Who would make a better chat show host: Millennial Woes or Claire Khaw?

Claire Khaw talking to Greg Johsnon

Millennial Woes talking to Greg Johnson

Millennial Woes talking to Faustian Spirit

Claire Khaw talking to Faustian Spirit

Millennial Woes talking to Ecce

Claire Khaw talking to Ecce

Millennial Woes talking to Babylonian Hebrew


Coming up soon: Claire Khaw in conversation with Babylonian Hebrew

I wonder why my application to be on Millenniyule 2018 has not been successful

My application to be on Millenniyule 2018

Further comments in support of my application to be on Millenniyule 2018

My application to be on Millenniyule 2018

MY APPLICATION

Claire Khaw has been promoting Secular Koranism since 2009 believing this to be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and morally regenerating a degenerate civilisation. The government supporting marriage and family values through 

1) the shaming of sluts and the men who cannot resist them by making fornication a sexual offence attracting corporal punishment as prescribed by 24: 2 of the Koran

2) abolishing no fault divorce

3) repealing the Equality Act 2010

would be the only way of restoring the patriarchy and returning the West to moral order. Unfortunately, this must mean dumping democracy and establishing a one party theocracy.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained.  No pain, no gain.  

When did Britain start being a matriarchy? As long ago as 1974 when Keith Joseph criticised unmarried mothers and found Thatcher becoming Tory leader instead of him. I fear if no attempt is made to challenge the matriarchy before its 50th year, Western civilisation would end in ignominy.

Me discussing Secular Koranism with various people

Should Millennial Woes censor discussion of White Sharia on Millenniyule?

Eli Harman and I do not exactly see eye to eye on certain matters. He has even declared war on me on the subject of Islam, but he and I are agreed that White Sharia should be discussed, and I like to think I am man enough to just concentrate on the positive

https://www.facebook.com/claire.khaw.92/posts/1565487930192501?comment_id=1565944593480168&reply_comment_id=1566217936786167

Eli Harman and I are also agreed that the views of women don't matter because if the men who want patriarchy and nationalism triumph over the Morally Compromised Slut Fuckers who dare not denounce feminism because they are frightened of feminists, have no principles they care to defend and only care about filling their boots before they die, the women will just take their pussies to the men who command the resources and allow themselves to be impregnated by them, just like the lionesses of a lion's harem.

Time and energy is being wasted by hungry alt-right male YouTubers trying to please these pretty but intellectually mediocre alt-right female YouTubers.

Important topics such as White Sharia and MGTOW are being deliberately not discussed in order to protect the feelings of pretty pretty alt-right female YouTubers from getting all butthurt and ruffled.

This one here is very upset about White Sharia and wants White Men to shut up about it because discussing these subjects make them feel threatened, uncomfortable, anxious, nervous and generally "triggered".

She is complaining about the podcast below which complains about feminists.

'I think the men that counter-signal white rape gangs and white sharia, they're doing very basic beta shit. They're sitting there saying "They're so bad, they're so mean, they're so evil. I would never do that to you. Will you reward me with sex?" They're just being beta trying to be white knights and they're never going to fucking get laid doing that shit.'

I found much of this laugh out loud funny but I know many will find it wildly triggering. Be warned: obscene satirical scatological man talk. But I took it to bed for a listen before a nap and found myself chuckling periodically before dozing off.  



The vague and subjective selection criteria imposed by Millennial Woes:

+ effort/- laziness
+ good taste/- low audibility
+ intelligence/- boring
+ enjoyability/- white sharia, nihilism etc
+ politeness/- crassness, crudity etc

was clearly intended to exclude people like me and The War Room.

What would be your criteria for selection if you were Millennial Woes being Mistress of Ceremonies and Chat Show Hostess for Millenniyule?

https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/answers/143649932417

Prominent alt-right YouTuber Millennial Woes exercises ferocious censorship on aspiring alt-right YouTubers

The vague and subjective selection criteria imposed by Millennial Woes:

+ effort/- laziness
+ good taste/- low audibility
+ intelligence/- boring
+ enjoyability/- white sharia, nihilism etc
+ politeness/- crassness, crudity etc

One Man's Chorus:

Eli Harman. Everyone ought to subscribe to his Youtube channel. 

@MGTOWisFREEDOM's idea of White Sharia: women would have no right to own property and no right to divorce while the Koran has a chapter on divorce. The Muslim marriage contract implicitly excludes no fault divorce making marriage once again a good bargain for men who want legitimate children.

Me to One Man's Chorus

Eli does provide thoughtful content but is guilty of having already discussed White Sharia, which means he will be disqualified by MW.

One Man's Chorus

It would be a shame if this year's Millenniyule featured idiotic bimbos like Blonde in the Belly of the Beast and Dreamy Diglot rather than quality content producers like Eli. My two cents.  

Me to One Man's Chorus

Although MW said on 11 April 2017 "I'll have you on for this year's Millenniyule season", he has subsequently withdrawn this offer.  I agree with you about the bimbos who haven't an original idea in their head and can only poodle along behind the men. Both Eli and I are guilty of wanting to discuss White Sharia and have already been guilty of discussing this, so we won't be featured. How ironic that those who complain about censorship by MSM end up practising even more draconian censorship. MW has actually forbidden his followers to ask him questions about me!  https://ask.fm/MillennialWoes/answers/143655672203

At 8:45 he says "maybe if I were to listen to them I would change my tune or something but I really doubt it". I have sent him a message to see if he is maybe prepared to listen to me on this, having assured him that I am not Muslim, just an agnostic who sees the point of theocracy because it is the only way to have patriarchy without which not enough rational, masculine and principled men will be produced to defend the national interest. 

Here is my pathetic YouTube channel with only 28 subscribers and only three videos with a messed up recording of the first video I made with E Michael Jones who has certain views about Jews. https://www.youtube.com/user/Andromeda07734

Millennial Woes says you cannot be alt-right if you are not antisemitic or racist. If you are neither, you are "alt-lite", he says. Interestingly, he won't discuss this with me. My definition of the alt-right is anyone who thinks mainstream Conservatism won't solve the problems Liberalism created. The alt-right can include ethno- and civic nationalists. You can have quite radical ideas that will attract accusations of extremism without being guilty of antisemitism, racism or Islamophobia.   

Surely no one would dream of calling me and my ideas "alt-lite"? I don't think even MW would put me in that category since he has gone to the trouble of banning even his followers from asking him questions about me. If I am alt anything, I imagine I would be "alt-extreme".

Another topic Millennial Woes won't discuss with me is whether civic nationalism can get ethno-nationalists what they want. 

Such a shame that not even the victims of censorship can themselves respect free speech.  

"Only me and my mates and people I like with ideas I like will stand a chance of being on Millenniyule so probably the pretty white women I won't feel threatened by because they haven't got a single original idea in their pretty little heads."

I am sure Millennial Woes will enjoy a cosy little fireside chat with someone who thinks it is very brave to say what the NF and the BNP have been saying about compulsory and voluntary repatriation since before they were born and, er, that's it ....