison officer for Quilliam, the counter extremist think tank.

0810

David Cameron is outlining new measures today to tackle extremism in the UK - plans for a counter-extremism bill will be set out at the first meeting since the election of the National Security Council. Theresa May is the Home Secretary.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/380595/SMSC_Guidance_Maintained_Schools.pdf

Through their provision of SMSC  (spiritual, moral, social and cultural [development]), schools should:
• enable students to develop their self-knowledge, self-esteem and self-confidence;
• enable students to distinguish right from wrong and to respect the civil and
criminal law of England;
• encourage students to accept responsibility for their behaviour, show initiative, and
to understand how they can contribute positively to the lives of those living and
working in the locality of the school and to society more widely;
• enable students to acquire a broad general knowledge of and respect for public
institutions and services in England;
• further tolerance and harmony between different cultural traditions by enabling
students to acquire an appreciation of and respect for their own and other cultures;
• encourage respect for other people; and
• encourage respect for democracy and support for participation in the democratic
processes, including respect for the basis on which the law is made and applied in
England.
The list below describes the understanding and knowledge expected of pupils as a result of schools promoting fundamental British values.
• an understanding of how citizens can influence decision-making through the democratic process;
• an appreciation that living under the rule of law protects individual citizens and is
essential for their well-being and safety;
• an understanding that there is a separation of power between the executive and
the judiciary, and that while some public bodies such as the police and the army
can be held to account through Parliament, others such as the courts maintain
independence;
• an understanding that the freedom to choose and hold other faiths and beliefs is
protected in law;
• an acceptance that other people having different faiths or beliefs to oneself (or
having none) should be accepted and tolerated, and should not be the cause of
prejudicial or discriminatory behaviour; and
• an understanding of the importance of identifying and combating discrimination.

As a qualified solicitor, I am sure Anjem Choudary already understands all of the above.

If Britain is a matriarchal society - and believe me it is - does proposing and promoting a return to the patriarchy mean you are guilty of extremism?

What is the evidence that Britain is a matriarchal society? The desecration by the establishment of the institution of marriage. All it takes for a matriarchy to establish itself is the absence of the practice of marriage and society's lack of respect for this institution. To respect marriage, we must logically and necessarily forbid extramarital sex. Instead, however, a Conservative government actually went out of its way to legalise gay marriage, which is like decriminalising what was once a criminal offence to solve the crime problem. Sadly, the British are now so degenerate that they cannot see through this ruse, or worse, they are so depraved they pretend not to understand this point no matter how many times or how clearly I explain this.


To this list I would add "paedo".

Margaret Thatcher:

Watch your thoughts, for they become words. Watch your words, for they become actions. Watch your actions, for they become habits. Watch your habits, for they become your character. And watch your character, for it becomes your destiny. 

Q1.   What are the thoughts of the British?

A1.   [Extramarital] sex and shopping.

Q2.   What are the actions of the British?

A2.   Sexual intercourse, especially of the extramarital variety.

Q3.   What are the habits of the British?

A3.   Drunkenness, over-eating, gambling, anti-social behaviour and borrowing to buy things they don't need with money they don't have. When they are not having extramarital sex, drinking, over-eating and shopping, they like pretending that indiscriminate universal suffrage - the so-called democratic process - is superior to all forms of government when it is clear that they out of all nations have lost the most through the operation of democracy.

Poppy Mania Day prevents any rational and impartial analysis of the insanity of UK foreign policy for the past 100 years

In short, their habits are indulging in all the seven deadly sins without any longer being able to understand the concept of sin let alone list them.

Q4.  What are the characteristics of the British?

A4.   Dipso, fatso, bingo, ASBO, Tesco, paedo, and denial.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Q5.   What is the destiny of the British?

A5.   Deuteronomy 28: Curses for disobedience



SSMs = Slut Single Mothers

It has been a British "value" not to criticise irresponsible, stupid and promiscuous women since 1974.

Howard Flight echoes Keith Joseph's 1974 warning that 'our human stock is threatened'

The 4 Categories of Unmarried Motherhood

Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock - most British children *bastards*, most British mothers *sluts*, no male British politician will criticise sluts, therefore all British men lower than stupid, irresponsible, promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards.

Tories have been soliciting the vote of stupid irresponsible promiscuous sluts who are bad mothers of bastards since 2002, *at the suggestion of Theresa May*.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/11554595/Pornography-has-changed-the-landscape-of-adolescence-beyond-all-recognition.html

Allison Pearson:

In recent years, Sue had treated growing numbers of teenage girls with internal injuries caused by frequent anal sex; not, as Sue found out, because she wanted to, or because she enjoyed it – on the contrary – but because a boy expected her to. “I’ll spare you the gruesome details,” said Sue, “but these girls are very young and slight and their bodies are simply not designed for that.”

Her patients were deeply ashamed at presenting with such injuries. They had lied to their mums about it and felt they couldn’t confide in anyone else, which only added to their distress. When Sue questioned them further, they said they were humiliated by the experience, but they had simply not felt they could say no. Anal sex was standard among teenagers now, even though the girls knew that it hurt.

For Sue’s surgery isn’t in some inner-city borough where kids may have been brutalised or come from cultures where such practices are commonly used as contraception. Sue works in the leafy heart of Hampshire. The girls presenting with incontinence were often under the age of consent and from loving, stable homes. Just the sort of kids who, only two generations ago, would have been enjoying riding and ballet lessons, and still looking forward to their first kiss, not being coerced into violent sex by some kid who picked up his ideas about physical intimacy from a dogging video on his mobile.

Yet when Muslim parents take organised action to prevent the same thing from happening to their daughters, they are denounced as "Trojan horses". http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/10983109/Trojan-horse-plot-report-disturbing-evidence-of-intolerant-Islamic-ethos.html As you would expect, their Muslim values warns them against integrating into a society that asserts extramarital sex as a right or even a sacrament. While Muslims worship and fear an omnipotent and morally perfect God, Islamophobes, feminists and liberals worship and fear sluts. They fear and hate Islam because they see it as an ideology that threatens their right to have extramarital sex as well as what they regard as their "liberty" and their "way of life". 

How long has under-aged sex been condoned in Britain all the way up to the House of Lords? Since 1985. http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=Gillick+competence

DEMOCRATS' IDEAL VOTER: ILLEGAL ALIEN, SINGLE MOTHER, CONVICTED FELON

Coulter: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president"

Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan agree with Claire Khaw's proposal of no representation without taxation (to disenfranchise non-taxpaying Slut Single Mothers)

Would David Cameron's proposal to "tackle extremism" criminalise people like Keith Joseph, Howard Flight, Ann Coulter, Ian Cowie and Benedict Brogan as well as my good self and Anjem Choudary?


004.015
YUSUFALI: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four (Reliable) witnesses from amongst you against them; and if they testify, confine them to houses until death do claim them, or Allah ordain for them some (other) way.
PICKTHAL: As for those of your women who are guilty of lewdness, call to witness four of you against them. And if they testify (to the truth of the allegation) then confine them to the houses until death take them or (until) Allah appoint for them a way (through new legislation).
SHAKIR: And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them.

004.016
YUSUFALI: If two men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, Leave them alone; for Allah is Oft-returning, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And as for the two of you who are guilty thereof, punish them both. And if they repent and improve, then let them be. Lo! Allah is ever relenting, Merciful.
SHAKIR: And as for the two who are guilty of indecency from among you, give them both a punishment; then if they repent and amend, turn aside from them; surely Allah is Oft-returning (to mercy), the Merciful.

024.002
YUSUFALI: The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication,- flog each of them with a hundred stripes: Let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment.
PICKTHAL: The adulterer and the adulteress, scourge ye each one of them (with) a hundred stripes. And let not pity for the twain withhold you from obedience to Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of believers witness their punishment.
SHAKIR: (As for) the fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them, (giving) a hundred stripes, and let not pity for them detain you in the matter of obedience to Allah, if you believe in Allah and the last day, and let a party of believers witness their chastisement.

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=terrorism
at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 29 April 2014

Which is worse: Trojan Horse Muslim parenting or liberal parenting?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2609332/Islamic-school-hardliners-confiscated-Easter-eggs-pupils-head-Ofsted-takes-charge-inquiry-Muslim-Trojan-Horse-plot.html
Muslim schools 'must respect British values' says Jack Straw as Birmingham MP admits there is a 'Trojan Horse' plot by extremists

Is British parenting liberal parenting?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2615421/Middle-class-drug-user-Grim-Reaper-drawn-Facebook-page-Classmates-tell-murder-suspect-bright-boy-loner.html

1.  Imagine if there are two groups of people: one produced mainly suicide-bombing sons, and one produced mainly teacher-murdering sons. Which is morally superior?

  • The people who produced suicide bombers
  • The people who produced teacher-murdering sons

It is my belief that a person who murders out of conviction for his cause is better than someone who murders for personal reasons.

You can imagine an animal killing another animal for annoying him, but you cannot imagine an animal killing another for a political reason. A political reason is of course a moral reason, however misconceived.

It is our capacity for being able to conceive of and practise morality that makes us superior to lower animals. Muslim parents may produce suicide bombers, but it is single mothers who practise liberal parenting who produce murderous twisted shits like the boy who murdered his teacher in front of her class.  The single mothers of the murderers of Jamie Bulger were liberal parents par excellence.  How long will the liberal media and the liberal political establishment remain afraid to criticise the parenting skills of single mothers, who have the vote?

2.   Is indiscriminate universal suffrage a grave and continuing error?

3.   If so, why do we not rectify this as soon as possible before this cancer of society spreads even more? http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ianmcowie/100010127/a-tax-based-alternative-to-the-alternative-vote/

4.   Are politicians too afraid to discuss this because women (who are mostly sluts/fornicatresses in Britain because most mothers in Britain have babies born out of wedlock http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html) have the vote?

5.   Are the mothers of bastards (SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379) likely to have higher morals than mothers of legitimate children?

6.   Are divorced mothers bad mothers for the same reason that SSMs are bad mothers?

7.   Are SSMs parasitical?

8.   Is there any danger of the parasites overwhelming the host by sheer weight of numbers?

9.   Should we worry that there are more SSMs than there are mothers of legitimate children with the vote?

10.   Should women have been given the vote?

11.   Would you have given women the vote if you knew this was going to happen to your country and your civilisation?

12.  If you were a murderer and you murdered for political reasons would you be a better person than a murderer who murdered for personal reasons?
  • Yes
  • No

13.  What are the advantages of having a son who was a suicide bomber over having a son who stabbed his teacher to death in class for "victimising" him?

The practical advantage, I would suggest, is that the inconvenience of having to visit your suicide bomber son in prison will not even arise because he will be conveniently dead, while people might expect you to visit your teacher-murdering son, and you will also be faced with questions about him and the kind of liberal single working mother parenting he received long long after the event.


14.  If your son had to be a murderer, which would you rather his reason be?

  • He was a terrorist killing to further political ends.
  • He stabs his teacher to death for "victimising" him.

15.  Which makes you a worse parent?
  • Your son stabs his teacher to death in class.
  • Your son was a suicide bomber.

16.  Which would you choose if you had to choose?
  • Your son stabs his teacher to death in class for "victimising" him.
  • Your son was a suicide bomber.

17.  What kind of parenting would the boy who stabbed teacher have received if his father had been in the home?

18.  Why are no questions being asked by female journalists about liberal parenting boy who stabbed teacher received from his working divorced mother?

19.  Should parents be made legally responsible for the actions of their murderous shit kids? 

20.  Would the boy who stabbed teacher to death not have done so had he not been deprived of his father?

21.  What kind of a mother produces a son who stabs his teacher to death in class? 

22.  Is honour killing the answer when you produce a shit kid who stabs his teacher to death in class?

23.  Did you know that the elder brother of the boy who murdered teacher had no social skills either according to his neighbours?

Rebecca Hardy, 21, said: ‘He would never look at anybody. He would literally walk face-down to the ground with his bag on his back. Once or twice I’ve tried to get him to make eye contact and smiled, but he’s never let on.’

She added: ‘They’re both quiet boys – if you said hello they probably wouldn’t say hello back. I would say they were a bit weird.’


24.  Do shit parents produce shit murderous kids?

25.  What would you want to happen to the shit kid who stabbed his teacher to death in front of his class if Ann Maguire had been your mother or your wife?

http://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answer/112864113793 has my my anti-feminist answer to this comment:

I would judge a mother on her morals and conduct towards her children. Not all children listen to or agree with their parents, not to mention external pressures from society and peers to steer the young away from the traditional and the established. Parents are just scapegoats for individual failure.

If you enjoyed this post, you may also enjoy http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/my-adam-lanza-facebook-page-unpublished.html

and http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/diane-abbott-grows-up-and-says-feminism.html
Diane Abbott grows up and says feminism makes bad mothers

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

Claire Khaw offers to speak at the Freedom Festival in Bournemouth on 14 March 2014

To sharon@tfa.net
Today at 11:37 AM

Hi Sharon

I am thinking of coming along but believe my presence may be a bit of a problem with some of your speakers and organisers.  

Perhaps you would like to run the idea by Simon Richards and then get back to me on this?

I would be quite happy to be one of the speakers, if this is possible.  

Regards
Claire Khaw

Uh oh.  Just discovered at 2:07 pm that my post has been deleted.  Don't think they will be inviting me to speak.

But perhaps they will allow me to attend the conference?


https://www.facebook.com/events/586787874740078/?previousaction=join&ref_dashboard_filter=upcoming&source=1


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

God behaving badly

1:03:00  CLAIRE  KHAW joins to say God in the Koran is more reasonable than God in the Old Testament, but there is only one Abrahamic God.  ...