Pope Benedict has blocked me from following his tweets on Twitter

The Pope and his Tablet.  Will he be excommunicating the morally corrupting Tina  Beattie,  Director  of  The Tablet

I suppose this means he will be predictably feeble about punishing the morally corrupting Tina Beattie who is Director of The Tablet.  Tina Beattie is a Catholic cool about about gay marriage and she has said so publicly.

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2012/09/11/bishop-cancels-lecture-by-liberal-theologian-who-argued-for-same-sex-marriage/

I feel sorry for those Anglicans like *Mark Barnes of Wakefield who have turned to Rome in the hope of moral and national salvation.   They have no hope if the Pope is cool about gay marriage too.  

They may as well convert to Islam.



*Mark Barnes is the UKIP member from Wakefield who has expressed a desire to see non-Europeans in Europe turned into second class citizens and the wish to sterilise promiscuous women who want abortions.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/what-ukip-man-says-about-making-non.html

There is SECRET Facebook group administered by a UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions

It is called Exchanging Ideas.   You can join this secret group if you request friendship from Stuart Hamilton, the backstabbing piece of shit who used to jointly administer the group with me.

We agreed that, since I had broken the rules of secrecy, I should be seen to be punished.  I agreed that my punishment would be a week's exile.

However, he soon put up polls about whether I should remain admin and then whether I should return at all.

Of course, if the boot had been on the other foot, I would have kept to my word about letting him return after a week, and left it at that.   However, these days, in slut and bastard Britain where even educated men have no grasp of the principles of fair dealing and keeping one's word, his behaviour was only to have been expected.

And so he has banned me permanently and made Mark Barnes, the UKIP man who wants to sterilise women who want abortions and to make non-white citizens of Europe second class citizens, the group admin.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/what-ukip-man-says-about-making-non.html repeats verbatim what he said about wanting to sterilise women who want abortions and making non-European citizens in Europe second class citizens.

I was content to have it as an open group, but Stuart Hamilton wanted it closed and then finally secret.

Were we sharing porn with each other or something of that nature?  NO.

Why was he so obsessed with secrecy?

Because he feared jeopardising his social life and his chances of future employment.

I went along with it because I was at the time content to post there, and did not at the time see the harm of the group being secret.

However, when I read that a UKIP member in Exchanging Ideas, Mark Barnes, was saying that he wished to sterilise women who want an abortion, and that he wished to make non-Europeans living in Europe second class citizens, I could not hep but want an answer to this question:

"Why is this intensely chauvinistic and misogynistic man who wishes to treat other races as second class citizens and sterilise women who want an abortion in UKIP while I am forbidden to join just because I  am ex-BNP?"

What Mark Barnes wants goes much further than the BNP after all.  He really should join the NF with views like his.  However, he is too cowardly and hypocritical to do so and already knows the NF are full of proles he despises and wouldn't be seen dead with.

Also, his wife might object and his business might suffer.

So there you are.  Anyway, Mark Barnes is currently administrator of this secret Facebook group full of people who fear to express their political views in an open group.

That group is now cursed.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/ is a new group I have set up, called PUBLIC debate which is an OPEN group, for people who are not afraid to say what they mean, and who are able to defend their views morally and intellectually, but if not, withdraw them.

UKIP man wants women who want abortions sterilised

"If abortion must be countenanced then at least sterilise the defective life-bearer at the same time to prevent a repeat of this monstrousness from occurring in the future. Those who refuse to bear life when they took on board the responsibility to create it in the first place, ought not to be given a second chance."

Why is this man a member of UKIP while I am not allowed to join just because I am ex-BNP?

UKIP man wants to make non-Europeans second class citizens

I'm actually not opposed to a strong, unified Europe just the weak, fractious, liberal, secular, socially democratic one we have at the moment; hence my desire to escape from its clutches. The Imperium Europa concept is too socially liberal for me; it is also secular.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_Europa

My ideal would along the lines of the Roman Empire, restore classical education, underpinned by Christianity, an Imperator rather than a President, an Imperial Senate that meets in Rome with delegates from the nations of Europe; a fortress Europe that expels dissident elements, that is proudly European, that gives priority rights to European subjects and second rate ones to non Europeans. A European army assembled from national contingents under the command of outstanding European generals. An internally free trading Empire with Russia as an ally and trading freely with China, India and other developing nations.     

5 September 08:25

And below are his shockingly vengeful thoughts about what should happen to women who find themselves in need of an abortion:

If abortion must be countenanced then at least sterilise the defective life-bearer at the same time to prevent a repeat of this monstrousness from occurring in the future. Those who refuse to bear life when they took on board the responsibility to create it in the first place, ought not to be given a second chance.

5 September 22:29

If truth be told, this goes much further than the BNP (who only advocate voluntary repatriation and have no policy of sterilising women who have got themselves knocked up).

I find it rather galling that ex-BNP members who have not expressed such views cannot join UKIP while such a man who has expressed such a view is considered OK to stay in UKIP.

I wonder what Searchlight and Hope Not Hate have to say about this.

I have already suggested to UKIP a way of dealing with members who hold such views.


All UKIP members would be invited to sign a declaration that they will not so long as they remain in the party:

1.  promote a policy of the forcible repatriation of non-white British citizens

2.  promote apartheid

3.  promote any policy that discriminates either for or against any British citizen on racial grounds

on pain of expulsion.

This solution has been described as "ingenious" by Andrew Reed, UKIP spokesman in Brussels.  Sadly, they are still not going to do it.   Why not is a question that should be considered at conference with the utmost urgency and seriousness.

Although UKIP have refused to sell me a ticket on the grounds that I am an ex-BNP member, I intend to go to Birmingham to meet the more independent-minded type of UKIP activist.  It is quite disgraceful that UKIP are behaving as if they were a private club rather than a political party.  The longer they continue to confuse the nature of their role and the purpose of their activity, they shall remain the doldrums.

Should they admit me then doubtless they would have every intention of appointing me as their Director of Communications and Policy Consultant.   Once that is done, UKIP will go from strength to strength.

UKIP men must get over their fear of the likes of Maggie Chapman (a Scotswoman who about her four illegitimate grandchildren) and the likes of Ngaire Wadman who form a fearsome female cabal.

For this country to return to rationally small government, we must defeat feminism.  To defeat feminism, men must not be seen to be afraid of criticising SSMs (Slut Single Mums) and their Running Dogs (ie men who have sired illegitimate offspring and the grandparents of illegitimate grandchildren).  The worst way of desecrating the institution of marriage is to say, like Maggie does, that it is OK to have illegitimate grandchildren, that marriage is only a piece of paper and that it is optional even when you want to have children.

Men of UKIP, dare to discuss this with the woman of your life!

But you won't, because you are no longer men.   Pah.  

UKIP man refuses to discuss sex with me

1. How would you feel if you have FOUR ILLEGITIMATE GRANDCHILDREN?

2. What steps would you take to prevent this?

3. If you had FOUR ILLEGITIMATE GRANDCHILDREN by your daughter, would you blame your wife a little?

These questions were asked of Mark Barnes, a UKIP supporter who prides himself on his contribution to society as an entrepreneur and a father of legitimate children.

I know he refuses to answer because another UKIP member, Maggie Chapman has four illegitimate grandchildren and he does not want to offend her.

Mark in fact dislikes me for the persistence with which I punch through my anti-SSM message.  He thinks it is too unladylike for his delicate sensibilities and he wishes I would stop, for it offends his ears.  He would rather I keep quiet about such indelicate subjects that upset people, especially people like Maggie Chapman, who is proud of her four illegitimate grandchildren and actually boasted to me that she her daughter's children were illegitimate, in order to silence me.

Mark also says I have made no contribution to society because I do not have a full time job and have recently admitted to once having had an affair with a married man in my past.

As far as he is concerned, my admission means my message that SSMs are bad for Britain and that women should be discouraged from becoming SSMs is invalidated.

I disagree.  If we had to wait till we were morally perfect to discuss morality then morality will never be discussed.

He also asks me again, what "material contribution" I have made to society.   (At least I know that I must leave this question to be answered by posterity!  If you were God Himself and were asked this question, how might you answer?)  Does he mean to discover how much tax I pay?  I am happy to concede that I do not pay as much as he does, being the entrepreneur he is.

I use him only to demonstrate how neurotic, cowardly and hypocritical the British are about discussing sexual morality, because most men these days are so pathetically frightened of offending women for any reason whatsoever.

How can this man, who refuses to give his honest answer to a simple question like this, claim to be a better politician than me, or even a worthier person?

This man also thinks that my admission into UKIP would be bad for it.  I think this man acts of petty-minded spite.  I think I would be excellent for UKIP.

Those who agree with me should tell Steve Crowther, UKIP Chairman, exactly this in no uncertain terms.   The next general election is not that far away and we still have time to make UKIP a more exciting and radical party than it currently is.

His email is mail@ukip.org