I like to think that male MPs would rather have me than Lady Butler-Sloss to chair the child abuse enquiry

The Home Office has announced that Lady Butler-Sloss, a retired judge and former president of the family division, will chair the child abuse inquiry. Downing Street said she was "a very strong appointment". The prime minister's spokesman said:

 It is the very wide respect that her professional expertise as well as her personal integrity commands that makes her a very strong appointment for this role. It is the width and breadth of her experience that counts.

At the home affairs committee Vaz asked Sedwill if he thought the fact that Butler-Sloss was a member of the Lords, and that her late brother, Lord Havers, was Lord Chancellor, could make it hard for her to investigate allegations potentially involving peers and senior member of the judiciary. But Sedwill replied:

She is a woman of unimpeachable integrity ... Anyone who's every dealt with her would not question for a second the integrity, capability, intelligence and rigour that she will bring to this job.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2014/jul/08/mps-question-home-office-chief-over-missing-child-abuse-files-politics-live-blog#block-53bc149de4b012f5b90a0432

She ruled that the child killers of toddler James Bulger should be entitled to lifelong anonymity

She overrode the wishes of the parents whose 15-year-old daughter, already a mother, sought an abortion

She dismissed an appeal by millionaire racehorse owner Ivan Allan against an order that his former mistress, Glory Anne Clibbery, should be allowed to reveal details of their relationship

She blocked a mother's attempt to have her 29-year-old mentally disabled daughter sterilised

She blocked a man's legal battle to see a test-tube baby daughter, who was conceived after his relationship with the mother broke up.

In 1999 she said she supported the adoption of children by gay couples, although she did not go so far as to advocate a change in the law.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5307946.stm

MPaedophiles should expect no mercy from her then.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/lady-butler-sloss-patron-of-marriage.html
Lady Butler-Sloss, Doyenne of Divorce, is Patron of the Marriage Foundation. Why not put Dracula in charge of a blood bank?

http://livinginamadhouse.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/elizabeth-butler-sloss-and-the-worthlessness-of-public-inquiries/

The pornocratic political hierarchy of Britain

Feminazis, Slut Single Mothers, Mumsnet, Women's Hour listeners etc make up the PORNOCRACY > Pussywhipped Prime Minister and pussywhipped MPs > Pussywhipped Archbishop of Canterbury whose Church is stuffed with Commie Pinko Homo Feminazis > social conservatives who are badly represented by moral cowards Nigel Farage and Nick Griffin whose pariah political parties will never ever win an election because they are stuffed with unmarriageable and unfanciable beta-omega males who are the victims of and afraid of Feminazis, Slut Single Mothers, Mumsnet, Women's Hour listeners etc who make up the PORNOCRACY

Only a Secular Koranist Movement can break this deadlock.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

MY rules for reporting sexual offences: uncorroborated testimony inadmissible and strict operation of limitation period

I would make it a rule that UNCORROBORATED testimony is never admissible, no matter how many complainants there are.

This means if it is just one person's word against another, forget it, unless the alleged offence was reported within 4 weeks of the commission of the alleged offence to the police.

I think 4 weeks is time enough. If it was really serious you would report it immediately without passing go and without collecting £200. If you took 4 weeks to think about it and then decided not to, then you weren't obviously that bothered about it.

If you are out of time then it is too bad and you have to just get on with your life: this has the advantage of helping the victim achieve closure. If you are really that bothered about it, you can do stuff to the perpetrator for revenge and take your chances with the law if what you do to the perpetrator breaks the law.

Or you may just end up like Frances Andrade.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/the-person-most-responsible-for-death.html

Extensions are only permitted if you were kidnapped, imprisoned and kept as a sex slave, obviously. Then time would start to run the moment you were in a position to report the sexual abuse you suffered.

If the victim is a child then time runs from the time the parent/guardian/carer knew of the alleged abuse.

I think that is nice and clear, don't you?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroboration_in_Scots_law

http://www.richardwebster.net/similarfactevidence.html

What about the MPaedophile scandal, you scream?

These rules would also apply to MPaedophiles. The paper trail should be quite easy to follow. They will choose who they will throw to the wolves in the next 10 weeks and the "real" findings will not be made public till after the next General Election according to http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-announces-details-of-independent-inquiry-into-paedophile-network-claims-9590545.html

It was perhaps a delicious revenge for Dickens who was by all accounts a bit of a clown http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/07/geoffrey-dickens-mp-campaign-child-abuse-taken-seriously to have given it to Brittan himself who is said to have been implicated at the link that is now removed from http://4bitnews.com/uk/explosive-corrosive-and-breathtaking-the-biggest-scandal-in-british-history. He may have been implicitly saying "I know it was you, and you will try to cover it up, but you will get found out, maybe not even until after I am dead, but you will get found out, and a tsunami of shit will hit you and those who helped you cover it up, Anyway, here it is. Do what you like with it."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2680060/Tebbit-piles-pressure-Brittan-VIP-abusers-Tory-grandee-joins-chorus-demanding-explanation-missing-dossier-detailing-Westminster-paedophile-ring.html

British national identity and culture defined in the light of the MPaedophile scandal

The British in general are now known as the people with MPs who sexually abuse children in care homes or MPs who were sexually abused as children, who solicit the votes of their doubtless equally depraved voters every 5 years by pandering to their vices.

They are also known as the people who won't criticise immoral and irresponsible sluts who go on to become mothers who keep giving birth to new victims for child sex predators to prey on, as if they were a production line and conveyor belt in a factory for producing fresh victims for sex predators of all classes, nations and races when these poor bastards are abandoned by their disgusting and irresponsible slut mothers into care homes.

The fact that no man will criticise fornicating sluts who go on to become Slut Single Mothers is evidence that all men are lower than these women who are lower than lower animals.  Lower animals make more rational reproductive choices than these Spinster Single Mothers - SSMs - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Should-Spinster-Single-Mothers-be-lashed-100-times/417696111659379?fref=ts who probably do not remember the names of the men who impregnated them and perhaps never even thought to ask. Perhaps, even if you could pinpoint the exact date and time of the conception of their bastard they may still be uncertain as to which man it could have been who impregnated them.

I wonder if I can sue anyone for emotional distress and loss of self-esteem.