Translate

Showing posts with label John Redwood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Redwood. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 July 2016

Suggested punishment for the male Tory Brexit MPs who were duped by Leggy Legsom



The 39 male Brexiteer Tory MPs who snatched defeat from the jaws of victory

Were these men "thinking" with their sex organs?

Should they be made to apologise for thinking with their sex organ as a warning to other men also inclined to "think" with their sex organs?

Should there be any women in politics at all since their very presence in public life confuses these stupid men?

Why couldn't they have supported Gove?

Why did they pretend that he had done something terrible by choosing to stand after all?

Because he wasn't a woman who could avail himself of the woman's prerogative to change her mind.

If there is a weaker sex, there is an even weaker sex, made up of men who "think" with their sex organs.

Sturgeon: I can block UK exit from Europe

In a master stroke of obfuscation, Theresa and Nicola agreed that Article 50 of the EU treaty would not be invoked until full agreement had been reached between Westminster and Edinburgh over a satisfactory approach to exiting the EU. In other words we won’t leave until Nicola gives her permission. The Daily Telegraph reported; ’Theresa May has indicated that Brexit could be delayed as she said she will not trigger the formal process for leaving the EU until there is an agreed “UK approach” backed by Scotland.’ 

http://salisburyreview.com/2016/07/theresa-may-referendum-never/

I am not suggesting hanging, drawing and quartering as a punishment for these men who "think" with their sex organs. All you do have to do is retweet the tweets below, if you are a disappointed Brexiteer, until we have a public apology from these men.



































Wednesday, 12 November 2014

Western banking is run on usurious principles and no Western politician is prepared to consider running it on Islamic principles






I should also mention that I asked what he thought of Islamic banking. He responded by saying that Muslim countries were basket cases (or words to that effect) and gave me a long list of Muslim countries he thought were basket cases. I interrupted him by saying that I was not asking what he thought of Muslim countries but about Western economies run on non-usurious principles. His response was that it was not his business to think about things that are unlikely to happen. I further asked him he thought was the evil the prohibition against usury was intended to discourage. He answered correctly, saying that it was to prevent the rich (eg bankers) from having all the money and using their leverage to oppress and exploit their borrowers. Then he said "Anyway ... " turned on his heels and headed towards the gents, I think.  I thanked him for giving me his time.  

Will TLC ask Objectivist Craig Biddle why he won't engage with me?

  12:02 PM @OfficialSecularKoranism ​​Would people like to help me troll Craig Biddle? 12:02 PM @OfficialSecularKoranism ​​I guess I am sort...