Claire Khaw makes enquiries about being slut-shamed in Indonesia in a bid to promote slut-shaming in the West to save Western civilisation

I have been making my support for marriage and slut shaming quite clear.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 23 January 2018

Common sense is very rare in our degenerate matriarchy.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 23 January 2018

Sexual corruption leads to moral corruption. moral corruption leads to intellectual corruption. The left now hate the right for pointing out the obvious because intellectual corruption means rejecting truth, logic and morality.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 23 January 2018

Sexual corruption = extramarital sex

Moral corruption = condoning extramarital sex

Intellectual corruption = rejecting truth, logic and morality as a means of solving problems

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 23 January 2018

It is a form of teshuvah.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 24 January 2018

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801

For putting things right, of course. Tikkun olam and all that.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 24 January 2018

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/satan

I am trying to arrange a visit to Aceh province with @KBRILondon with this purpose in mind.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 24 January 2018

I am trying to arrange a visit to Aceh province with @KBRILondon with the purpose of promoting the practice of slut-shaming in the West as prescribed by https://t.co/3K8zKsPjZt  https://t.co/CtTxenRXgR https://t.co/Nz5mrgmldv

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 24 January 2018

Because that would drive the point home better. Please support me on Patreon so I can get to Indonesia.  @GenZMGTOW

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 24 January 2018

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/auberon-waugh-and-me.html

Auberon Waugh, now the Editor of the Literary Review, has gained a reputation as a controversial journalist. In conversation with Michael Parkinson, he talks about his father Evelyn Waugh, his childhood and his writing, which has included seven novels and his diary Private Eye. [Taken from the original programme material for this archive edition of Desert Island Discs] Favourite track: Don Giovanni Act 1 by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Book: Other Men's Flowers by Lord A P Wavell Luxury: Vine

The Jews and the Chinese

They have a few things in common. The Chinese are called the Jews of Asia and in Indonesia there have been anti-Chinese pogroms just as the Jews have suffered pogroms in Europe.

One of the most interesting aspect of anti-Chinese feeling in the Far East is the different legal status of the Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia respectively.

Anti-Chinese pogroms are more frequent in Indonesia though they have been known to happen in Malaysia too, but officially the Chinese and the indigenous Muslim Indonesian have parity of status. We must remember that Indonesia is also an empire and this necessarily means having a dominant culture, the quelling rebellions from time to time and basically kicking minorities around for the purpose of imposing and retaining imperial hegemony.

In Malaysia, the bumiputra - the indigenous Malay Muslim, translated as the Prince of the Land - has privileges that the other races are not entitled to in terms of university places, employment quotas etc.

On this matter my family are divided. My father says this is obviously unfair. My mother however says it is imperative that the Malays keep their privileges because if they don't, they won't be able to compete with the other races and will for this reason get angry and then have their anti-Chinese pogroms.

Does this mean the Malays have racial superiority? I would suggest not.

I know the BNP would love indigenous whites to have racial privileges over non-whites, but does this mean they are racially superior? I would suggest not.

But then this is not a question of who is racially superior but what is fair, practicable and conducive to national harmony.

What is a racist?

It seems this means anyone who proposes any policy that discriminates on grounds of race, but it is certainly arguable that in certain circumstances it can be fair to do so, and even conducive to national harmony.

If I were to say that the Jews are a superior race, does that mean I am racist? I am not a Jewess, but I like to think I am in thinking like one. I have said before that Judaism is like an exclusive golf club while Islam is more akin to a political party in a single party state. It is certainly possible to be both a member of an exclusive club as well as a member of a political party in a single party state and I like to think I am capable of both.

Why are the Chinese considered the Jews of Asia? Probably because we are thought to be good with money and too clever by half, with an impenetrable language operating by the rules of patriarchy with many rituals and traditions.

Why might I say the Jews are a superior race to the Chinese?

Because the strength of the Jewish tribe comes from adherence to their traditions, which may in time triumph over the numbers of the Chinese, especially if they lose their traditions, which I feel bound to say they have.

The Jews have also been around even longer than the Chinese who are also well known to have been around for quite a while, hence all those Jewish jokes about what the Jews did before there was any Chinese food.

https://forums.egullet.org/topic/113757-why-jews-like-chinese-food/

http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-life-and-religion/53569/jewish-christmas 

Disabled Indonesians Required to Wear Traffic Signs

http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Asia/Story/A1Story20090526-144074.html



How very sensible.

Unlike what Cameron is proposing, ie trying to make things easier for the disabled and their parents.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/david-cameron/5838718/David-Cameron-calls-to-end-bureaucratic-pain-for-families-of-disabled-children.html

Doesn't he know that this is only encouraging them?

First, someone thought a few disabled parking spaces here and there would be kind and considerate. Now, our supermarkets car parks have empty disabled spaces that the able bodied dare not use for fear of being fined.

Do we really want an increase in people claiming disabled privileges? Is it in the national interest to encourage the parasitical behaviour of the less productive at the expense of the more productive?

Cameron does, because he thinks they are electorally significant and increasing in number. No doubt they are a suitable audience to demonstrate his "Conservative compassion"?

These people are quite organised too, trawling the Internet for comments unflattering to the disabled and sending them hate mail. I have received quite a few in my time and expect to receive more.

Well, let me tell you this: the Indonesians will get richer and the British poorer, if we carry on like that.

When we get poor enough to be Indonesians, I suppose we will finally junk the insanity of privileging the disabled. They should be tolerated and treated compassionately, certainly, but not privileged and given a sense of entitlement.

There was a ridiculous discussion on Radio 4 last week at 9am on a weekday last week, consisting entirely of women discussing ante-natal screening. One of them, disabled and arrogant beyond belief, was objecting to this practice because it meant that fewer people like her would be born, because it was discriminatory.

Strangely, no one pointed out that most sane people don't want to be disabled or want a disabled child. If I were disabled, I wouldn't be wearing it as a badge of honour and lording it over everyone.

Even more strangely, she was treated with a kind of exaggerated deference that frankly made me feel quite nauseous, confirming to me that we are now suffering from a terminal form of national dementia.